Diff agencies, same girls
Hey everyone, I've been starting to get more involved on the boards, but am still not perfect, so apologies if there's a better place for this somewhat generic questions. I'm just curious what's the situation when I see the same girls on different sites. Ultimately are they all the same booker just using multiple sites to get traffic? Will the girls be at the same location regardless or do some agencies have better incalls? I am vetted with 3 or 4 agencies, but curious what's the situation with these "others" and should I get vetted by them because they'll occasionally get different girls that are not "shared" with others.
TIA and again, apologies if the wrong forum. Also, I tried searching but kind of broad so didn't pull up if it's already been discussed.
5 photos
The pussy rent is too damn high
[QUOTE=DownloadX;7483786]The only reason you see HYA Hunters reviewing more than MILF Hunters is [B]we are more afraid of shipwreck than them![/B] I swore I am never climbing in bed with an old woman again.
Even if you have high standards, you make some compromise to be happy. I've never had a girl check every box, but several girls have checked 11 out of 12 so they rocket up to S-Tier. For example, FA Isabella's main drawback is she's not Asian. Nanase and Jira are Team Seven with young cute faces, but no tits. Tits are a low priority for me, but they still count as 1 checkbox. The trick is that getting MMs wouldn't help because then they'd be trading one checkbox (tits) for another (all natural). So 11 out of 12 is as good as it gets in practice. It is amazingly good to me.
Guys with very different checkboxes than me wouldn't understand my taste. I hope I can still help them though, even if it is as simple as saying "She is HYA, so don't even bother if you don't want to bring service". Team Seven girls tend to check a lot of boxes because one of the requirements is they are perfectly proportioned (head, torso/belly, ass, arms, legs, hands, feet) like models. Here are two girls with good body proportions: DGR vs GMS.[/QUOTE]I saw & reviewed Jane & Shelby. They're both fine in their own way, but they're old, especially Jane, especially because she uses old photoshopped pics from when she used to be very hot, so when you meet her in person it's jarring. My point is that it's insane that MILFs are charging $350 cfs when they're objectively not worth that. I can't imagine they're that busy, but probably too prideful to lower their price.
We are starting to see price discrimination, but only in one direction: UP. There were a few rare premium girls in the past, but now everyone who is popular wants to charge 400+. Love Q was worth premium because she's a young hot ABG with a killer body, but Mila, despite having a great body, is older & Vietnamese. Girls like her would not have been "premium" in the past. I saw Baby Sugar in the past & wasn't into her looks because she lacks tits & ass, so she went out and bought them. Great! Maybe I'll give her another try. But then she jacks her already premium rates up higher? Ugh.
A mere few years ago, HH used to be like 200-220 pretty standard (and HR was under 300), then all the korgs jacked their HH rates up to like 280-300 so its pointless since HR is only slightly more. Basically everyone except FirstAsians, HH is pointless.
When this all happened, I actually almost entirely stopped seeing Kgirls. I switched to the Enclave crew because they had hot young non-pro girls at HH rates of 200-250, which is still the case. Unfortunately while Enclave used to have incredibly hot talent, that dried up & now it has switched to mostly south American imports. A few of the early ones of those were hot, but the talent dry spell was bad enough that I started to switch back to Kgirls this year.
My experience: Baby Sugar (expensive miss), Baby Kendal (hit but not memorable to me for some reason, maybe I should try again), Kona (MILF I had a really great time with & would happily see again but other guys said she gained weight. If she's skinny, I'll see her again), Baby Peach (MISS, bad service, bad attitude, not as hot as people say, hip implants), Emmie K (HIT, pretty with great big natural tits, memorable), Jane (miss, I didn't like her body, had to have her do a handjob to finish, but when I came, she sucked me harder, better, and longer than any other girl ever, absolute peak, she seems nice but is way overpriced), Love Q (HIT, literally the best in years, absolutely worth her premium), FA Tomi (hit, but she's a MILF, kinda dorky, it was good but not as good as Kona), Shelby (miss, she's too tall & her face was rough, service was not a standout either), Mila (Hit, amazing body, but she shouldn't be premium), FA Dallas (HIT, super hot & great service, only girl I repeated this year), FA Toni (miss, she's hot in some ways but not really my type), FA Sabrina (miss, didn't like her face or waist, but she had nice natural tits).
You'll see I went hard on the FA roster lately. This is because I was more willing to roll the dice on them since they have reasonable rates, though now that I've had multiple misses I'm not so eager. Dropping 300+ or now often 400+, I really don't want to miss. As a matter of personal discipline, I don't want to have a high "burn" on this hobby and rip through tons of money. We are paying for experiences and memories, just like when women go on vacation. My goal is to have memorable good experiences just like my favorite girls from my dating days.
Part of being memorable is the girl's attitude. The main reason I liked Kona so much is that she was cheerful, bubbly, and acted genuinely into me so the chemistry was great. By contrast, Baby Peach had a bad attitude so it was a waste. Love Q was the best of both worlds. Dallas was the best of both worlds at almost half the price. But the thing is, we can't know things like attitude, attraction, and chemistry in advance. We are limited to knowing general service & looks. And honestly? If Baby Peach actually looked like Dongeuran, I wouldn't even mind her bad attitude that much. If anything it would have been a turn on for a super hot chick to look down on me, yet here I am, still inside her getting my run of her body for the hour. Hell, I would even repeat.
Exactly that happened with me a long time ago where I saw a Kgirl who was incredibly hot but with a terrible attitude. 1st session I kept pounding away until she got pissed, then I had her jerk me off and blasted all over her. But then I was like, wow, it's so crazy that she can have such a bad attitude yet I'm still in her holes. So I repeated. She opened the door, scowled at me & said "OH, YOU ARE NOT EASY CUM!" but she didn't refuse to see me, and there I was, this time ready to sport fuck her to oblivion, and this time her bad attitude was like a bonus since I'd adapted to it, so I had a great time. YEARS LATER, I saw her again. She didn't remember me. This time her service & attitude was much better. I think she's the only girl I've ever seen 3 times, and if she was still around, I'd be hitting it regularly. That's the power of looks. When a girl is just VERY YOUR TYPE, nothing else matters. Pics of the girl below. She's not even the hottest chick I've seen, maybe not even top 5, she just had a very specific look that drove me wild.
We can't control for chemistry, but we can at least try to for looks. My odds of having a good time are going to be much better with a girl who has a body that is strongly my type (super skinny with big nice tits (Mila, FA Dallas), or moderately skinny with great natural tits & ass (Love Q)) versus when the session starts off with me not being that physically into the girl. I've had good sessions with girls with small tits (Bona) but I'm going to pick big tits every time. I am just insanely into tits. It isn't pure size, as natural perky Cs on a skinny frame can still be 10/10, but my absolute favorite thing about sex is for a girl to do cowgirl & just be mesmerized by her tits as she rides me. LOL. So that's my perspective on girls and bias in reviews.