-
Just my opinion but mongering on Seeking has been challenging over the past few years. It seems that at least from my experience its getting harder and harder to find good quality girls. I'm not sure what the other mongers are doing but I'm taking a break from seeking.
[QUOTE=EumYang;7240330][B]Nat[/B] ([URL]https://members.seeking.com/member/9d671aa2-8c05-4432-80b2-82b5b8a56cc4[/URL])
Her location says Columbia, but she said that she actually lives in Frederick. She seemed DTF. We were trying to schedule something before Thanksgiving last year, but then she stopped responding to my texts. Then we resumed texting two weeks ago, and finally set up a meet for last Thursday in Catonsville. After I arrived at the meeting location that day, she texts me, saying that she couldn't do this and that she was turning around. She hasn't been on Seeking in two months, but in case she comes back on at some point, I would avoid.
[B]cutie2222[/B] ([URL]https://members.seeking.com/member/1d69869b-9ba9-474b-8ee7-6c4cf270938c[/URL])
I'm not sure what's going on with this one. I was able to move the convo to text, but she took so long to respond, then she stopped responding. Later, I requested her private photos. Much later, she gives me access to them. I text her saying thank you, but she doesn't respond. I message her on Seeking, and she's saying that the number was not her number now. I ask her to text me again, she texts from a different number. Then she again takes forever to respond, and then stop responding again. She may be playing games or something, so I would avoid.
[B]all_vibes_welcome[/B] ([URL]https://members.seeking.com/member/d4ac1c02-da22-4628-8577-389c3ca541ef[/URL])
I got her to text, but then she stopped responding before we could set up something. Anyone contact her?
[B]H3ll0k1tty[/B] ([URL]https://members.seeking.com/member/8664aebe-2e61-42fd-b435-bbaccdc77702[/URL])
I messaged her, asking if she was interested in an arrangement, but she responded "Sorry I'm not on here like that", whatever that means. Anyone contact her?
Trying to find anyone on Seeking sucks. I've known this, having read previous posts on this thread, but still, it's pretty bad. I only have one regular now, and it's someone I found on Seeking back in 2018. I took a long break from mongering, and reconnected with her late last year. I've been trying to find another girl to add to the rotation, but have had no luck.[/QUOTE]
-
Sa
[QUOTE=ShortMan22;7241092]Just my opinion but mongering on Seeking has been challenging over the past few years. It seems that at least from my experience its getting harder and harder to find good quality girls. I'm not sure what the other mongers are doing but I'm taking a break from seeking.[/QUOTE]May / June last year was a good time. Good quality, and selection without the insane asks like I saw when I was back on a few months ago. I know of a few hidden gems out there but you have to have a lot of patience with them in finding a reliable arrangement.
-
Long wrap-up
My texting app went haywire a long time ago so reconnecting with ladies and tag-team bros in DMV has been a challenge. Tried to reconnect with the following but missed:
Tawny72.
Reese.
Gymfine76.
The. In Perryville.
While traveling I hunt the 30+ sex starved milfs: Fet, hotwives, Hinge / Tinder, SA freeebie / value play. Cross referencing profiles between Fet, SA, Hinge, and Tinder has become a hobby and resulted in lots of casual, free play. Turns out a woman on at least 2 of those platforms is often hunting new dick as much if not more than sugar. While a few I see in DMV are close hold I did reconnect and enjoy the following:
B. J. In HARCO, Natalie (the former Wildcat) in D. C. , and the resident witch in are's Delight. All are off the open market for various reasons but if you did them good in the past they may let you enjoy them again.
While not hot, if you have some game you can get an extreme value play and send these back home to their husband and kids with handprints on their ass and few loads of chum leaking into their panties:
Hot_Mel.
Kristen.
EnchantingTemptress.
Likely real but I had fairly unpleasant interactions with:
MashlyAddisin.
SassyPrincess.
Was passed to me by a fellow mongerer as he enjoyed her but I didn't find her attractive enough for any ppm kink and she wants / needs sugar:
Jennbunni.
I don't post links because you can search SA. If you can't find her it's because blocked you or she changed her name.
PSA: please, please, please stop sending women pics that have been on your social media accounts, LinkedIn, etc. Even if you are single. I found out during recent pillow talk that my date used some tools to vet potentials. She wasn't scamming, just checking to see if guys were real, had red flags, and a career that she thought could allow for sugaring. What she showed me could find was eye opening. Photo recognition AI tools and scrapers are accessible enough now that even good women can easily check you out. The crazies, scammers, or LE. Well they can do much worse. Do some research and find how to keep your anonymity until you establish mutual trust with a woman.
-
Thanks for the intel! I normally agree about not posting links except there are like four Kristen's in the area LOL.
[QUOTE=AnomBox;7243328]My texting app went haywire a long time ago so reconnecting with ladies and tag-team bros in DMV has been a challenge. Tried to reconnect with the following but missed:
Tawny72.
Reese.
Gymfine76.
The. In Perryville.
While traveling I hunt the 30+ sex starved milfs: Fet, hotwives, Hinge / Tinder, SA freeebie / value play. Cross referencing profiles between Fet, SA, Hinge, and Tinder has become a hobby and resulted in lots of casual, free play. Turns out a woman on at least 2 of those platforms is often hunting new dick as much if not more than sugar. While a few I see in DMV are close hold I did reconnect and enjoy the following:
B. J. In HARCO, Natalie (the former Wildcat) in D. C. , and the resident witch in are's Delight. All are off the open market for various reasons but if you did them good in the past they may let you enjoy them again.
While not hot, if you have some game you can get an extreme value play and send these back home to their husband and kids with handprints on their ass and few loads of chum leaking into their panties:
Hot_Mel.
Kristen.
EnchantingTemptress.
Likely real but I had fairly unpleasant interactions with:
MashlyAddisin.
SassyPrincess.
Was passed to me by a fellow mongerer as he enjoyed her but I didn't find her attractive enough for any ppm kink and she wants / needs sugar:
Jennbunni.
I don't post links because you can search SA. If you can't find her it's because blocked you or she changed her name.
PSA: please, please, please stop sending women pics that have been on your social media accounts, LinkedIn, etc. Even if you are single. I found out during recent pillow talk that my date used some tools to vet potentials. She wasn't scamming, just checking to see if guys were real, had red flags, and a career that she thought could allow for sugaring. What she showed me could find was eye opening. Photo recognition AI tools and scrapers are accessible enough now that even good women can easily check you out. The crazies, scammers, or LE. Well they can do much worse. Do some research and find how to keep your anonymity until you establish mutual trust with a woman.[/QUOTE]
-
Kristen: Bear, DE.
[QUOTE=Biggyv;7246227]Thanks for the intel! I normally agree about not posting links except there are like four Kristen's in the area LOL.[/QUOTE]
-
Brace yourself boys.
Quality of sugar babies going to skyrocket while allowances dump.
Layoffs coming in hot; which means more ladies will need to sugar to make rent, play money, and to cover their chipotle and Starbucks. It's going to spill over everywhere. Hotter waitresses, more strippers; fewer openings all around.
Less competition from the tech and Bitcoin bros who were driving up expectations. Those ladies who are asking for thousands of dollars in allowance are going to be sorely disappointed when they realize that the Splenda daddies are the only ones who are left in the game because those were the guys who were smart about their cash.
Happy hunting boys. Pussy will be falling from the sky shortly.
-
[QUOTE=AnomBox;7243328]My texting app went haywire a long time ago so reconnecting with ladies and tag-team bros in DMV has been a challenge. Tried to reconnect with the following but missed:
Tawny72.
Reese.
Gymfine76.
The. In Perryville.
While traveling I hunt the 30+ sex starved milfs: Fet, hotwives, Hinge / Tinder, SA freeebie / value play. Cross referencing profiles between Fet, SA, Hinge, and Tinder has become a hobby and resulted in lots of casual, free play. Turns out a woman on at least 2 of those platforms is often hunting new dick as much if not more than sugar. While a few I see in DMV are close hold I did reconnect and enjoy the following:
B. J. In HARCO, Natalie (the former Wildcat) in D. C. , and the resident witch in are's Delight. All are off the open market for various reasons but if you did them good in the past they may let you enjoy them again.
While not hot, if you have some game you can get an extreme value play and send these back home to their husband and kids with handprints on their ass and few loads of chum leaking into their panties:
Hot_Mel.
Kristen.
EnchantingTemptress.
Likely real but I had fairly unpleasant interactions with:
MashlyAddisin.
SassyPrincess.
Was passed to me by a fellow mongerer as he enjoyed her but I didn't find her attractive enough for any ppm kink and she wants / needs sugar:
Jennbunni.
I don't post links because you can search SA. If you can't find her it's because blocked you or she changed her name.
PSA: please, please, please stop sending women pics that have been on your social media accounts, LinkedIn, etc. Even if you are single. I found out during recent pillow talk that my date used some tools to vet potentials. She wasn't scamming, just checking to see if guys were real, had red flags, and a career that she thought could allow for sugaring. What she showed me could find was eye opening. Photo recognition AI tools and scrapers are accessible enough now that even good women can easily check you out. The crazies, scammers, or LE. Well they can do much worse. Do some research and find how to keep your anonymity until you establish mutual trust with a woman.[/QUOTE]I was able to find profile of EnchantingTemptress.
[URL]https://members.seeking.com/member/4521a5f3-5d51-4a4c-9207-9b47d6e22bb4[/URL]
-
Warning: Tye on SA
Username Tye in Baltimore.
Nice pics and value offer. She claims to be on the cuddle site too but I didn't see her there, who knows. Met in public and she was ok if a little nervous. Face pics are accurate, she's cute. Closed the deal and got her alone. Her body is 25 years older than her face. It's eerie. The sex was bad, limited and she seems uncomfortable. Also she gets kind of crazy, mumble-talking into her phone and darting around. I cut my losses and sent her away. She started texting angrily I didn't give her enough. I gave her the agreed amount. Seems the mumble talking was hints I was supposed to give her more so she could make rent. I missed that I guess. Also she left her hair brush and wanted to come back for it. Blocked her on both SA and text and ran. Avoid at all costs.
-
Wildflower
Wants $1,200 ppm and will meet at Arundel Mills on your dime. LOL.
[URL]https://members.seeking.com/member/7d7c3a5c-a500-4af4-b510-b0173020d366??locale=en_USS[/URL]
-
GPS to the Max!!
[QUOTE=BustaNut60;7259044]Wants $1,200 ppm and will meet at Arundel Mills on your dime. LOL.
[URL]https://members.seeking.com/member/7d7c3a5c-a500-4af4-b510-b0173020d366??locale=en_USS[/URL][/QUOTE]She can kick rocks!
-
Re: Wildflower
[QUOTE=BustaNut60;7259044]Wants $1,200 ppm and will meet at Arundel Mills on your dime. LOL.
[URL]https://members.seeking.com/member/7d7c3a5c-a500-4af4-b510-b0173020d366??locale=en_USS[/URL][/QUOTE]She's been here on and off for years. She will start begging for Amazon gift cards. Then she'll supply a host of reason why she can't meet, or only meet for lunch or a quick BJ. Pics are real, and she will send better photos. Married, with either 3 or 4 kids. She texts me every time she resurfaces. Damn, rates gone way up!
-
Yeah, my max is $$$ and never even close to a g-note. I tried reaching back out before reading your post but I already have 2 regulars and was looking for something different. I might have gone much higher than my max but I'm definitely not now. Thanks for the heads up!
[QUOTE=Duuuuuuude;7259311]She's been here on and off for years. She will start begging for Amazon gift cards. Then she'll supply a host of reason why she can't meet, or only meet for lunch or a quick BJ. Pics are real, and she will send better photos. Married, with either 3 or 4 kids. She texts me every time she resurfaces. Damn, rates gone way up![/QUOTE]
-
Cassie GPS
I found another potential. But after discussing what she wanted, I decided to block her. She looks like a Latina, my weakness, with big ties. Her profile lists Baltimore, but she's really in Woodbridge VA. Wants a g-note for a one time ppm.
-
Time waster
Yes, I agree. Texts were good but then she started asking for gas money, then money for an Uber when I offered to pick her up. She's in this for nothing but a few bucks here and there. Too bad because she could have made some money and had a good time. But oh well, I'm going to meet one of my regulars at 5 for some late afternoon fun.
[QUOTE=Matt410;7239928]Needs money for a babysitter scam. Lmao. PASS.
[URL]https://members.seeking.com/member/7d054bfb-88e0-4bd0-9aa9-cd4e22e1b4e2[/URL][/QUOTE]
-
Ana
Ana - [URL]https://members.seeking.com/messages/inbox/2aa30d02-6aed-4cbd-9d67-f742c76049e6[/URL].
Wants to talk about ppm on the site, won't message you off-site. Not sure if she's real or someone looking to report on you.
