-
[QUOTE=MongerMan313;7122860]I doubt they go through all that trouble to catch guys paying for sex. Regardless, even if they can prove you were there, they can't prove you did anything illegal.[/QUOTE]The Feds have deeper pockets than anyone. Feds can charge anyone and give the defendant two options: 1) pay a defense attorney tens of thousands in legal defense fees or 2) plead guilty to a reduced charge that goes on your record. If the defendant has a professional license of any sort, then that will result in the loss of that license.
-
Proof or no proof.
[QUOTE=MongerMan313;7122860] Regardless, even if they can prove you were there, they can't prove you did anything illegal.[/QUOTE]From the article, "which of the liberated women are victims and which may be criminal defendants".
Liberated? Sometimes it's not about proof but the act of being investigated. Some people shudder when a detective knocks on the front door and starts asking questions because there was a loose end. The wife answers, "We think your husband has a hand in human trafficking. " Good luck explaining.
Stick to the basics. Use cash / burner / anonymous motels. Just because a hooker may accept Venmo doesn't mean a monger should use Venmo.
-
How do they know
We have to ask how do these investigators know the FS spots. Where are they getting this information. Seems like they know which one to go after to.
-
[QUOTE=JohnD420;7122501]V==[URL]https://www.clickondetroit.com/news/local/2024/12/06/michigan-state-police-arrest-70-year-old-man-for-human-trafficking-prostitution-in-southgate-home/[/URL].
Seems like the guy who owned that house got himself in some trouble![/QUOTE]May or may not have anything to do with Downriver Nuru Lady. Article cites a connection to an Investigation in Maumee Ohio. There was an AMP raided within recent months there. Toledo Massage forum has the details.
-
It's not over
[QUOTE=Rgv956;7122573]And " The investigation will include looking for customers who frequented the illicit massage parlors, Nessel said. "
It's Over. Feels like 2016 where Orange man went after Backpage.[/QUOTE]Orange man is not in yet. Nessel is a Democrat. Political points go both ways.
-
USA sex guide
[QUOTE=Rgv956;7123075]We have to ask how do these investigators know the FS spots. Where are they getting this information. Seems like they know which one to go after to.[/QUOTE]All the authorities have to do is read all these posts about where everybody doing boom boom and raid those places. It's all in black and white. LOL.
-
[QUOTE=RamButt;7123376]All the authorities have to do is read all these posts about where everybody doing boom boom and raid those places. It's all in black and white. LOL.[/QUOTE]I provide the FSLIST to all the local police departments. This makes them more efficient than having to read the entire forum. I plan to be appointed as head of Michigan DOGE.
-
[QUOTE=RamButt;7123376]All the authorities have to do is read all these posts about where everybody doing boom boom and raid those places. It's all in black and white. LOL.[/QUOTE]Only following a months long investigation.
-
Yep. Same owner.
[QUOTE=Timberwolf;7123101]May or may not have anything to do with Downriver Nuru Lady. Article cites a connection to an Investigation in Maumee Ohio. There was an AMP raided within recent months there. Toledo Massage forum has the details.[/QUOTE][URL]https://www.bizapedia.com/people/jingyu-jin.html[/URL]
The owner was busted before that in New Jersey. Interestingly, the recent bust cites her as being 45, while she was cited as 52 when she was busted in NJ. I doubt there's some Benjamin Button nonsense going on, so there's multiple women with the same name running these places and / or there's some papers being faked. Either way, she's very much failing at staying under the radar.
-
Trumped.
Ever hear of geofencing? It's how the FBI tracked down everyone who was at Capitol Hill on J6 months afterwards.
That's what's up.
A7 D.
-
Your link
[QUOTE=HouseOfCards;7123484][URL]https://www.bizapedia.com/people/jingyu-jin.html[/URL]
The owner was busted before that in New Jersey. Interestingly, the recent bust cites her as being 45, while she was cited as 52 when she was busted in NJ. I doubt there's some Benjamin Button nonsense going on, so there's multiple women with the same name running these places and / or there's some papers being faked. Either way, she's very much failing at staying under the radar.[/QUOTE]They probably are different women. At the top of your attachment, it says there are 11 women with the same name.
-
[QUOTE=AllSevenDays;7123659]Ever hear of geofencing? It's how the FBI tracked down everyone who was at Capitol Hill on J6 months afterwards.
That's what's up..[/QUOTE]This is the second time I have seen this said, so I feel the need to explain why this won't happen.
Geofencing can only predict within a range. In an area such as 16 and mound in Sterling Heights, it will be incredibly accurate, but not totally. If they were looking for a guy who did a specific thing at a specific place at a specific time, this could probably be enough to compel a subpoena for the owners of devices. But we are talking about devices that were in the area for a half hour to an hour, at most, a handful of times within a date range. There are several other businesses within a single-digit number of feet that operate within the same timeframe that AM did and within the date range that AM was open. These present challenges to the validity and reliability of geofencing.
The prosecutor would likely propose a range of accuracy based on calculations from a "geofencing expert" who will lay out the boundaries, which will probably be based on some sort of formula applied to a sample of like a hundred or so trials of measuring where different devices are in and around that office building. If there were any updates to software, for either satellites or phones pertaining to geolocation, these would also need to be accounted for and could potentially make the results from geofencing unusable because the tests for the range of accuracy could not be recreated. This alone would create such a headache and most likely resolve in a geofence so much larger than the bounds of that building, that conceivably, so many people would be caught within that geofence that they would need to reach out to hundreds-thousands of people who likely had no clue about this stuff, depending on their date range. Those experts would not be cheap. I would expect it to run the court about $50-100 k just for this silly little test, and I don't believe that a local judge would be happy about having to go through all of that, just to find out that most people caught in their net are soccer moms with sore backs, people who got injured at work, or maybe even, depending on the time of day and other factors, people sitting in their car waiting for their pizza at Happy's.
Geofencing worked in the context of the capitol because it was a relatively large area, and they had a very specific period of time. Here, there is a very, very narrow sliver of geography and they are looking for a specific period of time that a case was in the area within a wide range. This won't be used to bust guys who walked into a massage therapy facility where they were met with a woman who may or may not offered them sex for money.
And I know guys are worried about getting busted months later because of the Kraft case, but that is a 100% different case and that was thrown out. However, all mongers should read up on that.
-
[QUOTE=RayLatoole;7123712]They probably are different women. At the top of your attachment, it says there are 11 women with the same name.[/QUOTE]That's just the way the site presents data. It's definitely the same person for a bunch of them, as reported in the news.
-
[QUOTE=HouseOfCards;7124140]That's just the way the site presents data. It's definitely the same person for a bunch of them, as reported in the news.[/QUOTE]Often registered agent is the accountant that established the company, LLC, s or c Corp. She could just be the one owners use to file paperwork and look like a legitimate business. I doubt that's the case since she was mentioned in so many busts. But it's possible.
Kind of funny, an actual customer of mine opened healing plus. It changed hands from an owner in Novi to a guy in Atlanta GA few years back. In my work communication with said customer happens annually for the most part, they just pay the bill and don't inquire about anything. The original owner was a referred customer from a competitor that couldn't help. After meeting with him based on the info gathering I don't know if he was the actual owner or just being told to act like it or say he is.
I had no idea this would be a FS or even a HE place when starting to work with them, obviously after a few on site tours I know they're FS LOL. Customer doesn't know. So if something happened the higher up of the organization wouldn't be pulled into the legal issues.
-
Yeah sure
[QUOTE=DannyOceanMi;7122890]The Feds have deeper pockets than anyone. Feds can charge anyone and give the defendant two options: 1) pay a defense attorney tens of thousands in legal defense fees or 2) plead guilty to a reduced charge that goes on your record. If the defendant has a professional license of any sort, then that will result in the loss of that license.[/QUOTE]Oh please.
Stop it with the fear mongering.