Printable View
It gets annoying Googling stuff for people, but you have to appreciate the pains some sites go through to get a piece of the action (seekingarrangement-com dot com). I know of one female (who I met on POF) who signed up for that thinking that it was SA.
Happy Hunting,
Milfman.
Has anybody met her? Any advice, warnings or encouragement?
[URL]https://www.seekingarrangement.com/member/59225ad7-42d9-45f7-a5a1-66ac58148317[/URL]
Anyone have any info?
Pm!
[URL]https://www.seekingarrangement.com/member/223bc996-bc75-45d0-9dbf-1e3bd19be24c[/URL]
Thanks.
FT2.
I interact with an increasing number of women who are on SA. Once I meet them in real life or communicate outside of SA, I block them on the website although a few have asked why I deactivated my account. I don't need them trying to keep further tabs on me through SA as my profile changes. They get the message:
[I][center]
Profile not found.
That user's profile can no longer be found. The member might have deactivated their account, been suspended, or blocked you.
[/center][/I]
I was hanging out with a SB friend and she was showing me messages from some of the guys that had contacted her. The whole process was pure comic relief for her. I kept repeating, "WTH? C'Mon man!" as she showed me the profile with clear face pics and his approach to the hunt. She had created her profile as a SB, but also created an account as a SD to check out her competition. She was even communicating with other SBs, masquerading as a SD, and essentially messing with the girls for her own amusement. This seemed like actions of a sociopath, but I trusted that she had a method to her madness. After spending quite a bit of time shoulder surfing, I hope that none of us on USASG are guilty of this: posting clear face pics on SA, whether in the public or in private photo space of SA.
Just think about that for a moment: you are posting clear face pics on the Interwebs on a site like SA. Analogous to my SB friend's approach, you may be exposing clear face pics to a dude simply pic collecting. This likely isn't specific to SA (since the pics could be fakes), but we all have varying degrees of risk tolerance.
Stay safe,
Milfman.
Block a user after making connection: outstanding idea. Thanks.
[QUOTE=MilfMan865;3127507]I interact with an increasing number of women who are on SA. Once I meet them in real life or communicate outside of SA, I block them on the website although a few have asked why I deactivated my account. I don't need them trying to keep further tabs on me through SA as my profile changes. They get the message:
[I][center]
Profile not found.
That user's profile can no longer be found. The member might have deactivated their account, been suspended, or blocked you.
[/center][/I]
I was hanging out with a SB friend and she was showing me messages from some of the guys that had contacted her. The whole process was pure comic relief for her. I kept repeating, "WTH? C'Mon man!" as she showed me the profile with clear face pics and his approach to the hunt. She had created her profile as a SB, but also created an account as a SD to check out her competition. She was even communicating with other SBs, masquerading as a SD, and essentially messing with the girls for her own amusement. This seemed like actions of a sociopath, but I trusted that she had a method to her madness. After spending quite a bit of time shoulder surfing, I hope that none of us on USASG are guilty of this: posting clear face pics on SA, whether in the public or in private photo space of SA.
Just think about that for a moment: you are posting clear face pics on the Interwebs on a site like SA. Analogous to my SB friend's approach, you may be exposing clear face pics to a dude simply pic collecting. This likely isn't specific to SA (since the pics could be fakes), but we all have varying degrees of risk tolerance.
Stay safe,
Milfman.[/QUOTE]
[QUOTE=GaltGuy;3127718]Block a user after making connection: outstanding idea. Thanks.[/QUOTE]Sounds counter-intuitive, so I should have clarified. There's no reason to communicate with them through SA any more since we've made the proper connection and taken everything offline. Keeps the conversation moving more effectively outside of SA. Conveying the message: "I didn't see a need to keep the profile active since we met" seems to work with most of them. Blocked.
Stay safe,
Milfman.
[QUOTE=MilfMan865;3127507]I interact with an increasing number of women who are on SA. Once I meet them in real life or communicate outside of SA, I block them on the website although a few have asked why I deactivated my account. I don't need them trying to keep further tabs on me through SA as my profile changes. They get the message:
[I][center]
Profile not found.
That user's profile can no longer be found. The member might have deactivated their account, been suspended, or blocked you.
[/center][/I]
I was hanging out with a SB friend and she was showing me messages from some of the guys that had contacted her. The whole process was pure comic relief for her. I kept repeating, "WTH? C'Mon man!" as she showed me the profile with clear face pics and his approach to the hunt. She had created her profile as a SB, but also created an account as a SD to check out her competition. She was even communicating with other SBs, masquerading as a SD, and essentially messing with the girls for her own amusement. This seemed like actions of a sociopath, but I trusted that she had a method to her madness. After spending quite a bit of time shoulder surfing, I hope that none of us on USASG are guilty of this: posting clear face pics on SA, whether in the public or in private photo space of SA.
Just think about that for a moment: you are posting clear face pics on the Interwebs on a site like SA. Analogous to my SB friend's approach, you may be exposing clear face pics to a dude simply pic collecting. This likely isn't specific to SA (since the pics could be fakes), but we all have varying degrees of risk tolerance.
Stay safe,
Milfman.[/QUOTE]I don't post a pic on my profile and profile states pretty much to point what I'm looking for. It gets all the response I can handle. Pics are given by text or kik and actual up todate pics. Now I expect the same from the woman so if I show up at a m / g and pics aren't her or 20 years old I have no problem leaving. Fake pics are a complaint of guys and the girls have the same problem, a guy showing not looking at all like the pics he sends. Now this doesn't matter to the sex workers but for a real girl its a big red flag.
I have no problem with girls keeping track of my profile as I never change it. Most women are to busy with their own life to worry about what I'm up to. Now I do favor a profile if I want to keep easy track of a favorite. These are real girls and not the sex workers. Favoring shows when they was last active or if the profile is back active after deactivating it.
Anyone creating dual or fake profiles, catfishing has some serious problems.
I just now realize my comment could easily be misread from my intention. I was being quite serious: blocking someone with whom I've already made connection really, really is smart. It says "I have you, baby, and don't need anyone else. ". I really like that idea.
[QUOTE=MilfMan865;3127748]Sounds counter-intuitive, so I should have clarified. There's no reason to communicate with them through SA any more since we've made the proper connection and taken everything offline. Keeps the conversation moving more effectively outside of SA. Conveying the message: "I didn't see a need to keep the profile active since we met" seems to work with most of them. Blocked.
Stay safe,
Milfman.[/QUOTE]
[QUOTE=GaltGuy;3128141]I just now realize my comment could easily be misread from my intention. I was being quite serious: blocking someone with whom I've already made connection really, really is smart. It says "I have you, baby, and don't need anyone else. ". I really like that idea.[/QUOTE]Sounds good in theory but unless your providing everything that particular sb needs it doesn't say anythi g other than maybe your not looking, doesn't mean she has quit looking. Most are here for help and if your only contributing once a week usually. Thats not enough. Take in human nature of being greedy most figure they can handle multiple daddies. If their profile disappears probably means their rotation is full just like you. $1000 xtra a month means a lot to a minimum wage girl with kids but 2-3 means more.
Exceptions to every rule and some can be satisfied for very little but few and far between. My observation of the sd threads bring me to the conclusion most arent willing to do that kind of money and most couldn't afford it especially when complaining about the SA membership fee.
[QUOTE=JohnHandCock;3128219]Sounds good in theory but unless your providing everything that particular sb needs it doesn't say anything other than maybe your not looking, doesn't mean she has quit looking. Most are here for help and if your only contributing once a week usually.[/QUOTE]Good point about the flip side. I couldn't care less about whether she is looking or not; I'd actually encourage her to maximize her hustle since I have no desire to see any SB more than once a week. Simply no incentive to communicate with SBs on SA going forward after taking things offline. A tracking feature (memo / notes / whatever) needs to be added for the SDs' communication management because I get the gals mixed up too often (especially when they provide the same name and remind me of each other).
About a once a week commitment (on a monthly allowance basis), with several gals in the Knoxville area and fitting in variety while on business travel, has the cup running over in terms of time commitment just like many of you. I'm listed in multiple cities (and add any city that I'll be in for the week) and turned off all notifications from SA. I don't get notified when someone sends a message, views my profile, favorites me, or any of that annoying stuff. I rarely get on the SA site other than to modify the location settings and checking messages on there isn't part of my regular process. It's always a YMMV aspect in terms of strategy and approach to managing communication, but blocking seems to work for now.
Stay safe,
Milfman.
Mestizababy. Asked for $400/ meet and won't meet for less than $300. I passed.
[URL]https://www.seekingarrangement.com/member/c762c417-fadd-4fa8-beac-86e1a5b7640c[/URL]
East Coast Willow. Wants $500 for each meet and greet. No physical stuff until she feels comfortable over time.
[URL]https://www.seekingarrangement.com/member/f4f216f7-0de0-4f91-8c75-511df22dd150[/URL]
[QUOTE=KnoxTNman;3130641]Mestizababy. Asked for $400/ meet and won't meet for less than $300. I passed.
[URL]https://www.seekingarrangement.com/member/c762c417-fadd-4fa8-beac-86e1a5b7640c[/URL]
East Coast Willow. Wants $500 for each meet and greet. No physical stuff until she feels comfortable over time.
[URL]https://www.seekingarrangement.com/member/f4f216f7-0de0-4f91-8c75-511df22dd150[/URL][/QUOTE]This is about the norm for these young girls.
One quoted 850. She said that was the normal rate. Yeah right, most have a bad case of GPS!
[QUOTE=GaltGuy;3128141]I just now realize my comment could easily be misread from my intention. I was being quite serious: blocking someone with whom I've already made connection really, really is smart. It says "I have you, baby, and don't need anyone else. ". I really like that idea.[/QUOTE]Its not that simple. Girls have multiple profiles so that they can monitor stuff that is blocked from them, and also they band together, either on campus or online, and GFs check on the pages of SDs for them. So if you block 1 profile, that doesn't mean the girl can't see you really haven't deactivated, now you are creeping on her.
How many of you are paying for just a meet and greet? Some of the girls I talked to are expecting anywhere between $100-$200 to meet and say hello. This sounds more like a scam than a legit reason to discuss arrangement.
[QUOTE=KnoxTNman;3136057]How many of you are paying for just a meet and greet? Some of the girls I talked to are expecting anywhere between $100-$200 to meet and say hello. This sounds more like a scam than a legit reason to discuss arrangement.[/QUOTE]Never pay for a M / G. Think of it as a job interview for both of ya and explain it to them in those terms. WHo gets paid for showing up for a job interview.