Saw her a few times back when she was on here before, it was fantastic. She's a sweet girl. Have texted her 3 times since her ad popped back up and no response yet.
Printable View
Saw her a few times back when she was on here before, it was fantastic. She's a sweet girl. Have texted her 3 times since her ad popped back up and no response yet.
[QUOTE=DickHerDown;2515064]Has anyone seen this girl yet? I'm considering it just because of those big ass titties alone! Some open post a review or PM me please. Thanks.[/QUOTE]Damn thems some TIGOBITIES.
[QUOTE=Knight73;2515152]Did not think of combining the name. Thanks for the heads up.
Knight.[/QUOTE]Yes I've seen her, very good. Glad she is back.
Brookee is the real deal. I had made contact with Brookee about three weeks ago when she was an independent. She just placed an Ad on NR and I was curious and texted her. She was completely new (and had another name) and there wasn't any reviews about her. Yet I decided to inquire and find out about her. We texted back and forth then we spoke over the phone. Long story short we agreed to meet at a location in Florence so as to verified each other as non LEO.
We each were cool and proceeded to her place for fun. Yes her 36 double the's are natural and felt great. Brookee has a wide menu but no islands. She was very active and spontaneous and fun in session. Absolutely not a dead-fish attitude whom many other providers most of us encounter at one time or another.
Brookee's personality is charismatic and she goes the extra mile to make you feel comfortable and relax. I had a great time with her and will repeat.
Also before I wrap this report up, she has a beautiful and distinct face. Incredible eyes and pearly white teeth like a model.
When we met she was working a full-time job during most days so I'm assuming that's the situation for her now and for awhile. She'll be low volume and keep that in mind if you're trying to book her.
Harpo.
Her ad says she's back, but my search turned up empty, can anyone shed any light on this one?
Her ad only popped back up once, and that was on Friday. Have tried several times, no reply. Weird. I hope she's ok.
[QUOTE=TommyJohn;2517209]Her ad says she's back, but my search turned up empty, can anyone shed any light on this one?[/QUOTE]I tried three times this week and nothing but crickets.
[QUOTE=Fishing1270;2518932]I tried three times this week and nothing but crickets.[/QUOTE]No response to my attempts.
[QUOTE=DistantFirtst;2518599]Her ad only popped back up once, and that was on Friday. Have tried several times, no reply. Weird. I hope she's ok.[/QUOTE]She's been responsive to my texts but scheduling has been tough. Still trying to see her but she has bee stringing me along.
[QUOTE=Enricojinx;2520440]She's been responsive to my texts but scheduling has been tough. Still trying to see her but she has bee stringing me along.[/QUOTE]Just got back. She is the woman in the picture. Staying at motel in near fairfield. Pics are old. She is about 15 pounds heavier. I would describe her as cute at best plain at worst. She's not unattractive. She tries very hard. Bbbjcmws and cfs with multiple positions. Very nice person. Still, I likely will not Repeat. Nothing wrong with her, she's just not what I'm looking for.
[QUOTE=BuyingSmiles;2417636]With her permission. Some Sadie Mae.
Enjoy!
BuyingSmiles![/QUOTE]Sadie is one of the best. Pics at #7384.
EightFiveNine XXX-Five417 is her NEW NUMBER.
There's nothing wrong in just saying that she's not what she claims to be by putting up those pics. Any deception like this is no short of trickery and unethical IMHO. Her pics are not current, period! I had a friend travel long distance to meet her a while ago and once he saw her, he politely requested to cancel the date. How hard is it for these chicks to update pics anyway?
[QUOTE=Enricojinx;2520687]Just got back. She is the woman in the picture. Staying at motel in near fairfield. Pics are old. She is about 15 pounds heavier. I would describe her as cute at best plain at worst. She's not unattractive. She tries very hard. Bbbjcmws and cfs with multiple positions. Very nice person. Still, I likely will not Repeat. Nothing wrong with her, she's just not what I'm looking for.[/QUOTE]
[QUOTE=ChickaAmante;2524477]How hard is it for these chicks to update pics anyway?[/QUOTE]Answer: Not hard. Ever try finding a cell phone without a camera? Imposible, really. Even the free "Obamaphones" have cameras. Nowadays, any old photo posted is intentional with the intent to mislead. There are no excuses.
[QUOTE=DNut;2525370]Answer: Not hard. Ever try finding a cell phone without a camera? Imposible, really. Even the free "Obamaphones" have cameras. Nowadays, any old photo posted is intentional with the intent to mislead. There are no excuses.[/QUOTE]Maybe they should all get updated photos taken in Glockman's and JSmith90's photo contest. See the User Blog. The ads could use a good sprucing up.
[QUOTE=DJake069;2528049]Maybe they should all get updated photos taken in Glockman's and JSmith90's photo contest. See the User Blog. The ads could use a good sprucing up.[/QUOTE]I am sure most guys worry less about the quality of the photo, than it's truthfulness.