Printable View
[QUOTE=PaulRew;4483229]There has been mention of this before but how is it possible? SA tracks IP's so how can you have a ghost account as well?[/QUOTE]You can get around it by using a VPN service but I would keep it set to giving you an IP address within the US and also try to keep it constant. If you login to the same account with two many different IP locations, they will flag it as suspicious as well.
[QUOTE=SwimSays;4483738]You can get around it by using a VPN service but I would keep it set to giving you an IP address within the US and also try to keep it constant. If you login to the same account with two many different IP locations, they will flag it as suspicious as well.[/QUOTE]What he said. Definitely be careful or you will lose both accounts. Suggest not using Nord as I had no luck using Nord with SA.
[QUOTE=Hyperion11;4479095]Joe1223 - what you say sounds indeed right.
Now, continuing my adventures on SA, two more Acute GPS examples:
[URL]https://www.seeking.com/member/7fecd928-791c-45b4-8cb6-005b1ba513f1[/URL]
She asked for $400, and going unui details she says she doesn't do Greek, only CFS and BBBJ. She also wanted me to book a hotel room in Nashua area. I obviously refused, she stated acusing me for wasting her time and blocked me.
[URL]https://www.seeking.com/member/58686a6c-aa95-4d71-9c24-2912600fc336[/URL]
Everything covered, no Greek, asking for 300 per meet. I wonder if she really looks like her pics.[/QUOTE]Did you get to meet any of these girls? How did it go? Fake pics?
SA absolutely scans messages. That's not to say they ban every one the first time it's detected. I never talk "PPM" or any $ talk within SA. KiK or texting via my Google Voice number.
[QUOTE=ItIsWhatItIs45;4481109]So was she the one that reported you and banned you? Or does SA go through everyone's messages and ban them for certain things?
Cause I chatted with dozens of girls and received lots of messages from girls wanting to hook up instantly and said lots of stuff I guess I can get banned for now like donation, ppm, allowance, tons of sex questions and once they agree then we exchange numbers.
That's why I'm wondering why you got banned.[/QUOTE]
Nope, I refused to meet for the prices they offered and they didn't do any counterproposal.
So the search goes on!
[QUOTE=SHawker25;4483987]Did you get to meet any of these girls? How did it go? Fake pics?[/QUOTE]
I've used IPVANISH before and it did the trick.
[QUOTE=Spill;4483885]What he said. Definitely be careful or you will lose both accounts. Suggest not using Nord as I had no luck using Nord with SA.[/QUOTE]
[QUOTE=Aimstraight;4484456]I've used IPVANISH before and it did the trick.[/QUOTE]Yes, that is what I am using now.
Isabel is a reasonable and accommodating 40 yr old, in the Lowell / Methuen area.
Cute MILF, 5', 135,40 yr old, GFE. Slightly bigger than my usual preferences, but very nice. Here is link and pics. PM me if you have questions.
[URL]https://members.whatsyourprice.com/profile/BvWzP16KZ5E18Yb5j4qbwQpE[/URL]
Met her at a hotel. All holes available bare but kind of pricy at 400 per meet.
[URL]https://www.seeking.com/member/0cc3c270-5a4c-4281-ba87-338916f5663f[/URL]
Likes it rough. Almost out of my comfort zone.
[QUOTE=BR1201;4487353]Met her at a hotel. All holes available bare but kind of pricy at 400 per meet.
[URL]https://www.seeking.com/member/0cc3c270-5a4c-4281-ba87-338916f5663f[/URL]
Likes it rough. Almost out of my comfort zone.[/QUOTE]I tried reaching out to this lady in the past and she ghosted me when we actually decided to meet up.
After a couple back experiences, I am back on the wining side again. I have been chatting with this one for a while but $400 was a little stiff so I pass. 2 weeks later got a a text saying she'd agree to a price range to my liking. She has a killer body, I mean I don't usually DATY but this one I could not resist and Icing on the cake, she's a squirter. I had a lot of fun with this one. GFE, DFK was on point. I had to admit she well worths the $400 . She takes direction well. She's a keeper. She looks much younger in person.
[URL]https://www.seeking.com/member/56978f0a-1b80-4033-a2d3-517b59429542[/URL]
JP.
[QUOTE=RedStar819;4488550]I tried reaching out to this lady in the past and she ghosted me when we actually decided to meet up.[/QUOTE]I found her impossible to work with as well. Messages as if she's quite interested, then goes silent / won't progress the process. I'm intrigued by her preferences (not so much the allowance) but my lack of interest in "chasing" women means it won't happen. This happens a fair bit on SA; chasing has very diminishing returns.
[QUOTE=Bran001;4484255]SA absolutely scans messages. That's not to say they ban every one the first time it's detected. I never talk "PPM" or any $ talk within SA. KiK or texting via my Google Voice number.[/QUOTE]You are correct, they surely DO scan messages! Humans are actually reading those messages. Now, I don't know whether they also use bots or filters to do that. But whether or not they do, I have, neverheless, been able to determine definitively that a HUMAN actually READS those out-going messages from non-paying males, before they let them go out. This is NOT so for paying males. Nor is it so for either paying or non-paying females. But for non-paying males, a human reads those messages CAREFULLY. Well, at least they read them carefully SOMETIMES! But occassionally, contact info, such as an email address or phone number, CAN be slipped thru in those messages! That is indeed the method I've been using that has allowed me to get a phone number to quite a few hoes on SA, and some did indeed text me. Most of those were platinum pussy delusionals, and so I did not follow up. But there were some that I indeed did meet, and enjoyed inseminating, for a fair price.
I am now going to reveal how I got my messages thru as a non-paying member, as I've been promising now for a long time, to make public! Well here's the trick, and I'm going to reveal it now, finally, because it has become increasingly difficult to use successfully, because, I suspect, the moderators have caught on, and so are now looking MUCH more closely at non-payng males' outgoing messages.
The trick is to simply embed your burner number in the text of your message, so it will be somewhat inconspicuous. This was easy about a year ago, but now they have become MUCH more diligent about detecting and censoring messages from non-paying males with contact info in them. Here's an example of the type of message I'm talking about:
Hey there, LilCunntBaby89! I'd love to meet you, for oh one! If you would like to get together, ate sicks for, please get in contact with me, but not here, because as a non-VIP I won't be able to read your replies--I can send messages on here, but I can't read your replies! So please get in touch off-site, for for three too, if you are interested! Looking forward to hearing from you soon, LilCunnt!" (Of course, you need to make the message much longer, talk about your interests with the girl, ask about hers, or whatever, etc. , to make a longer message in which the embedded number is less noticible by some poor dude sitting there all day speed-reading those hundreds of messages!
Now, the main reason that I'm FINALLY revealing this now, is that SA has become, over the last year or so, MUCH more diligent about finding and preventing these types of messages from going out! But nevertheless, sometimes it is still possible to slip them thru, if you are clever enough at writing a message in which the contact info is not too noticible. Keep in mind that some minimum wage dude is sitting there reading hundreds or thousands of these messages every day. So its really not all that surprising that you can slip a message through, occassionally, whiile the moderstors are asleep at the switch! And I know it is humans doing this, and not bots, for two reasons: There is a time delay before the female gets a message from a non-paying male. No such time delay exists for a non-paying female. And secondly, it has been possible to get the same, identically written message thru sometimes, but not other times.
But even when it used to work more frequently, generally a LOT of messages were needed before one got thru. I would estimate less than 10% got thru. Now, a lot less less than that, unfortunately, because they are looking more closely! Maybe that was because of little' old me, but I suspect that others have also figured out this very simple trick!
So my reasoning now is, the more non-paying members that know this trick, the better! Because I do think that it might overwwhelm their system, and with hundreds or even thousands of such messages out there, it will, once again, become MORE likely to get some of them thru the overwhealmed censors! So try it, non-payong dudes! You may indeed catch a very nice pussy-fish or three that that way, as did I!
Now, that said, there is yet ANOTHER, VERY DIFFERENT way to get one's contact info thru to them on SA, without paying! This new method requires a LOT more preparation, but once established, it works every time! It now allows me to get my contact info to ANY hoe I choose, without paying a penny to SA, 100% of the time! And this NEW method, I am not going to be revealing to ANYBODY, any time soon! Not even my long-term email contacts will get the necessary details for this new method! Because I'm going to milk this new method for all its worth, for quite a while! So PLEASE do not clog my emails or inbox on here, asking me for the new method! Some of its essential details I actually discovered quite accidentally, and fortuitously. So I'm surely going to be sitting on this new method, probably for about a year, if it continues to work, before I will think about revealing its salient features.
But, regarding the old method--just remember the ancient saying, "If one is PERSISTENT enough, one can sharpen an axe with a banana! " .
Am I correct in my thinking that since you've received some replies, that is proof to you that coded messages from non-paying members are getting through to the women? If so, do you have a way of knowing which messages have gotten through and which have not? Otherwise, you may be flooding a woman with many messages and she may not be savvy enough to see your embedded code. Then she will be angry about getting blown up with all of your messages. But of course if she's not seeing the coded message, I suppose it doesn't really matter, because you won't ever meet her anyway. Also, once the woman has broken the code and responded to your number, do you exchange e-mails and correspond by e-mail or do you stay with text messages?
[QUOTE=KingOfFours;4489310]You are correct, they surely DO scan messages! Humans are actually reading those messages. Now, I don't know whether they also use bots or filters to do that. But whether or not they do, I have, neverheless, been able to determine definitively that a HUMAN actually READS those out-going messages from non-paying males, before they let them go out. This is NOT so for paying males. Nor is it so for either paying or non-paying females. But for non-paying males, a human reads those messages CAREFULLY. Well, at least they read them carefully SOMETIMES! But occassionally, contact info, such as an email address or phone number, CAN be slipped thru in those messages! That is indeed the method I've been using that has allowed me to get a phone number to quite a few hoes on SA, and some did indeed text me. Most of those were platinum pussy delusionals, and so I did not follow up. But there were some that I indeed did meet, and enjoyed inseminating, for a fair price.
I am now going to reveal how I got my messages thru as a non-paying member, as I've been promising now for a long time, to make public! Well here's the trick, and I'm going to reveal it now, finally, because it has become increasingly difficult to use successfully, because, I suspect, the moderators have caught on, and so are now looking MUCH more closely at non-payng males' outgoing messages.
The trick is to simply embed your burner number in the text of your message, so it will be somewhat inconspicuous. This was easy about a year ago, but now they have become MUCH more diligent about detecting and censoring messages from non-paying males with contact info in them. Here's an example of the type of message I'm talking about:
Hey there, LilCunntBaby89! I'd love to meet you, for oh one! If you would like to get together, ate sicks for, please get in contact with me, but not here, because as a non-VIP I won't be able to read your replies--I can send messages on here, but I can't read your replies! So please get in touch off-site, for for three too, if you are interested! Looking forward to hearing from you soon, LilCunnt!" (Of course, you need to make the message much longer, talk about your interests with the girl, ask about hers, or whatever, etc. , to make a longer message in which the embedded number is less noticible by some poor dude sitting there all day speed-reading those hundreds of messages!
Now, the main reason that I'm FINALLY revealing this now, is that SA has become, over the last year or so, MUCH more diligent about finding and preventing these types of messages from going out! But nevertheless, sometimes it is still possible to slip them thru, if you are clever enough at writing a message in which the contact info is not too noticible. Keep in mind that some minimum wage dude is sitting there reading hundreds or thousands of these messages every day. So its really not all that surprising that you can slip a message through, occassionally, whiile the moderstors are asleep at the switch! And I know it is humans doing this, and not bots, for two reasons: There is a time delay before the female gets a message from a non-paying male. No such time delay exists for a non-paying female. And secondly, it has been possible to get the same, identically written message thru sometimes, but not other times.
But even when it used to work more frequently, generally a LOT of messages were needed before one got thru. I would estimate less than 10% got thru. Now, a lot less less than that, unfortunately, because they are looking more closely! Maybe that was because of little' old me, but I suspect that others have also figured out this very simple trick!
So my reasoning now is, the more non-paying members that know this trick, the better! Because I do think that it might overwwhelm their system, and with hundreds or even thousands of such messages out there, it will, once again, become MORE likely to get some of them thru the overwhealmed censors! So try it, non-payong dudes! You may indeed catch a very nice pussy-fish or three that that way, as did I!
Now, that said, there is yet ANOTHER, VERY DIFFERENT way to get one's contact info thru to them on SA, without paying! This new method requires a LOT more preparation, but once established, it works every time! It now allows me to get my contact info to ANY hoe I choose, without paying a penny to SA, 100% of the time! And this NEW method, I am not going to be revealing to ANYBODY, any time soon! Not even my long-term email contacts will get the necessary details for this new method! Because I'm going to milk this new method for all its worth, for quite a while! So PLEASE do not clog my emails or inbox on here, asking me for the new method! Some of its essential details I actually discovered quite accidentally, and fortuitously. So I'm surely going to be sitting on this new method, probably for about a year, if it continues to work, before I will think about revealing its salient features.
But, regarding the old method--just remember the ancient saying, "If one is PERSISTENT enough, one can sharpen an axe with a banana! " .[/QUOTE].
I'm not exactly sure what you are asking, but here goes: With the method I've just revealed, you will not know if the girl got your number or not, that is, whether or not the mods intercepted it and blocked it, until and unless you get a call or text from the girl.
However, I'm not commenting at all on that issue, regarding the second method, which I'm keeping COMPLETELY UTR for ALL, except to repeat the statement I already made below--that I can now get my contact info to ANY girl on SA. 100% of the time, without paying a cent. Details of how that second method works, however, or how I set it up, will just have to remain unsaid.
[QUOTE=OffTheGrid;4489395]Am I correct in my thinking that since you've received some replies, that is proof to you that coded messages from non-paying members are getting through to the women? If so, do you have a way of knowing which messages have gotten through and which have not? Otherwise, you may be flooding a woman with many messages and she may not be savvy enough to see your embedded code. Then she will be angry about getting blown up with all of your messages. But of course if she's not seeing the coded message, I suppose it doesn't really matter, because you won't ever meet her anyway. Also, once the woman has broken the code and responded to your number, do you exchange e-mails and correspond by e-mail or do you stay with text messages?
.[/QUOTE]
[URL]https://www.seeking.com/member/501632a9-ecd4-4c6a-aa5c-8a9c8e0b140c[/URL]
Can't host. Wants $500. Will do two holes bare. Not interested. Could find much much hotter for half that.
Wondering if anyone's been down this road before I TOFTT.
Found a very cute 18 year old latina on WYP. Exchanged numbers and I texted my offer for a date and expectation of sex and she quickly accepted.
The trouble is she's asked me to send her money three times already and we haven't met yet. I'm hoping she's just young and new to the game, but it's a red flag. Now I'm wondering if she's scammer or even a female at all. I want badly to believe she's the sexy girl in the pictures. And even if she is, how is she going to behave in person? Her profile is gone from the site now, which makes me wonder if someone reported it.
Still, the big head isn't in control now. Think I'll try a video call before proceesing any further.
She was on SA last year and was excellent. Went by HappyBlondie2020 or something.
Well, I had a pretty good run with my newer, 100% working, non-paying communication method, but the SA dudes finally figured out how I was accomplishing this, and shut me down, LOL!
No biggie. If I can do it once, I can do it again!
I CAN tell you that my UTR method IS time consuming to set up, but I got a good run using it, for about a week, and learned MUCH more about their crooked system, in the process. So I will be going back to the drawing board, to try to do some minor or perhaps major modifications, so that they don't discover it next time! .
And no, I won't say another word about the basis or mechanism of this method, nor of any related methods.
There are, by the way, still other methods of getting thru besides my methods, that are workable to some degree, but not optimal, and not 100% reliable, as was my UTR method, up until this morning when they shut it down! So if you are up to the challenge, try some of your OWN ideas out, dudes! Because after corresponding with a few dudes, I learned that there are at least two other workable, though not optimal methods, out there, about which I'm also not saying a word!
But just do your own research and experimentation, dudes, and try out some of your OWN ideas! You may be quite surprised at how easy some of these methods are!
[QUOTE=KingOfFours;4489310]You are correct, they surely DO scan messages! Humans are actually reading those messages. Now, I don't know whether they also use bots or filters to do that. But whether or not they do, I have, neverheless, been able to determine definitively that a HUMAN actually READS those out-going messages from non-paying males, before they let them go out. This is NOT so for paying males. Nor is it so for either paying or non-paying females. But for non-paying males, a human reads those messages CAREFULLY. Well, at least they read them carefully SOMETIMES! But occassionally, contact info, such as an email address or phone number, CAN be slipped thru in those messages! That is indeed the method I've been using that has allowed me to get a phone number to quite a few hoes on SA, and some did indeed text me. Most of those were platinum pussy delusionals, and so I did not follow up. But there were some that I indeed did meet, and enjoyed inseminating, for a fair price.
I am now going to reveal how I got my messages thru as a non-paying member, as I've been promising now for a long time, to make public! Well here's the trick, and I'm going to reveal it now, finally, because it has become increasingly difficult to use successfully, because, I suspect, the moderators have caught on, and so are now looking MUCH more closely at non-payng males' outgoing messages.
The trick is to simply embed your burner number in the text of your message, so it will be somewhat inconspicuous. This was easy about a year ago, but now they have become MUCH more diligent about detecting and censoring messages from non-paying males with contact info in them. Here's an example of the type of message I'm talking about:
Hey there, LilCunntBaby89! I'd love to meet you, for oh one! If you would like to get together, ate sicks for, please get in contact with me, but not here, because as a non-VIP I won't be able to read your replies--I can send messages on here, but I can't read your replies! So please get in touch off-site, for for three too, if you are interested! Looking forward to hearing from you soon, LilCunnt!" (Of course, you need to make the message much longer, talk about your interests with the girl, ask about hers, or whatever, etc. , to make a longer message in which the embedded number is less noticible by some poor dude sitting there all day speed-reading those hundreds of messages!
Now, the main reason that I'm FINALLY revealing this now, is that SA has become, over the last year or so, MUCH more diligent about finding and preventing these types of messages from going out! But nevertheless, sometimes it is still possible to slip them thru, if you are clever enough at writing a message in which the contact info is not too noticible. Keep in mind that some minimum wage dude is sitting there reading hundreds or thousands of these messages every day. So its really not all that surprising that you can slip a message through, occassionally, whiile the moderstors are asleep at the switch! And I know it is humans doing this, and not bots, for two reasons: There is a time delay before the female gets a message from a non-paying male. No such time delay exists for a non-paying female. And secondly, it has been possible to get the same, identically written message thru sometimes, but not other times.
But even when it used to work more frequently, generally a LOT of messages were needed before one got thru. I would estimate less than 10% got thru. Now, a lot less less than that, unfortunately, because they are looking more closely! Maybe that was because of little' old me, but I suspect that others have also figured out this very simple trick!
So my reasoning now is, the more non-paying members that know this trick, the better! Because I do think that it might overwwhelm their system, and with hundreds or even thousands of such messages out there, it will, once again, become MORE likely to get some of them thru the overwhealmed censors! So try it, non-payong dudes! You may indeed catch a very nice pussy-fish or three that that way, as did I!
Now, that said, there is yet ANOTHER, VERY DIFFERENT way to get one's contact info thru to them on SA, without paying! This new method requires a LOT more preparation, but once established, it works every time! It now allows me to get my contact info to ANY hoe I choose, without paying a penny to SA, 100% of the time! And this NEW method, I am not going to be revealing to ANYBODY, any time soon! Not even my long-term email contacts will get the necessary details for this new method! Because I'm going to milk this new method for all its worth, for quite a while! So PLEASE do not clog my emails or inbox on here, asking me for the new method! Some of its essential details I actually discovered quite accidentally, and fortuitously. So I'm surely going to be sitting on this new method, probably for about a year, if it continues to work, before I will think about revealing its salient features.
But, regarding the old method--just remember the ancient saying, "If one is PERSISTENT enough, one can sharpen an axe with a banana! " .[/QUOTE]
Been on the platform for several years. Have never had any issues (did get banned once for questionable network activity but was reinstated). Then today I get banned for soliciting prostitution. I think it might have been a woman who messaged me yesterday and asked if I was okay with PPM. But I didn't even respond. Then another woman was writing me unsolicited dirty messages this AM and I was responding with one and two word responses. Like "okay" "sounds good" etc.
The thing is my account just renewed automatically Saturday. What a bunch of a holes.
I wrote their support team asking for evidence and to be unsuspended but who knows. I have no advice to give since I have no idea what the SA police found objectionable. Oh well. I do still have a few numbers.
[QUOTE=Aardvarks;4492218]Been on the platform for several years. Have never had any issues (did get banned once for questionable network activity but was reinstated). Then today I get banned for soliciting prostitution. I think it might have been a woman who messaged me yesterday and asked if I was okay with PPM. But I didn't even respond. Then another woman was writing me unsolicited dirty messages this AM and I was responding with one and two word responses. Like "okay" "sounds good" etc.
The thing is my account just renewed automatically Saturday. What a bunch of a holes.
I wrote their support team asking for evidence and to be unsuspended but who knows. I have no advice to give since I have no idea what the SA police found objectionable. Oh well. I do still have a few numbers.[/QUOTE]THEY banned YOU for soliciitig prostitution?! Jesus H Christ, that's about the most hypocritical whoreshit I've ever heard! That's like Joe Biden firing a staff member for plagerism. , LOL!
But this is one of the myriad reasons I'll NEVER pay a red cent to that asinine, crooked website, and I will encourage everyone to find methods to hack it, as I have!
She accepted $350 for a couple hours spend together. I confirm she accepts BBFS, however I didn't partake (chickened out at the last moment LOL).
However, she gladly did BBBJ + cim.
Now for the downside, I'd only give her 4 (out of 10) for looks. Definitely curvy and not that attractive. If the little head wasn't screaming like hell after a sexting session with another potential SB, I wouldn't have done it.
[QUOTE=BR1201;4490749][URL]https://www.seeking.com/member/501632a9-ecd4-4c6a-aa5c-8a9c8e0b140c[/URL]
Can't host. Wants $500. Will do two holes bare. Not interested. Could find much much hotter for half that.[/QUOTE]
[QUOTE=Aardvarks;4492218]Been on the platform for several years. Have never had any issues (did get banned once for questionable network activity but was reinstated). Then today I get banned for soliciting prostitution. I think it might have been a woman who messaged me yesterday and asked if I was okay with PPM. But I didn't even respond. Then another woman was writing me unsolicited dirty messages this AM and I was responding with one and two word responses. Like "okay" "sounds good" etc.
The thing is my account just renewed automatically Saturday. What a bunch of a holes.
I wrote their support team asking for evidence and to be unsuspended but who knows. I have no advice to give since I have no idea what the SA police found objectionable. Oh well. I do still have a few numbers.[/QUOTE]Maybe SA is becoming more strict, I haven't went on since June and will probably sign up again and pay. But when me and a couple of my friends were on it we mentioned all the words that you can apparently get banned for, allowance, donation, ppm. Etc. And we never got banned. Also lots of girls messaged us also mentioning ppm and donation and $ etc.
Maybe you have a higher chance of getting banned if you end up declining the girls offer and she reports you? Cause if that's the case then I'll probably be banned soon LOL. How can they ban you if a girl messages you and says 'ppm' first??
That's bull.
Weekly 500 only platonic LOL.
[URL]https://www.seeking.com/member/fbe9e319-77de-425c-b40d-9d7819697965[/URL]
Always go to texting before discussing specifics. SA can check messaging but they are less likely to take action if the complaint originates on the basis of text messaging.
[QUOTE=ItIsWhatItIs45;4492754]Maybe SA is becoming more strict, I haven't went on since June and will probably sign up again and pay. But when me and a couple of my friends were on it we mentioned all the words that you can apparently get banned for, allowance, donation, ppm. Etc. And we never got banned. Also lots of girls messaged us also mentioning ppm and donation and $ etc.
Maybe you have a higher chance of getting banned if you end up declining the girls offer and she reports you? Cause if that's the case then I'll probably be banned soon LOL. How can they ban you if a girl messages you and says 'ppm' first??
That's bull.[/QUOTE]
I was in a bad mood the other day and create a support ticket asking for my money back. A day later, I was allowed back on the site. No mention of why I was suspended.
[QUOTE=OkWhatever;4480110]I got banned the other day. I was chatting with someone on SA and she asked me if I was ok with PPM. I responded with an affirmative and one hour later I was banned. I knew right after I shouldn't have responded or asked her to take it offline. I did not and will not contact SA support to get back on. This time around on SA has been pretty bad with all the GPS and flakes. The girl that contacted me was from the south shore and said she was a nurse which is probably BS because so many of them say they are nurses or students.
If you want to stay on SA, avoid responding to messages that have certain phrases like PPM or any mention of money.[/QUOTE]
[QUOTE=Aardvarks;4492218]Been on the platform for several years. Have never had any issues (did get banned once for questionable network activity but was reinstated). Then today I get banned for soliciting prostitution. I think it might have been a woman who messaged me yesterday and asked if I was okay with PPM. But I didn't even respond. Then another woman was writing me unsolicited dirty messages this AM and I was responding with one and two word responses. Like "okay" "sounds good" etc.
The thing is my account just renewed automatically Saturday. What a bunch of a holes.
I wrote their support team asking for evidence and to be unsuspended but who knows. I have no advice to give since I have no idea what the SA police found objectionable. Oh well. I do still have a few numbers.[/QUOTE]It is true that some women will set you up trying to get them to ban you. You will have to be careful and play dumb. Never agree to anything online. 4 lines of convo and move to text. All I say there is hello, How are you?.
They may let you back on. I was suspended / banned and wrote a nasty message via their support system. A day later I was let back on. I'm not renewing though. It has really gone downhill IMO.
[QUOTE=Aardvarks;4492218]Been on the platform for several years. Have never had any issues (did get banned once for questionable network activity but was reinstated). Then today I get banned for soliciting prostitution. I think it might have been a woman who messaged me yesterday and asked if I was okay with PPM. But I didn't even respond. Then another woman was writing me unsolicited dirty messages this AM and I was responding with one and two word responses. Like "okay" "sounds good" etc.
The thing is my account just renewed automatically Saturday. What a bunch of a holes.
I wrote their support team asking for evidence and to be unsuspended but who knows. I have no advice to give since I have no idea what the SA police found objectionable. Oh well. I do still have a few numbers.[/QUOTE]
I've been favorite by the first 2 and texted with the others. Hate to waste time but if I follow through I'll report the findings. Worries about getting banned after reading these last few weeks.
[URL]https://www.seeking.com/member/dec3a436-aa06-47ce-86b9-0771005f62aa[/URL]
[URL]https://www.seeking.com/member/ad47e04b-e4fc-4c0a-8b78-3c1d20668b4f[/URL]
[URL]https://www.seeking.com/messages/inbox/d869a0c7-62dc-4955-9d8d-c531b239463d[/URL]
[URL]https://www.seeking.com/messages/inbox/f0d15388-2a24-4f52-9675-03a6b5933eda[/URL]
[QUOTE=Samuel05;4430967]Any comments on these two? Definitely hotties.
[URL]https://www.seeking.com/member/81025f99-cf1d-48ee-bdd3-195c30aaa4a4[/URL][/QUOTE]They are super "high end". Negotiated down to $1,000 for 6 hours together, but I couldn't pull the trigger for that price, even at 166/ hour. Our of an apartment in Northshore. Follow one of them on Snapchat, and it simply looks like a rich 20 something chick who has daddy money (or SA money) and no education.
Hey Guys,
Any one been with this lady? She is pretty cool to chat with, but concerned she will be a flake when I meet her later this week on our date. Any feedback? I believe she use to have another profile on WYP, same girl.
[URL]https://members.whatsyourprice.com/profile/8GYKE1OV6AG1Qj25vMpL9rdB[/URL]
[QUOTE=TexasYesMan;4495163]Hey Guys,
Any one been with this lady? She is pretty cool to chat with, but concerned she will be a flake when I meet her later this week on our date. Any feedback? I believe she use to have another profile on WYP, same girl.
[URL]https://members.whatsyourprice.com/profile/8GYKE1OV6AG1Qj25vMpL9rdB[/URL][/QUOTE]Face is busted. Drunk and zero intentions for having fun.
[QUOTE=OkWhatever;4494162]They may let you back on. I was suspended / banned and wrote a nasty message via their support system. A day later I was let back on. I'm not renewing though. It has really gone downhill IMO.[/QUOTE]The message I got back from them was ridiculous they actually threatened me that any further activity by me on their site would result in "action" on their part. They used foul language, stated that what I was doing was ILLEGAL, in all caps. And then told me I was BANNED multiple times (again in all caps). The support tech was named Sydney so I guess could be a guy or girl. But why not just tell me what verbiage I did to get banned? Really? I pay you to message women looking to connect with guys who want to spoil them. It's a scam. Brandon knows it and if he doesn't he will know soon.
Bad business in my opinion.
In this respect, you probably shouldn't correspond with a post that had just joined. Someone very new is either testing the system for "bad actors " , neive, or has GPS syndrome. Time and disappointment bring them back to reality.
[QUOTE=MamboMikea;4493134]Always go to texting before discussing specifics. SA can check messaging but they are less likely to take action if the complaint originates on the basis of text messaging.[/QUOTE]
Smoking hot Ebony girl that can host. Great Fuuck and awesome oral. So why the avoid headline? She wants your license and to know who you are IRL for a better " connection" Proceed with caution.
[URL]https://www.seeking.com/member/75f4f07f-053d-4a8e-aab3-96b5f35ce954[/URL]
Guys,
Avoid this woman. She's a junkie and a thief. I may have left a review on here, but can't find it. I have real intel on her that was shared with me by another member. I will only share that intel in private, so feel free to message me like some already have.
Trust me, avoid.
[QUOTE=TexasYesMan;4495163]Hey Guys,
Any one been with this lady? She is pretty cool to chat with, but concerned she will be a flake when I meet her later this week on our date. Any feedback? I believe she use to have another profile on WYP, same girl.
[URL]https://members.whatsyourprice.com/profile/8GYKE1OV6AG1Qj25vMpL9rdB[/URL][/QUOTE]As a follow up, she flaked. She's hot (if real) but a bit hard to work with. If anyone is successful let me know for the simply sake of curiosity. Cheers.
[QUOTE=OkWhatever;4497632]Guys,
Avoid this woman. She's a junkie and a thief. I may have left a review on here, but can't find it. I have real intel on her that was shared with me by another member. I will only share that intel in private, so feel free to message me like some already have.
Trust me, avoid.[/QUOTE][URL]https://www.seeking.com/member/997d191d-a3e9-42be-ae7b-d60dd941db43[/URL]
[QUOTE=TexasYesMan;4494942]They are super "high end". Negotiated down to $1,000 for 6 hours together, but I couldn't pull the trigger for that price, even at 166/ hour. Our of an apartment in Northshore. Follow one of them on Snapchat, and it simply looks like a rich 20 something chick who has daddy money (or SA money) and no education.[/QUOTE]Any profile that says, "We spend a lot of our time in Miami, NYC, and Boston!" I avoid. Travelling escorts or Instagram escorts. Not why I'm on SA.
Anyone have contact with this Zero post wonder looking for info?
SportsGuyRed.