Printable View
[QUOTE=Drodgers11;7535995]Not sure what you mean. There's only one review of her that I can find unless she was also at adore acupressure.[/QUOTE]
Look under the Prince George's County forums. She didn't work at Adora as far as I know but there is a lot of information about her on that website. I tried to post a link for you but it got altered and wouldn't work.
I visited Kim's. I did not meet Kim, I met Gina. Limited service was incomplete.
Most useful part of the visit was the intelligence that Friday is a bad day to visit because it was always 'too busy'.
Might try again if I knew Kim's schedule and was confident the two reports regarding her were accurate, but not worth a visit othrewise.
[QUOTE=Thenocturnal;7536566]I visited Kim's. I did not meet Kim, I met Gina. Limited service was incomplete.
Most useful part of the visit was the intelligence that Friday is a bad day to visit because it was always 'too busy'.
Might try again if I knew Kim's schedule and was confident the two reports regarding her were accurate, but not worth a visit otherwise.[/QUOTE]I have been with Kim a few times in the last two years, and she changes her name every time. I usually go on Saturday afternoon and Kim is the only one there. Kim is in her 60's and has a very nice figure for her age. My recommendation is to call and make an appointment without mentioning any name. Kim has always provided an excellent service to me. Good luck and take care.
Looking for a shop that can help me fulfill my vaulted double header fantasy. Anywhere recommended?
[QUOTE=Thenocturnal;7536566]I visited Kim's. I did not meet Kim, I met Gina. Limited service was incomplete.
Most useful part of the visit was the intelligence that Friday is a bad day to visit because it was always 'too busy'.
Might try again if I knew Kim's schedule and was confident the two reports regarding her were accurate, but not worth a visit othrewise.[/QUOTE]Same thing happened to me. I'd seen Kim before and was interested in a session with her. Unfortunately I got Gina. Service was very limited and disappointing. I maybtrybagain one day, but I'll leave immediately if Gina answers the door.
Went before the snowstorm a few days ago which was ideal as I had choices. Turned down momo as she looked rough and went with Jenny instead for her nice c cup naturals. Pleasant TS followed by an awful massage. She tried her best during FS but ultimately couldn't make junior sneeze, sadly. Maybe it was because I felt ripped off as rates were up both for house fee. 85 and FS was 1. 7. Haven't been to PG in a while but those rates are madness. Won't be repeating. -DC.
[QUOTE=HarryKrevitz;7531674]I agree with you, I have seen hotter for sure but she's not bad at all and age can be relevant to how old we are, for me 35 is young, for someone that is 25 it's not so young. But generally speaking a 35 year old provider in PG county is still on the younger side as far as I know.
Mia is coming back on the 21st, and I know she is younger and I think you would like her a lot more. She's hard not to like and there's plenty of reviews on Ampr e v I e w s about her.[/QUOTE]Planning on visit Mia something soon, and as wondering what is the current rate? Because I have seen reports of house fee being 70 and also at 80, and FS at $. 7 and $. 8. Very much input for anyone!
[QUOTE=Jerry99;7539337]Planning on visit Mia something soon, and as wondering what is the current rate? Because I have seen reports of house fee being 70 and also at 80, and FS at $. 7 and $. 8. Very much input for anyone![/QUOTE]Yeah Mia's back with Suzy and another new girl named Nicole is there, she's supposed to be hot. I haven't seen her yet.
The house fee is still 70 and for tip 160 will get it done but if you're feeling generous another Jackson will most likely ensure a better session. As always YMMV.
Sonia is new to the east coast, and is a typically middle-aged MILFy type from San Fran. Not slender, and not fat, with a rather nice, natural D rack that was pillowy soft (but not too soft). They were quite nice IMO. Young spinner, she is not. She reminded my of a shorter version of Candy. She has a spunky, fun and flirty personality and good English. The TS was quite thorough and the massage was pretty good, by AMP standards.
On the flip, things were interesting, in a good way. At one point, during some mutual pleasure, she started playing with her free hand and I thought I was going to get a simultaneous PM. Not necessarily my thing, but I know it's something some folks look for, so this may be an option. I must have been tired and was having some "personal difficulties", but Sonia was a trooper and kept at things. The only downside, IMO, was that I think she took it personally as if I didn't like her. I should also mention that Sonia is not fully shaved and kept a little track of fur.
If you're looking for someone not *too* young, experienced, and with a nice rack, Sonia could be a good choice.
A somewhat humorous aside, not that Sonia is old, or looks old, but mamasan described her as young. For many of us, mama included, I suppose Sonia is young. LOL!
[QUOTE=RobSquad;7537833]Looking for a shop that can help me fulfill my vaulted double header fantasy. Anywhere recommended?[/QUOTE]Nova thread discusses places like 678/ ocean in sterling that seems to offer doubles on the reg if you're willing to make the drive.
[QUOTE=DMVNiceGuy;7538650]Same thing happened to me. I'd seen Kim before and was interested in a session with her. Unfortunately I got Gina. Service was very limited and disappointing. I maybtrybagain one day, but I'll leave immediately if Gina answers the door.[/QUOTE]I had nearly the exact same thing happen to me. I had asked for Kim, but being my first visit, did not know what she looked liked. Ended up with Gina for an underwhelming experience. I did try to negotiate but Gina holds firm that she is worth a 20-30% premium over the other local locations. Kim's is now a hard pass for me.
Called them. MMS said 2 girls are available for my preferred time slot. Got there and she showed me Shasha and Lucky. Both looked charming, with bright, glowing smiles. Shasha looked a bit older than Lucky but I picked her because her perfect slender body in her tight dress and hard nips through dress really caught my eyes. She was vibrant and brought a joyful energy to the room. And even she knew what I was looking for and earned the gratuity through hard work.
Walking in the hallway, I ran into Pinky with big boobs and it made me think these girls fit the mold of what AA looks for in their employees.
[QUOTE=Coaster42;7543582]I had nearly the exact same thing happen to me. I had asked for Kim, but being my first visit, did not know what she looked liked. Ended up with Gina for an underwhelming experience. I did try to negotiate but Gina holds firm that she is worth a 20-30% premium over the other local locations. Kim's is now a hard pass for me.[/QUOTE]Kim also goes with the name of Jenny. I have been with Kim (Jenny) a few times on Saturday afternoon, and she is the only one there. I have always had a good time with Kim (Jenny). Good luck and take care.
Jenny was cute enough, with a decent figure and nice B+. Younger than your average PG AMP lady, but not *young*. I know it sounds under-whleming, but the package works, and I went back for multiple repeats because of the service, among other things.
Her TS is solid and fun. The massage is pretty hard, and she likes to walk on your back. The flip is where it's at. I normally dismiss all ladies attempts to move and sound like they can't contain their pleasure the second you touch them, which I find rather annoying, if it gets too over the top. Jenny is the closest I have come to believing that she was enjoying herself as much as I was, while receiving,. This really enhances the experience for me. The icing on the cake is that, for me, she was a perfect fit. Not too tight, but super grippy. The view from behind, while pulling out, was magical. I could go broke watching that. LOL!
Suzy, Mia, and a new girl called Sarah. The new girl has a similar build and age as Mia (30 ish), and like the others her service is outstanding.