Printable View
[QUOTE=La Chic]Supere,
I'm changing the ASS (Alexus Street Syndrome) to PUSS (Prostitute Up Sell Syndrome). I'm sure you could definitely think up a couple more that might be more appropriate. LOL
Be Safe,
La Chic[/QUOTE]
I love them both. How about JERK-OFF? :Jenn Evades Realism (on the) K (and) Offends a Frequent Fornicator?
[QUOTE=Spider Dart]Lmao. I some times drive up and down the ave 10 times before I decide. Then I have to find her again.[/QUOTE]
You might spend some time looking until you see something you like, but I have rarely seen a good one around on a second pass. They get picked up in a hurry. It is my experience that you need to be ready to make an impulse purchase.:D
Jenn topless; nude; wide spread; with pacifier; with flogger; with ball gag in her mouth; holding the "cum piggie;" about to suck my cock; sucking my cock.
[QUOTE=Supereloquent]You might spend some time looking until you see something you like, but I have rarely seen a good one around on a second pass. They get picked up in a hurry. It is my experience that you need to be ready to make an impulse purchase.:D[/QUOTE]
I agree SuperE, good ones don't hang around very long. They ussually lie low for them not to be noticed by LE and when they are ready to be picked up they don't stay long on the Ave.. :-)
[QUOTE=Supereloquent]I love them both. How about JERK-OFF? :Jenn Evades Realism (on the) K (and) Offends a Frequent Fornicator?[/QUOTE]Perfecta!
La Chic
Has absolutly gorgeous tiny titties. So sexy! Would love to suck on them all night.
Great find.
[QUOTE=Andy Crew]Simply gorgeous! Treat her like a queen, gents.[/QUOTE]
If she treats us like kings, then she deserves to be treated like a queen. The K is a two way street.
The adage is wrong, I think: a dog isn't necessarily always too old to learn new tricks.
There was a time when I posted dozens of pics at a time to accompany a report. I just recently started to post them just 10 at a time and spaced out enough for viewers to better savor and enjoy them. I saw a tremendous increase in the "Number of Views" in the Photo Gallery. While there are many factors that affect the number of views (the number of pics of any one girl <the fewer pics of each girl, the tendency for there to be a greater number of views,> the attractiveness of the girl, the nature and quality of the poses, whether the picture is commercial or "real," how long the photos remain on the first few pages of the gallery), I have noticed an additional important factor which is the variety and type of the poses. There seems to be a boredom factor at work in looking at the same girl in relatively the same pose within the same set of pics (with some exceptions: viewers seem to all be budding gynecologists and just love the wide-spread beaver shots ;)). HOWEVER, this seems to disappear to some degree, and there are many more views of each pic, even within a set of 10, if one varies the "looks" of the photos enough within each set.
In the past, I not only bunched all the photos together with my report, but I also tended to keep them in chronological order from clothed, to undies, to posing with kinky props (if applicable), to nude to BJ pics. This meant that there might be strings of pics clothed, in undies, etc., which can admittedly be tedious to the eyes. I don't know why this obvious fact never occurred to me, but I just started to tell mini, more complete stories when posting each set of Jenn's pics, rather than posting one long chronological series with each set being a part of that series. This provided much more variety in the types of photos and poses within each set of 10 that I posted After all, there is nothing sacrosanct about chronological order. And, as a result, I noticed that the number of views for each photo was a lot higher.
Why did I do this? Firstly, I received some friendly and experienced advice by PM from a fellow monger about pic selection for posting. While I had a contention with his argument (so, what else is new? LOL), I also gave it considerable and careful thought, because it represented a professional's opinion (someone familiar with fashion photography, certainly a related field), and the argument was presented in a well-reasoned and well-intentioned manner. I tweaked the idea from its original form, but the idea itself is what got me thinking about photo variety and appeal to the eyes in the first place. Secondly, I can be stubborn in my ways, but I am not opposed to experimentation, especially based on wise counsel. Thirdly, contrary to popular belief, I do care what readers think in here, and I am usually willing to change my behavior based on affable and intelligent recommendations. Fourthly, I am not oblivious to what seems to work.
Jenn topless; with flogger; looking at my clamp; close-up of her pussy; her tight round ass; working on my shaft and licking my dick.
[QUOTE=Supereloquent]Jenn topless; with flogger; looking at my clamp; close-up of her pussy; her tight round ass; working on my shaft and licking my dick.[/QUOTE]Dang, This one is really hott!!!! Nice work. I love your pic's Keep up the good work.
[QUOTE=Bruce M]Has absolutly gorgeous tiny titties. So sexy! Would love to suck on them all night.
Great find.[/QUOTE]
I like big soft round titties and I like perky little titties as well. Big tits are absolutely made to grab and squeeze and knead with your hands and fingers, but almost any size titties can be fun to suck, especially if the nipples are nice. My grandfather, who was as wise as my grandmother, always told me that any more than you can fit in your mouth is a waste anyway. ;)
Jenn face close-ups; topless; sucking on her pacifier; with a dog-bone gag in her mouth; growls with handcuffs in her mouth; getting ready to suck me; kissing my cock; sucking my dick.
[QUOTE=Johnny Sokko]Dang, This one is really hott!!!! Nice work. I love your pic's Keep up the good work.[/QUOTE]
Thank you.
I am trying to keep my SW photography more variegated and interesting, but, as you already said, it helps when you have a good-looking subject. ;)
Her very good looks, her friendly, engaging smile, her (apparent) enjoyment of worshiping the shaft. Let's clone her, and make her more widely available.
Thanks for continuing your tradition of posting some of the best, hottest pix on the USASG.
[QUOTE=Supereloquent]Jenn face close-ups; topless; sucking on her pacifier; with a dog-bone gag in her mouth; growls with handcuffs in her mouth; getting ready to suck me; kissing my cock; sucking my dick.[/QUOTE]
[QUOTE=Giani]Her very good looks, her friendly, engaging smile, her (apparent) enjoyment of worshiping the shaft. Let's clone her, and make her more widely available.[/QUOTE]
She DOES look as good in person as she does on camera, has a very natural and engaging smile, and her enjoyment of worshiping the shaft is more than just apparent. This gal genuinely loves to suck and fuck.
However, before we clone her, let's make her even more perfect and get rid of her expectations of above-market pricing. If this girl wised up she could be making money every waking hour on the K and her rep would be second to none.
[QUOTE=Giani]Thanks for continuing your tradition of posting some of the best, hottest pix on the USASG.[/QUOTE]
You are most welcome, and thank YOU for your continued admiration of my work. Re: "The salivating crowd:" Be careful that you don't drool into your Cheerios. :D
Normally, the ideas for a sexual tryst come from the monger. It is rare that the reverse is true. So, you can imagine my delighted surprise when a SW approached me with the following idea.
Firstly, let me preface this by saying that this SW is absolutely outstanding in looks, attitude and sexual performance. I am not mentioning her name or even hinting about her identity, because she has asked me not to do that. However, she did give me permission to post her proposition to me. My only hope is that I can give it justice from its original context as presented to me.
Secondly, I wasn't even aware that this particular SW was into this sort of thing, so I guess one should never assume anything.
So, here goes: she told me that this had nothing to do with any "persuasion or plotting" with any other girl, that it was just an idea she had. She once had a best friend who overdosed, with whom she apparently used to get it on a long time ago, and it has been since then that she has been with a woman, but the feelings are coming back strong. She thought it would be REALLY hot to have a 3 or 4 some, including a few other SWs and me. She claims that lately she has been really REALLY attracted to a few girls out there, which hasn't happened for a very long time. She prides herself on being quite clean, and is very turned off by uncleanliness, dirty teeth, dirty feet, etc. However, recently she has gotten pretty friendly with a few SWs, and finds herself turned on by a few of these girls, and they have absolutely no clue, which she thinks is the funniest part of it.
She is almost reluctant to bring up the subject with the girls in question, because she doesn't even know if the girls to whom she is attracted (with a few exceptions, where she does know that they are) are into other girls, or especially other SWs. She doesn't want them to think she is totally nasty or whatever for having these feelings, but she would want to make it perfectly clear that she would only want to consider girls who are very clean, and she knows (or is as reasonably certain as one can be on the K) always practice safe sex.
She mentioned a number of very specific girls for looks, personality (which seems to be an extremely important factor, female to female) and sexual appetite. She likes the idea of going down on these girls and pleasing them and receiving in return. She would prefer clean shaven in that regard, and is willing to shave the girl if the girl is willing.
I never was aware how turned on this SW is to other girls. She was talking about their nice tits, and how hot they looked and acted, and was especially turned on by the ones that seemed to really like sex. She affectionately referred to them as "nymphos".
She says she gets wet just thinking about getting it on with these SW "hotties," and that it would be no fun at all without also having a "big dick in the mix." I am actually flattered that she would consider me for this role.
She says how fun this would be, and that it would almost be like a brand new experience for her, because it's been so long. She reminded me she knows how to suck dick real good (as if I didn't already know! LOL). She also knows how she likes her pussy eaten, so she is SURE she knows exactly how any girl wants hers eaten. However, she only wants to do this if she/they were just as interested in it as her, and not just as some pretend thing for a date. She wants the girl(s) screaming and cumming from her tongue action, and she wants to get tongued in return, and she wants to suck and fuck me, and watch the others suck and fuck me too. Anyway, she wants to hook this up, and is horny just thinking about it.
SOOOOOO....it sounds like a great idea and I look forward to seeing if we can make something happen.
You just have to love the name and cute round face and tats of this BP ad poster from Louisville:
[url=http://www.usasexguide.info/forum/attachment.php?attachmentid=110004]Sluttypie's Tats and Tiny Tits[/url]
[url=http://www.usasexguide.info/forum/attachment.php?attachmentid=110005]Sluttypie's Arm Tats and with Cum Dribble on Her Black Top[/url]
Cute young chubby gals are among the best IMHO for a nice BJ, but this gal wants 150 for an hour? GEEEEEZ! She's cute, and MAYBE she gives great head, and MAYBE she is even is a good fuck, but 150? This is what I will never understand about BP patrons. I recently picked up a very cute young chubby gal on the K (cuter than Sluttypie IMHO) with MUCH nicer tits and a pretty nice hourglass body for a chubby girl, and we did 3 excellent long cups of BBJCIMSW in my car for 30 and a Big Mac with a soda (after all, she needed to keep up her strength, LOL).
When I am finished posting Jenn's pics I will post my report and pics on my "chubby car date" and you can judge for yourself. However, I think the Ave is still the best bargain around, ESPECIALLY compared to the internet.
[QUOTE=Hortense]Your intentions are good, your photos are good, your sharing is good. Keep it up.[/QUOTE]
A carrot: good start.
[QUOTE=Hortense]But please quit trying to impress us about yourself.[/QUOTE]
A big stick emerges: tsk, tsk. Why should you give a shit who I am or what I do? Just enjoy the sharing and the pretty pictures. If this negative remark was intended to change my behavior or "shut me up" about certain things, then you need to take some rudimentary courses in psychology. However, if you just wanted to thump your chest in protest like your evolutionary cousins at the zoo, you have succeeded.
[QUOTE=Hortense]The "business associates", the "ivy league education", the multiple cups, the free fuck girl at the ready, the great "grammar" knowledge (which you often confuse with "usage"), the writing of a book, etc. All of these are highly suspect.[/QUOTE]
So you say. You don't know me, so it is easy to say anything you like. I am a professional businessman, so I have "business associates." I have both undergraduate and graduate degrees from Ivy League Universities; that is just another FACT. I do multiple cups; if you can't, then tough shit; some of us are blessed/cursed with an extremely high sex drive. I have a fuck buddy; I am sure many here do; that is nothing extraordinary. I try to use grammar and spelling the best I can; my writing speaks for itself. I AM writing a book and have been for some time, and announcing it in here has placed me in touch with a few editors willing to help me with it in various ways, and they have already made some valuable suggestions, and made me aware of a number of interesting publishing routes. That is terrific, because I can write reasonably well and have the experiences to relate in an autobiographical sense, but I lay no claim to being a great editor or knowing the world of publishing. ALL of these are highly suspect? Why do you give a shit in the first place, if you don't believe them? Like I already said, use the knowledge I present and look at the pics, and SHUT THE FUCK UP about everything else.
[QUOTE=Hortense]The word "variegated" is the latest example. I suppose, once again, you looked it up before using it, thinking it was high-minded, and then tossed it into a sentence as though you had been using it all your life. Please. Your plants are variegated, not your photos.[/QUOTE]
So, I used ONE word wrong out of thousands. You seem to like to pick the same nits as some others in here when I make the tiniest little mistake. That would seem in tune with your desire to beat your chest in complaint like our primate cousins. They enjoy preening one another of those nasty little critters as well. If you want to be an editor, I can suggest a few other contributors in here who make more spelling and grammatical and word usage errors in one post than I am likely to make in a lifetime.
[QUOTE=Hortense]All this said, you rank high in this forum, recognized by the administrator, fellow posters, and yes, even this lowly lurker.[/QUOTE]
At least you ended with another carrot.
[QUOTE=Hortense]But a little bit more humility and veracity. Please.[/QUOTE]
The veracity is already there; whether you accept that or not is beyond my control. More humility?: I will take it under advisement. A wise man once said that humility is freedom from thinking about yourself. By that measure I wouldn't post anything in here at all. A certain amount of hubris comes with the territory. Or, as Ted Turner once put it: "If I only had a little humility, I would be perfect." ;)
[QUOTE=Hortense]The word "variegated" is the latest example. I suppose, once again, you looked it up before using it, thinking it was high-minded, and then tossed it into a sentence as though you had been using it all your life. Please. Your plants are variegated, not your photos.[/QUOTE]
As a PS to my earlier response:
I SO agree that egregious errors like this must be assiduously pointed out, so that we can all aspire to perfect grammar and word usage on here. I don't have the time to do this, because I am too busy with mundane tasks, like reporting on SWs and taking their pics, but you seem to have plenty of time on your hands for this assignment, especially given your incredibly useful and informational posting history. I would suggest again; however, that there are far richer target environments for your gallant efforts than my occasional faux pas.
[QUOTE=Supereloquent]As a PS to my earlier response:
I SO agree that egregious errors like this must be assiduously pointed out, so that we can all aspire to perfect grammar and word usage on here. I don't have the time to do this, because I am too busy with mundane tasks, like reporting on SWs and taking their pics, but you seem to have plenty of time on your hands for this assignment, especially given your incredibly useful and informational posting history. I would suggest again; however, that there are far richer target environments for your gallant efforts than my occasional faux pas.[/QUOTE]
He has 20 mighty impressive posts so give him a break. Hahahaha
[QUOTE=Supereloquent]All I have to say in reply is: [b]Antiquis temporibus, nati tibi similes in rupibus ventosissimis exponebantur ad necem. [/b] :D[/QUOTE]I'm no latin scholar, but I did stay at a Holiday Inn.
Quisque comoedus est.
Quando podeces te regi eorum fecerunt? :o
[QUOTE=Tha X Facta]I'm no latin scholar, but I did stay at a Holiday Inn.[/QUOTE]
GREAT reply X!
[QUOTE=Tha X Facta]Quisque comoedus est.
Quando podeces te regi eorum fecerunt? :o[/QUOTE]
Gotta LOVE that one! The assholes must have made me king while my back was turned. LOL.
All in good funnin:
Te futueo et caballum tuum. :D
[QUOTE=Supereloquent]GREAT reply X!
Gotta LOVE that one! The assholes must have made me king while my back was turned. LOL.
All in good funnin:
Te futueo et caballum tuum. :D[/QUOTE]
Derideo te! :D
[b]X[/b] Out
[QUOTE=Malodr]He has 20 mighty impressive posts so give him a break. Hahahaha[/QUOTE]
Yes, I read them all in about 5 minutes: quite a profound body of contributions. That's why I suggested he might have a higher calling in correcting the writing of the more seriously grammatically challenged. There HAVE to be juicier victims on here than I. :D
Hortense, you went and ruined it for me.
[QUOTE=Hortense]
The word "variegated" is the latest example. I suppose, once again, you looked it up before using it, thinking it was high-minded, and then tossed it into a sentence as though you had been using it all your life. Please. Your plants are variegated, not your photos.
[/QUOTE]
[QUOTE=Joe Cocker]Hortense, you went and ruined it for me.[/QUOTE]
OMG that was funny! You have to have been following this argument closely to "get it:" variegated?...vitiligo?...VERY clever! :D
Super,
Based upon your experience ( and I can say it is legion) where do you think the better overall quality SWs are, Philly or South Jersey?
I hate to sound like the devil but it seems this recession and the new high in the poverty rate (see today's news) has forced nicer looking talent out onto the streets. ??
[QUOTE=Scarlet Kink]Super,
Based upon your experience ( and I can say it is legion) where do you think the better overall quality SWs are, Philly or South Jersey?[/QUOTE]
In all fairness, I have mongered much more and for a longer time in Philly than in Camden, but I feel I have mongered in Camden enough to have a perspective sufficiently informed to make a comparison. I don't want to denigrate either place because each has its good points. I would have to say that both locations have a number of truly outstanding SWs, but it is my experience that Philly tends to have more in this category, a more constantly changing variety of SWs, and a greater number of SWs in general. Also, Camden seems to have more SWs at the mediocre to bottom end of the scale than Philly. In Philly, you also occasionally get a chance to find a girl that is not typically drug-addicted and/or with a pimp. See 2 recent posts I did on this for details:
[url=http://www.usasexguide.info/forum/showpost.php?p=1061825&postcount=2239]Philly SW "Stats"[/url]
[url=http://www.usasexguide.info/forum/showpost.php?p=1062252&postcount=2244]More Philly SW "Stats"[/url]
So, Philly would be my choice for "better overall quality" if the issue were forced to an either/or vote. But that does not mean that I would recommend ignoring Camden. There is some good hunting there also, and a few real gems.
[QUOTE=Junky11]I hate to sound like the devil but it seems this recession and the new high in the poverty rate (see today's news) has forced nicer looking talent out onto the streets. ??[/QUOTE]
There have been more SWs on the K lately, in my experience, outside the norm of the more typical drug-addicted and/or pimp-affiliated girls. But, this is not some brand new development. It is a change IMHO that has been going on ever since the recession began. Rather than pulling some estimate out of my ass, I looked over the SWs I have dated in 2009 and 2010, and reported on in here, and here is my own personal breakdown:
2009: Classic drug-addicted and/or pimp-affiliated SWs: 34 (69%)
Other (mostly just girls looking to make some extra dough): 15 (31%)
2010: Classic drug-addicted and/or pimp-affiliated SWs: 44 (73%)
Other (mostly just girls looking to make some extra dough): 16 (27%)
I certainly don't pretend to portray all the SW activity on the Ave, but this is a pretty good representative sampling. It may just be reflective of my personal preferences, but the stats are interestingly pretty consistent from 2009 t0 2010: roughly 2/3 to 1/3 in the categories noted: something to think about.
Jenn close-up; topless; with ball-gag; with a flogger; afraid of clamp; spreading her pussy with her fingers; kissing, licking and sucking my cock.
Jenn topless; in her "rowwwwr" cat pose; sucking a pacifier; holding and kissing the "cum piggie;" kissing my cock and sucking it all the way down.
And, oh, for you money-shot lovers: take a close look at:
[url=http://www.usasexguide.info/forum/attachment.php?attachmentid=110147]My Sticky Fresh Cum Drooling from Jenn's Lips to My Cock[/url]
The money-pic is hot, but it is just a preview. There are hotter yet money-shots to "cum." :)
[QUOTE=Supereloquent]There have been more SWs on the K lately, in my experience, outside the norm of the more typical drug-addicted and/or pimp-affiliated girls. But, this is not some brand new development. It is a change IMHO that has been going on ever since the recession began. Rather than pulling some estimate out of my ass, I looked over the SWs I have dated in 2009 and 2010, and reported on in here, and here is my own personal breakdown:
2009: Classic drug-addicted and/or pimp-affiliated SWs: 34 (69%)
Other (mostly just girls looking to make some extra dough): 15 (31%)
2010: Classic drug-addicted and/or pimp-affiliated SWs: 44 (73%)
Other (mostly just girls looking to make some extra dough): 16 (27%)
I certainly don't pretend to portray all the SW activity on the Ave, but this is a pretty good representative sampling. It may just be reflective of my personal preferences, but the stats are interestingly pretty consistent from 2009 t0 2010: roughly 2/3 to 1/3 in the categories noted: something to think about.[/QUOTE]
Got to love the stats.
SE: This pic is the all time hottest you've ever posted. Thanks. Dripper.
[QUOTE=Malodr]Got to love the stats.[/QUOTE]
I wasn't sure whether you were admiring the quantity of my SW encounters, or the information they were delivering, but thank you on either count.
More "stats:" I have been contributing to this Forum less than 2 years now, but I have reported on and/or posted pics of more than 150 [b]DIFFERENT[/b] SWs (including both Philly and Camden), not to mention many I have reported on and/or posted pics of on more than one occasion. And, as many of you are already well aware from my latest 4000th SW Pic Anniversary Contest, I have posted more than 4000 SW pics and I am well on my way to 5000.
In my head I was thinking that a rough estimate of 1 in 3 SWs on the K is actually just some gal down on her luck: out of work, single Mom from the burbs, girl who just moved to Philly from somewhere else (maybe even with a bf) and is looking to make some extra money for food and rent, a "normal" chick just supplementing her income, or a college student trying to make some extra dough for school expenses. etc. I think you have a better chance of finding these girls the more time you spend exploring the K because: even though these SWs seem to look better than most, and tend to be very accommodating providers and actually enjoy sex, they don't have a daily habit to feed, are not out as much, are usually out in the day as opposed to the evening or at night, and don't tend to remain on the Ave for long. It is not an absolute daily necessity, nor something they intend to do for a long time. I think there are many more out there than you think because they seem to come and go more quickly than the girls who are drug-addicted and/or with pimps.
Counting my actual experiences on the K confirmed my rough estimate of 1 in 3 almost exactly, and it was consistent for 2009 and 2010 to date. That's a side benefit of keeping a running public log of one's SW exploits.
The situation in Camden is far different IMHO. I have yet to run into a SW in Camden who was not a heroin junkie, with the exceptions of convincing a dancer in a strip bar and a few "occasional SWs" in GC to allow me to take pics and be intimate for a "reward." :) Maybe there are some non-junkies roaming Broadway or the strolls in East Camden; however, I haven't met one yet.
[QUOTE=Dripper]SE: This pic is the all time hottest you've ever posted. Thanks. Dripper.[/QUOTE]
Thanks. Here is the shot you referenced, in case anyone is only just recently recovering from a bout of temporary blindness, LOL:
[url=http://www.usasexguide.info/forum/attachment.php?attachmentid=110147]My Sticky Fresh Cum Drooling from Jenn's Lips to My Cock[/url]
Dripper, your screen name says it all. You must clearly be an aficianado of money-shots. I agree with you that the above money-shot I recently posted of Jenn was VERY hot, but, trust me, I have a few more to "cum" that are hotter still. :)
Jenn topless; sucking on her finger; close-up of her ass; chewing on handcuffs; with ball gag; spreading her pussy lips with her fingers; licking and sucking on my cock...
AND, [b]another great money shot: my cock and her lips glistening wet with my cum![/b]
[QUOTE=Supereloquent]I wasn't sure whether you were admiring the quantity of my SW encounters, or the information they were delivering, but thank you on either count.
Counting my actual experiences on the K confirmed my rough estimate of 1 in 3 almost exactly, and it was consistent for 2009 and 2010 to date. That's a side benefit of keeping a running public log of one's SW exploits.[/quote]Super,
I have to say you are the Frommer's guide to SW. I have been perusing the photos pages of many of the forums and without a doubt you and Cookyjar have the best overall quality pictures and reports. I live in maryland but as a result of your tireless investigative style, have made a decision to visit the City of Brotherly Love for a weeks vacation and try my hand ( and other appendages) on the streets of Philly. Thanks for the great tips and tactics, wish I could tip a few beers with you sometime.
[QUOTE=Scarlet Kink]Super,
I have to say you are the Frommer's guide to SW. I have been perusing the photos pages of many of the forums and without a doubt you and (censored) have the best overall quality pictures and reports. I live in maryland but as a result of your tireless investigative style, have made a decision to visit the City of Brotherly Love for a weeks vacation and try my hand ( and other appendages) on the streets of Philly. Thanks for the great tips and tactics, wish I could tip a few beers with you sometime.[/QUOTE]
Thank you so much. I use Frommer's all the time for travel. They do a fantastic job. So, comparing me with them is high praise indeed. I suppose if they included a SW section in their Philly area guide with my reports, advice, tips and photos they would be even more popular, LOL.
Have fun on your "vacation" to our fair city.
Is there a better pair of tits on the Ave. If there is I haven't seen a pic of them yet. Her tits are incredible.