I Know Most Have Significant Others.
[QUOTE=KingKane;6410932]They all have real boyfriends their age. Some have husbands. They're just doing this internet thing for money.[/QUOTE]The way she replied to me made it sound like she was sneaking around and drama could be lurking around the corner. I've banged ones with BFs, and I've banged ones with husbands, but none of them gave me the sense that drama could ensue. Most have been in open relationships with no sneaking around, and I even met one of the BFs. I just prefer to avoid unnecessary drama.
1 photos
Current solution to discreet payment for SA membership
I posted about this in a preliminary way, search for that.
I found cards that are issued by Blackhawk. I include a picture of the exact card I used. When I bought it the cashier tore open a window on the back. Once I opened the packaging and saw the card, I recognized it from one I had long ago that worked.
I did go to the card website and put in a bunch of fake sugar info for the address, etc, and also put in a PIN.
I went to seeking and tried to pay with it. I got the usual message that they don't have a great success rate w / prepaid debit cards and they hope that I will use a major credit card. I went ahead anyway. I also used the discount code I posted about recently. The site was grinding away for a while, but ultimately, my membership renewal went through. With the discount. I gave up no personal information to do so.
2 photos
Death Nell for Secure Spend?
[QUOTE=FarFarAway;6430267]I posted about this in a preliminary way, search for that.
I found cards that are issued by Blackhawk. I include a picture of the exact card I used. When I bought it the cashier tore open a window on the back. Once I opened the packaging and saw the card, I recognized it from one I had long ago that worked.
I did go to the card website and put in a bunch of fake sugar info for the address, etc, and also put in a PIN.
I went to seeking and tried to pay with it. I got the usual message that they don't have a great success rate w / prepaid debit cards and they hope that I will use a major credit card. I went ahead anyway. I also used the discount code I posted about recently. The site was grinding away for a while, but ultimately, my membership renewal went through. With the discount. I gave up no personal information to do so.[/QUOTE]So are you giving up on the old OneVanilla, now Secure Spend, card?
1 photos
Seeking really has to stop this shit
Seeking really has to stop this shit.
Seeking I'd verification. Age?
Does anyone know if during I'd verification seeking confirms the SBs age on their I'd matches their age on their profile, or are they simply confirming their I'd is 18+ ?
Talking about Money Gets You Banned from SA!
[QUOTE=GeechieDan;6442432]See my attachment. I got this message not too long ago. It was my fault, because I mentioned "ppm". They were at least nice enough to warn me before I sent the message. I just found it interesting because I'd never gotten that before.[/QUOTE]Consider yourself extremely lucky, like winning the lottery! In the past stating anything that even remotely could be interpreted as P2 Play language got you banned from the site.
Best advice is talk stuff that has [U]nothing to do with P2P, allowance, PPM or whatever on the site[/U] and quickly get to PM / DM OFFSITE where you can talk PPM, allowance or P2 P!
Look, with the passage of FOSTA / SESTA that site, Seeking, is in the cross-hairs of LE. It is a cash cow for Bandon Wade. Every wonder how they stayed open when BackPage got knicked? Therefore, Wade IMMEDIATELY took steps to protect his business by instituting BOTS or AI to scan every e-mail looking for anything that could be inferred to be prostitution. When the BOT finds that, it was an immediate banishment. He had to do this, such that he could argue that his site was not prostitution related and thus not illegal. Protect the cash cow.
IF the site gives a pass, it could be considered "coaching" on how to get around their strict enforcement of no prostitution. That just opens the door for prosecution. That was part of what took BP down.
Now maybe there are so many dudes who never got the message and continue to use P2 P types of messages that they were banning a majority and decided to give warnings. IMHO that is a very risky move on SA's part as they are already trying to thread the needle legally in a very, very narrow loop-hole.