CookyJar's Streetwalker Photos

Great post, CJ. #95 is, in my opinion, one of the best photos you've ever taken.

Red

[QUOTE=CookyJar](Sabrina) quickly got bored with the pictures. On the other hand, she was fascinated with what had been said about her.[/QUOTE]CJ, if you see her again, tell her she's got a fan down in Florida.

;)

New to the site. And yes that girl sabrina is a cutie. I like them thick so I got no complaints LOL.

[QUOTE=CookyJar]And, let this be a lesson for all of us.

Gscs Ret,

Mike hit the nail on the head, your approach was all wrong. You asked too many questions. Believe me; I can understand your frustration. You got so close, but; no cigar. I would have been pissed as well. Sabrina may be young, but; she isn’t stupid. When it comes to street smarts she is very wise. She claims that Philadelphia LE is now using out of state cars in their sting operations. This and the fact that you were asking so many questions about CookyJar, spooked her. To her it was like an interrogation. If you are going to go on a fact finding mission, wait until you have your dick in the girl mouth.

You mustn’t blame Sabrina. She was doing what comes natural. She was protecting herself. She was following the first rule of mongering (and I guess the same goes for providers). She went with her gut feeling; I would have done the same thing. This should be a lesson to us all.

As for my part in this thing. Let’s clear one thing up; once and for all, I don’t lie to the girls. I always tell them that I will be posting them on the internet. I avoid going into details because for the most part it’s a waste of time. However; if the girl ask for more details or information, I give it. I don’t see the problems. Most providers know that some of their clients post reviews. The smart ones know that it behooves them to provide good service in order to get reviews that will benefit their business. Most of the girls who ply their trade on the streets could give a hoot, they don’t access the internet regularly and what they don’t know can’t hurt them. When it comes to the problems cause by information posted on the internet the girls aren’t the problem – the guys are. Whenever a girl has come up to me and complained about what I said about her in a post, the information was passed on to her by one of her clients or regulars.

Sabrina has been after me to show her some of her pictures. Normally when a girl asks to see her pictures, I will just print out a few and give them to her. Most girls are not really into looking at a bunch of naked pictures. Because of what was alleged, I choose to satisfy Sabrina’s request in a different manner. I let her see them as posted on this site. She quickly got bored with the pictures. On the other hand, she was fascinated with what had been said about her. She was especially excited by my review of the threesome involving her, Amy and myself. While, she laughed the whole time she was reading, she agreed that for the most part it was accurate. She was especially pleased with my description of Amy and her antics.

Hopefully this puts another misconception to rest. I do tell the girl what I intend to do with their pictures. Hopefully we have also learned a valuable lesson: stick to what you know and it is not necessary to involve others by asking a bunch of questions.

Don’t get me wrong. I agree with Sam I am. I am not going to go around introducing girls to this site. Not all girls are as understanding as Sabrina.

I am amazed at some of the positions Sabrina can get into. Ah! To be young again.

CookyJar[/QUOTE]Number 1 mistake. I hope she is not using the motel free wi-fi.?? LE can monitor that

[QUOTE=RoadWarrior615]Number 1 mistake. I hope she is not using the motel free wi-fi.?? LE can monitor that[/QUOTE]

So What?

Tell me you don't think that LE is watching all of the motels in Philly to see what hookers are doing on the web.

Exactly what law was she breaking?

CookyJar

[QUOTE=RoadWarrior615]Number 1 mistake. I hope she is not using the motel free wi-fi.?? LE can monitor that[/QUOTE]You can not trace an unsecured WiFi signal to a specific computer. It's untraceable and anonymous.

[QUOTE=Kyrumrunner]You can not trace an unsecured WiFi signal to a specific computer. It's untraceable and anonymous.[/QUOTE]That's not true. Unless you're spoofing your MAC address. Every packet you send has your MAC address attached. And if you are using a network you don't directly control, you [b]should[/b] assume that it is a [b]hostile environment[/b] and that any number of people are sniffing or otherwise logging your traffic. And someone with adequate tech can locate you quite precisely -- as long as your [i]radio[/i] is on and broadcasting.

I'm not saying that is likely to be happening, but it also isn't particularly hard or difficult. Triangulating a broadcast radio signal dates back to the 1930s, if not earlier.

If you are serious about secure communications, you'll forward your sensitive traffic thru an encrypted SSL tunnel. Then it doesn't matter who's listening. By the time THEY (whoever THEY are) decrypt your traffic, we'll all be in the Old Monger Home for the Incorrigibly Randy.

Conveniently, your MAC address is printed on your laptop somewhere. It is a 12 digit number in the range of 0-9, A-F (hexadecimal).

But the Media Access Control/MAC address or Ethernet Hardware Address (EHA) Is only the number on the Network Card.... And does not contain any personal identifiable information...

The network administrator could gain access to your computer but your still anonymous unless your sending out personal info over that connection...

Just wanted to say thanks to CookyJar for posting his pics. I'm not from Philly but work up there quite often. I had my 1st SW experience in Camden NJ and many more since then. I also had my 1st CL provider experience in South Jersey/Philly as well. Anyway. Just wanted to say thanks.

I see her almost everyday up on the K and the surrounding block.

I drive from work home that way.

I'm tempted but I dunno. I'm just an AMP lover of the asian never tried a SW.

[QUOTE=Nick The Dick]The network administrator could gain access to your computer but your still anonymous unless your sending out personal info over that connection...[/QUOTE]You mean like your USASexGuide username/password combo? granted, that's not all that bad but it is an additional piece of information. And if the NA can actually gain access to your computer, you're screwed. They can infect you with keyloggers, virii, and trojans.

But they might just go looking for useful files. You do keep more than just your pr0n collection on your computer, right? you read your email, yes? keep your address book there? do you dump your cellphone data to the disk?

Look, we all practice variations and extensions to the 22-step guide when pursuing a SW. It makes sense to exercise similar cautions when on-line, as it is much more difficult to know when someone is watching.

But if you want to practice unsafe hex, be my guest.

Is this CookyJar's Photos or Network Administration 101?

Let' s get this back on topic and move the network discussion elsewhere.

[QUOTE=Youreabeast]I see her almost everyday up on the K and the surrounding block.

I drive from work home that way.

I'm tempted but I dunno. I'm just an AMP lover of the asian never tried a SW.[/QUOTE]


Been seeing alot of her myself lately. Doesn't seem like she's been getting
much action out there. Have seen her hanging out around the bull for
an extended time without getting picked up.

[QUOTE=Davey1965]Been seeing alot of her myself lately. Doesn't seem like she's been getting much action out there. Have seen her hanging out around the bull for an extended time without getting picked up.[/QUOTE]


I have heard something similar from a couple of the girls. It seems like thing have slowed down a wee bit on the “K.” Even Britney (Gia) complained to me that she’d been out a while without getting a date. Imagine that, Britney arguably one of the best looking girls out there and she couldn’t get pick-up? I picked-up a really nice find, named Nikki (pictures to come later), who said she has been avoiding the Avenue because there are so many girl out there. It seems like the competition to get a date/monger has risen lately. When I drove down the “K” the other day, at a little after 5pm, I must have spotted at least 9 or 10 fairly nice looking working ladies.

You would thing that this would be a good thing for us mongers. Sorry it doesn’t seem to work out that way. The longer a girl is out there and deprived of whatever it is that she needs; the more of a rush she’ll be in to get it. Mingle that with the heat and you could end up with a disaster. I picked-up Claudia, a girl that I have previously dated and pictured, and she was so hot, sweaty (not smelly) and in such a rush, I had to pass her up and return her back to the Avenue. The two block trip cost me $10 bucks. She was complaining the whole time about how long she’d been out and how lousy she felt. When I told her that I had changed my mind about our date, she went into a rage. She promised me a good time, but I could tell from her condition that that wasn’t likely.

Has anyone else noticed an influx of girls, mostly sitting or standing around in the heat, like it’s been a long wait? Did some look a little desperate?

IMHO, it’s a mongers market. Buyers beware!

CookyJar