Massage Parlor Reports

[QUOTE=Jayke00;7545912]I'm confused about the "other property (seized)" which was mentioned, but from the rest of the post, I got:

[I]A well-known, high-post-count contributor who, from time to time, has been accused, without evidence, of operating multiple accounts under multiple names, has forcefully posted several times in the recent past that this kind of activity is driven entirely from an administrator sitting behind a desk wagging their paper finger, and is not funded to operate in the field.

When others offer a different opinion, they are attacked for daring to believe that the agency in question is actually out and about and acting on the standard kind of tradecraft practiced in their line of work.

Offered as evidence that such a "hands on" approach is, indeed, in effect, is that a group of service providers are operating in an unusual area, which is not as lucrative as their usual territory. Mentioned is other, related enforcement activity in their usual stomping grounds that would jeopardize these providers' business operations, freedom and very residency in this country.

The poster concludes by openly wondering why someone would publicly offer their opinions if it's contrary to the purpose of why we are all gathered here in the first place[/I][/QUOTE]I have no idea what he is trying to say either. AMP's are by far your safest bet in this game. Could you get busted? - anything is possible. If it is raided while your enjoying a "massage" like Shampoo says (who I virtually never agree with} Keep your mouth shut! I also didn't see mongers arrested just the owner / operators. Thats no big deal to any of us other than we lost a few good AMP's. Stay safe.

I read that report and the charges that were filed, but for some reason there were no "sex trafficking" charges levied? Just plain old promoting prostitution charges.

Remember what [B]the definition of Sex Trafficking[/B] is?

[I]Human trafficking, also known as trafficking in persons, is a crime that involves compelling or coercing a person to provide labor or services, or to engage in commercial sex acts. The coercion can be subtle or overt, physical or psychological. Exploitation of a minor for commercial sex is human trafficking, regardless of whether any form of force, fraud, or coercion was used.[/I]

[URL]https://www.justice.gov/humantrafficking/what-is-human-trafficking[/URL]

So as far as the info given, it doesn't look like there was any "trafficking" going on. I guess it depends on the case of a few girls that said they weren't paid as to if that was force, compulsion, coercion or just a situation of employer cheating its workers?

This is the problem. Everyone equates all prostitution with sex trafficking, when it isn't. Why is this state with its politicians that want to be just like CA, are cracking down on sex work, taking a VERY conservative, Bible-thumping approach?

[QUOTE=Jayke00;7531583]This is my hesitation in trying to see Moon, who has been reported seen at this spa.

My mongering time is so limited I want to be sure I'm going to be attracted to the therapist I draw. Your experience is similar to what I had the first (and only) time I went there.

Just not my cup of tea.[/QUOTE]Well you typically get to see the girl before she takes you to the room. You could just change your mind and walk away LOL.