Printable View
You make a good point. I know there are some real hotties out there, but It becomes very time consuming to page through 2 or 3 pages of the same girl when you don't have a 4G phone. It is what it is though so if the mods don't take action, I'll just have to get a better phone.
True, but you have admire both Cookiejar and Supereloquent because both men are in their 60s. God bless them for enjoying their golden years.
[QUOTE=Waldo57;1089820]True, but you have admire both Cookiejar and Supereloquent because both men are in their 60s. God bless them for enjoying their golden years.[/QUOTE]Man, I hope I'm that able bodied and still on the prowl, when I make it to my 60's. That's impressive.
[QUOTE=Waldo57;1089820]True, but you have admire both Cookiejar and Supereloquent because both men are in their 60s. God bless them for enjoying their golden years.[/QUOTE]How do you know? Are you LE? Have you been checking-up on us? I don't remember ever mentioning an age? It's not in my profile? Oop! I am so sorry. I did mention that I served in the, 'Vietnam War. '
Hmmmmm! Then again, maybe it's a misdirection ploy. I could be a bright 16yo wise enough to put out wrong information in an effect to misdirect LE and people like you.
[QUOTE=Socalcasualguy;1089878]Man, I hope I'm that able bodied and still on the prowl, when I make it to my 60's. That's impressive.[/QUOTE]Don't believe everything you read.
CookyJar
PS: SuperElquent is actually 24yo. He had his BA at 17, his Masters at 19 and his Doctorate last year.
I did leave this message in the profile section of this Member on the Porn site.
[quote]Badri: I am Street Steve from USASG and I see you have used all my pictures in your Prostitutes section. If you want to continue to use my pictures then give me and USASG in Philly credit. Also stop calling then working girls and Hookers. They are real Street Walkers in the Philly area and we in Philly are quite protective of them. To everyone else know that I will start posting my pictures of Street Walkers on this site soon. If people are going to steal my stuff and post them-I want them to be from my originals and much larger and higher resolution then you see on Badr'si page.[/quote]Street Steve
This is his response
[quote]Yeah, I know. But people here on ImageFap search for the terms "working girls, Hookers, and Prostitutes" more frequently than "Street Walkers", I have no offensive ideas, its just that the search system here is not very good. If you do a search here for "Street Walkers" then you will only find 3 galleries / entries, so that is not very effective. Anyways, I love your stuff, especially how the girls have "real street look". I love when you take the pics of their asses. Yeah, I took your pics from ISG, but I did not have anything bad in mind, just posting the pics of the girls and women that I like and hope that others will find it useful. Sharing is caring. I think that you posted yesterday or couple of days ago on ISG on how people are copying your stuff. I also like CookieJar's and Superloquent's (or whatever his name is) stuff. I'd love to see the high-res pic.[/quote]This is what I wrote back.
[quote]ok Pal-I am glad you are a fan. However if you want to use my stuff. Just give ME and USASG Philly credit-this will also add to your authenticity. If you need to repost them to do so, then do it.
"I think that you posted yesterday or couple of days ago on ISG on how people are copying your stuff[/quote]I was referring to you. Use the words Prostitutes and Street Walkers-NOT working girls or Hookers. Do this out of respect for Me and Them. I will post this debate on USASG Philly. We all need to be thinking about these issues and I know they are interested in what happens to our pictures"
PS, the word "working girls" is a word that USASG keeps substituting for another word he uses that begins with a W-which is much worst.
Street
What does this have to do with the thread 'General Reports'? This is a thread for reporting on sex with women, not rambling opinions and Wikipedia excerpts. Put the same effort into a report about a hot girl you found and help us all out. You are obviously smart and a good writer so I think that you could write some awesome reports on SW's, AMPs, escorts or UTR civies. So what are you finding out there dude, let us know.
[QUOTE=Phillyewe; 1105608]I've always been a fan of good writing in this forum. Even those whose exploits or attributes were questionable have warranted praise from me for their writing style. To those whose prose approaches the eloquence of, say, Dark Phoenix, Old Dog, DukePV, or Mike 80, I say right on!
Here's an excerpt from [i]Wikipedia[/i]'s definition of eloquence: "the ability to understand and command the language in such a way that one employs a graceful style coupled with the power of persuasion."
Eloquence, however, has a responsibility that goes along with it: integrity. Every time one speaks or writes the audience must know that the words belong to the author. If the words are from another source and are not attributed, then they might easily be there to make a wrongful impression, willfully or not, of the writer's erudition.
You don't necessarily have good command of a language if you are simply quoting without attribution. And you are not necessarily eloquent because you say you are, or leave an impression that you are.
I'm sure Leonardo di Vinci would agree with all this. Like many of us, he was interested in anatomy, and he was also a good writer. Surely he would have been an eloquent contributor here. Born 500 years too soon!
Unfortunately he has been described, using the exact words from the clip below, elsewhere in this forum without attribution. Sorry about that Leo. In the interest of integrity, good writing and eloquence in this forum, let me set the record straight. The following bio clip is from [b]Wikipedia[/b]:
[indent][i]Leonardo di ser Piero the Vinci (April 15, 1452 – May 2, 1519) was an Italian polymath: painter, sculptor, architect, musician, scientist, mathematician, engineer, inventor, anatomist, geologist, cartographer, botanist and writer. Leonardo has often been described as the archetype of the Renaissance man, a man whose unquenchable curiosity was equaled only by his powers of invention. He is widely considered to be one of the greatest painters of all time and perhaps the most diversely talented person ever to have lived. [/i][/indent][/QUOTE]Please refer to Jackson's edit of your last post.
[QUOTE=Phillyewe; 1008709][blue]Gentlemen,
The purpose of this Forum is to provide for the exchange of information between Men on the subject of finding Women for Sex.
Let's get back to the subject.
Thank You,
Jackson[/blue][/QUOTE]I'm sorry that my response to your report is also off topic for the thread, and that it is in no way eloquently written, but I'm off to the K for some fun.
Play Safe,
SR
[QUOTE=Phillyewe;1105608]I've always been a fan of good writing in this forum. Even those whose exploits or attributes were questionable have warranted praise from me for their writing style. To those whose prose approaches the eloquence of, say, Dark Phoenix, Old Dog, DukePV, or Mike 80, I say right on! [/QUOTE]Hi Phillyewe,
I remember you from the, "Good Ole Days." I cannot remember if you were friend or foe; either way it is always nice to see a familiar user name.
CookyJar
I am going to use this General Reports thread to air some thoughts. It seems to me that the other threads in the Philly forum are topic-specific and that this thread is more amenable to discussions and observations of a more general nature.
Nothing in this post is about a specific encounter with a specific SW so right away I know some out there will raise that old charge 'what does this have to do with having sex with women? '
Well, all of us here are into sex with women but there are all sorts of ways that we find it or want it. And there are all sorts of topics of interest all related somehow to the hunt. The range of what is 'on topic' is very broad.
Unless I am mistaken (and I've been a member for a long time) this discussions on this forum have NOT been limited to discussing paid sex. There should be nothing wrong with discussing amateurs and how to find them, places to take a girl (whether she's being paid or not) or what to do with a girl (whether she's being paid or not). There should be nothing wrong with discussing what we like to do with a girl (amateur or SW).
Topics that have gotten a lot of interest here include the cars we drive for mongering; the cameras we use to take pictures; the drugs that some SWs use; the street scene and the life that breeds the SWs we see out there; the clothing or accessories that some men put on the girl before or during sex because it thrills them; the words that some men use when having sex (that never-ending 'cum piggy' topic). There has even been a lot of attention paid by some to the grammar used on this forum. Some posts are two lines long and others are quite lurid and eloquent. At least one poster here prides himself on his eloquence so what in the world was wrong with one monger discussing the topic of 'eloquence'? JEEZ! Leave the guy alone if that's what he wanted to discuss in the context of the posts on this forum.
What goes on in this forum. Especially this Philly forum that is so busy and so populated with prolific sex addicts. Is sometimes just an opportunity to discuss what the poster wants to discuss. And so long as it relates. However remotely. To sex with women it should be 'on topic. '
For some men, sex with a woman is wham-bam-thank-you-Ma'am. For others, it is seduction. The hunt, the dance, the pleasure. Some want more detail, other just want the essential facts. Some want to see pictures of just the girl with no part of the man, others want to see the girl actively engaged in the sex act. Variety, gentlemen, is what makes this and everything we do in life more interesting. Variety in our discussions should be tolerated and even encouraged. Jumping on someone just because YOU weren't interested in what he had to say or jumping on someone just because YOU didn't like the poses in his pictures or the language that he used, just seems awfully small minded to me.
Anyway, those are my humble opinions.
– Forth Ryte
"For some men, sex with a woman is wham-bam-thank-you-Ma'am. For others, it is seduction. The hunt, the dance, the pleasure. Some want more detail, other just want the essential facts. Some want to see pictures of just the girl with no part of the man, others want to see the girl actively engaged in the sex act. Variety, gentlemen, is what makes this and everything we do in life more interesting. Variety in our discussions should be tolerated and even encouraged. Jumping on someone just because YOU weren't interested in what he had to say or jumping on someone just because YOU didn't like the poses in his pictures or the language that he used, just seems awfully small minded to me" Quote by Forth Ryte.
"Eloquently" put Forth Ryte. A good reminder to us all that it's "different strokes for different folks."
La Chic
[QUOTE=Forth Ryte;1106455]Topics that have gotten a lot of interest here include the cars we drive for mongering; the cameras we use to take pictures; the drugs that some SWs use; the street scene and the life that breeds the SWs we see out there; the clothing or accessories that some men put on the girl before or during sex because it thrills them; the words that some men use when having sex (that never-ending 'cum piggy' topic). There has even been a lot of attention paid by some to the grammar used on this forum. Some posts are two lines long and others are quite lurid and eloquent.[/QUOTE]Actually, I don't have any issue with the topics you listed.
[QUOTE=Forth Ryte;1106455]At least one poster here prides himself on his eloquence so what in the world was wrong with one monger discussing the topic of 'eloquence'? JEEZ! Leave the guy alone if that's what he wanted to discuss in the context of the posts on this forum.[/QUOTE]If you read Phillyewe's post, it wasn't a discussion of 'eloquence' AT ALL! It was a veiled attempt to attack SuperE's integrity. He was bashing Super for plagerizing Di Vinci because Super used a quote and didn't attribute the words as Di Vinci's. Phillyewe didn't even have the guts to attack Super in the thread where this horrible violation of ethics occured. LOL.
[QUOTE=Forth Ryte;1106455]What goes on in this forum. Especially this Philly forum that is so busy and so populated with prolific sex addicts. Is sometimes just an opportunity to discuss what the poster wants to discuss. And so long as it relates. However remotely. To sex with women it should be 'on topic. '[/QUOTE]I agree, however Phillyewe's post had nothing to do with any of that, it was just a failed attempt at a 'clever' attack.
[QUOTE=Forth Ryte;1106455]Jumping on someone just because YOU weren't interested in what he had to say or jumping on someone just because YOU didn't like the poses in his pictures or the language that he used, just seems awfully small minded to me.[/QUOTE]Hey, I was just confronting someone that I saw as a bully. Sorry you didn't follow what it was that Phillyewe was really saying. I did specifically ask him to post actual reports because I think he is a good writer. I didn't jump on him "because YOU didn't like the poses in his pictures or the language that he used" There were no pictures, and I like the fact that he posted in english. I just didn't like the attack.
SR.
Anyway, those are my humble opinions.
Forth Ryte[/QUOTE]
[QUOTE=Forth Ryte; 1106455]. Jumping on someone just because YOU weren't interested in what he had to say or jumping on someone just because YOU didn't like the poses in his pictures or the language that he used, just seems awfully small minded to me.
Anyway, those are my humble opinions.
– Forth Ryte[/QUOTE]Forth Ryte.
The same goes for you, Forth Ryte. I remember you from the,"Good Ole Days." I cannot remember if you were friend or foe; either way it is always nice to see a familiar user name.
In response to you excellent point: every time I read the phase, "The purpose of this forum is," I cringe. It is usually used by those who offer little.
In my own defense; I try not to put down others and their likes and dislikes. I have on occasion pointed out my own opinions, likes and dislikes. For example, I personally do not like looking at another man's member. I also have a bunch of other dislikes, likes and opinions. I don't mind expressing them when I feel the need. And, I don't mind others expressing their likes, dislikes and opinions – whenever they feel a need.
JMHO.
Please forgive the bad grammar.
CookyJar
[QUOTE=Davey1965;1108136]Yes that is correct and I've never been a rock thrower. But as Jackson has stated many times, the purpose of this board is for sharing information about SW'ers. That's all I've ever done and when I see info about non-swers well I just had to open my mouth.[/QUOTE]To his discredit, Jackson did not delete SE's 30 November post slamming me, which I reported:
[url=http://www.usasexguide.info/forum/showthread.php?5976-Supereloquent-s-Reports-Philadelphia&p=1098788&viewfull=1#post1098788]SE's 30 November post #2838[/url]
I had indeed received contact information from SE. This board and the pics of her he had posted came up in my conversation with the WG in question. After all, SE has always claimed he has at least implied permission from his pic subjects. She was someone still having a civilian identity to protect, and was stunned and repulsed to find out about it. The episode made me rethink my participation on this board.
[url=http://www.usasexguide.info/forum/newreply.php?do=newreply&p=1108136]The rest of the exchange involving Davey1965 can be seen here.[/url]
I love sex!
I just got word that next year I'll be able to purchase season tickets to the eagles games so I'll be making quite a few visits up you guys way.
[QUOTE=Jicarlo;1110775]I just got word that next year I'll be able to purchase season tickets to the eagles games so I'll be making quite a few visits up you guys way.[/QUOTE]No Eagles next season. When collective bargaining ends in March habits will change.