Printable View
[QUOTE=Supereloquent]Somebody recently bragged about taking a 45 minute IQ test as a valid measure of an extremely high IQ? [/QUOTE]
Not on this subforum. PLEASE. Can't we all just get along? I thought the Admin put his foot down on this kind of cr@p.
[QUOTE=Squonk64]Not on this subforum. PLEASE. Can't we all just get along? I thought the Admin put his foot down on this kind of cr@p.[/QUOTE]We can get along when we behave somewhat normally. However when you make ridiculous comments that have no grammatical structure and sound like a hood rat not to mention are presumptuous,condescending,and insult the intelligence of someone with an IQ that's 30% lower than your purported 148 you'll get blasted. Deserving so I might add!! No rational sober person would've made the statements you made unless you want to stir up trouble. Either contribute reports or leave us the hell alone. Your wasting our time!!
[QUOTE=FlyGuyEddie007]Well the one has a tattoo on her right arm and super's does not.[/QUOTE]
I thought that was the most convincing clue, although it is also clear (to me anyway) that the face and body are different girls.
[QUOTE=Squonk64]Not on this subforum. PLEASE. Can't we all just get along? I thought the Admin put his foot down on this kind of cr@p.[/QUOTE]
"This kind of cr@p?" All I did was point out the elements of a [b]legitimate[/b] IQ test, and question whether yours was one.
I do obviously have some restrictions on here, but this is my thread and I can, within bounds, make reasonable commentary as I see fit.
I refer you to the following:
[url]http://www.usasexguide.info/forum/showpost.php?p=983001&postcount=1609[/url]
You can't expect that announcing to the world in this Forum that you have an IQ of 168 based on some 45 minute multiple-choice test, was going to give you a free pass from comment. I was not nasty or demeaning to you in any way in my original comment. I was; however, very thoroughly and explicitly questioning the validity of your stated IQ based on what you say led you to that conclusion.
Now you claim there was a government UFO conspiracy at Roswell and that Trashed is really I? The UFO thing just raises further doubts about your state of mind. Did you actually think that the movie "Independence Day" was a documentary? Stating that Trashed is really I?: that requires a definitive response, now that you have also decided to make clearly false accusations. He isn't. And we aren't related. And he isn't on my payroll or under my influence or any other such thing. He is a big boy, has a mind of his own, and I have known him to exercise it in accordance with his own conscience. So, please stop the faulty insinuations. Just because another person on here actually can spell and construct proper sentences and uses "big words," does not make him I. But, thanks in a way for your indirect compliment to us both. I think. LOL :D
[QUOTE=Kulli]Rachel, an outstanding specimen, reminds me of an SW I met in Baltimore. She was a light-skinned African American with similar facial and body features. Her name was, and I kid you not, Kandy Hooker. In her late 40s, divorced, one kid. Had gone to Morgan State and worked for UPS for 13 years. Then got addicted to H and became basically a homeless person. Yet when I first met her, she was delightfully normal, although she was snorting heavily. Eventually she graduated into shooting. Haven't seen her for several years; she is probably dead by now.
I recently gave up this hobby because stories like these break my heart.Instead a nice normal lady who wants to be appreciated hooked me through a dating site. I am grateful; she is grateful.[/QUOTE]
We would be heartless to not be sensitive to the plights of many of the SWs everywhere, and most especially whose lives with whom we intermingle. There are those who would say we prey on their drug-related vulnerability. There are those who say we contribute to the problem. However, this entire situation isn't going away anytime soon, even with some tremendous governmental or humanitarian effort. They don't call prostitution the oldest profession for nothing. We tried to make alcohol illegal in this country, and look what a wonderful success that was. A very dear friend of mine, who most sadly recently died, had a favorite saying, which is so true on both sides of the fence on the K: "People are going to do what they are going to do."
Sucking my cock and getting me ready to fuck; spit strings; hair in the face; in a prone position while sucking me
[QUOTE= Fbtom] I have met a few who are just like that. They are some of my favorite girls that I see often![/QUOTE]
I usually prefer SWs who will allow pics, but I will make exceptions for excellent providers. Some "UTR SWs" fall exactly into that category.
Love your pics bro, but you post way too many.
A couple of each angle is fine. Maybe 10 shots at the most.
But you overdue it with multiple shots.
Just my humble opinion, yo.
JR
[QUOTE=Jack Reacher]Love your pics bro, but you post way too many.
A couple of each angle is fine. Maybe 10 shots at the most.
But you overdue it with multiple shots.
Just my humble opinion, yo.
JR[/QUOTE]
Thank you for appreciating my work.
Everyone is entitled to their opinions. That doesn't necessarily mean that I will agree with or comply with them. :) However, that also doesn't mean that I am not open-minded either. Fbtom once made what I thought was a very observant suggestion about my former SW "rating system" possibly being a bit confusing. I agreed with him and changed it, and I think it is a lot more descriptive and less confusing now.
Regarding pics: some guys like how I photograph a SW session from fully clothed, through undressing to her underwear, to nude, to posing in my "photo props," to "sucking" pics. Some guys just want shots of the kitty, period. Some guys like or don't like BJ shots. Some guys can't get enough; the more the merrier. Different pics and angles appeal to different people. We are definitely not all the same, and we don't all have the same tastes either in women or pics of women.
Others in the past have told me that I "overdo" it with multiple shots. My multi-faceted suggested solution to you is simple. Only thumbnails are posted in my thread and in the pic gallery. You can probably get a good idea which shots and angles appeal within a few seconds, so just open those photos to view. Also, I used to clump dozens of pics from a SW session together at one time, and I don't do that any more. I post them 10 at a time for you to more slowly savor. That would seem somewhat in line with your "10 at-a-time" suggestion. If you still feel there are too many photos, and you still want to look at them in my thread, not opening those that don't appeal in the thumbnails very easily avoids whatever pics you don't care to see. The same is true in the pic gallery. Another alternative is just a mouse click or two away to a different page or report. So, excuse me if I don't take your opinion dramatically to heart and spare you those few incredibly arduous finger taps.
[QUOTE=Supereloquent] For my taste, her face and puss and ass more than made up for any shortfalls her tits may have presented.[/QUOTE]Yeah man. I agree. I would pick her up in a second too. Unfortunatley I live in Detroit, with relatives in Philly. Hence me being here to begin with.
I WISH I lived in Philly, because fucking shop is SHUT down over here for the most part, and has been for a long time. There is one 'serious' strip left and is too hot with cops for my taste. Plus they are all "impound happy" around here now.
I'm hanging out "studying" for my next trip out there. LOL.
On top of just the numbers being better out there. The girls are WAY better looking man. SUCH a big difference. You guys are fucking lucky. If I lived there I Philly would have a third subthread. Along with you and cookyjar
Be careful and have fun
Gotta love the ass in her little shorty-shorts on this one. I wouldn't even need to see the front to know I wanted her! Thanks Joshua X.
[url]http://www.usasexguide.info/forum/attachment.php?attachmentid=107759[/url]
Not sure but this girl looks really similar and she's been reviewed on bestgfe.
[url]http://philadelphia.backpage.com/FemaleEscorts/xxxrated-hailey-specials-xxxtremeley-fair-65-cum-on-i-wanna-go-out-with-a-bang-21/4722544[/url]
[QUOTE=Supereloquent]Sucking my cock and getting me ready to fuck; spit strings; hair in the face; in a prone position while sucking me[/QUOTE]
[QUOTE=Phillycam2002]Not sure but this girl looks really similar and she's been reviewed on bestgfe.
[url]http://philadelphia.backpage.com/FemaleEscorts/xxxrated-hailey-specials-xxxtremeley-fair-65-cum-on-i-wanna-go-out-with-a-bang-21/4722544[/url][/QUOTE]
She is definitely also a cutie but I am pretty sure she is not the same girl.
As I get deeper into this mongering lifestyle I'm starting to develop a good sense for my true likes and dislikes of streetwalkers and here attitudes.
What I prefer in a streetwalker and the experience of hunting for one (1) are:
1. Discretion in their actions- If a chick wants my attention just give eye contact, a subtle girlie hand wave, and/or a head nod. Simple and understated!
2. Professionalism- A happy customer is a repeat customer. The good ones aim to please and generally enjoy having sex and pleasing men. They don't rush the experience.
3. Positive Attitude- Cannot and will not deal with girls who act ghetto (black, white or Hispanic), or are unnecessarily conceited. For example I picked up a chick in New Brunswick and she told me she used to be a high class hooker and wanted me to pay $50 for a BJ and $80 for full service. I told her "you're not a high class hooker out here and you get $20 for a BJ and $30 for FS, the going rate for streetwalkers in New Brunswick. " She responded "you're not doing me any favors. " I said "your right, that's why I'm dropping you off! "
4. Good Hygiene- Self explanatory
5. Good Skills- The good ones drain the lizard completely. The jerk and/or suck until the orgasm is complete.
6. Have some sex appeal
7. They talk in the car- Most of my bad experiences have come from chicks that don't speak at all while I'm driving to the location to do the deed.
I like girls with:
1. Thick thighs
2. Wide hips
3. Big bubble ass-Like OMG, do you have a basketball or soccer ball stuffed in your pants ass!
4. Mature MILF type (35 and over)
5. Color/race doesn't matter. I've read post were guys mentioned that BSW are not their preference. To each his own but you're a monger and your goal in this game is to have different experiences with all types of chicks right? I have, and will continue to sacrifice physical features for good quality service. I've had professional and super ghetto chicks of Latin, African, and European decent. Each brings something positive to the table. For me maturity and professionalism is the key.
_________________________________________________________________
I hate when girls make a scene by:
1. Yelling to get my attention- I fucking see you! Why don't you send out a smoke signal or grab an air horn and blow it to get my attention, and the attention of LEO.
2. Standing in the middle of the street. Really?
3. Flag me down – I saw you the 1st time and the 30th time I passed you!
4. Flashing skin while they are on the sidewalk- Let my imagination run wild please!
5. Making BJ hand gestures- Really?
If a chick does any of the five (5) things mentioned above I will not pick them up. I don't care how fine they are, how thick there thighs are, and/or how big there ass is (I love thick thighs and big ass)! I will drive right by them every time. Period! Your thoughts?
Madlion
[QUOTE=Supereloquent]Gotta love the ass in her little shorty-shorts on this one. I wouldn't even need to see the front to know I wanted her! Thanks Joshua X.
[url]http://www.usasexguide.info/forum/attachment.php?attachmentid=107759[/url][/QUOTE]
Dude, don't take this the wrong way but shouldn't this comment go in the Pomona section. Instead of putting it here?
For example, nice picture Maxman99.
[url]http://www.usasexguide.info/forum/attachment.php?attachmentid=107668[/url]
Misfit
[QUOTE=Misfit]Dude, don't take this the wrong way but shouldn't this comment go in the Pomona section. Instead of putting it here?
For example, nice picture Maxman99.
[url]http://www.usasexguide.info/forum/attachment.php?attachmentid=107668[/url]
Misfit[/QUOTE]
I am limited to posting in my own threads. I have already previously mentioned and explained that the Admin has his own reasoning on this, and it was not a result of anything negative that I did. But, it is what it is.
I don't mind this limitation much, but it is awkward when I try to comment favorably on anyone's posts or pics from a different city. Firstly, it may be unlikely that they or anyone else in their local Forum would even see it, and secondly, those that do see it posted in my thread might wonder why that is the case, as you did.
I did give credit to Joshua X when I posted the link to his pic. I also acknowledged Maxman99 with a reprint of his post when re-posting a few of his pics. I only re-posted a few of Maxman99's pics of his Rachel for a direct comparison with mine because that's what my post was about.
[QUOTE=Detroit One]Yeah man. I agree. I would pick her up in a second too. Unfortunatley I live in Detroit, with relatives in Philly. Hence me being here to begin with.[/QUOTE]
Rachel was definitely repeatable.
Nothing against your current home town of Detroit, but I personally would pick Philly any day of the week for mongering.
[QUOTE=Detroit One]I WISH I lived in Philly, because fucking shop is SHUT down over here for the most part, and has been for a long time. There is one 'serious' strip left and is too hot with cops for my taste. Plus they are all "impound happy" around here now.
I'm hanging out "studying" for my next trip out there. LOL.[/QUOTE]
I hear that about certain cities. They have a real hard on about the Johns as well as the girls. That is somewhat true in Camden. LE in Philly seem to have a lot more important fish to fry (as they should), like robbery and drugs and violent crime.
[QUOTE=Detroit One]On top of just the numbers being better out there. The girls are WAY better looking man. SUCH a big difference. You guys are fucking lucky. If I lived there I Philly would have a third subthread. Along with you and cookyjar
Be careful and have fun[/QUOTE]
Move here and start reporting and taking pics like a demon: the more the merrier.
I had dated Tanya a number of times in the past, and I recently hooked up with her again, and made an appointment to get together again soon. In anticipation of this eventuality, I looked through the "photo trunk" of our old dates, and realized there were a TON of pics I had taken of her on previous dates that were yet unpublished. SO... as a whetting of my appetite, and yours, for the date forthcoming, here are a few unpublished pics from our very first date.
A LOT more is coming from the "past" and the "future."
More previously unpublished pics of Tanya sucking my cock on our first date
One pose can look like another, although, everyone has their own tastes, and even a slight change in pose or angle can be more appealing, depending upon what you like.
HOWEVER, there is one type of shot that seems to get somewhat limited "exposure," but is an overwhelming favorite on this site, and that is the money shot. If you like money shots, try out these recent shots I posted of Jessica on my Jersey thread:
[url]http://www.usasexguide.info/forum/showpost.php?p=1047052&postcount=278[/url]
As thumbnails, they look like ordinary BJ pics. But, open up Jessica115 through Jessica120 if you appreciate money shots.
[QUOTE=Supereloquent]Thank you for appreciating my work.
Everyone is entitled to their opinions. That doesn't necessarily mean that I will agree with or comply with them. :) However, that also doesn't mean that I am not open-minded either. Fbtom once made what I thought was a very observant suggestion about my former SW "rating system" possibly being a bit confusing. I agreed with him and changed it, and I think it is a lot more descriptive and less confusing now.
Regarding pics: some guys like how I photograph a SW session from fully clothed, through undressing to her underwear, to nude, to posing in my "photo props," to "sucking" pics. Some guys just want shots of the kitty, period. Some guys like or don't like BJ shots. Some guys can't get enough; the more the merrier. Different pics and angles appeal to different people. We are definitely not all the same, and we don't all have the same tastes either in women or pics of women.
Others in the past have told me that I "overdo" it with multiple shots. My multi-faceted suggested solution to you is simple. Only thumbnails are posted in my thread and in the pic gallery. You can probably get a good idea which shots and angles appeal within a few seconds, so just open those photos to view. Also, I used to clump dozens of pics from a SW session together at one time, and I don't do that any more. I post them 10 at a time for you to more slowly savor. That would seem somewhat in line with your "10 at-a-time" suggestion. If you still feel there are too many photos, and you still want to look at them in my thread, not opening those that don't appeal in the thumbnails very easily avoids whatever pics you don't care to see. The same is true in the pic gallery. Another alternative is just a mouse click or two away to a different page or report. So, excuse me if I don't take your opinion dramatically to heart and spare you those few incredibly arduous finger taps.[/QUOTE]SE,
Keep it up, its all good, post all ya got, can't understand guys complaining.
WTF are they doing here?
Thanks,
H.
That Tanya is built like a brick house.
She looks like she is a lot of fun.
[QUOTE=Hungryeye]SE,
Keep it up, its all good, post all ya got, can't understand guys complaining.
WTF are they doing here?
Thanks,
H.[/QUOTE]
You are most welcome, and I heartily agree with you.
If I have learned anything in life, I have learned that some people appreciate everything they get, and some people appreciate nothing that they get.
Guys get information and pics on this site for FREE. I will never understand people who complain about something they get for nothing.
Of course, there will always be those who complain, when you give them a free ham, that you didn't pre-slice it for them, and also didn't give them mashed potatoes, green beans, hot buttered rolls and a nice bottle of Chianti to go with it.
[QUOTE=ScooterAllCity]That Tanya is built like a brick house.
She looks like she is a lot of fun.[/QUOTE]
YES, Tanya is definitely a lot of fun. She not only has a very pretty face, smile and eyes, but also has incredibly big, beautiful, soft titties, a narrow waist and a terrific round ass. Her pleasant attitude couldn't be better. She is only 5 feet tall, has the flexibility of a gymnast and loves sex! She sucks cock as well or better than anyone I know. She is smart, imaginative and KINKY! She likes to get tied up, handcuffed, spanked, use toys and take it up the ass. She loves her nipples bitten, especially as she is cumming. She cums a zillion times, screams like crazy, has squirting orgasms and loves dirty talk, the filthier the better, both hearing and saying. A more perfect woman for hours of intimate fun you couldn't conceive in your wildest dreams.
Now, THIS is an ass ready made for doggie! Thank you Tessa101 from Rockford. I did a little mongering there when I lived in Chicago. This was an ass I most certainly would have wanted to tap! It reminds me of Tanya. :D
[url]http://www.usasexguide.info/forum/attachment.php?attachmentid=108034[/url]
[QUOTE= Street Steve] For some reason I don't pick up a SW on the north end of the stroll until I tour the south end. There is no good reason for this except for this; I know I may be missing out on something. This is why I did not pick up Mindy. I regret it now she seem fun and we seemed to have a connection.[/QUOTE]
Sometimes one in the hand is worth two in the "bush." ;)
[QUOTE= Street Steve]Mindy said She was hungry, needed a pack if smokes and wanted to know if I wanted her company. Has anyone done Mindy? She is sexier then these pictures show.[/QUOTE]
Funny you would mention Mindy and provide "street" pics of her (how appropriate :D). I just did a date with her at the Carlyle, and I will have a report and a bunch of pics to share soon. Mindy is very cute, thin and was a fun date. The only real downside is that she has some serious stretch marks and some flab rolls around the middle. I can get past that when a SW is cute, has a good ass, and has a great attitude.
[QUOTE=Supereloquent]Topless; nude; doggie; in mirror; spread on the counter; sucking her finger; sucking my cock[/QUOTE]My hat off to you.
That's a great find!
More unpublished pics from my "photo trunk" of my second date with Tanya. More to come.
[QUOTE=Hungryeye]SE,
Keep it up, its all good, post all ya got, can't understand guys complaining.
WTF are they doing here?
Thanks,
H.[/QUOTE]
[QUOTE= Lansdowne] That's a legitimate question, Hungryeye.[/QUOTE]
Amen. People will certainly complain about whatever they feel like complaining about. That doesn't mean their beefs are legitimate nor that I will necessarily care to understand or sympathize with their gripes. They have a right to complain and I have a right to ignore them, and do what I feel like doing.
[QUOTE= Lansdowne]Some guys who express their views here have a very narrow focus. They interpret the forum's purpose, to facilitate the exchange of information between men who are looking for sex with women, very strictly. They only want information that helps identify these women. They think that identifying a woman doesn't require multiple shots of that same woman with the same man's penis. They think that two or three shots are sufficient for identification. They get tired of paging through multiple posts containing repetitive photos and contrived stories. They think it wastes bandwidth and only serves to boost the poster's ego.[/QUOTE]
However anyone interprets the "purpose" of this Forum is his own opinion. You can interpret it your way and I will interpret it my way. If my way results in making many detailed reports, and taking a few thousand pics of girls that sucked and fucked me, and you don't like it, or you don't like the way I write, or how much I write, or how many pics I take, or the style of my pics, or whatever, then the solution is very easy. Everything I post is right here. Just don't open my thread. If you don't like having to see all my pics in the gallery, a mouse click or two will fix that as well. I have no sympathy for your consternation. Vent away if it makes you feel good. Every now and then a well-reasoned suggestion may catch my eye, and I may just actually change my behavior. It has been known to happen. I can be open-minded when warranted. But, as far as thinking you are going to influence what I do whenever you get the urge to complain: I wouldn't hold my breath if I were you.
[QUOTE= Lansdowne]Well, Hungryeye, those people with the narrow focus are abnormal. Where have they been these past few years as this forum has, despite it's stated purpose, grown into a full-service sex site with erotic pornographic writing and bounteous erotic photographs in addition to the good informational reports. I repeat, this forum has grown and expanded into a full-service pornographic site. Real men, with real heterosexual desires, should applaud what is now offered, not criticize it, just as you have stated![/QUOTE]
It is what it is.
[QUOTE= Lansdowne]You, Hungryeye, viewing the photographs over there in Ohio, are normal. The guys complaining are abnormal. WTF are they doing here? Beats me. They should chill, or take a broader view of the purpose here, or lobby the administrator to update the mission statement, or get the hell out of here and start their own photo-limited forum.
It's nice to see normal people in Ohio coming in here with their observations. Keep up the good work, enjoy the numerous cock-filled pictures, come visit in the City of Brotherly Love, and someday perhaps exchange some information with us.[/QUOTE]
The Philly area Forums are the envy of the rest of the country for the variety and quality of SW talent available, and for the abundant reporting on and pic taking of the same. Why anyone would want to place strictures on that of any kind is misplaced criticism at best.
[QUOTE=Supereloquent]Funny you would mention Mindy and provide "street" pics of her (how appropriate :D). I just did a date with her at the Carlyle, and I will have a report and a bunch of pics to share soon. Mindy is very cute, thin and was a fun date. The only real downside is that she has some serious stretch marks and some flab rolls around the middle. I can get past that when a SW is cute, has a good ass, and has a great attitude.[/QUOTE]Good for you SuperE! I am looking forward to seeing those pictures
[b]Street[/b]
Some SWs are almost immediate pick-up decisions. They have what I call “curb appeal.” Mindy had that: a very cute face, sparkling eyes, bright red hair, an infectious smile, promising tit mounds, a tight ass in her tight jeans and a little wiggle in her walk. Of course, you never really know for sure what you have until you get them unwrapped. But, curb appeal and what appears to be a nice attitude are a great start.
We discussed what I wanted, but price never came up. I like that. It tells me a few things that are almost always the case: she will be reasonable, and I will be fair, and I will get what I want and she will as well. As long as I know that FS, multiple cups and pics are on the table, I know we will usually work everything else out satisfactorily 95 times out of 100. The other 5% I can live with and work around.
We went to the Carlyle. I opted for a 2 hour stay, because my thought was to get sucked several times for a good long time, and to hit that tight little booty as many times as I was able. Mindy was a good poser. Her facial communication especially was particularly expressive. She had a few body flaws, such as some very noticeable stretch marks, a few small belly rolls, and her tits were the tiniest bit flabby (but VERY perky and suckable nips!). However, her excellent attitude, very fuckable shaved wet puss and tight appealing ass, far more than made up for the detriments.
Mindy was a sublime cock sucker. She sucked deep and sloppy, varied her speeds, and used her hands, mouth, tongue and throat well. I lay back and thoroughly enjoyed that for 2 cups. I also got some great BJ pics for you to see. I would have gotten some money shots too, but it was just too much fun to have her suck me bone dry with that pretty mouth, and watch her lick me clean and swallow every single drop.
After a little rest I was really ready to fuck her. I started mish and hooked the crooks of my elbows into the crooks of her knees. I tilted her backwards until her knees were pinned to the bed, and whaled away at her. She wiggled her legs, and moaned and screamed and pushed back at me. I pounded her for a good 15 minutes like that before turning her over and pumping her doggie. Now THAT was a perfect way to fuck her. Her ass was marvelous to behold as I told her to spread her knees wide, slapped her ass and jack-hammered that tight cu*nt from behind. She squealed as I slid into her hard, over and over and over. Finally I busted a huge nut and collapsed beside her. But, I knew I wasn’t yet finished. We completed our 2 hours with CG and RCG. RCG was a perfect way to end the session. It was even better than doggie, and with the same incredible view of her tight ass riding up and down on me until I was ready for one final draining blast.
Ratings?: Face: outstanding (VERY cute!); Body: above average (nice tits, even if a bit saggy; incredible puss and ass; some deductions for tummy rolls and stretch marks); BJ: outstanding; Fucking: outstanding; Attitude: outstanding; Overall Experience: outstanding. Repeatable?: YES. Eliminate the over-lookable stretch marks, and a little bit of tummy flab, and the whole scenario would have been absolutely perfect.
Many more pics are forthcoming, including Mindy nude and giving me a BJ, in keeping with my new, "savor them slowly," pic philosophy.
In bra and panties and topless
Including the pics on my Jersey thread, I am closing in on 4000 total pics posted in this Forum. I would like to post an official 4000th anniversary pic. Rather than my choosing one, I thought it might be interesting and fun for all of you to choose one. The rules on this one are wide open: it can be anyone for whom I have previously posted a pic and/or any particular pic you might nominate.
I will let this "contest" open through Labor Day, Monday, September 6th, after which I will tally the "votes" and announce a winner. I will likely already be past the 4000 mark by then, but that's not the point. The point is to select a 4000th anniversary SW and pic to commemorate the occasion.
If the response is minimal or "ho-hum, I can't be bothered," then that's OK too. In that event, I will choose the winner myself. Either way there will be an official 4000th anniversary pic. However, if you have an opinion, and care to voice it, let me know here (no PMs please; it clogs my mail), and we should have a little fun with it, and maybe learn something about your tastes in SWs and their pics. :)
Here are 10 of my most recent Philly favorites in reverse chronological order to help you decide on one for my 4000th Anniversary SW Pic Post:
[url=http://www.usasexguide.info/forum/showpost.php?p=1048282&postcount=2035]Mindy[/url].
[url=http://www.usasexguide.info/forum/showpost.php?p=1046883&postcount=2021]Tanya[/url].
[url=http://www.usasexguide.info/forum/showpost.php?p=1045141&postcount=1978]Rachel[/url].
[url=http://www.usasexguide.info/forum/showpost.php?p=1043919&postcount=1973]Kelly[/url].
[url=http://www.usasexguide.info/forum/showpost.php?p=1041874&postcount=1966]Erin[/url].
[url=http://www.usasexguide.info/forum/showpost.php?p=1037576&postcount=1902]Tanika[/url].
[url=http://www.usasexguide.info/forum/showpost.php?p=1036769&postcount=1885]Aundrea[/url].
[url=http://www.usasexguide.info/forum/showpost.php?p=1029713&postcount=1868]Kay[/url].
[url=http://www.usasexguide.info/forum/showpost.php?p=1026780&postcount=1857]Bijou[/url].
[url=http://www.usasexguide.info/forum/showpost.php?p=1023424&postcount=1838]Hottie Nicole[/url].
Here are an additional 10 of my favorites in reverse chronological order to help you decide on one for my 4000th Anniversary pic post:
[url=http://www.usasexguide.info/forum/showpost.php?p=1022948&postcount=1834]Candace[/url].
[url=http://www.usasexguide.info/forum/showpost.php?p=1021126&postcount=1821]Meg[/url].
[url=http://www.usasexguide.info/forum/showpost.php?p=1019363&postcount=1816]Sharlie[/url].
[url=http://www.usasexguide.info/forum/showpost.php?p=1011532&postcount=1780]Amber and Aundrea Threesome[/url].
[url=http://www.usasexguide.info/forum/showpost.php?p=1011517&postcount=1776]Amber Solo[/url].
[url=http://www.usasexguide.info/forum/showpost.php?p=1010188&postcount=1756]Mandy[/url].
[url=http://www.usasexguide.info/forum/showpost.php?p=1004361&postcount=1719]Kali[/url].
[url=http://www.usasexguide.info/forum/showpost.php?p=998886&postcount=1697]Kelly[/url].
[url=http://www.usasexguide.info/forum/showpost.php?p=996758&postcount=1680]Staci[/url].
[url=http://www.usasexguide.info/forum/showpost.php?p=992217&postcount=1646]Megan[/url].
That makes 20 so far and only goes back to the middle of May of this year. But I will continue to post some ideas going back as far as I can.
Your line-by-line links to photos brings to mind what was one of the most useful threads in this forum: the Photo Index.
You obviously have a lot of time on your hands. Why not spend that time alphabetizing all your photos (and perhaps others') so that fellow members can have a handy reference to the fruits of your labors. It would seem to be more useful than sponsoring a popularity contest. And you would likely get an equivalent amount of praise and attention.
Here are an additional 10 of my favorites in reverse chronological order to help you decide on one for my 4000th Anniversary pic post:
[url=http://www.usasexguide.info/forum/showpost.php?p=988950&postcount=1624]Sparkles[/url].
[url=http://www.usasexguide.info/forum/showpost.php?p=988648&postcount=1622]Stefany[/url].
[url=http://www.usasexguide.info/forum/showpost.php?p=986343&postcount=1618]Holly[/url].
[url=http://www.usasexguide.info/forum/showpost.php?p=984818&postcount=1614]Kitty[/url].
[url=http://www.usasexguide.info/forum/showpost.php?p=975313&postcount=1551]Jen[/url].
[url=http://www.usasexguide.info/forum/showpost.php?p=974081&postcount=1539]Dawn[/url].
[url=http://www.usasexguide.info/forum/showpost.php?p=969763&postcount=1511]Elektra[/url].
[url=http://www.usasexguide.info/forum/showpost.php?p=967975&postcount=1483]Megan[/url].
[url=http://www.usasexguide.info/forum/showpost.php?p=965627&postcount=1458]Nicole[/url].
[url=http://www.usasexguide.info/forum/showpost.php?p=964487&postcount=1429]Jess[/url].
That makes 30 so far and only goes back to the end of March of this year. But I will continue to post some ideas going back as far as I can.
[QUOTE=Ed Norton]You obviously have a lot of time on your hands. Your line-by-line links to photos brings to mind what was one of the most useful threads in this forum: the Photo Index.
Why not spend that time alphabetizing all your photos (and perhaps others') so that fellow members can have a handy reference to the fruits of your labors. It would seem to be more useful than sponsoring a popularity contest, and moreover you would likely get an equal amount of praise and attention.[/QUOTE]
The sourness of your first and closing lines were REAL encouragements for me to listen to your suggestion with an open mind.
You are correct about the photo index. It was a very useful thread. I have commented on several occasions that I wished there was a way to revive it and keep it up-to-date. It is still a mystery to me why it was closed.The photo index had some specialized features which made it very handy to keep current. One was that it wasn't limited to a 24 hour window for editing as is the case with other regular postings.
However, if you have such a hard on for alphabetizing either my or everyone's photos why don't YOU do it? I am not your employee to do your bidding in this regard, most especially since your suggestion was SO nicely put to me. :D
In the meantime, if I want to hold a contest for my 4000th pic anniversary, I will do so. I don't require or seek permission from you to have one, or advice on the manner in which I choose to do it. If I want to list the choices in reverse chronological order and pick and choose which ones to include in the lineup, then I will do so. If I choose later to do an alphabetical list of my pics and/or reports I will do that as well. Yours was not a bad thought, and I may have even considered it seriously for this contest in another life, but I would suggest a better sales approach if you seek to have an idea willingly adopted as opposed to stuffing it down someone's throat while insulting his alleged motivations. If you want to have your own pic contest, and set up your own format, then, by all means, feel free to do so. You won't get any gripes from me. Oh, that's right. You don't have any pics posted. What WAS I thinking? :D
Dark Phoenix said it best:
"...[P]lease spare me the multiple shrill responses. Every time anyone criticizes you in the slightest you go entirely off the wall. It screams insecurity. Dude, just "ignore" me. I won't be offended."
[QUOTE=Ed Norton]Dark Phoenix said it best:
"...[P]lease spare me the multiple shrill responses. Every time anyone criticizes you in the slightest you go entirely off the wall. It screams insecurity. Dude, just "ignore" me. I won't be offended."[/QUOTE]
YOU were the one who started this. I didn't come and rattle your cage. You came and rattled mine. You are the one who should have ignored this, "dude." I wasn't bothering you. I wasn't pissing on your parade. You were the one who decided to piss on mine. And, I am supposed to lie down and "ignore" you because you point your finger and call me insecure? What is this: playground time in the sandbox? The "insecurity" lies with you, "dude."