Remember guys,
Jackson would refer that you not posts the names of the accused.
By the way? I know #3 very very well
Printable View
Remember guys,
Jackson would refer that you not posts the names of the accused.
By the way? I know #3 very very well
[QUOTE=Cruiser D]Why post the names?[/QUOTE]
sorry I just copied from the bpd webpage
[QUOTE=MeatMan]Remember guys,
Jackson would refer that you not posts the names of the accused.
By the way? I know #3 very very well[/QUOTE]
I know we're not supposed to post the names of Mongers but I didn't know the same applied to providers.
heard through a buddy that there is some task force doing a sting (via cl) near the westgate mall using **** girls as bait. apparently the ad states the girl is 18 but when you email her she replies back and states to being 15 and she is looking to hook up. i know none of you, sane, reasonable, decent guys out here are into the young stuff anyway, but just be careful.
i'm sure some of you will be skeptical about this info, but my budd has never steared me wrong. besides you can never have too much info on le activities pertaining to our "hobby".
[quote=cldude]heard through a buddy that there is some task force doing a sting (via cl) near the westgate mall using **** girls as bait. apparently the ad states the girl is 18 but when you email her she replies back and states to being 15 and she is looking to hook up. i know none of you, sane, reasonable, decent guys out here are into the young stuff anyway, but just be careful.
i'm sure some of you will be skeptical about this info, but my budd has never steared me wrong. besides you can never have too much info on le activities pertaining to our "hobby".[/quote]
if anyone here is dumb enough to fall for the "48 year old cop pretending to be an **** girl looking to hook up" scam, or for that matter, sick enough to try to bang someone that claims to be 15, then they don't deserve to be warned off.
however, it's good to know about a possible sting, regardless of the bait.
[quote=cldude]heard through a buddy that there is some task force doing a sting (via cl) near the westgate mall using **** girls as bait. apparently the ad states the girl is 18 but when you email her she replies back and states to being 15 and she is looking to hook up. i know none of you, sane, reasonable, decent guys out here are into the young stuff anyway, but just be careful.
i'm sure some of you will be skeptical about this info, but my budd has never steared me wrong. besides you can never have too much info on le activities pertaining to our "hobby".[/quote]no rumor, see brockton/streetwalker posts arounf 9/09 [url]http://usasexguide.info/forum/showthread.php?t=4185&page=2&pp=15[/url]
[QUOTE=Phat Bastard]I know we're not supposed to post the names of Mongers but I didn't know the same applied to providers.[/QUOTE]
Yep! It does as written by Jackson..
[size=-2][blue]EDITOR'S NOTE: This report was edited to remove the names or persons who were arrested from within in the text. To avoid delays in future reports containing news stories of law enforcement actions, please overwrite or delete the names of persons who were arrested.
Now, I want to say this carefully so no one gets the wrong idea here, but if you think about it, posting the names of people who have been arrested is somewhat heartless and really just helping the police in their efforts to embarrass these people. Since this website is all about assisting people in obtaining commercial sex services, we don't want to add to the problems of the unfortunate people who have been arrested by publishing their names and/or photographs. Thanks![/size][/blue]
here we go again
Daily Incidents for Monday, November 5, 2007
Five Johns Arrested In Operation Squeeze
On Friday November 3, 2007 at 11:00pm, officers from District B-2 (Roxbury) conducted Operation Squeeze. Designed and put into effect to enhance the quality of life for Boston’s residents, Operation Squeeze was conducted in the Roxbury neighborhood making numerous arrests. The operation is an organized plan that uses undercover officers as decoys to arrest “johns” who are adversely affecting the quality of life in the city’s various neighborhoods.
W***** A*****, 60, of Roxbury, S*** A****, 20, of Roslindale, J***Q******, 48, of Roxbury, M**** A*****, 26, of Roxbury and C***** C*******, 56, of Dorchester were all arrested and charged with Sex for a Fee.
[QUOTE=Rito1]here we go again
Daily Incidents for Monday, November 5, 2007
Five Johns Arrested In Operation Squeeze
On Friday November 3, 2007 at 11:00pm, officers from District B-2 (Roxbury) conducted Operation Squeeze. Designed and put into effect to enhance the quality of life for Boston’s residents, Operation Squeeze was conducted in the Roxbury neighborhood making numerous arrests. The operation is an organized plan that uses undercover officers as decoys to arrest “johns” who are adversely affecting the quality of life in the city’s various neighborhoods.
W***** A*****, 60, of Roxbury, S*** A****, 20, of Roslindale, J***Q******, 48, of Roxbury, M**** A*****, 26, of Roxbury and C***** C*******, 56, of Dorchester were all arrested and charged with Sex for a Fee.[/QUOTE]
Roxbury neoghborhood? How vague!
None of em were me. And it's getting pretty thick around there!. Be on your guard.
[url]http://www.telegram.com/article/20071112/NEWS/711120592/1008/NEWS02[/url]
Monday, November 12, 2007
Police conduct 2-day sex sting
Drug deals also lead to arrests
By Scott J. Croteau TELEGRAM & GAZETTE STAFF
[email]scroteau@telegram.com[/email]
WORCESTER— A two-day prostitution sting in Main South resulted in about 20 people being arrested, mostly on charges of sex for a fee.
Two women were arrested both Friday and Saturday on prostitution charges, according to Sgt. Eric A. Boss of the vice squad.
A...... and Y..... were both charged with sex for a fee.
Several johns were also arrested on sex for a fee charges.
Sgt. Boss also said vice squad officers saw two drug deals going on during the two-day sting and made arrests.
Arrested Friday were: ................all charged with sex for a fee. M....... was charged with being a common nightwalker.
W... F... of Worcester, was arrested and charged with possession of cocaine with intent to distribute, drug violation in a school zone, failure to stop for police and driving after suspension of license.
Arrested Saturday for sex for a fee were: J.............
Also arrested Saturday were: E..S.., 29, of Worcester, charged with heroin distribution and drug violation in a school zone, and M... S... of 14 Duxbury Road, Apt. 20, charged with heroin possession.
Forest, you may want to edit out those names even though they're still in the link. If you don't, Jackson may do it for you.
[QUOTE=Phat Bastard]Forest, you may want to edit out those names even though they're still in the link. If you don't, Jackson may do it for you.[/QUOTE]
I edited out the names as suggested.
Does anyone know the difference between being charged with, "sex for a fee", "prostitution charges" and "being a common nightwalker"?
Don't the police have anything better to do in Worcester? I thought you guys in Massachusetts were progressive types!
[QUOTE=Forest]I edited out the names as suggested.
Does anyone know the difference between being charged with, "sex for a fee", "prostitution charges" and "being a common nightwalker"?
Don't the police have anything better to do in Worcester? I thought you guys in Massachusetts were progressive types![/QUOTE]
I have no idea what the difference is. Maybe it all depends on how much you piss them off;)
As far as progressive goes, the few of the lunatic fringe yell so loudly that they're painted as representative of the whole.
[url]http://www.boston.com/news/local/massachusetts/articles/2007/11/13/doctor_accused_in_sex_sting_says_he_was_gathering_information/[/url]
Turns out that one of the older dudes whose names were given in that original article was out on a research expedition.
[quote=Boston Globe]
WORCESTER, Mass. --A doctor at [...] has been charged with soliciting sex from an undercover Worcester police officer who was posing as a prostitute.
But Doctor [...] says he is not guilty and was only "gathering information" when he was arrested Saturday. He told the Telegram & Gazette that he is a specialist in infectious diseases and researches sexually transmitted diseases.
Police say [...] offered the undercover female officer $40 for sex. His arrest came as part a two-day prostitution sweep in the Main South section of the city.
The 65-year-old [...] is a professor at [...] Medical School and has published dozens of articles about infectious diseases.
He's scheduled for arraignment Wednesday in Central District Court.
[/quote]
I have a feeling that "The 65-year-old" is going to be retiring soon. I hope he takes the case to trial, though, and uses the trial as a soapbox to make the valid, scientific case for decriminalizing sex work (and ending the War on Some Drugs) as part of a comprehensive public health campaign against STDs, drug ODs, and HIV/hepatitis spread by drug users. If he's going to go out he should go out in style. And, who knows, maybe the progressive AND Libertarian case for sanity about sex'n'drugs will get a few more supporters among the unprogressive, non-Libertarian moralists who control the Great and General Court of the Commonwealth of Massachusetts.
But I'm not holding my breath, much.