BackPage Advertiser Reviews

[QUOTE=Skybound;2484829][URL]http://memphis.backpage.com/FemaleEscorts/mit-and-jordans-specials-901-481-6093/13033131[/URL]

Stage Name is Cassie and has this ad on Backpage. I talked to her in advance. She advertises $50 qs, which I would take as being a "quick session. " We had agreed in advance on $100 for a half hour. She was very wary of law enforcement. She asked me again and again about being law enforcement. I had to keep calling over and over as I got off the exit where she would be, what hotel she was located at, what floor she was on, what room she was in. Finally, I got in the room. She had no clothes, just a towel. She said her clothes were being washed.

Even though we had agreed on $100, she wanted more. I gave her all I had, $145. She said $200 would be "the full treatment," but that she would "work with me. " After all that, all I got was a hand job with a condom, where she didn't even finish me. She then gave me a "massage," which was just barely light touching. The session lasted, maybe, 15 minutes.

She kept telling me, over and over, "I am a professional. " She probably said it a dozen times. She kept saying it after she wouldn't finish me, when she stopped after the 15 minutes. Over and over, she said she did what she did "because I'm a professional. " Plus, she had all kinds of tattoos, and was rough looking for 24.

Easily the worst session I have ever had, or could ever imagine having. When I left, a bag of clothes for her was waiting outside the room. I am guessing that it was left there by her pimp, who was probably in the next room. The hotel was a run-down former chain hotel, filled with pimps and escorts. Very shady.

This is the first time I have ever used Backpage, and it will certainly be my last! I am guessing it is the Wild West of the provider business.

I would certainly advise anyone: 1.) Do not go to see a provider unless she is at a decent hotel / motel. Tell her in advance that you will not go in if it isn't a hotel / motel where you would feel safe. That way, there can't be an accusation of you being a "no show. " 2.) Do not go to a provider unless she is independent. Providers with pimps are going to up-sell the hell out of you, and are going to give you as little as possible, since they have their pimp to be the enforcer right there, and 3.) Don't use Backpage. I can't imagine using any provider again unless they are on a site with reviews.

I just went with it this time, knowing that I would just have to give up on Backpage, and for the most part, never trusting a provider ever again.[/QUOTE]I have posted multiple times about this girl being bad news. Sounds like your experience with her was very similar to mine and others. Up sell big time, lie, fail to provide as promised, RUSH RUSH. In the end you get screwed, not her. Not sure why guys keep having to learn the same lesson.

I would never trust her or any of the others she works with on and off. Sorry for your bad experience. Next time, try to learn something from others who report on these sham providers.

My 2 ¢.

DD.

[QUOTE=Glockman;2484614]Simple. First, they had already discussed price. That removes any entrapment defense. Second, entrapment is not a defense in Tennessee.[/QUOTE]

[QUOTE=Tungdocta;2484963]Entrapment by condoms? Are you serious? If you seriously think LEO need a Reason to lock you up for anything then you are from another planet. We all take risks.ALL of us in this game. I know providers/utr/p2p whatever you call them that did everything they was supposed to do and still got arrested. So your 3 visits with her make you an authority on her temperament and emotions? Man please[/QUOTE]Just a few of the ads from BP that mention entrapment:

[URL]http://memphis.backpage.com/FemaleEscorts/memphis-ask-about-the-60-and-up-special-last-day-special/13091879[/URL]

[URL]http://memphis.backpage.com/FemaleEscorts/black-chiina-is-here-call-me-901-729-9452/13090511[/URL] *No explicit talk*.

[URL]http://memphis.backpage.com/FemaleEscorts/red-as-cherries-and-drippin-like-water/12371787[/URL]

[URL]http://memphis.backpage.com/FemaleEscorts/hot-and-eager-to-please/12357745[/URL] *No explicit talk*.

[URL]http://memphis.backpage.com/FemaleEscorts/elite-luxury-companionship-high-class-super-blonde/11078716[/URL]

Discussing "price": I have never seen anyone list a price, providers use the terminology of donation or roses not price. We are donating for their time and companionship.

"Entrapment is not a defense in Tennessee. " You presume that providers are legal experts. LOL!

Tungdocta, you GTFOH! I've seen her and you haven't, your loss, she absolutely gorgeous. I made no claim to being an authority on Candy's temperament but I've been there when she's answered her phone and some idiot asks her if she does BBBJ and she just hangs up on them. Go ahead though and continue to ask explicit questions, some will hang up on you, some will tell you to GTFOH. I didn't know that one could get locked up for anything. Whistling while you work? Playing golf? Wishing someone a nice day?

[QUOTE=Glockman;2484614]Simple. First, they had already discussed price. That removes any entrapment defense. Second, entrapment is not a defense in Tennessee.[/QUOTE]EXACTLY. And I haven't missed out on a thing. You ask questions to find out if it's worth your time. She hangs up over a question? Get real. And. If you're there and she answers the phonet then how are you donating roses for her time and she answers the phone on your time. Smh

Done with this post. Moving on.

[QUOTE=JohnGrow;2485515]Just a few of the ads from BP that mention entrapment:

[URL]http://memphis.backpage.com/FemaleEscorts/memphis-ask-about-the-60-and-up-special-last-day-special/13091879[/URL]

[URL]http://memphis.backpage.com/FemaleEscorts/black-chiina-is-here-call-me-901-729-9452/13090511[/URL] *No explicit talk*.

[URL]http://memphis.backpage.com/FemaleEscorts/red-as-cherries-and-drippin-like-water/12371787[/URL]

[URL]http://memphis.backpage.com/FemaleEscorts/hot-and-eager-to-please/12357745[/URL] *No explicit talk*.

[URL]http://memphis.backpage.com/FemaleEscorts/elite-luxury-companionship-high-class-super-blonde/11078716[/URL]

Discussing "price": I have never seen anyone list a price, providers use the terminology of donation or roses not price. We are donating for their time and companionship.

"Entrapment is not a defense in Tennessee. " You presume that providers are legal experts. LOL!

Tungdocta, you GTFOH! I've seen her and you haven't, your loss, she absolutely gorgeous. I made no claim to being an authority on Candy's temperament but I've been there when she's answered her phone and some idiot asks her if she does BBBJ and she just hangs up on them. Go ahead though and continue to ask explicit questions, some will hang up on you, some will tell you to GTFOH. I didn't know that one could get locked up for anything. Whistling while you work? Playing golf? Wishing someone a nice day?[/QUOTE][I]State v Jones[/I] 598 S. W. 2 d 209,221 (Tenn. 1980)(entrapment is not a defense to the crime of solicitation). That's from the Tennessee Supreme Court, not from a provider. His post also made it clear they were discussing price. That shows that she was predisposed to accepting money for sex. Read his post again.

[QUOTE=No1DDcuplover;2485435]I have posted multiple times about this girl being bad news. Sounds like your experience with her was very similar to mine and others. Up sell big time, lie, fail to provide as promised, RUSH RUSH. In the end you get screwed, not her. Not sure why guys keep having to learn the same lesson.

I would never trust her or any of the others she works with on and off. Sorry for your bad experience. Next time, try to learn something from others who report on these sham providers.

My 2 .

DD.[/QUOTE]I'm guessing that Backpage is mostly these kinds of "providers. " Using Backpage once was enough for me.

[QUOTE=Wyldhorses;2485419]You also took a HUGE chance by going to an incall with a girl you don't already know. Outcalls are a million times safer than doing an incall. Less to zero chance of it being a LE Sting, less chance of the pimp coming in, less chance of being set up to be robbed. Going to an incall based on an ad on Backpage, is a very, very dangerous game. Consider yourself lucky that all you got was a bad session, it could of been a lot worse of an outcome for you.[/QUOTE]Given my background in life, a pimp would have gotten a much more severe "surprise" than me.

[URL]http://memphis.backpage.com/FemaleEscorts/the-one-n-only-diamond-upscale-and-classy-40-special-all-day/9857529.[/URL] This is treasures friend. Matter of treasure was in the room. Diamond is prettier in person but she looks really young I kinda felt bad till I saw her smack treasure on the ass LOL. Anyway has a nice thick soft plump warm body. CBJ, ds,mish. I have to repeat I was tired so I didn't do what I wanted to do. Besides that view from behind is amazing.

[QUOTE=Tungdocta;2485654][URL]http://memphis.backpage.com/FemaleEscorts/the-one-n-only-diamond-upscale-and-classy-40-special-all-day/9857529.[/URL] This is treasures friend. Matter of treasure was in the room. Diamond is prettier in person but she looks really young I kinda felt bad till I saw her smack treasure on the ass LOL. Anyway has a nice thick soft plump warm body. CBJ, ds,mish. I have to repeat I was tired so I didn't do what I wanted to do. Besides that view from behind is amazing.[/QUOTE][URL]http://memphis.backpage.com/FemaleEscorts/the-one-n-only-diamond-upscale-and-classy-40-special-all-day/9857529[/URL]

Hey Docta, is this the Diamond that you're talking about? Your link just goes to BP.

[QUOTE=Glockman;2485557][I]State v Jones[/I] 598 S. W. 2 d 209,221 (Tenn. 1980)(entrapment is not a defense to the crime of solicitation). That's from the Tennessee Supreme Court, not from a provider. His post also made it clear they were discussing price. That shows that she was predisposed to accepting money for sex. Read his post again.[/QUOTE]I didn't see anyone say they wanted to use entrapment as a defense in any of these posts related to this topic.

It's common knowledge not to mention price or acts when first talking to a provider.

The bigger question is why in the world would anybody trust a providers condom, that is the craziest thing I have ever heard. Not once in my life have a thought, oh I'll just trust she has one for me and that it's not old, too big, too small, crappy brand etc. A can think of no reasons why this would be an acceptable practice.

[QUOTE=No1DDcuplover;2485435] In the end you get screwed, not her.

DD.[/QUOTE]To quote a saying amongst exotic dancers, "you won't get laid but you will get fucked". Sounds like it applies here as well.

[QUOTE=BigBoiTerry;2485681][URL]http://memphis.backpage.com/FemaleEscorts/the-one-n-only-diamond-upscale-and-classy-40-special-all-day/9857529[/URL]

Hey Docta, is this the Diamond that you're talking about? Your link just goes to BP.[/QUOTE]Yep that's her they are running a two girl special for 100 I need to rest up for that one LOL.

[QUOTE=HornyHomeBoy;2485862]It's common knowledge not to mention price or acts when first talking to a provider[/QUOTE]The point is that too many people think there are ways around breaking the law, and the fact is if you call, that already shows intent. It doesn't matter if you talk price or specific acts, or if you use abbreviations or nicknames. It's all the same. For fuxks sake, most of the ads already have prices on there, and those stupid disclaimers the providers put about money just being for time, and anything between consensual adults is a matter of choice is irrelevant. I mean think about it, some street walker thinks she is smarter than the system and has found a better way to sell puzzy than the millions of hookers that sold it before her? Come on, that's nave. All this shit does is make the game harder on the mongers and give the bad providers a bit more wiggle room to screw the client because they don't actually know what they are getting when they set the appointment. The bottom line is, the more vague and sketchy the provider is beforehand, the more likely you are to not get what you expected. It's perfectly fine to be cautious and discrete, but don't let imaginary rules be an excuse to agree to anything you are not sure about beforehand.

[QUOTE=BangerHard;2486321]The point is that too many people think there are ways around breaking the law, and the fact is if you call, that already shows intent. It doesn't matter if you talk price or specific acts, or if you use abbreviations or nicknames. It's all the same. For fuxks sake, most of the ads already have prices on there, and those stupid disclaimers the providers put about money just being for time, and anything between consensual adults is a matter of choice is irrelevant. I mean think about it, some street walker thinks she is smarter than the system and has found a better way to sell puzzy than the millions of hookers that sold it before her? Come on, that's nave. All this shit does is make the game harder on the mongers and give the bad providers a bit more wiggle room to screw the client because they don't actually know what they are getting when they set the appointment. The bottom line is, the more vague and sketchy the provider is beforehand, the more likely you are to not get what you expected. It's perfectly fine to be cautious and discrete, but don't let imaginary rules be an excuse to agree to anything you are not sure about beforehand.[/QUOTE]This is actually kind of the thing I ran into recently. I called a new provider via BP, and before I even had a chance to fully ask the question she listed her rates for the time. I'm not sure whether that is a good or bad sign. If I do end up dreaming with her, I will definitely set up an outcall for safety.

[QUOTE=Tungdocta;2485532]EXACTLY. And I haven't missed out on a thing. You ask questions to find out if it's worth your time. She hangs up over a question? Get real. And. If you're there and she answers the phonet then how are you donating roses for her time and she answers the phone on your time. Smh

Done with this post. Moving on.[/QUOTE]Pretty obvious, if you'd bother to think about it for a second. Getting cleaned up and dressed after the session is over.

[QUOTE=Glockman;2485557][I]State v Jones[/I] 598 S. W. 2 d 209,221 (Tenn. 1980)(entrapment is not a defense to the crime of solicitation). That's from the Tennessee Supreme Court, not from a provider. His post also made it clear they were discussing price. That shows that she was predisposed to accepting money for sex. Read his post again.[/QUOTE]Read my post again. I know that entrapment is not a defense but lots of providers don't. I presented multiple examples of ads from providers that mention entrapment specifically, so obviously some providers think that it is a defense. Did you look at those ads? Did you call them and let them know that they're wrong? No, of course not, it's neither your duty nor your problem that they are mistaken. If you were to call any of the providers that I listed and asked them question of a sexual nature, odds are that they would, at the least hang up on you, but may cuss you out.

Candy's ads have the donations listed, obviating any need for discussion. If no mention is made of any sexual nature (that rules out asking about condoms) then, as many providers also mention, what happens between two consenting adults spending time together, which one party is giving something in exchange for that time and the other party gives something else, what happens is their own business. For instance, you being the excellent photographer and admirer of feminine beauty that you are, could possibly be making a donation for the providers time to take photographs of her, she's your model and there is nothing LE could object to. That's, of course, in a world where everything is done by the book, which doesn't actually exist.