Spotted her on 5th last night. She has gained some weight and looks a little thick in the ass now. She looked like she was out of her mind though. Flailing her arms at passing cars, holding her stomach and groaning and all around erratic behavior.
Printable View
Spotted her on 5th last night. She has gained some weight and looks a little thick in the ass now. She looked like she was out of her mind though. Flailing her arms at passing cars, holding her stomach and groaning and all around erratic behavior.
This dawn 49 cicero.
Regarding CLearpath, clearmap, other stats
[QUOTE=StanleyStankas;3911610][URL]http://publicsearch2.chicagopolice.org/ProstitutionArrest/Home/Results?FIRST_NME=&LAST_NME=&NAME_OPTIONS=&RACE=&AGE_RANGE=0&StartDate=0&STREETNAME=&O_CITY=&O_ZIP_CD=&O_DISTRICT=&O_AREA=&O_BEAT=&submit=Search[/URL] [/QUOTE]Thanks.
But those are the results I got from going to the link I posted and selecting the largest possible search: no limits specified other than the largest date range possible, which is 30 days. I've got to think that more than 3 guys got arrested in the last 30 days, even assuming it's behind (which other chicagopolice. Org thing make me believe they are about 2 weeks behind).
Also, strangely enough, if you use this search: [URL]http://publicsearch1.chicagopolice.org/Arrests?Page=1&ChargeId=1622&IsEmpty=False[/URL].
Then those 3 guys show up [U]along with a bunch of girls, (and some other guys, some of whom are hookers and some of whom could be johns) with the same offense listed for each[/U]. So are these 3 johns or are they hookers? Who knows?
The most recent record there is August 8 - so I guess it will be a few more weeks before last Wednesday's (8/15-16) haul will show up. If they show up at all under this offense.
You get there by going here: [URL]http://publicsearch1.chicagopolice.org/Arrests[/URL] and selecting offense "8-8-060: PROSTITUTION. SOLICITING FOR PROSTITUTION" {and specifying nothing else} and clicking "search".
I've tried a couple other likely offenses, but none seem to come with recent records for the johns. For example offense 720 ILCS 5. 0/11-14.1-A: SOLICITATION. SEX ACT brings back arrests, all of guys. But they're from 2014.
[QUOTE=StanleyStankas;3911610]Clearpath looks like it is now clear map[/QUOTE]Which is a whole other kettle of fish. So far I haven't gotten names or gender out of it. It's more about aggregated statistics.
Interesting nontheless: starting here: [URL]http://gis.chicagopolice.org/CLEARMap_crime_sums/startPage.htm[/URL]#.
You can make this: [URL]http://gis.chicagopolice.org/website/clearMap_crime_sums/viewer.htm?SUMTYPE=TRACT&SUMCATA=N16&SUMTIME=90[/URL].
Or [URL]http://gis.chicagopolice.org/website/clearMap_crime_sums/viewer.htm?SUMTYPE=BEAT&SUMCATA=N16&SUMTIME=90[/URL].
I think those are really interesting. They show the places you're most likely to be arrested. So don't go to any of those places, boys!
[QUOTE=StanleyStankas;3911610] as when I was looking around online there were really no apps for this sort of thing. Another thing a lot of cops told me as when I lived down there I got to know (well as best I could, they never really trust anyone outside of their blue circle) was an operation called "operation angel". I do believe that was more for online services though. Stings and that sort of thing. Good luck all![/QUOTE]
[QUOTE=HappyHunter7;3912229]Spotted her on 5th last night. She has gained some weight and looks a little thick in the ass now. She looked like she was out of her mind though. Flailing her arms at passing cars, holding her stomach and groaning and all around erratic behavior.[/QUOTE]I seen her too the other night she was a hot mess looked strung out. Hoe was walking in front of cars on 5th acting like she was flying. I don't care how thick she is Ill Pass she would be the type you would have to literally drag out your car.
[QUOTE=Dre69;3912258]This dawn 49 cicero.[/QUOTE]I'd consider doing her.
[QUOTE=GeorgeStark;3912510]Regarding CLearpath, clearmap, other stats
Thanks.
But those are the results I got from going to the link I posted and selecting the largest possible search: no limits specified other than the largest date range possible, which is 30 days. I've got to think that more than 3 guys got arrested in the last 30 days, even assuming it's behind (which other chicagopolice. Org thing make me believe they are about 2 weeks behind).
Also, strangely enough, if you use this search: [URL]http://publicsearch1.chicagopolice.org/Arrests?Page=1&ChargeId=1622&IsEmpty=False[/URL].
Then those 3 guys show up [U]along with a bunch of girls, (and some other guys, some of whom are hookers and some of whom could be johns) with the same offense listed for each[/U]. So are these 3 johns or are they hookers? Who knows?
The most recent record there is August 8 - so I guess it will be a few more weeks before last Wednesday's (8/15-16) haul will show up. If they show up at all under this offense.
You get there by going here: [URL]http://publicsearch1.chicagopolice.org/Arrests[/URL] and selecting offense "8-8-060: PROSTITUTION. SOLICITING FOR PROSTITUTION" {and specifying nothing else} and clicking "search".
I've tried a couple other likely offenses, but none seem to come with recent records for the johns. For example offense 720 ILCS 5. 0/11-14.1-A: SOLICITATION. SEX ACT brings back arrests, all of guys. But they're from 2014.
Which is a whole other kettle of fish. So far I haven't gotten names or gender out of it. It's more about aggregated statistics.
Interesting nontheless: starting here: [URL]http://gis.chicagopolice.org/CLEARMap_crime_sums/startPage.htm[/URL]#.
You can make this: [URL]http://gis.chicagopolice.org/website/clearMap_crime_sums/viewer.htm?SUMTYPE=TRACT&SUMCATA=N16&SUMTIME=90[/URL].
Or [URL]http://gis.chicagopolice.org/website/clearMap_crime_sums/viewer.htm?SUMTYPE=BEAT&SUMCATA=N16&SUMTIME=90[/URL].
I think those are really interesting. They show the places you're most likely to be arrested. So don't go to any of those places, boys![/QUOTE]They tow your car give you a ticket and then you go to a hearing. Unless you get finger printed which these guys did. They're making money and by it they take your car so it should saved you. I know a monger who hott caught up.
[QUOTE=Dre69;3912258]This dawn 49 cicero.[/QUOTE]She doesn't look like that anymore I saw her last twice she gave me head Jon the alley twice she gives great head super skinny drugs!! Saw her Sunday walking again.
[QUOTE=SluggaP;3910223]Did she have freckles, kinda thick? She only did CBJ with me b / c first time but FS. Lastnight.[/QUOTE]Yes it's her she gave me a BBBJ CiM she was thick she was with her pimp 20 was the damage decent head.
[QUOTE=Homies76;3912643]They tow your car give you a ticket and then you go to a hearing. Unless you get finger printed which these guys did. They're making money and by it they take your car [b]so it should saved you[/b]. I know a monger who hott caught up.[/QUOTE]Emphasis added.
I personally never even got that far. No ticket, no impounding of my car, they didn't even check my I D. I just got told to stay away from there. Which I am going to do. But yes, from what you're saying, that sort of thing won't show up in the records I'm searching.
That doesn't make sense if they're trying to impress the locals and the public, though. I'd think they'd *want* to be able to claim prostitution-related arrests. Unless they simply don't have the resources to properly charge and try everybody.
I seen Her today early on the morning 30 for FS and COF But when she undressed I could see that she had too many pimples and marks all over her body and she smelled too bad but she gived good head and nice f**k Hopefully and I do not have a contagious disease But I think I will not see it in a long time.
I seen Her today early on the morning 30 for FS and COF But when she undressed I could see that she had too many pimples and marks all over her body Hopefully and I do not have a contagious disease But I think I will not see it in a long time (And she smelled too bad and she was really bad high and crazy) I will definitely not see her for a good time.
[QUOTE=GeorgeStark;3912675]Emphasis added.
I personally never even got that far. No ticket, no impounding of my car, they didn't even check my I D. I just got told to stay away from there. Which I am going to do. But yes, from what you're saying, that sort of thing won't show up in the records I'm searching.
That doesn't make sense if they're trying to impress the locals and the public, though. I'd think they'd *want* to be able to claim prostitution-related arrests. Unless they simply don't have the resources to properly charge and try everybody.[/QUOTE]It's the same logic to arresting drug dealers and not drug users, typically. 99% of the time, they want the source of the problem not the person who is just using.
That cook county website with the links was amazing, some good looking girls! I wish they had phone numbers, would save us all a lot of trouble.
[QUOTE=JamesNoper;3913221]That cook county website with the links was amazing, some good looking girls! I wish they had phone numbers, would save us all a lot of trouble.[/QUOTE]If you search on the names, sometimes something interesting will come up. I've never acted on it, though.
"pedestrian solicit ride on roadway" as search criteria.
Interesting results.
[QUOTE=GeorgeStark;3912510]Regarding CLearpath, clearmap, other stats
Thanks.
But those are the results I got from going to the link I posted and selecting the largest possible search: no limits specified other than the largest date range possible, which is 30 days. I've got to think that more than 3 guys got arrested in the last 30 days, even assuming it's behind (which other chicagopolice. Org thing make me believe they are about 2 weeks behind).
Also, strangely enough, if you use this search: [URL]http://publicsearch1.chicagopolice.org/Arrests?Page=1&ChargeId=1622&IsEmpty=False[/URL].
Then those 3 guys show up [U]along with a bunch of girls, (and some other guys, some of whom are hookers and some of whom could be johns) with the same offense listed for each[/U]. So are these 3 johns or are they hookers? Who knows?
The most recent record there is August 8 - so I guess it will be a few more weeks before last Wednesday's (8/15-16) haul will show up. If they show up at all under this offense.
You get there by going here: [URL]http://publicsearch1.chicagopolice.org/Arrests[/URL] and selecting offense "8-8-060: PROSTITUTION. SOLICITING FOR PROSTITUTION" {and specifying nothing else} and clicking "search".
I've tried a couple other likely offenses, but none seem to come with recent records for the johns. For example offense 720 ILCS 5. 0/11-14.1-A: SOLICITATION. SEX ACT brings back arrests, all of guys. But they're from 2014.
Which is a whole other kettle of fish. So far I haven't gotten names or gender out of it. It's more about aggregated statistics.
Interesting nontheless: starting here: [URL]http://gis.chicagopolice.org/CLEARMap_crime_sums/startPage.htm[/URL]#.
You can make this: [URL]http://gis.chicagopolice.org/website/clearMap_crime_sums/viewer.htm?SUMTYPE=TRACT&SUMCATA=N16&SUMTIME=90[/URL].
Or [URL]http://gis.chicagopolice.org/website/clearMap_crime_sums/viewer.htm?SUMTYPE=BEAT&SUMCATA=N16&SUMTIME=90[/URL].
I think those are really interesting. They show the places you're most likely to be arrested. So don't go to any of those places, boys![/QUOTE]
[QUOTE=Explorer8;3913507]"pedestrian solicit ride on roadway" as search criteria.
Interesting results.[/QUOTE]Indeed. Good work, brother!