Printable View
[QUOTE=TwoNutts;2929994]What you are talking about. This guy is very well respected by many including me!! He is a personal friend as well. He has more game then most on this board have. His parties at his house would make Ron Jeramy blush.[/QUOTE]If that were true he wouldn't have time to continually troll the boards like the loser he is.
You guys need to like your pussy and talk about something more positive things instead of sounding like some negative ragging bitches! GGGGEeeeeeeZzzzzz.
[QUOTE=TwoNutts;2929994]What you are talking about. This guy is very well respected by many including me!! He is a personal friend as well. He has more game then most on this board have. His parties at his house would make Ron Jeramy blush.[/QUOTE]He shouldn't need your help in fighting his own battles.
[QUOTE=MillitaryMan69;2930025]If that were true he wouldn't have time to continually troll the boards like the loser he is.[/QUOTE]I've noticed your not that welcome in the indy board either right now.
[QUOTE=MojoGuy;2930279]He shouldn't need your help in fighting his own battles.[/QUOTE]But I will always have a friends back!!
[QUOTE=TwoNutts;2930440]I've noticed your not that welcome in the indy board either right now.[/QUOTE]When I asked for intel I got it. I was surprised how fast too. Yeah there are a few vocal losers on there so what. For your analogy to make any sense sense he would have to be fucking every time he types up a post.
Is this the personality?
[QUOTE=MillitaryMan69;2928203]My vote is C based solely on others and the Ursula blog. I just couldn't support someone even a little who has done so much damage unless she had made amends. By that I mean paying back the people she has ripped off. All of them.[/QUOTE]Or is this the personality?
[QUOTE=MillitaryMan69;2816021][B]Ursula Saga LAME![/B] The job of a fool is to entertain. A peasant such as yourself does the bitching and whining. Lame is when someone uses you for money and rides back and forth to INDy. Lame is writing 18 chapters and thinking your not a tool. Forest gump was shaking his head after chapter three asking how dumb is this guy? Why couldn't she stay as long as one night? Cause you are lame. Hail to the king baby.[/QUOTE]One personality about the blog is LAME and the other personality is worth a vote. Will the real MM69 please stand up!
I have to agree
[QUOTE=KentuckyKatana;2930066]You guys need to like your pussy and talk about something more positive things instead of sounding like some negative ragging bitches! GGGGEeeeeeeZzzzzz.[/QUOTE].
[QUOTE=FreckleFreak;2930701]Is this the personality?
Or is this the personality?
One personality about the blog is LAME and the other personality is worth a vote. Will the real MM69 please stand up![/QUOTE]"Lame" does not mean useless.
"Lame" does not mean "contains no information".
"Lame" does not mean false.
Something that is "lame" can still be used to help making a decision. There is no inconsistency in this.
[blue][Deleted by Admin][/blue]
[b][u]EDITOR'S NOTE[/u]: [/b] [blue]This report was edited or deleted because it appeared to be a [u]threat made towards other Forum members[/u]. Threatening other members in any way, either veiled or directly, is strictly prohibited and will result the the perpetrator being banned from the forum. Please read the Forum's Posting Guidelines for further information.
Don't EVEN fucking try writing me and saying it wasn't because you added the word probably.
A2[/blue]
[QUOTE=Zomby;2930760]"Lame" does not mean useless.
"Lame" does not mean "contains no information".
"Lame" does not mean false.
Something that is "lame" can still be used to help making a decision. There is no inconsistency in this.[/QUOTE]I guess I was using the Lame slang definitions of "Unconvincing", "Unbelievable", "Uninteresting", "Irrelevant" when it was called Lame. I guess none of these definitions qualify for any of the ones you listed. One question though, by your definitions above wouldn't it be a Lameless story since the antonyms of Lame are convincing (not useless), believable (not false), interesting and relevant (contains information)? Or is there another definition I am missing somewhere?
[QUOTE=KentuckyKatana;2930066]You guys need to like your pussy and talk about something more positive things instead of sounding like some negative ragging bitches! GGGGEeeeeeeZzzzzz.[/QUOTE]Well said. I was planning on saying infantile tantrums surrounding their favorite toy being taken away but this works too.
[QUOTE=FreckleFreak;2931110]I guess I was using the Lame slang definitions of "Unconvincing", "Unbelievable", "Uninteresting", "Irrelevant" when it was called Lame. I guess none of these definitions qualify for any of the ones you listed. One question though, by your definitions above wouldn't it be a Lameless story since the antonyms of Lame are convincing (not useless), believable (not false), interesting and relevant (contains information)? Or is there another definition I am missing somewhere?[/QUOTE]Feeble, stupid, un-original, weak, lifeless, boring.
None of which which mean useless, un-informative or false.
[QUOTE=MillitaryMan69;2930791]Even though you are still the [B] biggest loser [/B]and I would probably punch you in the face if we met.[/QUOTE]When you come to Indy next week. There is a strip club called Brads and it's well known and I would be happy to meet you there or anywhere you prefer. Just be aware I will not fight back because I don't believe that a war of words on a board are worth actual violence. For a matter of fact I would turn my cheek and let you go at it again. Then I would laugh and say I proved my point and walk away. Of course you did say "Probably" which is probably the only reason A2 hasn't sanctioned you yet for threatening another member on the board.
Yes MM69 you are angry and obviously have violent tendencies. I'm sure now some members can see this in you. I may be a looser but I would never stoop to your level of violence unless the life of someone was threatened.
[QUOTE=Zomby;2931248]Feeble, stupid, un-original, weak, lifeless, boring.
None of which which mean useless, un-informative or false.[/QUOTE]So since it's both, by your definitions here and before, then it's a Lame and a Lameless story. Makes sense now. I appreciate the input.