BackPage Advertiser Reviews

[QUOTE=Corneliusguy40;2137084]This may be a fake ad or a girl using someone else's pic. But that's besides the point of this quick rant.

[URL]http://charlotte.backpage.com/FemaleEscorts/the-best-is-back-nevermind-them-im-ready-to-please-you-p-19/17249124[/URL]

So is it just me or do ads that do the following make you annoyed (even when it's not about me.).

Top 5 ad techniques that annoy the piss out of me.

1. Using $ is ad titles or descriptions when it's not next to a rate or used to replace "s".

2. "Timewasters will be ignored or blacklisted. ".

3. Any references like "Good Service isn't Cheap" or "Only see generous men".

4. References to them selves in the 3rd person.

5. Deceptive pic strategies (aside from covering their face).

Aside from a cultural preference statement. Am I alone in this? Doesn't matter either way? Or are there others that will just make you pass as it seems to reveal their attitude. Or at least the attitude of the person who posted the ad.[/QUOTE]What bugs me is when they clamed to be "open minded" but then state "no black men" that do's sound very open minded to me!

[QUOTE=Corneliusguy40;2137084]This may be a fake ad or a girl using someone else's pic. But that's besides the point of this quick rant.

[URL]http://charlotte.backpage.com/FemaleEscorts/the-best-is-back-nevermind-them-im-ready-to-please-you-p-19/17249124[/URL]

So is it just me or do ads that do the following make you annoyed (even when it's not about me.).

Top 5 ad techniques that annoy the piss out of me.

1. Using $ is ad titles or descriptions when it's not next to a rate or used to replace "s".

2. "Timewasters will be ignored or blacklisted. ".

3. Any references like "Good Service isn't Cheap" or "Only see generous men".

4. References to them selves in the 3rd person.

5. Deceptive pic strategies (aside from covering their face).

Aside from a cultural preference statement. Am I alone in this? Doesn't matter either way? Or are there others that will just make you pass as it seems to reveal their attitude. Or at least the attitude of the person who posted the ad.[/QUOTE]The ones who say they're "well reviewed" in their ads, only to not have a single review to their name on any reputable website.

I thought the purpose was to review providers not make endless comments concerning advertisements. Lots of wasted space, IMO.

[QUOTE=WetLapper;2137320]I thought the purpose was to review providers not make endless comments concerning advertisements. Lots of wasted space, IMO.[/QUOTE]Please don't take this the wrong way but, unless there's a daily posting quota per user, having an on topic community discussion doesn't prevent people from ALSO posting about providers. We are not bashing any one girl with this topic, but I'll also point out for the sake of discussion (not argument) two things. 1. the girls and their handlers do visit sites like this. So if they give a rip about their business, maybe this can be a "teachable moment" for them. It can help them understand us better. 2. This, in my opinion IS about reviewing the girls on backpage which seems to fit the thread.

But I do respect your point. I want to read more intel on other's experience for sure! But as you can see by the timeline, it was a slow day in here yesterday.

[QUOTE=Corneliusguy40;2137978]Please don't take this the wrong way but, unless there's a daily posting quota per user, having an on topic community discussion doesn't prevent people from ALSO posting about providers. We are not bashing any one girl with this topic, but I'll also point out for the sake of discussion (not argument) two things. 1. the girls and their handlers do visit sites like this. So if they give a rip about their business, maybe this can be a "teachable moment" for them. It can help them understand us better. 2. This, in my opinion IS about reviewing the girls on backpage which seems to fit the thread.

But I do respect your point. I want to read more intel on other's experience for sure! But as you can see by the timeline, it was a slow day in here yesterday.[/QUOTE]For purpose of discussion, I agree that commenting on ads to the extent read by providers / handlers might serve to teach them how to place ads that have more credibility. Perhaps that teaching purpose should be part of the intention of the open forum. I agree that many of the comments are more about providers personally than being intel about experiences with them. It was a slow day as are most. Personally, I'd be in full support of substantially raising the percentage of posts in the public forum devoted to either (1) providing FIRST HAND (not rehashes of someone else's report) and RECENT (last two months) intel on sex experiences with providers or (2) legitimate inquiries about those experiences. Sometimes, to my dismay, I get gossipy and off point in the open forum. I find that 95% or more of reliable and targeted intel (exchanges of information on sex experiences) that I receive requests for, have provided, have received / seen is exchanged backchannel. Just an observation not a judgement.

Thanks for your well thought out views on the subject.

[QUOTE=WetLapper;2137320]I thought the purpose was to review providers not make endless comments concerning advertisements. Lots of wasted space, IMO.[/QUOTE]I saw this lady last week, non GFE and all covered but I had a nice time. Damage $100 hh.

[URL]http://charlotte.backpage.com/FemaleEscorts/naughty-by-nature-mya-south-charlotte-22/17109498[/URL]

[ATTACH=CONFIG]330340[/ATTACH][ATTACH=CONFIG]330339[/ATTACH][ATTACH=CONFIG]330338[/ATTACH][ATTACH=CONFIG]330341[/ATTACH].

[QUOTE=JcFallen;2138537]I saw this lady last week, non GFE and all covered but I had a nice time. Damage $100 hh.

[URL]http://charlotte.backpage.com/FemaleEscorts/naughty-by-nature-mya-south-charlotte-22/17109498[/URL]

[ATTACH=CONFIG]330340[/ATTACH][ATTACH=CONFIG]330339[/ATTACH][ATTACH=CONFIG]330338[/ATTACH][ATTACH=CONFIG]330341[/ATTACH].[/QUOTE]Now that's what I consider real in person recent and on target intel. Thanks immensely.

I was in the mood for a hot blonde so I had a dream of Bianca taste. First, she is not the girl in the picture. Red flag number one. She must have just checked in and had people lined up because she was extremely rushed.

Non GFE but there was a short BBBJ before the cover.

She did have a nice body but she looked late 30's at least. For the damage of 1. 5 I would definitely not repeat. However she did seem to have potential so YMMV. She was just way too rushed for me.

[URL]http://charlotte.backpage.com/FemaleEscorts/and-b-l-o-n-d-e-34/17320198[/URL]

[QUOTE=DaveGrow66;2138812]I was in the mood for a hot blonde so I had a dream of Bianca taste. First, she is not the girl in the picture. Red flag number one. She must have just checked in and had people lined up because she was extremely rushed.

Non GFE but there was a short BBBJ before the cover.

She did have a nice body but she looked late 30's at least. For the damage of 1. 5 I would definitely not repeat. However she did seem to have potential so YMMV. She was just way too rushed for me.

[URL]http://charlotte.backpage.com/FemaleEscorts/and-b-l-o-n-d-e-34/17320198[/URL][/QUOTE]Thanks for the intel. Was it 1. 5 for HJ or full hour. Where is her location? Seem safe?

[QUOTE=WetLapper;2138820]Thanks for the intel. Was it 1. 5 for HJ or full hour. Where is her location? Seem safe?[/QUOTE]1. 5 was for 30 minutes. I was out in 15. Nice hotel off s tryon. Very safe.

Haven't seen any posts for Brandi or her two other girls (Kasey and Dezeraii) in the past week or so. I know someone said they were planning to TOFTT with Kasey but haven't heard anything. Does anyone have any updated intel on these three?

Was going to toftt with Kasey. I tried calling a weekend or two ago but no answer. Oh well. I'd still like to see her if she pops back up.

[QUOTE=Forand06;2138882]Haven't seen any posts for Brandi or her two other girls (Kasey and Dezeraii) in the past week or so. I know someone said they were planning to TOFTT with Kasey but haven't heard anything. Does anyone have any updated intel on these three?[/QUOTE]Check Raleigh Backpage.

[URL]http://charlotte.backpage.com/FemaleEscorts/new-girl-in-raleigh-dezeraii-23/17193042[/URL]

[QUOTE=JcFallen;2139571]Check Raleigh Backpage.

[URL]http://charlotte.backpage.com/FemaleEscorts/new-girl-in-raleigh-dezeraii-23/17193042[/URL][/QUOTE]That goes to show me that they were coming up short on customers. They were on BP off and on like Brandi is trying to stay UTR. I have been seeing the BR Brandy and having good luck and reliable service.

Juliette is for real and does a good job. She is the girl in the pics, however the pics are a little old and she is a bit heavier. No problem though.

Opted for the QV for 60 and she began a nice flute lesson. She can really play the hell out of it too. Hitting high notes and low notes perfectly.

At the end the flute runneth over. CIMWS. Excellent.

[URL]http://charlotte.backpage.com/FemaleEscorts/juliette-come-unwindany-way-you-like-it-calltext-new-7045917391monday-505050-spcl-26/7312065[/URL]

GB40.