OPSEC. Operattional Security

[QUOTE=FarFarAway;6426745]The link just routes to a general news page. Perhaps make a screenshot.[/QUOTE]The problem is the board. You can't copy a link from the text of another post and paste it into a second post. The link always gets broken with the ellipsis bullshit instead of remaining intact. You can go back in and edit the text to be correct later, but then the board's ability to automatically convert hyperlinks will stop instead (which, frankly, is better, since at least then you can 'paste and go' in most browsers). I've explained this in about 9 different threads by now.

[QUOTE=CuriousVaMan;6427175]Try this. Gist is Popo raided her salon and found her "logbook. ".

"During the bust, Troopers found a logbook of all of Zlobin's appointments and said her alleged prostitution clients could face charges as well. ".

[URL]https://www.yahoo.com/news/washington-county-hairstylist-facing-charges-214613443.html[/URL][/QUOTE]The names in that story are Slobin, Wacker and Gags. Ha!

[QUOTE=FatWhiteGuy;6427317]The names in that story are Slobin, Wacker and Gags. Ha![/QUOTE]This won't be the first or last time a "logbook" is kept on various activities. I remember a similar situation in the Carolina's involving a wife and husband team running a website of high-end ladies. She was known as the "South Park Madam" and ran the largest prostitution ring in the Country.

They were busted, convicted, and sentenced to federal prison for as much as 24-month. The couple assisted the Feds and the fall out nabbed a bunch of "John's" throughout the Carolina's, some big names too. Doctors, lawyers, businessmen, and more. The most famous was Skipper Beck (deceased), of Beck Motors in Charlotte. It was crazy listening to the local radio station as this was the talk for months. Sadly, Beck died in a plane crash. While taking off, the plane lost power, Beck tried to circle back and land at Rock Hill airport, but crashed. The plane was obliterated.

[URL]https://www.wbtv.com/story/8899776/prostitution-ring-leader-sally-saxon-sentenced/[/URL]

I on occasion send a photo to a girl, by text or by email. I think photo apps these days are smarter than including any meta-data that could identify the person or place. I don't trust this, though, so I open the photo and take a screenshot, then send that.

Please correct me if I am doing this wrong. A screenshot can't be traced back to me via IP address, etc. , right?

[QUOTE=FarFarAway;6437922]I on occasion send a photo to a girl, by text or by email. I think photo apps these days are smarter than including any meta-data that could identify the person or place. I don't trust this, though, so I open the photo and take a screenshot, then send that.

Please correct me if I am doing this wrong. A screenshot can't be traced back to me via IP address, etc. , right?[/QUOTE]Use image-scrubber a browser based tool. Bookmark the page on your phone.

[QUOTE=Mazvid;6439223]Use image-scrubber a browser based tool. Bookmark the page on your phone.[/QUOTE]So what information would it remove from a screenshot? And I don't do anything on my phone, only a computer browser.

What's the better option for a burner phone, flip or smart? Aside from cost and monthly prepay, which is better?

Which service requires photo Id and PII to initiate or continue service? Old post from a while ago and never saw a response, thanks.

[QUOTE=OpusDog;6052858]My burner phone now requires a photo ID to refill. The company changed the policy and now wants to verify everyone's PII. Any suggestions for a decent anonymous phone provider?[/QUOTE]

I have a burner, and I also run Google voice on the burner, and use my GV # as my primary tool for sugar dating. It is convenient to be able to check texts on the web.

I have never ever crossed over from IRL to sugar. That is, no one I have ever been in contact w / in my real world has any of those numbers. I am considering a relationship that will be more of an affair, w / someone who already knows my true identity. I am trying to decide if I should give her either of my sugar numbers. I can't easily give her my IRL cell #, that seems too riskly.

Should I add in another texting app to the mix? How best to handle this.

[QUOTE=DarkRai2;6459191]Which service requires photo Id and PII to initiate or continue service? Old post from a while ago and never saw a response, thanks.[/QUOTE]If that is required, I'd bail on it. I use Tracfone, they have none of my personal info, and I refill w / prepad cards. It is very cheap, just based on usage, not time.

FFA, I'm curious about your characterization of this prospective realationship as an "affair. " Please elaborate. Is this someone you met outside of the bowl and who has a longer-term potential for a relationship, compared to an SB?

[QUOTE=FarFarAway;6490140]I have a burner, and I also run Google voice on the burner, and use my GV # as my primary tool for sugar dating. It is convenient to be able to check texts on the web.

I have never ever crossed over from IRL to sugar. That is, no one I have ever been in contact w / in my real world has any of those numbers. I am considering a relationship that will be more of an affair, w / someone who already knows my true identity. I am trying to decide if I should give her either of my sugar numbers. I can't easily give her my IRL cell #, that seems too riskly.

Should I add in another texting app to the mix? How best to handle this.[/QUOTE]

I wonder if TracFone has the capability to determine if you are also a Verizon customer by the proximity of the phones?

[QUOTE=FarFarAway;6490143]If that is required, I'd bail on it. I use Tracfone, they have none of my personal info, and I refill w / prepad cards. It is very cheap, just based on usage, not time.[/QUOTE]

[QUOTE=CuriousVaMan;6490325]FFA, I'm curious about your characterization of this prospective realationship as an "affair. " Please elaborate. Is this someone you met outside of the bowl and who has a longer-term potential for a relationship, compared to an SB?[/QUOTE]She knows who you are. So she knows the drill on being discreet. I would give her your GV only. And then adjust your setting to back Nothing up ever.

[QUOTE=CuriousVaMan;6490328]I wonder if TracFone has the capability to determine if you are also a Verizon customer by the proximity of the phones?[/QUOTE]Doesn't seem like proximity would be the way to connect them. I mean, I could be next to someone w / a Verizon phone on a train for hours, and we would not be connected.

[QUOTE=CuriousVaMan;6490325]FFA, I'm curious about your characterization of this prospective realationship as an "affair. " Please elaborate. Is this someone you met outside of the bowl and who has a longer-term potential for a relationship, compared to an SB?[/QUOTE]Yes, this is someone I met in my work life who knows exactly who I am. I sense mutual attraction (strong), and there could some sense of sugar dating to it, as I am way more than twice her age. My knowledge of her could provide a rationale why she would be interested. I would be prepared to have some elements of sugar involved, but yes, I'd be interested in a long-term relationship w / her. She is tres sexy, smart, headed for a professional career, sweet. There's not a thread on this site for affairs though. Just 'commercial' banging. Hahaha.

I have most of the details down of keeping myself safe in sugar dating. Both from the SB and my SO. If I were in a vanilla relationship w / this girl, though, I only would need to worry about the SO.