[QUOTE=GeeDaty;7438302]Wondering if anyone can find a review of either of these anywhere as I'm having no such luck. I'm screened with SC but haven't visited yet so want to know a little more about what to expect before heading all the way to Pas.
I'm a HYA and natural body enjoyer, so pluses if either of those are true. Compared with kgirls how is the set-up there (like an AMP or similar apt style setting)? What about age, looks, accuracy of photos, and service?[/QUOTE]
I have not seen Ana or Sara so can't speak to them, they might be new. I haven't been to the Pasadena location either, but I used to their agency very often before they moved to LA. So I will answer your more general question about Thai girls and this agency. The average Thai girl at this agency is 30s, compared to korgs which are 40s. There is light PS on ad photos or they find a lookalike model or generic placeholder. In the rare cases they have a MILF, they dare to proudly use MILF ad photos. If it's a HYA they use HYA ad photos - even if it's a random placeholder ad. Then once the girl starts working and "makes the cut", they'll usually update the ad photos. They will cut any girl if guys aren't liking her.
Whereas korg MILFs will usually use HYA ad photos. Korg girls of all ages use a higher level of PS on average. It's why I don't toftt korgs on ads, but I'll still do it with thai orgs. The average Thai girl service is good, but it is a different style of service than kgirl service. It is more freestyle and like a real girlfriend imo, no fixed routine. Therefore, some people will prefer kgirl service, some will prefer thai girl service. Thai service is not too different from Viet girl service, it tends to feel genuine and mutual. Thai girls these days tend to be strictly GFE only.
Thai orgs have fewer duds, but that is simply due to slightly higher minimum standards than korgs. In looks the thai org girls I've seen have ranged S to C tier, whereas at korgs they range from S to E tier. But that is mostly because the D tier girls were upfront with D tier ads showing they were MILFs. It was safe for me to assume they were high service thai MILFs, and later reviews seemed to confirm this. Thai ads set more realistic expectations, and for better or worse they have more full bodied women with tits and big ass. I have seen Thai HYA both the skinny types as well as the full bodied ones, but HYA are uncommon just like with korgs (let's say 10%). In service, the thai girls ranged S to D tier service, whereas at korgs they range from S to F service. This is impressive because I was usually going in blind on ads alone. I will give one tip that respect matters in Thai culture, and I got a long with every girl with a positive approach.
Apart from that, I could have been lucky. I was never once tricked by ads (so far), but I will add to make sure you scroll through every ad on HX. And after a girl has worked they will occasionally post low or zero filter selfies. The best girl I saw at SC was 2 years ago, SC Emily. Her ads were representative, but later on they added real selfies (see attached). I had seen her many tours and at her peak when she was skinniest, she had a very good S line and was TOAS with ass. High A-Tier, in-between Lizza and Baby Peach who are also very cute HYA. Photo attached.
She was A looks, S service. She got 3 or 4 shots out of me, and I'm normally a one shot guy. I liked her service style, it could best be summed up as "anything I want" and she'll help me do it enthusiastically. It helped that she was young and very horny. Guys who prefer kgirl service probably wouldn't rate it as high, kgirl service queens are better at worship service and "do it for you" service which I highly recommend to others too.
