Supereloquent's Reports - Philadelphia

[QUOTE=Supereloquent]I have my own experience to relate which completely grossed me out, and will cause me never to date this particular SW again, even though the rest of the experience was OK. It was so disgusting that I won't even link it to her name nor file a full report here on our date.

[/QUOTE]

I’d really like to know who this girl was. Why not share this information with the rest of the board. Your information might save another monger from having to experience a similar occurrence. If she had tried to rip you off, you’d report that information to the board, right? If she had offered you bare back sex, you would report that, right? If her blow job was terrible, you would report that, right? Why not this? This is the type of girl I’d like to avoid – maybe. On one hand, if she is really hot, I might be able to excuse her behavior and assure her that I would never abandon her. On the other hand maybe I’d just avoid her if she is just a so, so date with average looks. Then again, on another hand, maybe I am into water sports.

If you have pictures, that would be nice. Had it been me, I would have gotten a few shots of her doing the deed. I would have told her that I’d be posting the pictures along with the others. Who knows, maybe some members are into that type of thing. Ask Deepthroat.

I would have probably told the management and left a tip for the Cleaner. I have seen worst.

CookyJar

[QUOTE=Forth Ryte]Guys:
I certainly agree that distracted driving is risky but after all the energy put into discussing the distractions of cell phones and even radios and conversations with passengers, we might take note of more serious distracted driving risk: Driving the K while scoping for SWs.

Driving a lap on the K involves doing a lot of distraction along the way.

WHILE DRIVING, I find myself absorbed in spotting the younger females and then looking them over carefully. Is she looking back at me? Is she good looking? Does she look alert or nodding out? Is there a pimp nearby? Is LE watching? Was that a red light I just rolled through? Is LE watching? Do I recognize this one? How young is she? WOW, that one is hot, where is the next place I can turn to loop back and get another look? Will another monger get her before I get back there? I'd love to make a U turn but, is LE watching?

-- Forth Ryte[/QUOTE]

You hit a nail on the head. Similar to another favorite activity, half and half, I prefer to give equal attention to safety/caution and spotting. In addition to spotting SWs, I want to be aware of pedestrians (who tend to cross the K wherever the hell they feel like it), traffic lights and potential dangers.

I rarely take too much time in the first instance of spotting a SW to check out all the details. I usually turn the nearest corner and get out on foot (sometimes saves a lot of time vs. making a loop depending where you are on the K, and it has other benefits as well) to scope it out up close and personal. That allows me to look out for and avoid LE, see if I recognize her (now that colder weather is coming they are going to be more bundled up in their hooded coats and sweatshirts, and much more difficult to recognize or evaluate properly until you are close), observe the attractiveness of the girl, note if she has a pimp or "boyfriend," and get a sense of whether she is strung out and/or nodding off and her personality. I can learn a lot more that way than even the most careful observations while driving.

I may miss a few hotties by not stopping right there on the K or hanging a U turn right there on the Ave like some other knuckleheads, but there are plenty of fish in the sea and it isn't the end of the world if I miss one.

To quote one of my favorite authors, Victor Hugo, "Caution is the eldest child of wisdom."

[QUOTE=CookyJar]I’d really like to know who this girl was. Why not share this information with the rest of the board. Your information might save another monger from having to experience a similar occurrence. If she had tried to rip you off, you’d report that information to the board, right? If she had offered you bare back sex, you would report that, right? If her blow job was terrible, you would report that, right? Why not this? This is the type of girl I’d like to avoid – maybe. On one hand, if she is really hot, I might be able to excuse her behavior and assure her that I would never abandon her. On the other hand maybe I’d just avoid her if she is just a so, so date with average looks. Then again, on another hand, maybe I am into water sports.[/QUOTE]

You make some good points (regarding the waste can pee girl). As I said, the sexual experience was good, not fantastic, but good. Mongers might want to decide for themselves after reading my report of the experience. A monger might find what she did interesting and even exciting rather than disgusting.

[QUOTE=CookyJar]If you have pictures, that would be nice. Had it been me, I would have gotten a few shots of her doing the deed. I would have told her that I’d be posting the pictures along with the others. Who knows, maybe some members are into that type of thing. Ask Deepthroat.[/QUOTE]

I do have pictures and you have convinced me to post a report with pics. I would have taken some pics of her doing the deed, but I was in a mild state of shock at the time.

Deep throat said there was at least one monger who liked water sports, so this would seem to be his "cup of tea."

[QUOTE=CookyJar]I would have probably told the management and left a tip for the Cleaner. I have seen worst.[/QUOTE]

She definitely knew I was angry and I told her that I thought it was a very nasty and disgusting thing to do and showed no respect to the hotel and especially the cleaning crew.

I am sure equal to or worse things have occurred there such as barfing or bleeding all over the sheets or floors, cumming on the walls or floor, whatever. I was just so embarrassed at the time for myself and for her that I didn't mention it to the management. Things have a way of working out in one's mind with a little time, distance and perspective from a situation that catches one totally by surprise. Upon more careful reflection, the things I realize now that I should have done are the things that I will do, including posting the experience with pics, as you suggested, mentioning it to and apologizing to the management and leaving a tip for the cleaner (who will obviously remember the experience). Although I didn't do it, I assume the responsibility to make things right.

I am sure that many mongers would not have reported this experience for any variety of reasons. It is certainly not flattering in any sense. I have been accused of many things, from writing reports that sounded like they were improbable and came from the Penthouse Forum, to the similar improbability that I dated 7 SWs in a day. I consider any contention of these as pure jealousy and insecurity. Just because they don't or can't have these experiences doesn't mean that I don't or can't. But I don't just report sweetness and light. I have reported on bad and mediocre, and even a few close to danger experiences. Just like one of my favorite long movies, I report on "The Good, the Bad and the Ugly."

[QUOTE=Mythbuster]We should have our fun but remember that some things are just plain wrong. I'm urging you publicly super to tell your deep throat that she needs to report this guy. He is predator and probably victimizing some child somewhere....Let's have fun but let's do the right thing. Maybe you deepthroat will see this and step up to the plate.[/QUOTE]

Both the mongers in question have very sick and demented fantasies to be sure. One has role played them with an ADULT SW. That might be reprehensible but it isn't EVIDENCE of child victimization, nor would I EVER encourage such. In the other case the monger wants to do something that is also sick and demented. But there is a big leap between wanting to do something and actually doing it.

Don't get me wrong. I personally think Louisiana has the right idea by doing the following with regard to convicted child predators:

* Requiring lifetime registration for all sexual offenders;
* Increasing sentences for sex offenders for a variety of offenses;
* Linking internet sites such as Facebook to link up with
the state’s sex predator database; and,
* Allowing for chemical castration of certain sex offenders on their first
offense.

If a Deep Throat in question wants to report either guy I think she would be doing society a favor. LE could certainly conduct a sting on these guys similar to what they do on the running TV series, "To Catch a Predator." But for you to urge me "publicly" to tell the DTs to do so as if I were their agent or parental authority of some sort is WAY out of line. They read this forum. They are directly involved in the activity in question. They are adults. They have to make up their own minds about what they want to do about it.

[QUOTE=Mythbuster]You don't see your link when you see the pictures in the photo gallery. Sorry to offend but I'm just trying to offer you a better way to pull off what you were trying to do. I think the rules state that you should post pictures that you have taken yourself. The has been acceptance of pictures from adds but my view point from a conservative technolgy stand point is that it almost never makes sense to duplicate pictures in the gallery. Being wasteful of resources no matter how plentiful is just raises the hairs on my back so I appologize if I come off a little harsh.[/QUOTE]
Particularly - "it almost never makes sense to duplicate pictures in the gallery"

I agree, in matter of fact, unless you go out of your way and actually rename the photos, the gallery won't accept the upload, noting that they're duplicates. "You have already attached this file in thread"

This may only come into play on your own photos, e.g. trying to upload photos you, yourself have all ready uploaded before, but it shows how having duplicates is unfavored.

[QUOTE=Permanent Wood]... "it almost never makes sense to duplicate pictures in the gallery"[/QUOTE]

I take it that you would view my following past observations as still [b]almost never[/b] making sense to duplicate pics already in the gallery? If so, then I guess you and I and several others in the Philly thread and in other threads who have duplicated numerous gallery photos for what we thought was a good reason can agree to disagree with you. I would also suppose your contention would include duplicating SW Stroll Maps and placing them all in a separate thread for ease of finding and using them? (I have received dozens and dozens of PM and some publicly posted thank yous and kudos and props for this as a terrific and useful idea; I have not received any comments that it was a bad idea; but there is a first time for everything).

[QUOTE=Supereloquent]In the Philadelphia thread we often re-post one another's (or our own) pics for any number of reasons: to indicate what a SW looked like in a report if the monger reporting didn't take any pics; to show what improvements or enhancements are possible with photo software (I have benefited from this instruction); to confirm whether a particular SW described in a report is someone for whom a previous pic was posted; just to indicate our favorite pic (s), such as in a year-end roundup of SW pic favorites. We even had a photo thread (now inactive) with a collection of pics from all mongers of SWs by year, ratings and links to reports about them. [/QUOTE]

[QUOTE=Mythbuster]I don't seem to see that link you were talking about.[/QUOTE]

There is a link on EVERY pic in the gallery labeled "View Report."

[QUOTE=Supereloquent]There is a link on EVERY pic in the gallery labeled "View Report."[/QUOTE]When some one sees her picture they want the original report not yours. You should have at least added a link to the original. I guess there is always the edit feature.

[QUOTE=Mythbuster]You don't see your link when you see the pictures in the photo gallery. Sorry to offend but I'm just trying to offer you a better way to pull off what you were trying to do. I think the rules state that you should post pictures that you have taken yourself. The has been acceptance of pictures from adds but my view point from a conservative technolgy stand point is that it almost never makes sense to duplicate pictures in the gallery. Being wasteful of resources no matter how plentiful is just raises the hairs on my back so I appologize if I come off a little harsh.[/QUOTE]

You seem to have a different story every time I respond to your complaints. First it was that there was "confusion" as to the location or availability in re-posted pics and that "memory" was not an issue. Now you claim that "technology" (learn to spell it, as well as "ads" for "adds" and "apologize" for "appologize;" there IS a spell checker built in here!) is the issue after all and that duplicate pics are a "waste of resources."

As an aside, you also seem to be very high-handed morally (regarding your other complaint) for someone posting on a board dedicated to getting sucked and fucked by SWs.

For someone so concerned about the "technology" you need to take a brief look at how to use the photo gallery before launching all these complaints to me about how my pics wind up in it. Yes, there IS a link to a report on every photo in the photo gallery, as I previously explained to you a couple of times now. LOOK at it!

I also explained some good reasons for duplicating previously posted pics in my reply to Permanent Wood. OK, I agree that my posting of the Figueroa pics was just in good fun, but it's not like I do that a lot. I can't remember ever re-posting a pic before without a good reason, and that reason was usually that it was in the interest of sharing information more clearly. My original photo journalism here speaks for itself. I have taken 60-70% of the new photos of SWs on the K this year and far more than that in volume. Considering that CJ has taken almost all of the rest (and is also the overwhelming pic and report contributor for the Camden stroll), I think I can make a good argument that I hardly am or need to be predominantly a vulture of others' pics.

Photos, maps, etc. only need to be uploaded to the server's hard drive one time, no need to host duplicate files, just use [URL=http://usasexguide.info/forum/misc.php?do=bbcode]URL Hyperlinking[/URL] (about 1/2 way down on page). Also, I never said compiling SW Stroll Maps to one thread wasn't a good idea, it can be done by hyperlinking the existing URLs (of the maps), and in doing so, you aren't limited to the 10 uploads per post.

[url=http://usasexguide.info/forum/attachment.php?attachmentid=85388]Figueroa Street Shot, Originally posted by Baldy Cruiser[/url]

[QUOTE=Supereloquent]I take it that you would view my following past observations as still [b]almost never[/b] making sense to duplicate pics already in the gallery? If so, then I guess you and I and several others in the Philly thread and in other threads who have duplicated numerous gallery photos for what we thought was a good reason can agree to disagree with you. I would also suppose your contention would include duplicating SW Stroll Maps and placing them all in a separate thread for ease of finding and using them? (I have received dozens and dozens of PM and some publicly posted thank yous and kudos and props for this as a terrific and useful idea; I have not received any comments that it was a bad idea; but there is a first time for everything).[/QUOTE]It is not done often. Enhancements are not the exact same pictures. The phot galley and your maps are useful. The reposting of someone pictures from a different area to your thread is selfserving at the very least. You make enough good contributions on your own. You really don't need to add someone else's.

[QUOTE=Supereloquent]... But for you to urge me "publicly" to tell the DTs to do so as if I were their agent or parental authority of some sort is WAY out of line. They read this forum. They are directly involved in the activity in question. They are adults. They have to make up their own minds about what they want to do about it.[/QUOTE]We could argue all day about actions vrs desires. But this person is actively seeking out a way to fulfill his desires. You are the only one here who knows deep throat and her judgement may be compromised. When it comes to protecting children asking you to be proactive is not out of line. If however you think it is then please refrain from posting about the subject or put me on ignore because I will call you on it everytime. Everytime these guys get caught, it is always "the first time they have ever done it". You have no idea how big of a threat this guy is.

[QUOTE=Permanent Wood]Photos, maps, etc. only need to be uploaded to the server's hard drive one time, no need to host duplicate files, just use [URL=http://usasexguide.info/forum/misc.php?do=bbcode]URL Hyperlinking[/URL] (about 1/2 way down on page). Also, I never said compiling SW Stroll Maps to one thread wasn't a good idea, it can be done by hyperlinking the existing URLs (of the maps), and in doing so, you aren't limited to the 10 uploads per post.

[url=http://usasexguide.info/forum/attachment.php?attachmentid=85388]Figueroa Street Shot, Originally posted by Baldy Cruiser[/url][/QUOTE]Better watch out! When you start making sense they always pull out spellcheck!

[QUOTE=Permanent Wood]Photos, maps, etc. only need to be uploaded to the server's hard drive one time, no need to host duplicate files, just use [URL=http://usasexguide.info/forum/misc.php?do=bbcode]URL Hyperlinking[/URL] (about 1/2 way down on page). Also, I never said compiling SW Stroll Maps to one thread wasn't a good idea, it can be done by hyperlinking the existing URLs (of the maps), and in doing so, you aren't limited to the 10 uploads per post.

[url=http://usasexguide.info/forum/attachment.php?attachmentid=85388]Figueroa Street Shot, Originally posted by Baldy Cruiser[/url][/QUOTE]

I tried to click on your link and it didn't work. I get an error message that I can't access that page because I am not "logged in" as a User. But I am logged in, so I don't get it. This has happened to me with many links posted on here. This may be a problem particular to my computer; I don't know; I don't profess to be a computer expert nor understand why the links sometimes do not work. Re-posted pictures/maps, on the other hand, always work.

Regarding maps: it would be fine to hyperlink them but I collected them for my own use in a file folder after months and months of perusing the photo thread. At the time I never thought to want or need the hyperlink. To recreate them now would involve many, many hours of work. It was much more convenient for me, and much easier for members' use to re-post them. Plus, most of the original maps didn't have labels as to what cities they represented, and it would be much harder to use a map thread with such links, assuming one could even get the links to work. All one has to do with the way I have it set up is to go to the post section alphabetically that one desires and pause one's cursor over each map briefly, and the name of each city is in the title of the map. With a hyperlink I could not change the title to make it this easy nor graphically evident.

While I appreciate your suggestion and see that it would be a better way to go if planning future links as opposed to re-postings, I hope you see that I did not do this just to be a nudge.

I'll have to say, you do explain yourself well. I understand where you're coming from having saved all those maps over time, so yes, hyperlinking is out the window.