BBQ and fight thread

[QUOTE=BgDoc3;2926740]DO NOT DISCLOSE MEANS EXACTLY WHAT IT SAYS, NOT TO A SELECT FEW BUT TO ALL. IN OTHER WORDS DO NOT PUT MY BUSINESS ON PUBLIC DISPLAY! IF YOU ARE TOO FUCKING DUMB TO UNDERSTAND THAT THEN HOW DID YOU GET TO BE A SENIOR MEMBER? EVEN A FUCKING CHILD UNDERSTANDS IT WHEN YOU TELL HIM OR HER TO KEEP QUIET ABOUT SOMETHING That may not happen, but it seems in your case you believe you are special and therefore you "deserve" to be informed so you can have your way. WRONG. It means what it says. He respected her request you on the other hand didn't respect the ladies requests. How many women you suppose are going to read this and think CAN I TRUST MM? My guess is if they have a brain, quite a few are going to give you a wide berth. Then again maybe not but why take a chance ladies BLACKLISTS work wonders or so I have heard.[/QUOTE]I don't really want in this discussion, but my curiosity is killing me. If the BigMack guy is so discreet, why did he make it public to begin with? Why didn't he just PM the ladies his answer?

[QUOTE=Sexmoron;2927336]I don't really want in this discussion, but my curiosity is killing me. If the BigMack guy is so discreet, why did he make it public to begin with? Why didn't he just PM the ladies his answer?[/QUOTE]Regarding discretion with ladies that prefer to remain anonymous, here's my idea of discretion. I've been seeing the same girl almost exclusively for the past two months. She doesn't advertise anywhere and doesn't really want her name out there on the public forum and I respect her wishes. I could have gotten on here and told stories about our experiences that would make me the envy of most every monger out there but without a name attached to the story, it's just a story. With the exception of a few private messages between myself and two mongers (she knows who) and one escort and assuming she hasn't told anyone herself no one else should know we are seeing each other. They never will from me. BTW, the escort that knows caught us together so that one was unavoidable. LOL.

[QUOTE=MojoGuy;2927445]Regarding discretion with ladies that prefer to remain anonymous, here's my idea of discretion. I've been seeing the same girl almost exclusively for the past two months. She doesn't advertise anywhere and doesn't really want her name out there on the public forum and I respect her wishes. I could have gotten on here and told stories about our experiences that would make me the envy of most every monger out there but without a name attached to the story, it's just a story. With the exception of a few private messages between myself and two mongers (she knows who) and one escort and assuming she hasn't told anyone herself no one else should know we are seeing each other. They never will from me. BTW, the escort that knows caught us together so that one was unavoidable. LOL.[/QUOTE]I'm probably missing the point but I'm entertained -- sometimes -- by minutiae but also I want to be aware of all situations. If your gal is so UTR what kind of situation were you in that another girl could just walk in. Not in anyway questioning your veracity, but maybe I'm questioning her actual discretion (as opposed to her stated desire to be anonymous) . I'm kind of in a phase where I'm only seeing girls I've seen before, and frankly as long as she'll see me maybe only one recent returnee, mostly because I value discretion and being anonymous.

[QUOTE=Norsem;2927463] If your gal is so UTR what kind of situation were you in that another girl could just walk in. [/QUOTE]I never said my gal was a UTR. My gal does not have incall, we were going into a room at the manor when the escort just happened to be walking down the sidewalk. Does that sound plausible to you?

[QUOTE=MojoGuy;2927544]I never said my gal was a UTR. My gal does not have incall, we were going into a room at the manor when the escort just happened to be walking down the sidewalk. Does that sound plausible to you?[/QUOTE]I really didn't mean to call you out as such. If anything, and you can make of this what you will, it sounded like your gal was being less than anonymous but now I see my error. I misunderstood and assumed it was an incall with another escort present. My own sense of paranoia has so flipped from lassize faire to vigilant on the last few weeks I don't want there to be another escort within a mile although the last few years have taught me you probably going go anywhere in Jefferson County without another escort having an incall within a mile, anywhere.

[QUOTE=Sexmoron;2927336]I don't really want in this discussion, but my curiosity is killing me. If the BigMack guy is so discreet, why did he make it public to begin with? Why didn't he just PM the ladies his answer?[/QUOTE]This guy gets it.

The man gave his word to not compromise the ladies identities and kept it. His right to do so. Whether we or anyone else doesn't like it or agree with it is mute. It was his place to make the agreement and keep it. He did To agree or disagree with it has no bearing. It was his decision not ours between them and him not us and them. Why he did it is his business not ours. It is no ones place to tell him he was wrong to not tell us who they were due to his assurances. Ladies do starve in this but mostly due to their own problems not because someone does not identify them and what they do in a session. If a lady wants discretion she should get it or not provide what is needed. It's that simple. This should all be over but some people just have to drag it out and keep it going. GET OVER IT. It's over and done. There will be no names forthcoming by his own admission so accept it and move on whether we like it or not. That's my take and that is my last word on the subject. Too many ladies in the midwest to spend time with to worry about two to give our companionship fees to.

[QUOTE=Sexmoron;2927336]I don't really want in this discussion, but my curiosity is killing me. If the BigMack guy is so discreet, why did he make it public to begin with? Why didn't he just PM the ladies his answer?[/QUOTE]Who knows, sometimes it easier to post a thank you instead of sending out PM's. He decided to do it this way, his choice.

[B]History of the War[/B]

[QUOTE=BigMack;2916803]For the ladies PM me and tell me what is on the menu...As I have said before discretion guaranteed I do not kiss lick or fk and tell. My moto is the Vegas moto always has been and always will be. Mack.[/QUOTE]Initial Post Makes it Clear.

[QUOTE=BigMack;2918308]Ladies appreciate the kind correspondence but am not into 20 year olds and a 22 year old. Thanks again to the two lovely young ladies who did respond and appreciate your time. Had a couple of men contact me with suggestions but that did not pan out either.[/QUOTE]Polite thank you mentioning two unknown ladies. How is this bad? I have seen many posts on this board about UTR's or special friends with distinct instructions that no info would be handed out. Isn't that worse than this. I really don't care about the other "teases" that's a mongers discretion. Heck one was about a redhead but I never blew up the board asking why would you post that without handing out information. So I'm not sure why this is bad.

[QUOTE=MillitaryMan69;2922539]When asked for info I gave him some then when I asked Big B'I'T'C'H gave the middle finger. Big B'I'T'C'H I'm giving you the middle finger now. Don't send any more PMs my way.[/QUOTE]Then when a monger is upset because he didn't get the info he wanted via PM he immediately attacks on the board. Why the attack? Sexmoron questioned why Mack didn't use PM's with the ladies but you didn't ask why all of this couldn't be handled in PM's between two mongers. Couldn't he have simply put up a post warning others that Mack held to his word that he wouldn't disclose information to others as he indicated in his first post so if someone PM's him info don't plan on it being reciprocated? Didn't he get what he wanted from the ladies in the below post?

[QUOTE=MillitaryMan69;2918493]Young ladies are my favorite. Send a PM my way ladies.[/QUOTE]A post to the ladies not to a monger.

Thus the start of a war on the board about each others opinion of discretion. What is not known are the unknown PM's behind the scenes between Mongers and Providers. We will never know because that's part of discretion. Mack outlined his discretion up front. If someone didn't agree with it then they shouldn't have supplied information to him. Now everyone knows what Mack's discretionary limits are so you have a choice to partake or not. Many times I do not partake in his requests because I know what he is looking for so if I don't have what he needs I don't help him. Simple to me.

[QUOTE=MojoGuy;2926154]I don't take MM as being a bully. I take him as one of the few on here who has the balls to stand up and speak out for or against whatever he thinks is wrong or right and without regard to what someone else may think about it. Anyone who gets their panties in a wad about that just needs to avoid the bbq thread. You mentioned LC, as it turned out LC himself eventually admitted to everything that MM "bullied" him about. As in other cases if MM is only stating the facts could it really be called bullying or in reality is it more like the cold, harsh truth? BTW, it's not cool to be a online grammar Nazi. We all screw up on grammar sometimes and if you read your post closely you screwed up on your grammar.[/QUOTE]I agree with you MG, but if someone has to emotionally attack every time they don't get their way or their opinion is challenged then what is it called? No it's not bullying but what is it? The whole thing could have been dealt with in an entirely different way. Everyone on this board may totally disagree with Mack's definition of discretion but it is his definition and he has the right to it. Just like MM69's definition of a loser is me. He has the right to define me that way in his MM69 dictionary. If losing money or giving it to an addict unwisely eventually helps that addict get clean or helping others monetarily is a loser by his definition, then I accept it. It's his opinion, nothing more nothing less. Others may share his opinion just like many others don't share his opinion. This board is full of opinions but why do some who don't get their way or are challenged have to strike out with such emotion? Stability is the key here. I finally realized that's why the BBQ and Fight Thread was started, to weed out the emotionally stable mongers and the disturbed mongers. If you don't believe me look at the Prickyard in Indy. It's clear, all in black and white, a war of an omnipotent attitude.

[blue][Deleted by Admin]

I don't know which chick you are but don't try to post as a guy. Chicks can post in this thread if they want but you can't try to pretend you aren't the girl you are talking about.

A2[/blue]

[QUOTE=Norsem;2927662]I really didn't mean to call you out as such. If anything, and you can make of this what you will, it sounded like your gal was being less than anonymous but now I see my error. I misunderstood and assumed it was an incall with another escort present. My own sense of paranoia has so flipped from lassize faire to vigilant on the last few weeks I don't want there to be another escort within a mile although the last few years have taught me you probably going go anywhere in Jefferson County without another escort having an incall within a mile, anywhere.[/QUOTE]No problem man. I knee jerked when I first read your response to my post as I initially took it like you were questioning my credibility. My bad for doing that.

[QUOTE=Sexmoron;2927336]I don't really want in this discussion, but my curiosity is killing me. If the BigMack guy is so discreet, why did he make it public to begin with? Why didn't he just PM the ladies his answer?[/QUOTE]It makes him look important, UTR girls galore, but doesn't have to prove anything. Reminds me of the exploits of LC, except LC named names.

I met this perfect girl who does everything I want for free, oh, but I can't tell you her name.

[QUOTE=Rlthree;2928132]It makes him look important, UTR girls galore, but doesn't have to prove anything. Reminds me of the exploits of LC, except LC named names.

I met this perfect girl who does everything I want for free, oh, but I can't tell you her name.[/QUOTE]There were some who agreed. I'm guilty of this too but my one purpose was to fish for info and see if anyone would PM.

[QUOTE=FreckleFreak;2927976]Who knows, sometimes it easier to post a thank you instead of sending out PM's. He decided to do it this way, his choice.

[B]History of the War[/B]


I pretend like I know everything . Please shoot me. I am sick.
[/QUOTE]Please check out all of this losers posts. He comes to Louisville to troll. He failed on this board as he has failed in life. Loser keep the trolling to the Indy boards were the yes men and seals will clap to the rhythm of your ignorance and thiers.

If you don't agree with this loser he will spam your posts all day long. He will get up on his high horse of failure and talk down to you.

[QUOTE=MillitaryMan69;2928177]There were some who agreed. I'm guilty of this too but my one purpose was to fish for info and see if anyone would PM.[/QUOTE]Is this what I need to do to get any good info?

[QUOTE=MillitaryMan69;2928184]Please check out all of this losers posts. He comes to Louisville to troll. He failed on this board as he has failed in life. Loser keep the trolling to the Indy boards were the yes men and seals will clap to the rhythm of your ignorance and thiers.

If you don't agree with this loser he will spam your posts all day long. He will get up on his high horse of failure and talk down to you.[/QUOTE]What you are talking about. This guy is very well respected by many including me!! He is a personal friend as well. He has more game then most on this board have. His parties at his house would make Ron Jeramy blush.