Printable View
[QUOTE=Firefly2010]I'm suspicious of anyone who advertises 24/7 - that's desperate.[/QUOTE]
It is just more (often false) claims the girls put in ads, so that guys will call them. If they feel like working say at 2am, they may answer and schedule. I have called a couple after 1am and I haven't gotten any to answer or return my call. I guess they made enough those days to knock off early.
[QUOTE=Alan Duval]After you TOFTT, be sure to report back!!!! :)[/QUOTE]I called her to schedule, but said she is busy tonight. Asked me to call tomorrow, which is today, sunday. I called her Sunday, she said the listed fee is for 15 min. I said no way.
[QUOTE=Firefly2010]I'm suspicious of anyone who advertises 24/7 - that's desperate.[/QUOTE]
No one who really looks that hot could possibly be that desperate, could they?
She's a regular. Claims "real pic."
Here's the whole pic.
954-873-0682
Rapid
[QUOTE=Rapid]She's a regular. Claims "real pic."
Here's the whole pic.
954-873-0682
Rapid[/QUOTE]
Here's a whole lotta picsof her...
[url]http://erooups.com/2009/07/03/sexy_teacher_it_is_a_pity_that_she_didnt_teach_me_13_photos.html[/url]
Stay alert, stay safe
Googling her number gets you a multi-page history of prior ads, pics and names, which may be her. Hard to tell because of the size of the pics. If she is or was Jamie Sweets, she was well-reviewed in California November 2009 and January 2010. Appearance 7-9, performance 8.5-10. Google Jamie_Sweets and calwood to see it.
She's on BP and CL. All three pics below come from ads using 954 200 9668.
Rapid
[QUOTE=Rapid]Googling her number gets you a multi-page history of prior ads, pics and names, which may be her. Hard to tell because of the size of the pics. If she is or was Jamie Sweets, she was well-reviewed in California November 2009 and January 2010. Appearance 7-9, performance 8.5-10. Google Jamie_Sweets and calwood to see it.
She's on BP and CL. All three pics below come from ads using 954 200 9668.
Rapid[/QUOTE]
I also have been studying her various recent ads (both dc and baltimore) on several different sites. My sense is that she's legit, but I don't see why she uses the various names (kimberly, tiffany, meghan, Jamie Sweets) when she has very good relatively recent RB reviews. Also, a couple of pics she uses seem to be clearly not her, which I also don't understand since she's pretty good looking and obviously not shy about posting her own pics - including face pix. I fear she may have put on a few pounds recently judging from a couple of the RB pics - though perhaps the "heavy pics" are of someone else? Price point looks very reasonable (shown on some of her RB posts) - didn't see price advertised locally.
[QUOTE=Slick Tool]I also have been studying her various recent ads ... but I don't see why she uses the various names ... a couple of pics she uses seem to be clearly not her... I fear ...[/QUOTE]
Maybe we need some kind of lottery system to decide who is going to TOFTT?
Any experience with either of these two. Would like to know if they are for real and if they are worth it.
[QUOTE=Ntgs420]Any experience with either of these two. Would like to know if they are for real and if they are worth it.[/QUOTE]Ntgs,
I have seen Mary Jane she is real and pics are accurate. She is hosting out of a private home off of Sinclair. Quite neighborhood at least during early evening. Service where good and she accommodated me without complaints. I can say though you can get much better in looks and service for around the same rate.
Well I also saw her and I was very satisfied. She didn't rush me and she let me get off twice. Her head game was great. I plan to see her again. She sends her real pictures that are up to date so how can you say you can get better in the looks department? If you didn't think she looked all that then why did you go see her after you saw her pics? It's not like you walked in blind right? I give her high commendations and she practices safe sex only.
[quote]I have seen Mary Jane she is real and pics are accurate. She is hosting out of a private home off of Sinclair. Quite neighborhood at least during early evening. Service where good and she accommodated me without complaints. I can say though you can get much better in looks and service for around the same rate.[/QUOTE]
I also saw her and I was very pleased with her service. She didnt rush me and let me bust off twice. Her head game was great. She sends up to date pics so you have the option as to if you think she looks good enough before you get there. Theres no surprises when going to see her. She also practices safe sex and even showed me a recent negative HIV test. I give her high commendations on her performance. I plan to see her on the regular.
Massage in Canton, Kristy, 410-979-3122.
I went to see her a while back after reading some good reviews. My experience was pretty bad though.
I showed up on time, but she was late, texting, "I'll be there in a min. " we went back and forth, I got some food, and eventually, some hours later, she showed up.
I don't know if she was a little under the weather, tired, or just lame, but you get the point. She was apologetic, and offered for free 30 min extra or nude. Apparently she used to be a stripper. I took the extra 30 because I was sore.
The massage was average and the rest was uninteresting. Touching was limited. Just kinda boring in general. She was not into it. I finished in a reasonable time, but was only there for 45 min. So much for 90 min. She is cute though.
Weird stuff: Camera at the front door, massage room immediately upon entering from the street, and 4 hand prices are more than double. Weird.
Happen to be listening to the news tonight. Am a bit under the weather, not seeing a honey today. Any way, the report and I only caught a piece of it, was that Md. officials want Craig to take down Adult activities. Says some of the posts are slipping thru, and offering prostitution.
Imagine that. I have never read any thing about prostitution on there. All the girls are pretty clear, you pay for the time.
Oh well, perhaps we should all go out and demonstrate for our rights to arrange time with these fine ladies for their time.
Oh of course there is a freedom of speech issue here, and probably a few others. Next thing they will want to close down the 40 or fifty other sites dedicated to some fine women offering up thier time.
Smiling Fox ;}
Mikey,
First off, I never complained about her service. I was just stating the facts that at her rates there is better out there in. The looks and performance. Glad you. Had a good time and plan in making it a regular thing. That is why we all have different taste. I was just offering my opiniion and experience to another mongerer who was inquiring. To answer you question though, I work in DC area but live near Elkton and another provider was running late so I went with my backup. I always have at least 3 lined up for just that reason.
[QUOTE=Mikey1004]Well I also saw her and I was very satisfied. She didn't rush me and she let me get off twice. Her head game was great. I plan to see her again. She sends her real pictures that are up to date so how can you say you can get better in the looks department? If you didn't think she looked all that then why did you go see her after you saw her pics? It's not like you walked in blind right? I give her high commendations and she practices safe sex only.[/QUOTE]