General Reports

[QUOTE=OldGuy414;4306446]When I log on I am getting a report from Norton that they blocked an attack by Malicious Site: Malicious Domain Request 22.

Anyone know anything about this??[/QUOTE]See post #4033 under General Reports in Madison.

[QUOTE=OldGuy414;4306446]When I log on I am getting a report from Norton that they blocked an attack by Malicious Site: Malicious Domain Request 22.

Anyone know anything about this??[/QUOTE]I don't know anything about this except I'm getting the same message.

[QUOTE=OldGuy414;4306446]When I log on I am getting a report from Norton that they blocked an attack by Malicious Site: Malicious Domain Request 22.

Anyone know anything about this??[/QUOTE]In fact, this has been a daily occurrence for the last five days. Norton bans the traffic from the server for 24 hours but the message returns the next day. As long as the attack is blocked you're okay. I don't know if it's a spam attack or what.

[QUOTE=Soft7;4293916]Hey fellas, do you know if mpd enforces the state window tint percentages at all (50/35)?

I am thinking about getting this installed on my car, but don't want to go through with it if they'll make me remove it eventually, and the limits are pretty light and probably not worth it so would want to go darker.

For my 2 cents, I do see a lot of cars with tint that looks much darker than what is allowed, especially within milwaukee city limits, so that is encouraging.[/QUOTE]They did a contact 6 report awhile back about a guy that got stopped for tint that his GF had installed on top of the factory tint. They claimed it was legal, the meter said it was too dark, and found out when they interviewed the place that installed it that the GF was warned that it would be too dark. He did get a ticket for the tint and had to remove it. My understanding is that they need to have the meter to test the tint in order to give a ticket. It is similar to radar / lidar for a speeding ticket because they don't have "calibrated eyeballs".

As mentioned, it gives a reason to stop and question you and a freebie for them if they want to stop you.

[QUOTE=OldGuy414;4306446]When I log on I am getting a report from Norton that they blocked an attack by Malicious Site: Malicious Domain Request 22.

Anyone know anything about this??[/QUOTE]Found this on the Madison board, thought I would post it for others:

Because you're using Norton Anti-Virus which is famous for throwing false positives (they have to make you think you're getting something for your money).

In this case the false positive is a result of lazy programming, instead of scanning the code and seeing if there is an issue they are basing this report on the idea that the ad server our client contracts with to manage their ads has been used by other customers of the ad server for less than reputable purposes.

Since I can be assumed to have an agenda you can google "norton false positives" and see for yourself.

Maybe next time before you ring the anti virus bell in the open forum (like yelling fire in a theater) you might write us and ask.

What I would have told you is to scan the site with any available site scanner you wish which will show as negative and then start using Defender and Malwarebytes and stop getting bad info from your AV software.

[QUOTE=LoveSmallPerky;4306826]They did a contact 6 report awhile back about a guy that got stopped for tint that his GF had installed on top of the factory tint. They claimed it was legal, the meter said it was too dark, and found out when they interviewed the place that installed it that the GF was warned that it would be too dark. He did get a ticket for the tint and had to remove it. My understanding is that they need to have the meter to test the tint in order to give a ticket. It is similar to radar / lidar for a speeding ticket because they don't have "calibrated eyeballs".

As mentioned, it gives a reason to stop and question you and a freebie for them if they want to stop you.[/QUOTE]

[QUOTE=HuntingStreets;4300832]My tint is not legal and I've never had any problems, but as always YMMV. In Milwaukee they usually have better things to worry about, but get stopped for something else, roll past a traffic control cop (usually the ones on Motorcycles) or if LEO is just looking for a reason to pull you over, you could get cited. I think the type of car probably has something to do with it. I have a plain Jane SUV over 10 years old with 150,000 miles on it that typically doesn't even draw a second look. Drive a newer, flashier car and it may draw more attention.

HS.[/QUOTE]

[QUOTE=CharlieKane200;4299454]I was stopped several months ago. The officer used a small device to test the darkness of the tint. He told me that I was in violation and that I should get it fixed. Nothing in writing. Clearly, it was just an excuse to pull me over.[/QUOTE]Got it. So how dark do you think is still visible? Maybe 25 front /20 back? At 35 you can still see clearly into the car from a ways off.

There are excellent non-subscription antivirus and malware programs.

Subscribing to Norton's is wasting good money you could be putting elsewhere. Such as our shared hobby.

[QUOTE=OldGuy414;4307084]Found this on the Madison board, thought I would post it for others:

Because you're using Norton Anti-Virus which is famous for throwing false positives (they have to make you think you're getting something for your money).

In this case the false positive is a result of lazy programming, instead of scanning the code and seeing if there is an issue they are basing this report on the idea that the ad server our client contracts with to manage their ads has been used by other customers of the ad server for less than reputable purposes.

Since I can be assumed to have an agenda you can google "norton false positives" and see for yourself.

Maybe next time before you ring the anti virus bell in the open forum (like yelling fire in a theater) you might write us and ask.

What I would have told you is to scan the site with any available site scanner you wish which will show as negative and then start using Defender and Malwarebytes and stop getting bad info from your AV software.[/QUOTE]

[QUOTE=OldGuy414;4307084]Found this on the Madison board, thought I would post it for others:

Because you're using Norton Anti-Virus which is famous for throwing false positives (they have to make you think you're getting something for your money).

In this case the false positive is a result of lazy programming, instead of scanning the code and seeing if there is an issue they are basing this report on the idea that the ad server our client contracts with to manage their ads has been used by other customers of the ad server for less than reputable purposes.

Since I can be assumed to have an agenda you can google "norton false positives" and see for yourself.

Maybe next time before you ring the anti virus bell in the open forum (like yelling fire in a theater) you might write us and ask.

What I would have told you is to scan the site with any available site scanner you wish which will show as negative and then start using Defender and Malwarebytes and stop getting bad info from your AV software.[/QUOTE]I haven't use Norton in ages but they used to have the option to report false positives like this site. When you know a site is legitimate and get the false positive, you report it as a false and they would look into it and if true, they would correct it. It can take a little time b8 ut it did work. Like the other post, just switch to the free ones, Avast is just as good.

[QUOTE=SafeNsaFun;4308195]There are excellent non-subscription antivirus and malware programs.

Subscribing to Norton's is wasting good money you could be putting elsewhere. Such as our shared hobby.[/QUOTE]Best argument against Norton. Ever.

I have a tall bbw utr girl I think I've mentioned before. She reached out and asked if I had any friends. Since I don't have any I figured I'd ask you, my dear USG family, if you'd like her info. PM for details.

Tall, bbw but not gross, great rack, greek and excellent BBBJ on the menu. Can get freaky depending on what you're looking for.

[QUOTE=MilwaukeePics;4308408]I have a tall bbw utr girl I think I've mentioned before. She reached out and asked if I had any friends. Since I don't have any I figured I'd ask you, my dear USG family, if you'd like her info. PM for details.

Tall, bbw but not gross, great rack, greek and excellent BBBJ on the menu. Can get freaky depending on what you're looking for.[/QUOTE]Non-smoker? Sane? Safe place?

Airport area lady looking for companionship. DO NOT give a ride to her Grandfathers. I have new digits. Pm only if interested in seeing her.

Is that the one with the wierd skin condition?

[QUOTE=MilwaukeePics;4308408]I have a tall bbw utr girl I think I've mentioned before. She reached out and asked if I had any friends. Since I don't have any I figured I'd ask you, my dear USG family, if you'd like her info. PM for details.

Tall, bbw but not gross, great rack, greek and excellent BBBJ on the menu. Can get freaky depending on what you're looking for.[/QUOTE]

[QUOTE=BigMilwaukee;4309165]Is that the one with the wierd skin condition?[/QUOTE]Skin condition? No. Definitely not. She has tattoos and pierced nipples and is a little shy at first but fun and sweet.

[QUOTE=MilwaukeePics;4308408]I have a tall bbw utr girl I think I've mentioned before. She reached out and asked if I had any friends. Since I don't have any I figured I'd ask you, my dear USG family, if you'd like her info. PM for details.

Tall, bbw but not gross, great rack, greek and excellent BBBJ on the menu. Can get freaky depending on what you're looking for.[/QUOTE]Hi there would love her info. Plus do you have a pic if her.

Thanks for the info.