Just joined this great site.
Look forward to being part of the community.
SP.
Printable View
Just joined this great site.
Look forward to being part of the community.
SP.
[QUOTE=Quail;2651742]WTF is your problem TB aka Frank Pierce aka a bunch of other handles. Get a fucking life and let Kristine do things herself. You are ruining her business. Get a life. You're a jerk and she's a fool for trusting you and believing you![/QUOTE]
[QUOTE=SnakePliskin1;2665490]Just joined this great site.
Look forward to being part of the community.
SP.[/QUOTE]Well that didn't take too long, now did it.
Banned from eccie so time to try the luck here with this crowd.
Beyond ridicules!
PK.
[QUOTE=SnakePliskin1;2665490]Just joined this great site.
Look forward to being part of the community.
SP.[/QUOTE]At least this time you are using the same handle that you used on eccie and were banned there. What's the problem here? Are you getting lazy and tired of coming up with new handles each time?? How about Frank Pierce 1. OR Tree Bark 1 . ?
[QUOTE=Quail;2666301]At least this time you are using the same handle that you used on eccie and were banned there. What's the problem here? Are you getting lazy and tired of coming up with new handles each time?? How about Frank Pierce 1. OR Tree Bark 1 . ?[/QUOTE]Maybe the next screen name should be Millard Filmore, the illustrious New Yorker who was Mr. Pierce's immediate predecessor in high orifice.
[QUOTE=CMale135;2666398]Maybe the next screen name should be Millard Filmore, the illustrious New Yorker who was Mr. Pierce's immediate predecessor in high orifice.[/QUOTE]Maybe we can take a poll to decide on the next 'bandle'- as in banned handle LOL!!
BBAAAAAAAHHHAHAHA!
PK.
Phil More Butts!!
[QUOTE=CMale135;2666398]Maybe the next screen name should be Millard Filmore, the illustrious New Yorker who was Mr. Pierce's immediate predecessor in high orifice.[/QUOTE]
I was wondering, all is subjective, but BBW is one that is interesting because I have seen posts that say - ' well, she is a bit bigger than pics, curvy, but by no means a BBW' - or the like. Then when a dude goes to meet up with that gal, she IS SUCH a BBW. What should be the descriptive limits for BBW, THoughts anyone?
My friends prefer spinners and slender tall, but are not averse to an athletic build taller one. That does NOT mean "husky"(tough muscular bruiser chick with no feminine form) or tall and biggg boobies and big everything else unless there is a decent waist showing, that is, if their waist measurement is larger, then that is definitely a BBW and if it is the same as hips measurement it is probably a BBW ot a dude in drag, or a TV, TS, etc. THis was very evident with Vanessa, whose pics were good tall-curvy, but in person was with horrid makeup, big midriff along with the DDD and big butt and actually looked like a dude in drag. My friend had to pass on it quickly as she was BBW for sure and looked quite older than 27.
Thoughts of the general BBW limits?
[QUOTE=Freedom2B;2680663]I was wondering, all is subjective, but BBW is one that is interesting because I have seen posts that say - ' well, she is a bit bigger than pics, curvy, but by no means a BBW' - or the like. Then when a dude goes to meet up with that gal, she IS SUCH a BBW. What should be the descriptive limits for BBW, THoughts anyone?
My friends prefer spinners and slender tall, but are not averse to an athletic build taller one. That does NOT mean "husky"(tough muscular bruiser chick with no feminine form) or tall and biggg boobies and big everything else unless there is a decent waist showing, that is, if their waist measurement is larger, then that is definitely a BBW and if it is the same as hips measurement it is probably a BBW ot a dude in drag, or a TV, TS, etc. THis was very evident with Vanessa, whose pics were good tall-curvy, but in person was with horrid makeup, big midriff along with the DDD and big butt and actually looked like a dude in drag. My friend had to pass on it quickly as she was BBW for sure and looked quite older than 27.
Thoughts of the general BBW limits?[/QUOTE]As I'm sure you know, BBW is an acronym for big beautiful woman. What you consider to be BBW is going to depend on what you consider to be big. Some guys think if you can't see bone definition, she's fat. Others think the perfect woman has a little extra cushion. I myself, as a bigger guy (6'3" - 295) like a girl that's a little thicker. Soft, big tits, curvy. Not looking large rolls of flesh, or dimples on her as, but thick. Maybe that should be the quantifying value. How far the stomach hands over the waistband. LOL!
Does anyone know if there is a way to send pics in PM?
Thanks.
SP.
In my opinion, if you can't see any definition of a woman's body, due to fat, then she's bbw.
The ones with a little extra are considered full. I believe athletic is a nice way of saying she's full figured.
Personally, I'm into petite, but shapely petite. Boobs can't be bigger than a bee. Stomach has to be flat, with navel piercing.
Fat thighs are disgusting as is a fat ass! Just not my thing.
[QUOTE=Rdavis1972;2680763]As I'm sure you know, BBW is an acronym for big beautiful woman. What you consider to be BBW is going to depend on what you consider to be big. Some guys think if you can't see bone definition, she's fat. Others think the perfect woman has a little extra cushion. I myself, as a bigger guy (6'3" - 295) like a girl that's a little thicker. Soft, big tits, curvy. Not looking large rolls of flesh, or dimples on her as, but thick. Maybe that should be the quantifying value. How far the stomach hands over the waistband. LOL![/QUOTE]
[QUOTE=SnakePliskin1;2682151]Fee was 300. For some reason it won't let me post 3 dollar sings.
No upsell, tips not expected.[/QUOTE]Can someone please explain to me why using dollar signs to represent one hundred dollars is a good idea?
While I'm certainly able to type 3 consecutive dollar signs, and am not experiencing the same problem encountered by our Mr. Pliskin, I can't for the life of me figure out any reason we're using this system.
Does anyone have any history on this? Are there any other web sites using this? Is it a code that makes only those in the know know? Other (nameless) websites in my rotation just write it out in the normal manner.
Is it not much clearer to write $150 instead of $. 5? New members almost always write it out using standard notation and then have to be asked if they did indeed pay one hundred and forty dollars for a blow job. And some not-so-new ones, too.
Anyone?
[blue]I think it started because somebody figured that if you didn't type it then you didn't say it.
I wouldn't do it, but it's not hard to figure out.
A2[/blue]
A2 is right on.
I'm used to doing it that way from the review format I'm used to using (from another site).
[QUOTE=MalMonger;2682824]Can someone please explain to me why using dollar signs to represent one hundred dollars is a good idea?
While I'm certainly able to type 3 consecutive dollar signs, and am not experiencing the same problem encountered by our Mr. Pliskin, I can't for the life of me figure out any reason we're using this system.
Does anyone have any history on this? Are there any other web sites using this? Is it a code that makes only those in the know know? Other (nameless) websites in my rotation just write it out in the normal manner.
Is it not much clearer to write $150 instead of $. 5? New members almost always write it out using standard notation and then have to be asked if they did indeed pay one hundred and forty dollars for a blow job. And some not-so-new ones, too.
Anyone?
[blue]I think it started because somebody figured that if you didn't type it then you didn't say it.
I wouldn't do it, but it's not hard to figure out.
A2[/blue][/QUOTE]