Rants Opinions and Totally Pointless Bullshit

Just a clarification on this before the "socialism" talk gets out of hand.

The District of Columbia passed a living wage ordinance and it applies to businesses receiving government assistance.

I use to live in seattle when we had this and business didn't have to shut down because of it. Could you live on $1300 a month living in a big city?

[QUOTE=GregsRed; 1820790]The feds just passed legislation specifically aimed at Walmart last week. They have now MANDATED through legislation that Walmart pays its employees a higher wage than they are currently paying them. Unbelievable. Damn freedom the Feds are determined to engineer Utopia. Trouble is all of the unintended consequences are just going to cause more problems than they create.

Watch out folks, your Federally mandated surgically implanted sub-dermal tracking devices are right around the corner.

Where is the ACLU when you need them?

G.[/QUOTE]

[QUOTE=RonSwanson; 1821280]Just a clarification on this before the "socialism" talk gets out of hand.

The District of Columbia passed a living wage ordinance and it applies to businesses receiving government assistance.

I use to live in seattle when we had this and business didn't have to shut down because of it. Could you live on $1300 a month living in a big city?[/QUOTE][QUOTE=GregsRed; 1820790]The feds just passed legislation specifically aimed at Walmart last week. They have now MANDATED through legislation that Walmart pays its employees a higher wage than they are currently paying them. Unbelievable. Damn freedom the Feds are determined to engineer Utopia. Trouble is all of the unintended consequences are just going to cause more problems than they create.

Watch out folks, your Federally mandated surgically implanted sub-dermal tracking devices are right around the corner.

Where is the ACLU when you need them?

G.[/QUOTE]Correct, the bill was passed by the D. C. City Council, the Federal Government had nothing to do with it. That's called "States Rights!" In fact Mayor Vincent Gray has not decided to sign it yet, so it is not even law in D. C. If you stop and think about it, no law that raises the minimum wage is going to get out of the House of Representatives. Reminds me of "Chicken Little!"

Just my logic but. If you want to live in a big city you should probably seek employment that pays you the wage you need rather than rely on the GovCo to strong arm your employers into "giving" you more money.

It has everything to do with choices. If you choose to work at WalMart, you are not going to enjoy a particularly high standard of living.

Hell, I want the government to subsidize me sitting here at my computer bantering with you knuckleheads while I search for the next young lady. Maybe the ACLU can sue someone for me...that would be constructive.

No matter how much meddling the libs and Government does (I'm a card carrying Libertarian) they will never Never NEVER be able to control the Free Market. NEVER.

Greg.

[QUOTE=RonSwanson; 1821280]Just a clarification on this before the "socialism" talk gets out of hand.

The District of Columbia passed a living wage ordinance and it applies to businesses receiving government assistance.

I use to live in seattle when we had this and business didn't have to shut down because of it. Could you live on $1300 a month living in a big city?[/QUOTE]

Opinions wanted: Do smokers give the best BJ's?

Does the constant oral gratification of tobacco cause a predisposition to being a proper hose monster?

Discuss!

[QUOTE=Jeepster1;1825939]Opinions wanted: Do smokers give the best BJ's? Does the constant oral gratification of tobacco cause a predisposition to being a proper hose monster? Discuss![/QUOTE][b]I don't think I've got enough data to either support or refute your hypothesis! If you'll give me a half-million-dollar's funding as a research-grant I'll be happy to work full-time on researching this & writing up the study-report for peer-review prior to publication. I should have it done in four years; maybe five to seven if I have to re-study & RE-refine any of the data. [/b]

"But seriously, folks" I'm not sure that putting up with the smoke-odor from the bodies & mouths of constant heavy smokers would be worth seeking them out as preferred providers! I know that I noticed that my "quickie" with "Mia Rayne" last month in Clarksville left a noticeable cigarette-odor on my skin & in my hair; & I didn't have time to go someplace where I could take a shower (because of my time-crunch I had to forgo my usual preference for [u]out[/u]_call; see my report on [u]Clarksville[/u]_[u]B'P' Advertiser Review[/u]'s thread) so I had to pull-off at the L' B' L' boat-ramp on K'Y_Lake & dowse myself with lake-water so my S' O' wouldn't smell cigarettes on me & interrogate me when I got home. & I'm speaking as a former two-pack-a-day [u]UN[/u]-filtered cigarette's-smoker myself. It certainly is an interesting hypothesis & provocative question: I hope you get a lot of replies; I'll be curious to see the results. Personally I don't think I've noticed enough of a difference to remark on it; but since I "kicked" my addiction myself I've tended to prefer providers & strippers who don't smoke around me & have attempted to wash-off or otherwise expunge or supress the cigarette-odor on themselves!

Sincerely:

A. K.

[QUOTE=Jeepster1;1825939]Opinions wanted: Do smokers give the best BJ's? Does the constant oral gratification of tobacco cause a predisposition to being a proper hose monster? Discuss![/QUOTE][b]I don't think I've got enough data to either support or refute your hypothesis! If you'll give me a half-million-dollar's funding as a research-grant I'll be happy to work full-time on researching this & writing up the study-report for peer-review prior to publication. I should have it done in four years; maybe five to seven if I have to re-study & RE-refine any of the data. [/b]

"But seriously, folks" I'm not sure that putting up with the smoke-odor from the bodies & mouths of constant heavy smokers would be worth seeking them out as preferred providers! I know that I noticed that my "quickie" with "Mia Rayne" last month in Clarksville left a noticeable cigarette-odor on my skin & in my hair; & I didn't have time to go someplace where I could take a shower (because of my time-crunch I had to forgo my usual preference for [u]out[/u]_call; see my report on [u]Clarksville[/u]_[u]B'P' Advertiser Review[/u]'s thread) so I had to pull-off at the L' B' L' boat-ramp on K'Y_Lake & dowse myself with lake-water so my S' O' wouldn't smell cigarettes on me & interrogate me when I got home. & I'm speaking as a former two-pack-a-day [u]UN[/u]-filtered cigarette's-smoker myself. It certainly is an interesting hypothesis & provocative question: I hope you get a lot of replies; I'll be curious to see the results. Personally I don't think I've noticed enough of a difference to remark on it; but since I "kicked" my addiction myself I've tended to prefer providers & strippers who don't smoke around me & have attempted to wash-off or otherwise expunge or supress the cigarette-odor on themselves!

Sincerely:

A. K.

[QUOTE=GregsRed; 1823531]Just my logic but. If you want to live in a big city you should probably seek employment that pays you the wage you need rather than rely on the GovCo to strong arm your employers into "giving" you more money.

It has everything to do with choices. If you choose to work at WalMart, you are not going to enjoy a particularly high standard of living.

Hell, I want the government to subsidize me sitting here at my computer bantering with you knuckleheads while I search for the next young lady. Maybe the ACLU can sue someone for me. That would be constructive.

No matter how much meddling the libs and Government does (I'm a card carrying Libertarian) they will never Never NEVER be able to control the Free Market. Never Greg.[/QUOTE]Not saying it is right or wrong but the industry I work in is heavily subsidized by governments all over the world. I have made a very good living monetary and otherwise providing people with the one thing they will not be without oil.

Point is much of todays recovery technology would not have been developed with government subsidizes.

[QUOTE=Kyowa;1826205][b]I don't think I've got enough data to either support or refute your hypothesis! If you'll give me a half-million-dollar's funding as a research-grant I'll be happy to work full-time on researching this & writing up the study-report for peer-review prior to publication. I should have it done in four years; maybe five to seven if I have to re-study & RE-refine any of the data. [/b][/QUOTE]That's a great idea! I'll send a check as as soon as my own research is complete. Might be a while though as I feel it's always more accurate to survey the largest sample possible.

For the record, do you rate smoker Mia a proper hose monster?

I recently saw (scentless) smokers Lilly Whyte and Kati, both were tallied in the "yes " column.

-Jeepster1

[QUOTE=Jeepster1;1826908]That's a great idea! I'll send a check as as soon as my own research is complete. [b]Might be a while though as I feel it's always more accurate to survey the largest sample possible.[/b][/quote]Absolutely! High-quality research requires rigorous & thorough collection of all the material facts & potentially relevant data.

[quote][u]For the recor[/u]d, [b]do you rate smoker Mia a proper hose monster?[/b][/quote]I guess my answer would be "yes" although I didn't have time to sample her technique as [b]deeply[/b], or as long as I would have preferred. (I did like her version of the "cop check" though: she stripped naked & had me play with her titties while she started enthusiastically fellatiating me to an erection before she paused & asked for her "donation" to be given!)

[quote]I recently saw (scentless) smokers Lilly Whyte and Kati, both were tallied in the "yes " column. -Jeepster1[/QUOTE]I wish I could finagle some way to meet with either of those two; but I'm about two-hours one-way-driving-time, at the best of times, from Nash' & that's not even counting "play-time" into the calculation.

Sincerely:

A. K.

[QUOTE=Jeepster1;1826908]. I feel it's always more accurate to survey the largest sample possible.[/QUOTE]You do remember the ad that Gregsred posted last week, right? Are you sure you want the largest? (I won't repost. I'm not that sadistic.)

[QUOTE=Kyowa; 1826969]Absolutely! High-quality research requires rigorous & thorough collection of all the material facts & potentially relevant data.

I guess my answer would be "yes" although I didn't have time to sample her technique as [b]deeply[/b], or as long as I would have preferred. (I did like her version of the "cop check" though: she stripped naked & had me play with her titties while she started enthusiastically fellatiating me to an erection before she paused & asked for her "donation" to be given!)

I wish I could finagle some way to meet with either of those two; but I'm about two-hours one-way-driving-time, at the best of times, from Nash' & that's not even counting "play-time" into the calculation.

Sincerely:

A. K.[/QUOTE]Hope that kind of cop check catches on. Also gives an easy exit if the BJ is lousy: Honey, I'm a cop, but I'm going to let you off with a warning this time!

I would suggest a text or email to Lilly Whyte (or Kati, for that matter) describing your location dilemma. Lilly gets around, one of her stops might be closer than you think.

-Jeepster1

I'm glad that post did not go unappreciated!

Greg.

[QUOTE=Lily Whyte;1827067]You do remember the ad that Gregsred posted last week, right? Are you sure you want the largest? (I won't repost. I'm not that sadistic.)[/QUOTE]

[QUOTE=Lily Whyte;1827067]You do remember the ad that Gregsred posted last week, right? Are you sure you want the largest? (I won't repost. I'm not that sadistic.)[/QUOTE]Damn you Lilly Whyte, damn you to hell.

Now you're going to need to administer hours of free intensive therapy to knock that image out of my head again!

-Jeepster1

ATG. How could that NOT be noticed. Jesus Christ. And I was seriously afraid when I started doing this that I was waaaaaaaay too fat for it! Although I thi some may question whether it was "appreciated." LOL.

ATJ. As I tell everyone looking for a cerebral experience to go along w any sensuality, I can only offer "hands-on sexuality life coaching." "Therapy" requires a license. Don't get the APA on my case, the same way they went after "unlicensed massage therapists" in the past! (and furthermore, we probably both. Or I venture to guess all. Needed a little therapy long before g's unfortunate heifer among the gazelles.) LOL. :-p

[QUOTE=Lily Whyte;1834054]As I tell everyone looking for a cerebral experience to go along w any sensuality, I can only offer "hands-on sexuality life coaching." "Therapy" requires a license. Don't get the APA on my case, the same way they went after "unlicensed massage therapists" in the past! (and furthermore, we probably both. Or I venture to guess all. Needed a little therapy long before g's unfortunate heifer among the gazelles.) LOL. :-p[/QUOTE]Coach Lilly, please build your own story from the following snippets:

Batter box.

Tight end.

Trojans.

Foot on the rubber (and if you Google that phrase, you will find "Does a pitcher have to have both feet touching the rubber?" and "Back Foot in Contact with Rubber at Release?")

Oh forget it, even I'm getting tired of this game. Just come back to town and get spanked, already.

-Jeepster1