This is proof positive that asking a girl if she has a nice body (or how "good" she is for that matter) is absolutely worthless. CJ has saved us all some money on this one.
Printable View
This is proof positive that asking a girl if she has a nice body (or how "good" she is for that matter) is absolutely worthless. CJ has saved us all some money on this one.
[QUOTE=Spider Man]Well, if she does have AIDS, she seems pretty happy about it. I bet the dudes that have gotten a bj from her, if they're on this board, their asshole just puckered up a little after seeing that.[/QUOTE]Although AIDs is rarely contracted by a male from an unprotected BJ (more likely to infect the female if the male has it, since there is blood in the semen), and is a lower risk activity, it IS a risk nonetheless. Unprotected anal or vaginal intercourse and sharing needles is considered a high risk situation for contracting HIV. It is always a much higher risk for the catcher than the pitcher UNLESS there is a cut or sore or place on the penis where there can be blood to blood contact from unprotected exposure.
I think herpes is the bigger worry from an unprotected BJ (or even LFK or DFK), and a CBJ is the way to go in any event.
Be safe out there.
[QUOTE=CookyJar]T She said it was eczema.
CookyJar[/QUOTE]She also said she had a great body. Maybe she has a bridge for sale?
[QUOTE=Atl Guy]If you get a chance check out the thread in the Ft. Lauderdale SW section. Work of pure fiction. Hard to take any of his posts any other way[/QUOTE]
Like I said on the [post=776722]Florida, Ft. Lauderdale SW section,[/post] Supereloquent has a nice way with words. What a waste of talent. I was just starting to like the guy.
He has also posted fake pictures in the Baltimore thread. This tints all of his reviews and posts. Everything about him is now suspected. It kind of makes you wonder, “Why?”
Why? Supereloquent! Why? You had to know someone would notice that the pictures were fakes? Why all the posts? You didn’t need to post pictures. You were doing fine without them. Why post them in other Cities forums, spoiling the reputation of our fair city? What were your intentions?
[b](Mongers who purposely passes on bad information should pay a penalty. Perhaps the admin should hold on to his senior member status for a while. IMHO)[/b]
CookyJar
[QUOTE=CookyJar]Like I said on the [post=776722]Florida, Ft. Lauderdale SW section,[/post] Supereloquent has a nice way with words. What a waste of talent. I was just starting to like the guy.
He has also posted fake pictures in the Baltimore thread. This tints all of his reviews and posts. Everything about him is now suspected. It kind of makes you wonder, “Why?”
Why? Supereloquent! Why? You had to know someone would notice that the pictures were fakes? Why all the posts? You didn’t need to post pictures. You were doing fine without them. Why post them in other Cities forums, spoiling the reputation of our fair city? What were your intentions?
[b](Mongers who purposely passes on bad information should pay a penalty. Perhaps the admin should hold on to his senior member status for a while. IMHO)[/b]
CookyJar[/QUOTE]As I explained to and apologized to the mongers in the Fort Lauderdale forum, something happened to me that I hope never happens to you, and caution is the watchword. I was away on business for a few days and my brother has access to my computer. Did you ever let your logon to this site be automatic for convenience instead of having to type in the password? Well he found a history on my browser, accessed this site under my name and thought it would be great fun to post a few whoppers, complete with fake pics. He has little knowledge of this site other than a very quick read and he un-intelligently assumed he could pull a fast one. While I am glad he didn't get away with it, I am vexed that he did it under my screen name. Needless to say, tensions are a little high at the moment between him and me. He is banned from my computer, as I have changed the password and changed the logon to this site to require a password as well. My sincerest apologies are extended to all of you.
There was a suspicion (at least in my own mind) that the "incredible red-headed Sarah" and another gal named Sarah were two different people. I have cleared up the controversy on film. Here is a pic comparison of the "incredible red-headed Sarah," (link to pic taken by someone else) and my recent photo of the gal I have called "the incredible strawberry blond Sarah," (she is actually more blondish than reddish so maybe calling her "blond Sarah" would be more accurate and distinctive). Both are named Sarah and usually hang out at the the same "H" stop, but they are obviously different people with different faces and shades of hair.
I won't go into details on our date as I have reviewed both before and Trashed201 gave a recent update. Suffice it to say that the experience was excellent, as usual.
[url]http://www.usasexguide.info/forum/attachment.php?attachmentid=67344[/url]
[QUOTE=Supereloquent]As I explained to and apologized to the mongers in the Fort Lauderdale forum, something happened to me that I hope never happens to you, and caution is the watchword. I was away on business for a few days and my brother has access to my computer. Did you ever let your logon to this site be automatic for convenience instead of having to type in the password? Well he found a history on my browser, accessed this site under my name and thought it would be great fun to post a few whoppers, complete with fake pics. He has little knowledge of this site other than a very quick read and he un-intelligently assumed he could pull a fast one. While I am glad he didn't get away with it, I am vexed that he did it under my screen name. Needless to say, tensions are a little high at the moment between him and me. He is banned from my computer, as I have changed the password and changed the logon to this site to require a password as well. My sincerest apologies are extended to all of you.[/QUOTE]Nice apology but totally BS. Redeem yourself kid. Those pics posted in the Baltimore forum were great but a total let down. So I throw this friendly challenge to you. Let go toe to toe and see who post the best REAL pics. Redeem yourself. Let the people vote. The choice is yours.
Walt
[QUOTE=Supereloquent]There was a suspicion (at least in my own mind) that the "incredible red-headed Sarah" and another gal named Sarah were two different people. I have cleared up the controversy on film. Here is a pic comparison of the "incredible red-headed Sarah," (link to pic taken by someone else) and my recent photo of the gal I have called "the incredible strawberry blond Sarah," (she is actually more blondish than reddish so maybe calling her "blond Sarah" would be more accurate and distinctive). Both are named Sarah and usually hang out at the the same "H" stop, but they are obviously different people with different faces and shades of hair.
I won't go into details on our date as I have reviewed both before and Trashed201 gave a recent update. Suffice it to say that the experience was excellent, as usual.
[url]http://www.usasexguide.info/forum/attachment.php?attachmentid=67344[/url][/QUOTE]
Hey Super..I looked for the post that the attached photo of Sara you
just linked to and I can't seem to find it. Can you give a link to the
post. I must be going crazy or something. I can't remember ever seeing
that pic of her before.
[QUOTE=Dewalt52]Nice apology but totally BS. Redeem yourself kid. Those pics posted in the Baltimore forum were great but a total let down. So I throw this friendly challenge to you. Let go toe to toe and see who post the best REAL pics. Redeem yourself. Let the people vote. The choice is yours.
Walt[/QUOTE]I don't take challenges from someone making his very first post. I have posted a few pics and I will post more as I get the opportunity, but I don't need a contest with you or anybody else to "prove" or "redeem" a damn thing, "kid."
[QUOTE=Supereloquent]Here are a few of Natalie's pics. She was OK with my posting them as long as I covered her face.[/QUOTE]Is it just me, or in some of those pics it looks like she shot some change out of her "moneymaker"?!
[QUOTE=Supereloquent]I don't take challenges from someone making his very first post. I have posted a few pics and I will post more as I get the opportunity, but I don't need a contest with you or anybody else to "prove" or "redeem" a damn thing, "kid."[/QUOTE]It sounds like you are afraid of a rookie. Why even bother posting, when all your post are a lie. Your are a big fraud. Thats why people complain about you to the admin. I was looking out for you as a friendly gesture, but it seems you can't help someone that doesn't want to help themselves. I shall call you the pussy for pussy.
[QUOTE=A Knucklehead]Is it just me, or in some of those pics it looks like she shot some change out of her "moneymaker"?![/QUOTE]You have a sharp eye. It was dark in the room (the Carlisle usually is) and hard to notice when I was taking the shots, but the flash reveals a dime on the bed. How it got there is anybody's guess. My assumption is that it fell out of one of our pockets when removing our clothes.
Now, for the $64,000 question: can you read the date on it?
I guess I should have asked for the day rate (do they even have one?) but I took 4 dates there today this balmy late winter Friday. I know, some of you are going to give me gas about the credibility of 4 dates in a day, but at least I got pics as evidence. Not all of my dates were keen on my posting the more risque photos and/or showing their faces, but I have posted what I can, given what I have promised regarding anonymity. Some of the anonymous risque pics I have provided in a separate post because I didn't want them included specifically with each gal and I have included a few that were not taken today, just to mix it up. And, yes, they are all taken by ME!
PS: I noted in my own previous posts that I spelled the Carlylse as "Carlisle" and that's truly what I thought the sign said, even though I have seen it a number of times. Welcome to the hell of dyslexia. I often have to think every letter through on anything I see or type, because I see letters reversed, transposed and substituted. I stared at the hotel sign carefully today and still saw it as "Carlisle," but I asked the clerk how it was spelled because I have seen others in this forum spell it "Carlysle." So my apologies are extended for any past or future letter screwups.
There are so many Nikis and Nikkis on the Ave that I made sure I got the spelling right. Niki is mid to late 20s, pretty, 5 feet 2, about 130, dark brunette hair which is wavy and cascades over her shoulders, a soft curvy body, a great rack and a hairy pussy with a nice mound. She is pleasant and talkative. I had seen her before a few times in the "H" area but someone had always picked her up before I even had a chance to turn around.
On this occasion it was early morning, not my usual time to be mongering, and I had driven the length of the Ave with not a SW in sight. When I stopped for Niki she was hesitant to get in. At first I thought she might think I was LE but she explained after we were underway that she has a number of regulars and usually sticks with them.
At the hotel Niki was like a shy quiet gf, until we got into it and then she was a tigress. She gives a very nice CBJ with DT. Her pussy gets dripping wet (no need to lick her fingers for lube like a few SWs whom I have fucked) and you slide in like a hot knife through butter. That doesn't stop her pussy muscles from gripping you like a vice as she sighs and moans and squeals under you. We only did Mish (partly because she had mentioned she had bad knees, which puts a damper on doggie, and the CGs), but it was so hot to pump that fleshy wet puss and I came hard.
Niki gets an A+ from me all the way around: looks, personality, body, BJ skills and she is a great fuck. If you see her, snatch her up because she has curb appeal, and if you don't another monger will.
I saw this incredibly cute, petite SW at the corner of Cambria and K. I didn't want to let this one get away so I stopped on the other side of the street and caught up to her on foot as she was strolling back down Cambria.
Seeing and experiencing Melanie started me thinking about the very definition of "cute: " a small body size (she is under 5 feet and can't be more than 95 pounds soaking wet), large eyes, small nose, dimples, playfulness, a look of innocence and affectionate behavior.
Melanie is 28 but doesn't look much more than 18. Up until a month ago she was a civilian, but losing her job forced her to make money on the Ave. Being new to this makes her even more cute and innocent than she looks. She isn't hard or jaded in the least.
Melanie has a small mouth to go with her small face and frame but that didn't stop her from swallowing my cock right down to the root for some excellent DT action. Seeing that cute face and big eyes looking up at me as she sucked made me hard as a rock. And fucking that cute tight bod! I placed my elbows up against the back of her knees, lifted her ass high in the air and pounded that tight puss. I don't think I ever had anyone this petite. She squealed and screamed as I took her hard and locked her up in a ball at the edge of the bed and got leverage by standing there and finishing her that way. Yummmmmmmmm! What a hot little morsel.
If you like cute and petite this is about as good as it gets. I got some great pics, some of which I can't show you, but these that I posted were ok with her if I blocked out her face. That's too bad because her face is a cute as her body. A++s all around for her looks and performance.
Try to see this one before she disappears from the Ave. This is temporary until they call her back to work. I have her digits for anyone having valuable digits in exchange.