News and Media Reports

[QUOTE=DirtMerchant;7070786]All of this. Plus, if you have priors in any sex related offenses. If they run info on you and find you're on the SO list, you can believe they are getting any subpoenas or warrants they need and they will show up for you sooner or later. 99% of those arrests are in person because dude showed up but every now and again when you read articles, you'll see that they got some guy from way out of town that was pandering or importuning. If you're nobody and didn't really get into any terrible shit via voice / text you're likely OK. Just going to have to wait it out.

Bottom line, be careful, no unnecessary contact, do your research and watch what you say. Sure, technically what is being said in the ad on STG is likely enough to show intent of your contact, but if you're insulating yourself by using a burner, etc, and not asking to meet with a teen or whatever, they're not spending the time, and money to look for a random John.[/QUOTE]Is communicating through WhatsApp safer? I know most providers here in US probably never heard of that app but I hear its unhackable. I know as soon as I mention WhatsApp most providers will think I am trying to scam her from a foreign country. another thing freaks me out sometimes they would send pic but in the background there is a kid.

[QUOTE=Pinkumia;7071231]Is communicating through WhatsApp safer? I know most providers here in US probably never heard of that app but I hear its unhackable. I know as soon as I mention WhatsApp most providers will think I am trying to scam her from a foreign country. another thing freaks me out sometimes they would send pic but in the background there is a kid.[/QUOTE]You still have to provide a phone number. Problem isn't so much whether the communication itself is encrypted, problem is who is on the other end (or shows the other end to someone). I have seen more and more snapchat being used. At least messages get automatically deleted after 24 hours (by default, can be changed / individual messages can be saved).

[QUOTE=Blbl1234;7071528]You still have to provide a phone number. Problem isn't so much whether the communication itself is encrypted, problem is who is on the other end (or shows the other end to someone). I have seen more and more snapchat being used. At least messages get automatically deleted after 24 hours (by default, can be changed / individual messages can be saved).[/QUOTE]True, but your number can be your burner number.

Just want to get a pulse: I know we felt because it was an election year things got tight.

Do you feel that things will loosen up a bit now since the election is over or no? The streets seem to flow regardless, I'm wondering about the AMP and Stripclubs. Will the boys in blue to busy or will the red sweep have them at every door?

[URL]https://www.cleveland.com/community/2024/11/man-arrested-for-engaging-in-prostitution-at-hotel-independence-police-blotter.html[/URL]

Yost is going to run for gov. And he will want his name out there as much as possible.

[QUOTE=MrDo1;7102922]Just want to get a pulse: I know we felt because it was an election year things got tight.

Do you feel that things will loosen up a bit now since the election is over or no? The streets seem to flow regardless, I'm wondering about the AMP and Stripclubs. Will the boys in blue to busy or will the red sweep have them at every door?[/QUOTE].

[QUOTE=Dustit99;7105093][URL]https://www.cleveland.com/community/2024/11/man-arrested-for-engaging-in-prostitution-at-hotel-independence-police-blotter.html[/URL][/QUOTE]From the story. "Police issued a warrant for the arrest of a man suspected of engaging in prostitution at hotels in Independence and Middleburg Heights.

Police responded to a call. From management at a Red Roof Inn. ".

Does this read as they've been tracking this particular john for a period of time? Have they been following him from Red Roof Inn to Red Roof Inn? Or have they been tracking the woman? Or simply responding to a RRI employee who had suspicions? Article says cops interviewed her *after* the deed and that she admitted to pr* it*tion but no mention of arresting her for that.

I guess the big picture is just "be careful. ".

[QUOTE=CarGuyF599;7106873]From the story. "Police issued a warrant for the arrest of a man suspected of engaging in prostitution at hotels in Independence and Middleburg Heights.

Police responded to a call. From management at a Red Roof Inn. ".

Does this read as they've been tracking this particular john for a period of time? Have they been following him from Red Roof Inn to Red Roof Inn? Or have they been tracking the woman? Or simply responding to a RRI employee who had suspicions? Article says cops interviewed her *after* the deed and that she admitted to pr* it*tion but no mention of arresting her for that.

I guess the big picture is just "be careful. ".[/QUOTE]That whole article seems fucking crazy. First, police respondimg to RRI about a call of *possible* prostitution or drugs? Then, tracking the car? The woman admitting and confirming tricking this visit and many prior visits? The craziest part might be it was onnly $100.

Also, the headline says arrested but the article only says contacted. All of this for possible blow and go? Crazy. Sounds like he said she said. Good luck with that coppers.

[QUOTE=DirtMerchant;7106907]That whole article seems fucking crazy. First, police respondimg to RRI about a call of *possible* prostitution or drugs? Then, tracking the car? The woman admitting and confirming tricking this visit and many prior visits? The craziest part might be it was onnly $100.

Also, the headline says arrested but the article only says contacted. All of this for possible blow and go? Crazy. Sounds like he said she said. Good luck with that coppers.[/QUOTE]He clearly talked to them when he didn't have to. He made his bed, he can sleep in it. Will it lead to a conviction however? Probably not. But getting this far was clearly his choice.

[QUOTE=SteelPenguin;7106912]He clearly talked to them when he didn't have to. He made his bed, he can sleep in it. Will it lead to a conviction however? Probably not. But getting this far was clearly his choice.[/QUOTE]You don't know that from the article, which indeed is unclear. They had a warrant for his arrest. He was contacted and / or arrested. That's all you know.

If what the article says is accurate, and there's not much more to the story, it seems absolutely insane that a warrant was issued based on a call of suspicion. You need a lot more than suspicion to even detain someone in a traffic stop or on the street. It needs to be actionable suspicion.

Either there is more evidence or this is a pretty clear overreach, which will go nowhere, even if he did talk, based on the warrant not being valid in the first place.

We don't know the whole story so all we can do is speculate. But Ohio seems to be pushing the limits on civil rights.

I'm assuming they felt they're going to stand on some of the new laws to even attempt to make this stick. Someone's going to start pushing back on this kind of thing.

[QUOTE=TooManyLadies8;7107360]You don't know that from the article, which indeed is unclear. They had a warrant for his arrest. He was contacted and / or arrested. That's all you know.

If what the article says is accurate, and there's not much more to the story, it seems absolutely insane that a warrant was issued based on a call of suspicion. You need a lot more than suspicion to even detain someone in a traffic stop or on the street. It needs to be actionable suspicion.

Either there is more evidence or this is a pretty clear overreach, which will go nowhere, even if he did talk, based on the warrant not being valid in the first place.

We don't know the whole story so all we can do is speculate. But Ohio seems to be pushing the limits on civil rights.

I'm assuming they felt they're going to stand on some of the new laws to even attempt to make this stick. Someone's going to start pushing back on this kind of thing.[/QUOTE]Also, mind your own fucking business RRI employees. JFC. Nobody wants that heat for getting their dick wet. Let a man be.

A lot of the traveling women stay in this area. LE is watching that area like a hawk. Beware!

[URL]https://www.cleveland.com/community/2024/12/police-arrest-four-in-sex-sting-independence-police-blotter.html[/URL]

Everytime I contact a provider and they say they are staying in Independence I tell them in the future look for a different spot since that area is notoriously bad for SW trade.

[QUOTE=BuckeyeGuy2;7139008]A lot of the traveling women stay in this area. LE is watching that area like a hawk. Beware!

[URL]https://www.cleveland.com/community/2024/12/police-arrest-four-in-sex-sting-independence-police-blotter.html[/URL][/QUOTE]

[QUOTE=DirtMerchant;7139157]Everytime I contact a provider and they say they are staying in Independence I tell them in the future look for a different spot since that area is notoriously bad for SW trade.[/QUOTE]I've been there dozens of times, never an issue. Stop panicking. High end providers are there all the time. Vet better.

[QUOTE=SR7D1;7139476]I've been there dozens of times, never an issue. Stop panicking. High end providers are there all the time. Vet better.[/QUOTE]Yeah agree with you. I've seen Paris whenever she decides to come here usually there or Beachwood. Just have to make sure who you're seeing there is a reviewed provider. Tends to be the girls coming into the city that I see there though versus local girls. Local girls that go there I am wary of and will come here to check for reviews, next to TER to make sure they're legit.