Supereloquent's Reports - Philadelphia

[QUOTE=Licksforchicks]I couldn`t agree with you more..Nicole is the best girl on the ave,,the only girl I look for ..she is gorgeous,,and extremely thrilling to be with. Tonight she joked with me that I am "easy to bicker with" she is really pleasant,,and very very good at what she does...I have yet to last with her half as long as with other women she is just so freakin` beautiful,,I am overwhelmed by her and totally dazzled.[/QUOTE]

There is no question in my mind that Hottie Nicole is deserving of a stellar reputation on the Ave, for her good looks, sparkling personality, wonderful attitude and incredible sexual skills.

[QUOTE=Dripper]SE:

I'm a kind of Luddite, so I confess that I was not really sure how to cast my vote.[/QUOTE]

Luddite...that's funny. Those of you who might be scratching your heads on that one, refer to the following: [url= http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Luddite]Luddite[/url] I think there are many "Luddites," or maybe the last week of August was a very bad time to decide to hold a voting contest. Most people were probably trying to squeeze in the last of their summer vacation before Labor Day. However, please feel free to keep voting, and expressing your opinions of your favorite SWs. I will keep an open "favorites" list based on your opinions, and count your opinions and votes towards my SW of the Year Contest 2010 at year end.

[QUOTE=Dripper]But, I do vote for Tanya. What a gem. Hard to believe that she isn't in a different niche of the market. You in the City of Brotherly Love should be showing her a lot of it![/QUOTE]

Tanya is definitely a keeper: pretty, incredible body, flexible (in mind as well as body), smart, fun, imaginative, loves sex and is VERY good at it! You just don't find very many SWs or many women PERIOD who are any better.

[QUOTE=Dripper]The great thing about the compilations of SE's conquests is that it shows that he is, by leaps and bounds, the most ambitious and creative SW monger on the board, without peer.[/QUOTE]

Thank you for your testimonial, but I do feel I have a few peers. We all do our own things in distinctive ways, and what could be better. Viva la diff'erence.

[QUOTE=Dripper] Not even our own favorite son, Baldy Cruiser, a legend in his own right, is as prolific in sharing his exploits as SE. Keep everything up, SE.[/QUOTE]

I take nothing away from Baldy Cruiser. He has come up with some incredible finds and pics. I just love the T shirts he has for some of his girls, which look like the T shirts that say I Love NY, where the word "Love" is expressed as a big red heart. In his case the T shirt says I Love (big red heart) Baldy Cruiser. Gotta LOVE it! A picture is worth a thousand words and here is an example: [url=http://www.usasexguide.info/forum/attachment.php?attachmentid=104222I]I Love Baldy Cruiser T Shirt: "Lil Princess"[/url]

SuperE,

I vote for Baby Cakes.

Now if I could only meet her. LOL!

La Chic

[QUOTE=La Chic]SuperE,

I vote for Baby Cakes.

Now if I could only meet her. LOL!

La Chic[/QUOTE]

Baby Cakes is another keeper: cute, sweet, rockin' bod and LOVES to suck and fuck!

[QUOTE= Robert10]I was out on Saturday afternoon and after making a few passes on the K, I spotted Gina, the russian. I chose to just have a car date with a few pics. She does still seem to be very mechanical and rushed. She only offered a cbj. Nothing remarkable.[/QUOTE]

I would corroborate your experience with Gina. I had one car date with her a while back and she was as you reported: like a robot, in a hurry and didn't give a very good BJ. Plus, she used those awful words that every SW should learn to avoid: "Are you ready to cum yet?" The only difference with my date is that BBBJ was on the table for an extra fee, and I elected that route. She was a spitter, of course. I seem to remember hearing from someone that she works for one of the pimps on the Ave, but I can't remember which one. Kudos for at least getting her pics. She was camera shy when I dated her and very much against my taking her pics.

[QUOTE=Supereloquent]I would corroborate your experience with Gina. I had one car date with her a while back and she was as you reported: like a robot, in a hurry and didn't give a very good BJ. Plus, she used those awful words that every SW should learn to avoid: "Are you ready to cum yet? " The only difference with my date is that BBBJ was on the table for an extra fee, and I elected that route. She was a spitter, of course. I seem to remember hearing from someone that she works for one of the pimps on the Ave, but I can't remember which one. Kudos for at least getting her pics. She was camera shy when I dated her and very much against my taking her pics.[/QUOTE]Thanks. She did tell me she works for a pimp. She was definitely not someone I would repeat. I was able to get a video of the CBJ as well. Can those be uploaded on this site?

I had dated Ashley a few weeks ago. She had already been reported on, and had some pics posted here, so I saw no great hurry in posting her as well. Moreover, I had relatively little further to add than was already known. But then something happened that changed all that. I had a chance to date her again under very different circumstances. She was quite different on the two dates. It reinforced my newly modified view that some SWs can change their bad/mediocre behaviors by giving them the feedback to do so. This, of course, assumes that they are motivated to do that in the first place.

On my first date with Ashley I took her to the Carlyle. She had agreed to pics, but she got intermittently bitchy about my taking them. What do I mean by that? She refused at first to let me take any pics of her tits. She had some bruises on her left thigh and my assumption was that something similar was going on with her tits, and maybe worse, because she even refused to take off her top. But she let me take pics of her bottomless and spread and even sucking my cock, so go figure. I never pushed her for the reason because she seemed very defensive about it, and I didn’t want to make the mood even uglier than it was becoming. I thought it would be a better course just to take what I could get, and be sucked and fucked, even if she insisted on keeping on her top. The big head was a little pissed off, but the little head was screaming, “Just let me get off a few times!”

She was an OK BJ. She wasn’t terrible, but nothing stellar. I would have to say a little better than average. She couldn’t DT but she kept sucking without complaining and took my whole load and swallowed it.

It was actually a little hot to fuck her with her top on. Doggie was perfect for that since I couldn’t see her tits that way anyhow, and she had a nice tight round ass to watch while I pumped that tight little cu*nt from behind. She wasn’t into dirty talk, not hearing and certainly not saying. Her attitude was a little sour in that regard. She also just knelt there motionless like a rock. I prefer when the girl fucks you back and makes a little noise. But it was passable, an average SW fuck that seemed as if she was saying, “Yeah, I am getting paid, so fuck me any way you like and get it over with.” I busted a second nut and that was that.

Just recently I noticed her again on the same corner on the northern end of the stroll. I hardly recognized her. She looked very different, primarily because of her hair. The first time her hair was dyed a very light blonde. This time it was cut shorter and seemed to be returning to her natural color: it was a honey or dirty blonde, but she had black roots, so her natural color must be black or brunette. You can’t tell from her pubic hair because she was completely shaved both this time and last time.

I explained to her that we had dated before, and that it could have gone better. I further explained that our previous date wasn’t awful, but it wasn’t terrific either. I asked her if she might be willing to improve her performance. If she couldn’t or wouldn’t, I told her I would understand that, and would drop her back at her corner. Her attitude changed considerably. We talked a bit as we drove, and I bought her something to eat and drink at a drive-thru. We talked about many things. This was a big change from the first time, when our drive to the Carlyle had mostly been stony silence, which is usually a bad sign for the experience to come. I don’t know why, but I mentioned the book I am writing, the draft of which is now over 1000 pages and is autobiographical. It includes my experiences on the K, among other things. She was very intrigued by that, and asked if she would be in it. I said that I would include many of my actual experiences on the Ave, but I would change the names of the SWs, mainly because some of them use their real names. I also said I couldn’t use the pics, because I would obviously need written permission in the form of a release to do that in a published work. She said she would be very willing to sign such a release, and to tell her story as well. We talked a bit about that. She lost a child and became depressed over it, which led her to drugs and prostitution to support her habit. She had another child later that is not currently living with her, but she is trying to support it the best she can. But her drug habit has moved from pills originally to injecting coke at present. I could see the young 21 year old girl in her, handed a rough time in life, and trying to survive the best she could, while putting up a very tough front to protect herself. But, she still was willing and anxious to reveal her story to the world. She was becoming softer and more relaxed as we talked. She was comfortable being vulnerable and realizing that I wasn’t going to use it against her. I still wanted pics and sex; this wasn’t a charity exchange. I wasn’t trying to “soften her up;” this was a very normal conversation. And, I genuinely enjoy knowing more about the girls that I date. But, this was promising to be a much more fun arrangement.

I became inspired to do something completely different. I had recently discovered a relatively secluded place in the woods (yes, there are some in Philly, and close to the K too, LOL), and my plan was to go there, take some outdoor pics and do some outdoor sucking and fucking. We arrived and I took some good shots of her flashing me and sucking on my cock. I discovered that, without a camera flash in natural light, the movement in the sucking pics created a few that are a bit out of focus. But, the natural light outdoors was very nice IMHO and a different look with more attractive shadowing than with an indoor flash. Plus, for those of you that would have been waiting for some pics of her perky little titties, I got some excellent shots of those outside, and they are forthcoming.

She knelt on the ground while she was sucking my cock and it was very invigorating to be outdoors for that. In the midst of it I noticed a woman walking her dog on the hillside overlooking the woods where we were. The woman was staring at us intently. She couldn’t see us perfectly clearly because of all the foliage between us . However, she could see enough to know what was going on, just as I could see that she was walking her dog. My first instinct was to stop and go deeper into the woods. But she stood there watching us as if she wasn’t able to move, and it was actually very exciting to have Ashley suck me as this woman watched. I turned a bit sideways so she could have a good look at exactly what was going on. She continued to stand there motionless. I didn’t know if she knew I could see her. I don’t think it mattered to either of us. I finally erupted a load into Ashley’s mouth and she swallowed it all. We stood there for a few minutes more talking, and the woman kept still and kept looking. Ashley’s back was to her. I don’t think Ashley even saw her.

After about 10 minutes, the woman was still there. Maybe she wanted to see what was going to happen next, or to see what we looked like up close when we came out of the woods (which we later did). I had a devious thought, and asked Ashley to grab a nearby tree as I pulled down her jeans and panties and did her right there in a standing doggie position, with her jeans and panties around her ankles. The woman continued to quietly observe. I fucked Ashley hard and, this time, unlike the last time, Ashley moaned and sighed as I pumped her. There was no way the woman watching couldn’t hear it, but she didn’t move a muscle. I must have fucked Ashley for a good 10 minutes. I had actually never done that outside like that, let alone with someone watching. I will have to say that the whole thing was erotic as hell. When I busted a nut I said “fuck” out loud. I think I wanted the woman watching to know I had cum. When we left the woods she stared hard at us and I gave her a big knowing smile and I waved at her. She looked down at the ground as if she was embarrassed that I clearly realized she had been watching us. All in all it was a very unique sexual exploit.

Ratings? Face: well above average (Ashley is very cute; she needs to learn to smile more); Body:well above average (borders on outstanding: thin; very nice titties for a thinnish girl, and a nice tight round ass); BJ: above average the first time; well above average the second time (she could still learn a few things about giving an excellent BJ); Fucking: average the first time; well above average the second time (I think she has the potential to be an outstanding fuck with a little work); Attitude: average the first time; well above average the second time (outstanding potential here as well); Overall Experience: average the first time; well above average the second time; Repeatable? Yes. YMMV

All her pics, both in the Carlyle and in the woods, are forthcoming in bite-sized savory installments, as is my new preferred technique.

I have done the deed in the woods, but not sure if I were watched. Pretty exciting to say the least. I like outdoor activity, even if it is only pic taking of her flashing me. You got balls as I would be too concerned that the observer was on a cell with leo.

The woman observing in your story might have been embarrassed at that moment. I'd be willing to bet that she either fucked her man or her toy recounting in her mind what she observed! She was definitely interested in what was going on. Why else would she have stood there for twenty plus minutes?

Perhaps you should have told her, with a wink, "Meet me here at this same place and time tomorrow". Bring a different girl in case she isn't there. If the observer is there, ask her join in. Imagine that, an outdoor threesome and so close to the K!

[QUOTE=Fbtom]I have done the deed in the woods, but not sure if I were watched. Pretty exciting to say the least.[/QUOTE]

I was too quick to say I had never done it outside before. I remember now doing it once in HS. As I recall there were too many crawly and flying critters for my taste at the time. Oddly enough, there were no insects in the woods this time.

[QUOTE=Fbtom]I like outdoor activity, even if it is only pic taking of her flashing me.[/QUOTE]

I must say I liked it for a lot of reasons: the fresh air, the natural light for pic taking, the different venue for sucking and fucking, and the excitement of someone watching.

[QUOTE=Fbtom] You got balls as I would be too concerned that the observer was on a cell with leo.[/QUOTE]

It's funny you should mention that because that was my first and most overriding concern. She was close enough that I could see if she had a cell, and she either didn't or didn't seem to be using it. I would have actually been more concerned if she walked away for fear she may have been calling Uncle LEO.

[QUOTE=Fbtom]The woman observing in your story might have been embarrassed at that moment. I'd be willing to bet that she either fucked her man or her toy recounting in her mind what she observed! She was definitely interested in what was going on. Why else would she have stood there for twenty plus minutes?[/QUOTE]

She definitely was captivated and no doubt used it in her fantasies thereafter. How often do you get to see two people sucking and fucking in the woods?

[QUOTE=Fbtom] Perhaps you should have told her, with a wink, "Meet me here at this same place and time tomorrow".[/QUOTE]

Hindsight is 20/20. Maybe that would have worked and maybe not. Remember, she was a resident nearby enough to be walking her dog. Even though she was a willing participant for the moment, who knows what would happen in a planned return engagement after she had a chance to think about it and maybe even tell others? It may have been great, or maybe a nasty surprise of some sort would be waiting for me. Better safe than sorry.

[QUOTE=Fbtom]Bring a different girl in case she isn't there. If the observer is there, ask her join in. Imagine that, an outdoor threesome and so close to the K![/QUOTE]

Again, it may have been fun and it may have been a disaster to let her know exactly when I would be there again. Being a spontaneous voyeur is one thing; knowing about it in advance after considerable re-thinking and/or discussion is quite another thing.

[QUOTE=Supereloquent] I don’t know why, but I mentioned the book I am writing, the draft of which is now over 1000 pages and is autobiographical. It includes my experiences on the K, among other things.[/QUOTE]Years ago, in my personal research this book came on my radar. It is entitled [b]"My Secret Life"[/b] A huge body of work, it first it was simply dismissed as porn fiction, but then something wonderful happened. Scholars became interested in it because it was loaded with historic detail- tons of small things that only someone living in the 1800's would know.

Soon it was no longer dismissed as just old porn, but rather as a very detailed account of one Mans sexual exploits from the 1800's. It seems that you and this Man- who is still a mystery- are cut from the same cloth.

And let me tell you this guy cound really fucking score! He did Prostitutes, servants, and working class women-this guy spend all his mature years on Auto-Fuck. And like you SuperE, he had two important things going for him:

Intelligence and money. That is what took to score then; that is what it takes to score now.

Here is a link to find out more.

[url]http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/My_Secret_Life_(erotica[/url])

[b]Street[/b]

[QUOTE=Robert10]Thanks. She did tell me she works for a pimp. She was definitely not someone I would repeat. I was able to get a video of the CBJ as well. Can those be uploaded on this site?[/QUOTE]

Freaklikdat would be our video expert to consult. There are some free websites that allow you to upload videos, and then you can use them for links to share the videos with others, as with any regular web link. The problem is that some of these video upload facilities have issues with viruses and other nasty surprises. I would defer to Freak's expertise in this regard.

[QUOTE=Street Steve]I have a background in Libraries, and years ago, in my personal research this book came on my radar. It is entitled [b]"My Secret Life"[/b] A huge body of work, it first it was simply dismissed as porn fiction, but then something wonderful happened. Scholars became interested in it because it was loaded with historic detail- tons of small things that only someone living in the 1800's would know.[/QUOTE]

This is terrific. Thank you very much, Street, for pointing it out to me. It may give me some insights on including details that will make my book much more historically valuable, and perhaps, with some effort, worth reading by scholars in centuries to come.

[QUOTE=Street Steve]Soon it was no longer dismissed as just old porn, but rather as a very detailed account of one Mans sexual exploits from the 1800's. It seems that you and this Man- who is still a mystery- are cut from the same cloth.[/QUOTE]

I have been sexually obsessed from as far back as I can remember, and my book begins early in my life even before adolescent sexual awakenings might more typically occur. I was sexual in certain ways before I even had a concept what it was or the hormones to drive it.

I will definitely read this work you have mentioned because it seems an appropriate, if century old, parallel to my situation.

[QUOTE=Street Steve]And let me tell you this guy cound really fucking score! He did Prostitutes, servants, and working class women-this guy spend all his mature years on Auto-Fuck. And like you SuperE, he had two important things going for him:

Intelligence and money. That is what took to score then; that is what it takes to score now.

Here is a link to find out more.

[url]http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/My_Secret_Life_(erotica[/url])

[b]Street[/b][/QUOTE]

He sounds like my kinda guy! LOL Thanks for the reference. I don't know that it necessarily takes intelligence to "score," but being relatively smart gives you an ability to inject imagination into what you do. Money is another matter. Unless you are famous, with groupies in every city (Wilt Chamberlain?), or incredibly good looking, having money will get you laid a lot faster and more often than not. ;)

Ashley sucking on my cock. You have to love a pretty nail job on a SW!
More to come, both in the Carlyle and out in the woods.

More of Ashley sucking on my cock.

More pics to follow of her flashing and sucking on my dick in the woods.

Face view in my car; flashing me her tits as I drive; flashing her tits in the woods and as she sucks on a finger; flashing her pussy in the woods; flashing her ass in the woods; flashing it all in the woods; sucking my cock in the woods.

[QUOTE=Supereloquent]Face view in my car; flashing me her tits as I drive; flashing her tits in the woods and as she sucks on a finger; flashing her pussy in the woods; flashing her ass in the woods; flashing it all in the woods; sucking my cock in the woods.[/QUOTE]Hey SE. Nice. You are right and learning that natural light is so much better than flash. What camera are you using cause I can help you avoid the shake if your camera can do it. Let me know.

FYI: best outdoor lighting is early sun and late sun. Avoid midday sun as it tends to give harsh shadows. Also open shade (as in your pics) works well in most cases

Cheers,

TM

[QUOTE=TexasMonger]Hey SE ...Nice ...You are right and learning that natural light is so much better than flash......[/QUOTE]Yes, you get a more natural look outdoors and the shadowing is richer and more detailed without all that flash reflection on the skin, especially in a close-up.

[QUOTE=TexasMonger]What camera are you using cause I can help you avoid the shake if your camera can do it. Let me know.[/QUOTE]I am using a very basic digital camera. I can't even adjust the aperture or the shutter speed, so you pretty much get what you get.

[QUOTE=TexasMonger]FYI: best outdoor lighting is early sun and late sun. Avoid midday sun as it tends to give harsh shadows. Also open shade (as in your pics) works well in most cases[/QUOTE]Yes, open shade and overcast days are ideal for taking outdoor pics because the light is more diffused and the shadows are less harsh. The same is true early and late in the day. I am somewhat familiar with using outdoor light to good effect. I used to have an expensive Canon 35 MM SLR camera with a number of different lenses back in the day. I think my main problem with the fuzzy focus was not realizing that the light source was softer, and an action shot wasn't going to be as frozen as it is with a flash. Next time outdoors I just have to remember to hold the camera more steady. That's a tall order while getting my cock sucked. :D

[QUOTE=Supereloquent]Yes, you get a more natural look outdoors and the shadowing is richer and more detailed without all that flash reflection on the skin, especially in a close-up.

I am using a very basic digital camera. I can't even adjust the aperture or the shutter speed, so you pretty much get what you get.

Yes, open shade and overcast days are ideal for taking outdoor pics because the light is more diffused and the shadows are less harsh. The same is true early and late in the day. I am somewhat familiar with using outdoor light to good effect. I used to have an expensive Canon 35 MM SLR camera with a number of different lenses back in the day. I think my main problem with the fuzzy focus was not realizing that the light source was softer, and an action shot wasn't going to be as frozen as it is with a flash. Next time outdoors I just have to remember to hold the camera more steady. That's a tall order while getting my cock sucked.[/QUOTE]LOL at the rate you are going, I can make you a porn star. You fuck them and I snap away. LOL

Hell no. I also need some of that pie too.

Just kidding with you man. Nice reporting. Too bad I am a bit too far of a daily trip to the K stroll

Cheers

TM

[QUOTE=Supereloquent]Face view in my car; flashing me her tits as I drive; flashing her tits in the woods and as she sucks on a finger; flashing her pussy in the woods; flashing her ass in the woods; flashing it all in the woods; sucking my cock in the woods.[/QUOTE]Damn! Are there any women you guys see that are NOT drugged out skanky hos?

Hey SuperE,

First of all, very nice pics and report!

Your [url=http://www.usasexguide.info/forum/attachment.php?attachmentid=109407]Ashley[/url] looks very similar, like a thinner version, of the [url=http://www.usasexguide.info/forum/showpost.php?p=889615&postcount=2291]Jen[/url] that I dated a while ago. Same person?

PM me as I know what street she lived on, if you know, this might confirm.

[QUOTE=Fbtom]Hey SuperE,

First of all, very nice pics and report!

Your [url=http://www.usasexguide.info/forum/attachment.php?attachmentid=109407]Ashley[/url] looks very similar, like a thinner version, of the [url=http://www.usasexguide.info/forum/showpost.php?p=889615&postcount=2291]Jen[/url] that I dated a while ago. Same person?

PM me as I know what street she lived on, if you know, this might confirm.[/QUOTE]

Thanks.

Your Jen and my Ashley are not the same girl, but I do see the facial similarities.

[QUOTE=Supereloquent]Thanks.

Your Jen and my Ashley are not the same girl, but I do see the facial similarities.[/QUOTE]

Perhaps they are related? We know that sisters work on the streets

[QUOTE=Fbtom]Perhaps they are related? We know that sisters work on the streets[/QUOTE]

Anything is possible. I will ask her next time I take Little Red Riding Hood to the forest. :D

[quote=Cooky Jar]“I think multiple shots of another man’s dick are disgusting.” There, I’ve said it, and I am already sorry that I did.

Please don’t explain to me the obvious. I know I don’t have to look at them (I don’t). Don’t tell me about the ignore function – I already know about that. Don’t tell me about his right to post whatever he wants – I agree. And I know he is not likely to change because of anything that I or anyone else says. I am just voicing my own personal opinion.

Nobody cares.[/quote]
I'm not sure which is worse..... whining,,,, or whining about whiners.....hmmmm. [b][size=-2](Especially on a monger forum)
[/b][/size]
All we ever hear is how bad the pics are, tan lines, poor post timing, Blah, blah, bla...
[b]or[/b]
The other guy; all he does is, Waaa, waa, waa.....cry baby.

[b]The both of you:[/b]
Quit snilvling and keep shootin pictures or maybe quit mongering and chase a little white ball.

[b]"I'm just voicing my own personal opinion.

Nobody cares."[/b]

Nice outside shots! :)

[b]X[/b] ;)ut

[QUOTE=Bikervtx]Damn! Are there any women you guys see that are NOT drugged out skanky hos?[/QUOTE]

Yours is a common beef we seem to get from moralists and those who prefer to partake of MPs and escorts. If you are a moralist, you are in the wrong pew. If you think that patronizing MPs and escorts makes you somehow superior to those of us who enjoy trolling for SWs, I would suggest to you that it is hardly the same thing; however, many of the same girls "play" in both pools. If you are a SW monger, which would be the most appropriate and relevant comparison, and believe you date better looking SWs: [b]show us![/b]

As to your specific comments:

Drugged out? The drugs available on and near the Ave provide the main reason for SWs to be here in the first place. I would imagine that is true in most cities, most probably including yours. There are some exceptions, but SWs don't tend to be the girl next door or a fashion model making some extra pocket money.

Skanky? That would be in the eye of the beholder. SWs who take drugs usually aren't Playboy centerfolds, but some look better than others. They survive on the streets. They are likely to seem somewhat worse for wear, have a tired look about them and have far less than a perfect complexion, including some puncture wounds depending upon their drug of choice.

Hos? Well, YEAH. You got us on that one. :D

[QUOTE=Tha X Facta]I'm not sure which is worse..... whining,,,, or whining about whiners.....hmmmm. [b][size=-2](Especially on a monger forum)
[/b][/size][/QUOTE]

I tend to think of "whining" as complaining, its primary definition. There is a secondary definition of protesting in a childish fashion. There is no shortage of whiners in this Forum, by both definitions, but I beg to differ that I am a complainer. Whether my "protests" are childish I suppose is a matter of interpretation. I have been known to have a few outbursts like that. Those who wish to taunt me might characterize me as being "always" that way, but I have been making a concerted effort of late to be logically, if sometimes irritatingly cogent and analytical, even in response to what is obviously mindless criticism (that does not refer to your post, X Facta, but you could brush up on your spelling and grammar ;)). Mostly I post reports and pics of SW encounters like a good little SW monger photojournalist. Occasionally I do some reflection or offer an opinion on a subject relevant to mongering. I guess a relatively small portion of my posts reply to criticisms, like this one (or, at least part of it was). That comes with the territory of posting a great deal and varies with the volume of critiques. If that is "whining" by your definition, then I would respectfully disagree with your definition.

[QUOTE=Tha X Facta]All we ever hear is how bad the pics are, tan lines, poor post timing, Blah, blah, bla...[/QUOTE]

No comment. :)

[QUOTE=Tha X Facta]The other guy; all he does is, Waaa, waa, waa.....cry baby.[/QUOTE]

"All?" Asked and answered.

[QUOTE=Tha X Facta]Quit snilvling and keep shootin pictures or maybe quit mongering and chase a little white ball. [/QUOTE]

I didn't need marching orders to continue to do what I enjoy doing anyway. Besides, I hate golf and I love getting sucked and fucked.

[QUOTE=Tha X Facta][b]"I'm just voicing my own personal opinion.

Nobody cares."[/b] [/QUOTE]

Somebody cares. You must have cared or you wouldn't have written and voiced your "own personal opinion." :)

[QUOTE=Tha X Facta]Nice outside shots! :)[/QUOTE]

Thanks. I may try some more.

Couldn't this be a scene from a porn version of Robin Hood? Maid Marian...sucketh on my cock!:D

[QUOTE= Trick Williams]Tell that other guy to give it a rest too lol.. The kid dont mind big breasted bsw's but dammitt man!!![/QUOTE]

1. It would be nice to be able to say I "saw the light" from the compelling nature of your argument, and you may have intended to be well-meaning, but your language didn't exactly support that interpretation.

2. You could have extended me the courtesy of addressing me directly and here in my own thread. Of course, I am assuming you ARE addressing me, since you impolitely refer to me as "that other guy." My assumption would appear to be well founded, since I am not aware of any other pic postings of big breasted BSWs recently in the Philly threads that might need a "rest."

3. I stopped posting pics of Tanya almost a week ago. Were your eyes and brain on vacation?

4. You never said a peep while I was posting Tanya's pics. Is your comment supposed to be some kind of special posting effect like delayed time lapse photography?

5. You may feel that you have the right to whatever opinion you choose, and apparently at any time and in any venue you so choose, but that doesn't mean I will listen. When I get loutish comments like yours, my tendency is not to open my mind to the suggestion, but rather quite the opposite. I was a brat growing up, and not all of that has disappeared. I have another date forthcoming with Tanya. I will be able to spend as much time with her as I like: all day and all night if I want. Does 500 posted pics of that sound about right? 1000? 2000? More? It doesn't really matter what your or others' discourteous or boorish comments regarding that might be. I will be inclined to do as I please. However, you might take a page out of my wise old grandmother's book if your aim is to change behavior rather than merely criticize it: you should place a grain of sugar into what you say to another if you expect them to accept it with a grain of salt.

Super, have been watching your post for quite some time and have to say I am down right jealous of your choices,style, and overall delivery. You are the man and a bunch of wimps are just plain envious and small minded to ever complain about your choices or style. Keep up the great time and joy you Choose to share with us.

[QUOTE=Yung501]Super, have been watching your post for quite some time and have to say I am down right jealous of your choices,style, and overall delivery. You are the man and a bunch of wimps are just plain envious and small minded to ever complain about your choices or style. Keep up the great time and joy you Choose to share with us.[/QUOTE]

First of all, thank you. I appreciate your kind remarks.

Secondly, it is unfortunately in my insidious nature to clarify some things even when they appear in a congratulatory post. Please do not take it the wrong way. I do not mean it personally. Many people get wrong what I am about to explain.

Jealousy refers to the negative thoughts and feelings of insecurity, fear, and anxiety over an anticipated LOSS of something that the person values, such as a relationship, friendship, or love. One often properly hears, for example, of being jealous of a rival bf or gf because of the fear of losing one's love interest to another. However, you did mention envy in its proper context. Envy occurs when a person lacks another's (perceived) superior quality, achievement, or possession and either desires it or wishes that the other lacked it. Another way to look at it is that envy always involves only two people, and jealousy typically involves three people.

Envy can be a positive and useful thing, spurring one on to achieve or possess that which is envied. That seems to sound like your healthy form of it. Envy can also be negative. It can derive from a sense of low self-esteem that results from a perceived threat to a person's self image: another person has something that the envier considers to be important to have. If the other person is perceived to be similar to the envier, the aroused envy will be particularly intense, because it signals to the envier that it just as well could have been he or she who had the desired object.

So, it would seem that the "wimps and small-minded" would be the least of my worries where envy is concerned. Peers, or those who see themselves as peers, would be hardest hit, and would howl most loudly in complaint. Aristotle had a great definition of envy: "the pain caused by the good fortune of others." Kant, one of my favorites for many reasons, had a more involved definition of envy: "a reluctance to see our own well-being overshadowed by another's because the standard we use to see how well off we are is not the intrinsic worth of our own well-being but how it compares with that of others." I rarely, if ever, envy others, not because many others aren't doing things I would like to do, or possess things I would like to have, but rather because I do not personally choose to measure my self-worth by comparison with others.

I got a few well-written and well-reasoned PMS from a fellow monger regarding this. He had impressive credentials in the area of fashion photography, and I, as a relative amateur in this loosely related field of SW photography, was inclined to listen to his point of view. His main point was that when one takes many pictures, just a few should be selectively chosen that are the best angles and representations of the "model." That process provides the most interesting and appealing presentation of the photographic subject. I can see his argument. However, I can also see the other side of that argument.

Here is some of my reasoning related to this:

1. I am not choosing a magazine cover, or selective shots for a magazine photo spread, or just posting pics for ID, although good visual ID is a by-product. When I shoot pics of a SW I am telling the story of our encounter in pictures to accompany and complement the story I tell in words. It is my preferred "style." This is why I usually like to begin with clothed pics, then to underwear, then to nude and then to action shots. I throw in shots with photographic "props" on occasion just to increase the variety.

2. While some might think I post too many pics, I post far fewer than I actually take. I typically take 2 to 5 times more photos than I actually post. I select the better facial expressions, lighting, poses, angles, sensuality and the overall appeal of the shot. For some that still might represent too many. Others can't get enough. The bottom line is that you can't please everyone no matter what you do.

3. Everyone has different tastes in women and different tastes in photos of women. You could think of the pics I post as your own personal light board. They are only thumbnails, both in posts and as they appear in the photo gallery. It takes just a few seconds for your eyes to scan them and decide which pics and angles most appeal for opening and viewing more closely. Even an entire post or posting page or page in the photo gallery can be passed with one click of the mouse. I don't think that is much of an imposition on your time or patience.

4. I used to post literally dozens of pics at a time with any given report. Even in thumbnail format, that can be daunting and lead to sensory overload. Besides, I like to think of my photos as a fine Pinot, to be savored slowly and appreciated, and not a jug of Thunderbird to be gulped down indiscriminately. So, I recently started to post my pics 10 at a time, with enough time in between to allow viewers to enjoy them more slowly. I know this is working because I can see that the viewing count is WAY up on each pic.

5. While I listen to intelligent arguments, even good thinking won't always persuade me. My pic-taking philosophy and approach are pretty well ingrained. However, even a stubborn guy like me has been known to listen every now and then, and change his behavior depending upon the logic and appeal of the "argument." Good faith suggestions are always welcome. Bad faith ranting?: well, I think regular readers here have an inkling how that might work for you. :D

[QUOTE=Fbtom]There might be some who may grow weary of looking at the same girl with multiple shots. If you look at the viewed numbers, I'm sure that you will see varied counts reported as people picked which ones to look over more carefully.[/QUOTE]

I usually don't look at the "number of views" in the photo gallery as indicative of much, except my following personal observations:

1. When there is just one picture of a girl, there tends to be many views. Conversely, when there are many pictures of a girl there tends to be more selectivity and less views per pic. The fewer pics there are of a girl, the more views of each pic there tends to be and vice versa, regardless of the style of the pics.

2. The longer a pic stays on the first few pages of the photo gallery, the more views it tends to get. I guess guys don't tend to look much beyond what was most recently posted.

3. There is a tendency to like "flashing" pics of either top and/or bottom, up-skirt and naked spread pics. The rule seems to prevail, however, that the fewer the pics posted of one girl, the more views there are. There is a weariness or bored factor here operating to some extent.

4. There tends to be more views of "real" pics of a SW encounter by a monger reporting about it as opposed to commercial pics, advertising pics from the internet, etc.

5. There tends to be many views of a SW fully dressed as she might appear on the street (most especially shots of her actually on the street), or close-ups of her face or pics of her riding in a car. My guess is that this helps in real-life identification.

6. How pretty in the face or attractive in the body a girl is can always be a factor on how many views there are of a pic. But the above general rules still seem to apply.

I noticed myself that, when I limited my posts of any one girl at any one time to 10 or less, that the number of views per pic went way up, in many cases by a factor of 10 times or more. This reinforced the self-perceived wisdom of my decision to begin doing this in the first place.

[QUOTE=Fbtom]...criticizing pic count or quality is just ignorant. The viewer should feel lucky to have even seen any pics since posting online is all done voluntarily. Along that thought, girls get paid for pics. Did the complainer pay for that? Nope, so shut up already. The person taking the pics controls what is photographed and posted. So requests for certain poses should not be expected, but thankful if done. For example, if I like assholes, I'm going to take a pic of them, perhaps even post them for others who like to see them. If you don't like them, just keep on moving along. The same would go for pics of too thin, too fat, too whatever. You don't like them, then take ones that you do and post them! Otherwise, be courteous to the generosity of the adventurous peers.[/QUOTE]

I couldn't agree more. Be happy with what you get, even if it isn't perfectly what you want. If you really want to demonstrate your "superior" taste and choices, take your own pics and post them instead of just complaining about what "others" do.

[QUOTE=Fbtom]The same thing goes with reports, if they are wordy, repetitive, dull, full of errorrs and misspeellings, who cares? As long as the reports are accurate enough to satisfiy the goal of the forum of sharing info in order for men to have sex with women.[/QUOTE]

Tom, did you mean "errorrs(sic) and misspeellings(sic)" on purpose or was that a Freudian slip? ;)

My reports tend to be long and detailed. I am guilty on that count. However, I usually always provide a brief ratings summary at the end for those who just want to see if they care to date this girl or not.

[QUOTE=Fbtom]Peers may comment on how to improve pic taking or reporting content. Most of the time, if done with constructive criticism in mind, this is done for everyone's benefit.[/QUOTE]

"Constructive criticism" is like beauty. It is in the eye of the beholder. Making suggested improvements is one thing; just saying you don't like something is another. The latter isn't likely to be either very "constructive" or get any pic taking behavior altered.

[QUOTE=Fbtom]All of the above is my personal point of view..mentioned for consideration of peers to review or comment on. Hoping to find a common understanding so that we can all get along with less useless bickering. Let's talk about our adventures with the woman instead, it is a lot more interesting anyways![/QUOTE]

Less bickering about pic taking?: [b]HEAR, HEAR! and HIP HIP HOORAY![/b]

I am not holier than thou. I have had my share of contentions in this Forum about many things. HOWEVER, I have never, ever criticized the number, type, style, subject, content or anything else regarding anyone's posted pics. So, I feel somewhat justified in saying to everyone that I will post my pics my way and you can post your pics your way. :D

[QUOTE=Supereloquent]

Tom, did you mean "errorrs(sic) and misspeellings(sic)" on purpose or was that a Freudian slip? ;)

[/QUOTE]

Purposely smart azz, LOL!

I know that my own sentence structure, word usage, and spelling are not perfect. Now if these reports were for something serious, such as a job, then I would review and rewrite until correct. Butchered up as they may be, they are still suitable to get the point across.

Although your responses were insightful SuperE, please don't feel as if my comments were specific to you. As I mentioned in CJ's thread where I first posted it, it is a generalization of various comments by various peers over the past few months. If you feel as if they were, perhaps that is "Freudian" on your part? ;)

Seriously, I just wanted to bring the focus of our discussions back to the sexy women and our adventures meeting them. Let the past be as "water under the bridge" and move on towards a better forum. Where all, seniors, newbies, and even trolls, can view this forum as a respectable place to have decent exchange of info. I dislike opening up a thread only to find grade school style of exchanges taking place. WTF! Are we men or boys here?

[QUOTE=Fbtom]Purposely smart azz, LOL![/QUOTE]

Tom, not for a minute did I really think you were that bad a speeeller. I was pulling your chain, bud. :D

[QUOTE=Fbtom]I know that my own sentence structure, word usage, and spelling are not perfect. Now if these reports were for something serious, such as a job, then I would review and rewrite until correct. Butchered up as they may be, they are still suitable to get the point across.[/QUOTE]

You are MUCH better than the vast majority on here, even without trying very hard.

[QUOTE=Fbtom]Although your responses were insightful SuperE, please don't feel as if my comments were specific to you. As I mentioned ...where I first it is a generalization of various comments by various peers over the past few months. If you feel as if they were, perhaps that is "Freudian" on your part? ;) [/QUOTE]

I took you at your word: that your remarks were a generalization for commentary by the membership. I never thought they were specifically directed to me. There was no "Freudian" here at all, I favor the biopsychosocial psychiatric approach. :)

[QUOTE=Fbtom] Seriously, I just wanted to bring the focus of our discussions back to the sexy women and our adventures meeting them. Let the past be as "water under the bridge" and move on towards a better forum. Where all, seniors, newbies, and even trolls, can view this forum as a respectable place to have decent exchange of info. I dislike opening up a thread only to find grade school style of exchanges taking place. WTF! Are we men or boys here?[/QUOTE]

It is clear that we have some members who are still in "grade school" when it comes to mongering and appreciating the efforts of fellow mongers. Telling them not to be that way would be a bit like asking an 8 year old not to make fart sounds with his hand under his armpit. :D

[QUOTE=Supereloquent]...I favor the [b]*biopsychosocial psychiatric[/b] approach. :)
[/QUOTE]

Ah, yes, the 'product of environment' so to speak theorem. I guess I'm a pervert due to my early age exposure to sex. LOL! Although I'm inclined to somewhat agree on that thought model, I'm willing to bet I'd still be the a pervert without that same exposure. It just might be manifested differently. For example, how many times have you heard that the most influential of men, with their seemingly pristine backgrounds, are into the weirdest shit? So often that it has become a stereotype in media.

O.K., Let us ponder this discussion someday over a few brews, too deep of a discussion on this forum. Instead, let's talk about pussy and see some more pics too! ROFLMAO! :)

*Admittedly I had to google this as I didn't recall offhand comfortably enough to comment on it.

[quote=Tha X Facta]All we ever hear is how bad the pics are, tan lines, poor post timing, Blah, blah, bla...[/quote] [QUOTE=Supereloquent] No comment. :)[/quote]No comment? [b]WTF![/b] You're kiddin me right? ;)

It's funny how the most prolific mongers on this board can agree to disagree.

You and CJ are utterly antithetical in approach and engaging on this board by large.
Sometimes to the point of mind-numbing exasperation and awe.

Time after time....the imperious and dictatorial attitudes you guys have makes for a great read.

Even when the law was laid, I was awe-stricken at how one could avoid penalty.
Is there a bias? After all; what’s good for the gander is good for the goose.

[quote=Tha X Facta]The other guy; [b]all[/b] he does is, Waaa, waa, waa.....cry baby.[/quote][QUOTE=Supereloquent]"All?" Asked and answered.[/quote]Ebonically Speaking...
"Here's the crux of what I've tried to say
don't get slick with linguistics
until you know the basics."
[b] If you don't get it, you don't get it.[/b]

I don't look at dick shots either.......[b]De gustibus non est disputandum[/b]
_______________________________________________________________
[size=-2][b]It means “there is no disputing about tastes.”
The implication is that opinions about matters of taste are not objectively right or wrong,
and hence that disagreements about matters of taste cannot be objectively resolved.[/size][/b]
_______________________________________________________________
[QUOTE=Supereloquent]Somebody cares. You must have cared or you wouldn't have written and voiced your "own personal opinion." :)[/quote]Nawww, just funnin. :)

[b]X[/b] Out

I was intrigued ever since I read the initial reports on here about this relatively new SW. She seemed to get consistently great reviews on her sweet attitude and cock sucking skills. Furthermore, she seemed to look fresh and pretty and have a great, if somewhat thin, body. Street’s outside photos of her revealed a carefree and happy disposition, that just seemed to ooze out of her. Rook’s pictures showed her tits and pussy, licking his cock, and with a load of cum in her mouth. That’s a nice thing about pictures. They truly are worth a thousand words. The available pics and all the positive reviews encouraged me to at least sample this new treat on the K.

The word seemed to be that Jenn was different from the usual drug addicted SW with a pimp. She was supposedly a student and using the money for classes. Because she was pretty, clean and gave a great BJ, several had reported they were willing to give her a bit more than the standard Ave rate. I have no problems with that. If a girl looks better and performs better, then she should be worth more than the average fee. When I picked her up, her rap to me was also that she was a student. She was concerned that we would be back from our date in enough time for her to get to class. I was a bit concerned about the time squeeze, but I knew we had enough for at least about a 2 ½ hour indoor date at a nice place, and make it easily for her time deadline, even after taking travel time to and from into consideration. While I would have preferred a more open ended arrangement regarding time, this was better than nothing so off we went.

She was very talkative on the way and seemed quite intelligent. Her attitude was very pleasant. When we arrived she was very excited about posing for the camera and I will have to admit that she was extremely naturally photogenic. Some might think she is a bit too thin, or that her tits and ass were too small, but I liked the whole package: an extremely pretty face and a nice thin body. She would be a classic spinner except for her height. I found her to be very easy on the eyes, with a very fuckable body. Jenn was especially entranced with all my photo props. Her posing with them was like watching a little girl try on her mother’s clothes and prance in front of the mirror, although very few mothers probably have THESE particular accessories, LOL. You have the pics to review and see for yourself. Her teasing smiles and playfulness say it all.

My first suspicion that all was not all as advertised with Jenn was a bandage/patch on her ass. This is a classic mark of where a junkie is injecting herself. She said it was an insect bite. I have heard that one a zillion times: mosquito bites, bee stings, even spider bites. I can’t condemn her on this one piece of evidence, but there was more to follow. That does not make me any less enamored of Jenn to suck and fuck me that she should be a more typical drug addicted gal rather than girl working her way through school. But, it does present a different picture from her poor innocent student story. I had her place her hand on her ass where the patch was when taking the photos. I am not usually interested in showing a girl in her worst light, even if there is one. And, the patch by itself doesn’t necessarily mean anything. But, combined with other indications to follow it might add to piecing a puzzle together regarding the many mysteries of Jenn.

All of the reviews here of her cock sucking prowess were right on the money. This baby knows how to suck cock! She can DT, suck it sloppy, vary the speed, use her hands, swirl her tongue just right... she has the complete arsenal of dick sucking weapons and knows how to use them. I was spurting in a few minutes. It was a full load, and I asked her to hold in her mouth and drip it all over my cock again. I got some great shots of that, particularly one incredibly awesome money shot of a waterfall of sticky cum cascading from her lips to my dick. She eventually spit it into the sink, but you have to love a gal who will spit it all over you and lick it off again and let you snap pictures of that. WOW!: shades of Jessica from Camden!

Her first BBBJCIMSP was so good I just had to try another before we got to fucking. The second was as good as the first. This time I got onto my knees on the bed. She faced me on her knees and bent over to suck me as my balls hung free. She spread her knees wide. That top view was so erotic. It didn’t take me long to give her another hot mouthful.

I was so ready to fuck her after 2 cups of BBBJ. She was very tight and we needed to use some lube, but that was very OK. We started CG and flipped to mish from that position. I pushed her head over the edge of the bed and upside down as I pounded away at that tight fuckin’ cu*nt. I flipped her back again for RCG. That was so hot to see her ass pump up and down as she rode me. I slapped it and called her all manner of filthy names. She thought that was cute and giggled loudly as she rode me. She screamed out, “I want you to finish doggie. Fuck me like a doggie, Daddy.” She grabbed the edge of the bed, with knees spread as wide as she could, and I plowed into her. She was loving it. This was clearly her favorite position. I spanked her and banged her hard for what seemed forever, and she was moaning and screaming like crazy. I finally said gruffly to her, “What do bad little piggies say when they cum?” (I had coached her on this earlier, of course, LOL). She hissed back, “They say ‘fuck’ Daddy; they say ‘fuck’”I replied, “Say it for me, like a naughty little cum piggie.” She yelled, ‘Fuck... fuck... fuck... fuck.” Then there was a silence for about a minute while I really nailed her good, and she finally squealed at the top her lungs, “FUUUUUUUUUUUCCCCKKKKK!” I thought they might hear it three rooms down, as if they don’t know what happens in hotel rooms. :) I slammed into her a few more times, slapped her ass and squirted hard. Damn, that was one hot fuck!

So, we were finished. I would have been willing to stay a lot longer, but I knew we were pushing the time envelope of her class start time. We had enjoyed an awesome time, lots of terrific pics, three great cups, and a wonderful erotic attitude on her part. We hadn’t discussed the fee beforehand, but I gave her more than I had ever given any other SW, even for more cups and a longer date. I thought she was worth it. 99.9% of all other SWs would probably have given me a big hug and kiss and we would be in position to do this again real soon. But this was that other .1%. Jenn looked at me like I had somehow shortchanged her expectations. She said almost with a growl that she gets X for a hotel date, and expects a generous tip on top of that. I explained that I was no newcomer to the stroll, and this was more than I had ever given anyone for a date, but that didn’t seem to cut any ice. And, the ice was getting frosty. I said that X was not a number that even came close to what even the best girls on the K got for even a long date, and she knew it. She said she wasn’t just another girl on the Ave. I didn’t want to continue this argument. I already knew I had been more than fair. If she had been sweet about getting a little more she might even have been successful, but this strong arm stuff was not going to get her anywhere, especially now that she had absolutely no leverage. I tried to hold my cool, but she was escalating the tone of her demand, as if that was going to get me to cave. I told her the fee she was suggesting would even be high by BP and escort standards, and that if she wanted those prices she should be advertising on line, and not peddling her ass on the Ave. If she wanted to get nasty then I could get nasty too.

Jenn realized that being aggressive was going to get nowhere with me, so she turned on a dime to get my sympathy. She started practically crying about how she needed the money to pay her tuition bill for school today or they were going to kick her out. When that didn’t move me, she switched gears to the fact that she was part of a “group” (translation for the slow folks; she is part of a pimp’s harem), and she needed to bring back a minimum amount of money to account for being gone this long or she would be in trouble. Did she think I was so stupid that I would eventually fall for whatever soft soap story might work on me? She gave me the silent treatment all the way back, a far contrast to the ride there. That was fine with me. I was tired of her bullshit anyway, and her assumption that I would swallow it. If she thought the silent treatment would now do it, she was sadly mistaken. She should have considered herself lucky I was even giving her a ride back. A lot of guys would have dumped her ass and taken off. She eventually tried sympathy again, and was saying how hungry she was and could I spare her another 40 for something to eat. When I told her I had already given her quite enough to buy a meal, she said “How about 20?” Then she tried 10. I know the game is for us to get sucked and fucked, and for them to see how much of our money they can manage to get, but this was becoming just downright pathetic. If this whole thing had wandered down a different path I may have even volunteered to buy her a nice meal. But, at this point, there was no way this gal was getting another nickel from me. We finally reached her destination. It was hardly an area one might go to school: an area one might cop some dope,? yeah, for sure. And, on the way she was having phone conversations with “a friend.” It sure sounded like a pimp convo to me, and that she already owed him some dough. When we arrived it was all sweetness and light again, and she had a great time, etc. etc. Is this girl schizoid, or does she actually think she can sell me her act? I don’t care one way or the other. Whether Jenn is an innocent little girl working her way through school by turning a few occasional tricks, or a typical hard-core drugged out Ave SW with a pimp: either way I don’t appreciate being played hard like some fool for more dough. It took a lot of fun out of what otherwise was a terrific SW encounter.

Ratings? I am conflicted about this one. Except for the aggressive tactics for more dough at the end, the date was outstanding in every way: Jenn has the prettiest face, a rockin’ thin bod, does an incredible BJ, fucks like a champ and had an incredible attitude right up to the end. Why she had to ruin it at that point is anyone’s guess. You could call me thin-skinned about the post-date-press-for-more-money shenanigans, and none of it worked on me anyway, but it just places a shadow over wanting to go through that again. I guess I would repeat, because she is so excellent in every other way, IF we can be very clear about the compensation expectations, and satisfaction with them. Otherwise, there are plenty of other great SWs on the K.

My pics will be in installments of 10, as is my new and preferred approach. the very last one is a money shot that is not to be missed!

Excellent report SuperE! Your experience became evident as we read about the shenanigans. You were a gentleman to the end and handled it well.

Wow, great report SuperE! You held firm at the end, that makes me so proud to read and learn from your experiences.

Hot looking chick though.

I loved the report and the pic.

I will definitely have to look for her next time I'm out.

Looking forward to seeing more pics of her!