The list has a friend of mine on it. Initials are KHP guess she had to get out and celebrate after her rant on here about myself and Bluford. I do honestly wish her the best and hope she gets things turned around.
Printable View
The list has a friend of mine on it. Initials are KHP guess she had to get out and celebrate after her rant on here about myself and Bluford. I do honestly wish her the best and hope she gets things turned around.
[QUOTE=Bezee2012;2880953]The list has a friend of mine on it. Initials are KHP guess she had to get out and celebrate after her rant on here about myself and Bluford. I do honestly wish her the best and hope she gets things turned around.[/QUOTE]Got Strawberry too! Both girls living on the south side of town. Way to go KPD the gangs are running this cesspool of drugs town and your popping working girls. But lets talk about the real issues in this town Transgender Bathrooms hey Mayor and just because there is no money in busting gang members.
My issue with your post, mundane, is that you only have to something to say when someone makes fun of one of your girls. Rose has been called every unflattering name in the book on this forum and I've never read anything where you or anyone else took issue with that. Still, she must be making a living here or else she'd go somewhere else. If that's your girl you posted, I think that's great! You don't need to white knight her to the rest of the forum, though. If you don't like my opinion of the way she looks. Too bad! You're the one that posted her pic on here and opened her up to my opinion and everyone elses. I didn't expect to get any support in my way of thinking and I'm fine with that. I'm not going to lay down and let you or anyone else try and run over me about it, though. Bottom line. You're to blame for my post.
[QUOTE=Sexhoundtn2;2903164]So I saw the post about Jills 80 special. I had never tried her because honestly I thought the normal $. 2 quote was too high for what you got. But I see. 8 and think what the hell. I contacted her at a couple minutes past 5 thru text and by 533 we had an appointment set. My last response to her after getting the address was ok I will see you at 8 and will text when I am close. Done deal right? Wrong according to Jilly. After my 533 confirmation text I go into a meeting. While I'm in my meeting she freaking blows my phone up with 6 text which I don't get until after my meeting. I get out of my meeting at 644 I reply yes we are still on. She replys sorry I already booked the 8. WTF? Very very unprofessional. I'm done. You guys do what you will. But if these girls are allowed to tret customers that way then they will. I miss my fav massage girl.[/QUOTE]For this to happen to anyone, I hate that it happened to a highly-respected and perpetual contributor to the board. It sounds like you needed to confirm the confirmation of the confirmation within an unspecified period of time which happens to be less than the duration of your meeting. I agree with you Hound, an appointment is exactly that, your slot reserved, no further clarification needed.
This got me thinking about the looting etiquette of Need before Greed. I don't care if someone has had X appointment cancellations that day, my X+1 appointment should not be subjected to the non-professional behavior. Dealing with cancellations should be built into the business model as it's a normal part of doing business. A provider has a right to cancel a meeting for any reason she deems necessary just as a monger has the right to walk away of what you see at the door is vastly different than what is displayed in pics. This is a learning process for newer providers and further illustrates why it's hard for new providers to break into the biz and stay on top. When the business is coming fast and furious, does greed overtake whatever need was marketed, or are they just trying to strike while the iron is hot?
Dealing with a myriad of personalities and idiosyncrasies of various mongers makes me amazed that I never heard a complaint about Whitney, Candy Curves, Luscious Lexie, Thick Chick Bella, Lucy, Lovely Lydia, and there may be others, but those are the ones that come to mind not only for professionalism and stellar service, but longevity in the biz. They should not be overlooked nor forgotten.
Stay safe,
Milfman.
I try to provide stellar service and keep exact appointment times. I do understand things come up in lfe with everyone, so I do try not to get butthurt if someone has to cancel. As I do expect the same in return. I have not posted in a while due to the heat out there but rest assured I am working! I am not meeting new friends unless a senior member or a trusted provider can vet them. I enjoy my work as I hope my friends leave happy at the same time. Hope to see ya soon MM, stay safe and play hard. Luvs Luscious Lexie.
[QUOTE=MilfMan865;2903972]For this to happen to anyone, I hate that it happened to a highly-respected and perpetual contributor to the board. It sounds like you needed to confirm the confirmation of the confirmation within an unspecified period of time which happens to be less than the duration of your meeting. I agree with you Hound, an appointment is exactly that, your slot reserved, no further clarification needed.
This got me thinking about the looting etiquette of Need before Greed. I don't care if someone has had X appointment cancellations that day, my X+1 appointment should not be subjected to the non-professional behavior. Dealing with cancellations should be built into the business model as it's a normal part of doing business. A provider has a right to cancel a meeting for any reason she deems necessary just as a monger has the right to walk away of what you see at the door is vastly different than what is displayed in pics. This is a learning process for newer providers and further illustrates why it's hard for new providers to break into the biz and stay on top. When the business is coming fast and furious, does greed overtake whatever need was marketed, or are they just trying to strike while the iron is hot?
Dealing with a myriad of personalities and idiosyncrasies of various mongers makes me amazed that I never heard a complaint about Whitney, Candy Curves, Luscious Lexie, Thick Chick Bella, Lucy, Lovely Lydia, and there may be others, but those are the ones that come to mind not only for professionalism and stellar service, but longevity in the biz. They should not be overlooked nor forgotten.
Stay safe,
Milfman.[/QUOTE]
Excellent lengthy article on the profession, modern enforcement history, and those advocating abolition vs decriminalization.
It's worth a read.
"A growing movement of sex workers and activists is making the decriminalization of sex work a feminist issue. ".
Direct link: [URL]http://www.nytimes.com/2016/05/08/magazine/should-prostitution-be-a-crime.html[/URL].
This link should get you around the paywall: [URL]https://www.google.com/url?sa=t&rct=j&q=&esrc=s&source=web&cd=1&cad=rja&uact=8&ved=0ahUKEwjh7-DPk83MAhVGPCYKHYHUCUEQFggdMAA&url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.nytimes.com%2F2016%2F05%2F08%2Fmagazine%2Fshould-prostitution-be-a-crime.html&usg=AFQjCNHdJ05ZaxIZJ8kG5oc6og34HZoRTw[/URL].
[QUOTE=ThermoNuclear;2907343]Excellent lengthy article on the profession, modern enforcement history, and those advocating abolition vs decriminalization.
It's worth a read.
"A growing movement of sex workers and activists is making the decriminalization of sex work a feminist issue. ".
Direct link: [URL]http://www.nytimes.com/2016/05/08/magazine/should-prostitution-be-a-crime.html[/URL].
This link should get you around the paywall: [URL]https://www.google.com/url?sa=t&rct=j&q=&esrc=s&source=web&cd=1&cad=rja&uact=8&ved=0ahUKEwjh7-DPk83MAhVGPCYKHYHUCUEQFggdMAA&url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.nytimes.com%2F2016%2F05%2F08%2Fmagazine%2Fshould-prostitution-be-a-crime.html&usg=AFQjCNHdJ05ZaxIZJ8kG5oc6og34HZoRTw[/URL].[/QUOTE]Good article. Some thoughts: I feel.
It's demand for supply. There will always be a demand by men for a supply. I reverse those normally two linked words (supply and demand) because in a world where there is an abundant "supply" for men, IF men cared less about needing and wanting sex, there wouldn't be a demand. Or at least an extremely low demand. Women do not give out sex for free.
I have this honest convo with "straight" women all the time, and most just don't get why men need sex. And how we can have it with no emotions attached. Their responses are usually "ew"! Or "sick". The providers on the other hand, not so much. They get it.
All men pay for it in some way or another.
So which one is it?
Supply equals money and demand equals sex?
Or.
Supply equals sex and demand equals money?
I demand sex now I have the money. I think it does matters which comes first.
What I find interesting is that no one is looking at or talking about the side of the Mans needs and why men seek out sex, without the risk of name calling. "Perverts, over sexed, addicts, psychological obsessive disorder and it's all we think about".
Before I started this hobbie, I used to be judgemental about the trade. I now look at providers and courtesans in a totally different light. From this males perspective, I can't imagine a world without them. But, on second thought I guess I can imagine that world. And it's not a safe pretty world.
Rrayr.
[QUOTE=Rrayr;2794502]Anyone tried this contraption?
[URL]https://scroguard.com/how-it-works[/URL][/QUOTE]I think that is the most ridiculous thing I've ever seen. Well that and the underwear that let's you cum in the strip club LOL.
Here are some thoughts I've shared elsewhere on this topic:
"Prostitution" is a crime of semantics only.
"Prostitution" as a defined term, "exchange of sex for money or some other benefit", has always been legal. The legal form being by contract, and referred to as Marriage.
Any married person who has been thru marriage counseling can tell you that the first thing that is discussed is His Needs and Her Needs.
His Needs are usually expressed semantically as Devotion / Admiration. But when you get down to the crux of it, it is not about how clean the house is, how ordered the finances are, how well-behaved the kids are, or how good the food tastes. A man will feel most admired / devoted to when he is getting lots of sex.
Her Needs are usually expressed semantically as Safety / Support. She wants to not have to worry about a roof over her and her children's heads, food in everyone's mouths, and freedom to pursue hobbies and interests. Which is generally provided for by $$.
Marriage is a money / sex exchange. It always has been, always will be. Marriage is legal prostitution.
So, many will argue, NO, it more than that!
And I would agree, and say that it is the SAME for ALL male / female interactions, because every time I meet with one of my gentleman callers, it is ALWAYS more than that, but because I am single and polyamorous, society only wants to focus on the sex and money (and if I declare that I am a polyamorous, SAHM, it's discrimination based on sexual orientation and familial status, since mono-amorism is ok, but poly is not?
So, either we only focus on the "sex / money only" on ALL fronts and call ALL spades a spade; or we recognize that each and every interaction between men and women is negotiated as a mutual benefit exchange, unique to each coupling, regardless of benefit, and allow private consensual matters between adults to remain private, regardless of what semantics we use.
[QUOTE=Rrayr;2907489]Good article. Some thoughts: I feel.
It's demand for supply. There will always be a demand by men for a supply. I reverse those normally two linked words (supply and demand) because in a world where there is an abundant "supply" for men, IF men cared less about needing and wanting sex, there wouldn't be a demand. Or at least an extremely low demand. Women do not give out sex for free.
I have this honest convo with "straight" women all the time, and most just don't get why men need sex. And how we can have it with no emotions attached. Their responses are usually "ew"! Or "sick". The providers on the other hand, not so much. They get it.
All men pay for it in some way or another.
So which one is it?
Supply equals money and demand equals sex?
Or.
Supply equals sex and demand equals money?
I demand sex now I have the money. I think it does matters which comes first.
What I find interesting is that no one is looking at or talking about the side of the Mans needs and why men seek out sex, without the risk of name calling. "Perverts, over sexed, addicts, psychological obsessive disorder and it's all we think about".
Before I started this hobbie, I used to be judgemental about the trade. I now look at providers and courtesans in a totally different light. From this males perspective, I can't imagine a world without them. But, on second thought I guess I can imagine that world. And it's not a safe pretty world.
Rrayr.[/QUOTE]
[QUOTE=KnoxVol;2908195]I think that is the most ridiculous thing I've ever seen. Well that and the underwear that let's you cum in the strip club LOL.[/QUOTE]HA! First thing I thought of:
[URL]https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7YFC0O393DQ[/URL]
A truism is that sex is 90% of a bad relationship and 10% of a good relationship.
If you ponder that, it accounts for all the other things that a genuine, caring, devoted relationship can be. Sadly I and I am sure a zillion others of both genders got a bill of goods not matching the ideal when saying "I do".
I pay others to mow the lawn, because I never wanted the goddamn yard with the upkeep and half the weekend all summer to makntain. Likewise I have to outsource the sex and adult interaction because sadly the princess doesn't see this as her responsibility or interest. So it goes.
Noelle, I need to look you up as you are clearly intelligent understanding of the needs of men and women and how this crappy world of artificial scarcity for sex works. Cheers. And cudos to you for honesty and insight.
[QUOTE=Noelle;2908303]Here are some thoughts I've shared elsewhere on this topic:
"Prostitution" is a crime of semantics only.
"Prostitution" as a defined term, "exchange of sex for money or some other benefit", has always been legal. The legal form being by contract, and referred to as Marriage.
Any married person who has been thru marriage counseling can tell you that the first thing that is discussed is His Needs and Her Needs.
His Needs are usually expressed semantically as Devotion / Admiration. But when you get down to the crux of it, it is not about how clean the house is, how ordered the finances are, how well-behaved the kids are, or how good the food tastes. A man will feel most admired / devoted to when he is getting lots of sex.
Her Needs are usually expressed semantically as Safety / Support. She wants to not have to worry about a roof over her and her children's heads, food in everyone's mouths, and freedom to pursue hobbies and interests. Which is generally provided for by $$.
Marriage is a money / sex exchange. It always has been, always will be. Marriage is legal prostitution.
So, many will argue, NO, it more than that!
And I would agree, and say that it is the SAME for ALL male / female interactions, because every time I meet with one of my gentleman callers, it is ALWAYS more than that, but because I am single and polyamorous, society only wants to focus on the sex and money (and if I declare that I am a polyamorous, SAHM, it's discrimination based on sexual orientation and familial status, since mono-amorism is ok, but poly is not?
So, either we only focus on the "sex / money only" on ALL fronts and call ALL spades a spade; or we recognize that each and every interaction between men and women is negotiated as a mutual benefit exchange, unique to each coupling, regardless of benefit, and allow private consensual matters between adults to remain private, regardless of what semantics we use.[/QUOTE]
[QUOTE=Noelle;2908303]Here are some thoughts I've shared elsewhere on this topic:
"Prostitution" is a crime of semantics only.
"Prostitution" as a defined term, "exchange of sex for money or some other benefit", has always been legal. The legal form being by contract, and referred to as Marriage.
Any married person who has been thru marriage counseling can tell you that the first thing that is discussed is His Needs and Her Needs.
His Needs are usually expressed semantically as Devotion / Admiration. But when you get down to the crux of it, it is not about how clean the house is, how ordered the finances are, how well-behaved the kids are, or how good the food tastes. A man will feel most admired / devoted to when he is getting lots of sex.
Her Needs are usually expressed semantically as Safety / Support. She wants to not have to worry about a roof over her and her children's heads, food in everyone's mouths, and freedom to pursue hobbies and interests. Which is generally provided for by $$.
Marriage is a money / sex exchange. It always has been, always will be. Marriage is legal prostitution.
So, many will argue, NO, it more than that!
And I would agree, and say that it is the SAME for ALL male / female interactions, because every time I meet with one of my gentleman callers, it is ALWAYS more than that, but because I am single and polyamorous, society only wants to focus on the sex and money (and if I declare that I am a polyamorous, SAHM, it's discrimination based on sexual orientation and familial status, since mono-amorism is ok, but poly is not?
So, either we only focus on the "sex / money only" on ALL fronts and call ALL spades a spade; or we recognize that each and every interaction between men and women is negotiated as a mutual benefit exchange, unique to each coupling, regardless of benefit, and allow private consensual matters between adults to remain private, regardless of what semantics we use.[/QUOTE]100% accurate. Its also the case that nearly every Western Nation in the world except the USA Has recognized this and legalized prostitution. Its only our fruitcake religious right wing that prevents it from being legal in The USA And that's because they want to control sex instead of allowing individuals to make their own choices.
Just curious if he came, got blitzed, and arrested.
Might just be me, and I am not trying to instigate anything. Is it possible to give a Report with less detail? Well I guess it may be, at least the girls name is here. What does this tell anyone. Don't get me wrong, some of my posts are horrible, I wish I had done better when I first started.
[QUOTE=Niceone1;2917943]Took a nap and dreamed of bella last week. Dream was pleasant. I am sure I will dream again.[/QUOTE]We have posts like this hitting the market after a post by MM showing the best post I think I have ever seen:
[QUOTE=MilfMan865;2917140]Ad Location: [URL]http://usaadultclassifieds.info/classifieds/422/posts/2-Massages-Massage-Parlors/2-Massages-Massage-Parlors/16581-Sensual-deep-tissue-massage-.html[/URL].
Ad Posted: Thursday, May 5, 2016.
Provider contact: Jilly Bean (Forum Advertiser on USA Adult Classifieds) - contacted her through the number included in her ad.
Recommend? : Yes, highly. I get the impression that Jill takes constructive criticism well since she has made considerable improvements.
Note: This is a follow-up to previous reviews, only focusing on aspects that are different than what has been previously reported by me or others.
The Good:
Jill's deep tissue massage skills have improved considerably. I commented before that she moved around a bit, somewhat sporadically, during previous sessions, but she was focused and made a concerted effort to massage an area before moving on to another. Her core massage technique is still being refined and the improvements are to be applauded (especially her glute / hip approach using the circular effleurage). Having a couple of windows cracked created a soothing breeze through out the room along with the light aroma of candles. The lotion used didn't have a strong fragrance and once again, the heated lotion was a nice touch. Offered to hang my clothes so that they wouldn't get wrinkled. A shower was offered, but wasn't really needed since the lotion didn't leave me smelling like I'd been rolling around in a flower bed. I left relaxed, rejuvenated and looking forward to my next visit.
Opportunities for Improvement:
Music was playing this time, it was a radio station. I'd suggest playing Pandora or having a CD of sensual music (without lyrics) to help set the ambiance. I'm normally focused on the massage at hand but got a little distracted by a someone yelling at me to "Get on down to wherever and get a car! Buy here pay here! Yahhhh!
I'm not sure about any changes to her screening process or appointment setup since I've seen her on numerous occasions and contacted her on short notice for which she was able to accommodate me almost immediately.
Perhaps investing in a coat rack would be nice. Having a spot to hang a suit coat, dress shirt, hat, etc., such that everything is in a convenient location indicative of other massage places.
Seniors and Trusted may contact me directly for clarification on anything included in this follow-up report.
Stay thirsty my friends.,,.
Milfman.[/QUOTE]Again not trying to start anything, just wish there was a little more detail. Austin.
Can someone please give the real definition of "upscale" ? Either I'm stupid, been bamboozled or this word is being used a little to free by want to-bees.
[blue]I'll take this one.
Here, this is upscale;
[url]http://www.soloindependientes.com/escorts-acompanantes/Britany_15-2513-4846_945.htm[/url]
70 bucks an hour.
You're welcome
A2[/blue]