Visiting Philospher Part 2
[QUOTE=Jjbee62;3460637]Then selling any product or service is derogatory. If you have food you should just give it to anyone who asks. If you have a skill, you should make it available freely, rather than sell it to the highest bidder. Isn't that what it boils down to?[/QUOTE]No, selling your labor, skills, or thoughts and ideas is not the same as sex. Sex is different in that is not a skill or labor, but when one sells sex they themselves become the product.
[QUOTE=Jjbee62;3460637]The problem is that there will always be the strong and the weak, the greedy and the generous. You end up with slavery.
Why, out of all the services in the world is sex unique? Why is it the only action that has its own, completely unique set of rules? Why does a person who has worked hard to learn to provide pleasure, lose value for selling their skills, but a person who has worked to gain any other skill increase their value? Why is a person who hires a prostitute bad, but someone who hires a plumber is smart? [/QUOTE]See above comment, I never equated it as bad you did. Society sees it that way because it goes against the Christian value of adultery that this country has adopted.
[QUOTE=Jjbee62;3460637]Let's ignore local laws for a moment, because my local laws are different from your local laws. Let's assume a vo-tech school, the institute of sex. At the school students are taught, in addition to sexual skills, health and physiology, how to recognize herpes and genital warts, disease prevention, basic economics, how to deal with impotence and premature ejaculation. Upon successful completion, followed by tests, the graduate receives a license. They list their occupation as sex worker, pay taxes, get regular checkups and have certain rules they must follow. Customers require an anonymous I'd, that is only connected to a sexual health record. To keep the I'd active they require regular testing.
Is the buying and selling of sex, still derogatory?[/QUOTE]Yes, because it goes against the morals of society and as said before one becomes the product. Just because said person gets some regulated tests done does not change those facts, nor does it change the fact that those regulations are in place in order to curb the health impacts on the general populous if they were not performed.
Sex Object and Moral Laws
[QUOTE=Piemaster;3460795]Sex is different in that is not a skill or labor, but when one sells sex they themselves become the product. Society sees it that way because it goes against the Christian value of adultery that this country has adopted. Yes, because it goes against the morals of society and as said before one becomes the product.[/QUOTE]If I steal and destroy a product under society or our moral laws it's theft and destruction of private property, a felony at best. If I kidnap and take a life it's murder with a possible death sentence depending on the state. So the fallacy in your philosophy is even under the morals of our society, which is based on Christian values, the destruction of said sex object is still considered the taking of a human life. It makes no difference on the perceived worth of the sex product, it's true moral value under both our laws and Christian beliefs is once again priceless as a citizen and a human.
Well the morons at The Economic Times defines products
[QUOTE=FreckleFreak;3462858]You go to a hotel and rent a room, a service provided by the hotel, and you see a blow up doll with a gap, a product, and purchase it at the hotel and take it to your room and have sex with it, Self-Product by your definition. Then you get in your car, a product, but by your choice you left the doll and drove your car home. You could have left both your doll and your car at the hotel and taken an Uber home, a service, and never went back to get either one of the products you purchased and own.
Now you go to a brothel and rent a room, a service provided by the brothel, you see a prostitute at the brothel with a gap, a service provider, who will provide you with sexual favors, but you can only rent her pussy, ass and tits for an hour in your rented room. You take her to your room and she provides the services you desire. Now you love the gap and you want to take her home, but you don't own her so you have to leave her at the brothel because you only rented her services for an hour. You could drive your car, a product, home or take an Uber, a service, but no matter what you can't take the service provider with you. However if you negotiate a long term deal with her to provide you with services at your home, then it's out-call services. If these services become a permanent deal then she is now your live in service provider and most would call her your live in mistress or girlfriend. If you marry her, then she becomes your wife, however with that mistake you will soon be returning to the brothel to obtain their services once again![/QUOTE]Definition of 'Product' - The Economic Times.
Economictimes. [URL]indiatimes.com[/URL] › Definitions › Marketing.
A product can be a service or an item. It can be physical or in virtual or cyber form. Every product is made at a cost and each is sold at a price. The price that can be charged depends on the market, the quality, the marketing and the segment that is targeted.
Well the Morons at the Economist Say
[QUOTE=Bob0324;3462917]Definition of 'Product' - The Economic Times.
Economictimes. [URL]indiatimes.com[/URL] Definitions Marketing.
A product can be a service or an item. It can be physical or in virtual or cyber form. Every product is made at a cost and each is sold at a price. The price that can be charged depends on the market, the quality, the marketing and the segment that is targeted.[/QUOTE]Quote "When a client asks "what can you make for me?" they are asking about products; when a client asks "what can you do for me?" they are asking about services. While a product is something that can be measured and counted, a service is less concrete and is the result of the application of skills and expertise towards an identified need. A product is something you can point at, whereas a service, as The Economist defines it, is any activity "you can't drop on your foot". (see below reference).
[URL]https://www.archives.gov/preservation/products/definitions/products-services.html[/URL]
[URL]http://www.economist.com/economics-a-to-z?letter=S[/URL]
By your definition above what is the cost to make the providers product of pussy, tits and ass? Your definition above proves that all providers aren't the same because, "the price that can be charged depends on the market, the quality, the marketing and the segment that is targeted", which clearly indicates differentiation between the products. Thus a difference in the type of provider, thus not all providers are the same.
Bob, please at some point you are becoming a moron about this whole discussion. If you truly believe that any provider is an object, a product, a thing, all of them being the same, none being better than the other, all have issues then go ahead and believe what you want, it's your right. I feel sorry for you and the demise of your humanity over the past few months. Things must have been really tough on you for you to reach this low point in your life. I wish you well, I'm done with this discussion.