MSP Sugar

[QUOTE=Anonyminn;5885094]We'd lined up a M&G at a pub early this year. About 20 minutes before our date time, she texted to say that training for a new job ran late and asked if I'd reschedule for sometime the following week. I responded that I don't accept last-minute rain checks and blocked her.

She is local, has done some modeling, and is better looking than her profile pics suggest IMO (9.5 to 10 in my book). She also began a new job around that time -- but it's still no excuse for not communicating until the last minute.[/QUOTE]She got back to me.

Wants to see my picture before discussing any allowance. Should I send a picture and play along?

FYI she responds, maybe once a week.

Part of how I recieved reponses from the ladies on SA was that upfront I sent a pic before they even asked. It doesn't guatantee anything but gives them credibility that you are for real. What can I say, I wanted to get laid LOL so in terms of risk that is the choice you will have to make. I did have a couple situations where I felt like I was being invited to a lions den and if something doesn't feel right go with your instincts.

[QUOTE=Happtrav;5889224]She got back to me.

Wants to see my picture before discussing any allowance. Should I send a picture and play along?

FYI she responds, maybe once a week.[/QUOTE]

I'm surprised you guys get any bites here. The pickings are slim.

Has it always been like this?

[QUOTE=Ryan33;5852117]Absolutely agree with this![/QUOTE]X2 I'm agree.

[URL]https://members.seeking.com/member/70c9ec93-61ac-4ecc-971a-bb4863d847f3[/URL]

She wants cash for platonic dates, refused to be accountable to any timeline for intimacy (despite stating an openness to BBFS), and cancelled the date we were set to go horizontal. ID made.

SN: FunnyGirl.

Has a Pro Vibe. No reply over text.

DM me if you would like her phone number.

[QUOTE=Happtrav;5898594]SN: FunnyGirl.

Has a Pro Vibe. No reply over text.

DM me if you would like her phone number.[/QUOTE]The lipstick kiss tattoo on her ass, I am pretty sure I have seen that same picture in an ad either on STG or Megapersonals. So your guess about her being a pro is probably correct.

I have been ghosted by YourGirl.

DM me if you want to try your luck / waste your time on Yourgirl.

[QUOTE=Happtrav;5889224]She got back to me.

Wants to see my picture before discussing any allowance. Should I send a picture and play along?

FYI she responds, maybe once a week.[/QUOTE]

Was able to connect with a pretty good one last week. I had planned on seeing ElleT, but she never responded to messages till 9 pm while I was waiting to meet a new SB.

Bandanagirl.

[URL]https://members.seeking.com/member/076aba5c-1ab8-4f76-af4a-48579d8eb663[/URL]

BBFS and BBJCIM. I was the first guy she met so she charged a little more than what I usually do, but seemed to be down to do less since she felt more comfortable with the situation and that she did not get murdered. LOL Had a good time, was straightforward. She knows what we are here for and holds up her end of the deal.

Prior to meeting her this one wanted 400 for a BJ. LOL.

StrawbryFields4 ever.

[URL]https://members.seeking.com/member/ce2574a3-8f96-44e0-8d8f-5f91e98bb18e[/URL]

[QUOTE=Ccbb1;5904401]Was able to connect with a pretty good one last week. I had planned on seeing ElleT, but she never responded to messages till 9 pm while I was waiting to meet a new SB.

Bandanagirl.

[URL]https://members.seeking.com/member/076aba5c-1ab8-4f76-af4a-48579d8eb663[/URL]

BBFS and BBJCIM. I was the first guy she met so she charged a little more than what I usually do, but seemed to be down to do less since she felt more comfortable with the situation and that she did not get murdered. LOL Had a good time, was straightforward. She knows what we are here for and holds up her end of the deal.

Prior to meeting her this one wanted 400 for a BJ. LOL.

StrawbryFields4 ever.

[URL]https://members.seeking.com/member/ce2574a3-8f96-44e0-8d8f-5f91e98bb18e[/URL][/QUOTE]I believe StrawberryFields4 ever has been on and off the site several times. See pic. I believe one of her more recent screen names was "SushiFlower" or something like that. I never met her in person but had a very negative experience with her via texting. I messaged her recently but then blocked her once I realized who she was. Assuming I have the right person, she has had a lot of negative feedback on this site.

Have you noticed how the average age of the sugar babies on the site has increased? Used to be dominated by 18 to 23-year-old babies, but now it's mostly 25-35 babies.

[QUOTE=BBQ21;5915794]Have you noticed how the average age of the sugar babies on the site has increased? Used to be dominated by 18 to 23-year-old babies, but now it's mostly 25-35 babies.[/QUOTE]As a percentage wise, I don't think I agree with that, but my opinion is the number of legitimate profiles has decreased dramatically over the last few years. When I first started in the site I tracked the number of profiles within 50 and 100 miles of Minneapolis. This was not a scientific process but would just pay attention to the numbers.

When I joined in 2015 there were about 6800 profiles within 50 miles of Minneapolis. That number grew somewhat steadily of the years and although I didn't record them I seem to recall the number reaching around 8500 and was over 10,000 if you expanded to 100 miles.

Then you have to account for fake or inactive profiles and those that were really not serious about and arrangement. I estimated this to be 25-30% of the overall profiles going back a few yrs.

Today there are 7460 profiles within 50 miles, which isn't that different. But the change is really in the number of legitimate profiles. Now you have to deal with:

1. Increase in fake / scam profiles.

2. Online only.

3. Selling pictures.

4. Platonic only (seriously, when the hell did that even become an option).

5. Increase in number of professional escorts.

6. Inactive / not serious about an arrangement profiles.

With all of that I am not even sure how to estimate the percentage these profiles account for, but I would say it is at least 45-50% and it could be higher. So, overall there is a big decrease in opportunities even though you see the same number of profiles when you search.

At one time I also knew the number of male profiles and the ratio was very favorable for men I seem to recall about 4. 5 to 1 after adjusting for the fakes / inactive on both sides. I have not checked that in quite awhile, so don't have a clue on the current ratio currently.

As for the age groups you mention there are in the 18-23 group there are 3146 and the 25-35 have 3009, so not sure that ratio had changed that much over the years. However there might be more BS profiles in the younger group, there are so many of them it is really had to say.

I have been considering posting something on my perspective on other changes to Seeking over my time on the site and might put something together in the near future.

[QUOTE=Happtrav;5849678]SA Games happening again.

SN: Exploringblonde.

Comes across as an Entitled Brat.

DM me for her contact info.[/QUOTE]She has a new phone#.

Makes statements like "I get between 350-500 for every meeting".

She stopped responding because she got upset about a conversation we had. So, Anger issues?

Her number is up for grabs.

[QUOTE=Ryan33;5917327]As a percentage wise, I don't think I agree with that, but my opinion is the number of legitimate profiles has decreased dramatically over the last few years. When I first started in the site I tracked the number of profiles within 50 and 100 miles of Minneapolis. This was not a scientific process but would just pay attention to the numbers.

When I joined in 2015 there were about 6800 profiles within 50 miles of Minneapolis. That number grew somewhat steadily of the years and although I didn't record them I seem to recall the number reaching around 8500 and was over 10,000 if you expanded to 100 miles.

Then you have to account for fake or inactive profiles and those that were really not serious about and arrangement. I estimated this to be 25-30% of the overall profiles going back a few yrs.

Today there are 7460 profiles within 50 miles, which isn't that different. But the change is really in the number of legitimate profiles. Now you have to deal with:

1. Increase in fake / scam profiles.

2. Online only.

3. Selling pictures.

4. Platonic only (seriously, when the hell did that even become an option).

5. Increase in number of professional escorts.

6. Inactive / not serious about an arrangement profiles.

With all of that I am not even sure how to estimate the percentage these profiles account for, but I would say it is at least 45-50% and it could be higher. So, overall there is a big decrease in opportunities even though you see the same number of profiles when you search.

At one time I also knew the number of male profiles and the ratio was very favorable for men I seem to recall about 4. 5 to 1 after adjusting for the fakes / inactive on both sides. I have not checked that in quite awhile, so don't have a clue on the current ratio currently.

As for the age groups you mention there are in the 18-23 group there are 3146 and the 25-35 have 3009, so not sure that ratio had changed that much over the years. However there might be more BS profiles in the younger group, there are so many of them it is really had to say.

I have been considering posting something on my perspective on other changes to Seeking over my time on the site and might put something together in the near future.[/QUOTE]That is interesting information. Your numbers are correct. However, if you sort all the profiles by recently active, I feel like the average age of recently active sugar babies has increased as compared to maybe a year ago.

The issues you mentioned are spot on. For those sugar babies that actually want to meet to get money to help with their finances, they focus too much on price and not enough on volume. They can't find anyone to meet with them for 500 but could have met with three guys already for 300. Then of course they often flake out and stop communicating after a meeting or two.

On an unrelated note, check out the verification videos on Secret Benefits. You don't need to pay anything to do that. Its shocking how the pictures can look great and then the video shows the baby is actually not attractive and / or seems to have an unpleasant personality.

[QUOTE=BBQ21;5920207]That is interesting information. Your numbers are correct. However, if you sort all the profiles by recently active, I feel like the average age of recently active sugar babies has increased as compared to maybe a year ago.

The issues you mentioned are spot on. For those sugar babies that actually want to meet to get money to help with their finances, they focus too much on price and not enough on volume. They can't find anyone to meet with them for 500 but could have met with three guys already for 300. Then of course they often flake out and stop communicating after a meeting or two.

On an unrelated note, check out the verification videos on Secret Benefits. You don't need to pay anything to do that. Its shocking how the pictures can look great and then the video shows the baby is actually not attractive and / or seems to have an unpleasant personality.[/QUOTE]So secret benefits videos help a lot. It is truly amazing how many women have these great pics and when you see the videos it's incredibly disappointing how ugly or no where close they are to the pics. These girls want money. Would they go to a job interview looking like horse shit? They have a 3 second video to make an impression and they do that. On the opposite side I have actually seen some where I wasn't interested and saw the video and it was great. I had one ppm date a few months ago with one I found like that.

Happy hunting.

MD.