Parlor staff was likely cooperating on the sting
[QUOTE=Bbinsider;4165692]They've also charged two more billionaires. One is the former president of Citigroup and he says he hasn't heard anything from the police yet. The other is a big wall street guy. WARNING. Don't piss off a billionaire.[/QUOTE]The owners were cooperating with police in the sting. Since the inside recordings took place over a 5 day period inside the rooms, LEO would need to place robust cameras that would be impossible to install without the owner's knowledge. Simple wireless cameras could have been placed by health inspectors that entered prior to LEO, but they would not last 5 days and record continuously. A wireless camera that records continuously would need a LEO surveillance car or van within 100 feet to get a decent recording.
These cameras were likely powered by an outlet and recorded to SD cards (or equivalent). The cameras could have been hidden in a clock, radio, or anything else plugged into a wall. Handheld devices exist that are not terribly expensive and are specifically designed to detect the lens on a hidden camera due to the reflected light from the lens. I would use one of those to sweep the room either before the provider enters or after she has left the room.
The key takeaway is that the owners helped LEO entrap the customers. There is no other way the recordings inside the rooms could have happened over a 5 day event.
Sharing report if interested
Sharing full report and details.
[URL]https://ewscripps.brightspotcdn.com/74/98/64c708b942ac9a24ed0e40f57db0/hua-pc.pdf[/URL]
The more information; the more adept we will be to the tactics.