Massage Parlor Reports

So I went to Charlies Terrace and checked it out. Got in the room and laid down the $70 and got only HJ. BBBJ was $ more so I guess the $70 is not all inclusive like someone else had suggested here.

[QUOTE=CapeScape;6983781]So I went to Charlies Terrace and checked it out. Got in the room and laid down the $70 and got only HJ.
BBBJ was $ more so I guess the $70 is not all
inclusive like someone else had suggested here.[/QUOTE]Not sure if you gave $70 or $170. Why does the board use $ to signify 100 dollars? Like saying $$$ is going to keep LEO from understanding you meant $300 spent on cootchie

If you gave $170 and only got HJ, do what the website says and contact them. If, on the other hand you have $70 and got a HJ, you get whatvyou pay for.

$170 was what I brought and I left very satisfied with HJ, covered BJ, FS.

Hello mongers, I'm visiting from the Tampa area where we have aromatherapy centers and lingerie modeling shops that give the option of extras with rub downs for the right amount of roses. Are any of these massage parlors American ran? I don't care for AMPs.

[QUOTE=LowHangers55;6984439]Hello mongers, I'm visiting from the Tampa area where we have aromatherapy centers and lingerie modeling shops that give the option of extras with rub downs for the right amount of roses. Are any of these massage parlors American ran? I don't care for AMPs.[/QUOTE]Yes, see above in header. I had a great sexperience there.

P.

[QUOTE=Casper11;6983502]I've been twice this month no-one mentioned IDS.

The whole point of the arrests showed 10/10 massage parlors were not taking IDs to see clients. Thats why they got arrested. The massage parlors know most customers will not give IDs when visiting. Its the whole point of the law. Massage Parlors will need to close up and advertise like escorts having girls at a house or hotel to provide services.[/QUOTE]When they hit boyscout AAA then I will be concerned.

Angle.

[QUOTE=TilapiaDinner;6983941]Not sure if you gave $70 or $170. Why does the board use $ to signify 100 dollars? Like saying $$$ is going to keep LEO from understanding you meant $300 spent on cootchie

If you gave $170 and only got HJ, do what the website says and contact them. If, on the other hand you have $70 and got a HJ, you get whatvyou pay for.

$170 was what I brought and I left very satisfied with HJ, covered BJ, FS.[/QUOTE]Are you saying for $170 for half hour you got HJ, BJ, and FS in that time frame? And you got to pick your girl too?

Angle.

[QUOTE=PorkSword;6982456][URL]https://winknews.com/2024/07/31/11-arrested-massage-parlor-bust/[/URL][/QUOTE]They were apparently pulling over men who left the places for minor traffic violations and then changing the topic to the place they left from. Some even made up stories about them getting happy endings. Like for fuck sakes, be honest and tell them the truth, that you just got a massage and that is it.

[blue][Deleted by Admin][/blue]

[b][u]EDITOR'S NOTE[/u]: [/b] [blue]This report was edited or deleted because it appeared to be a public effort to [u]discourage members from posting information[/u]. Please read the Forum's Posting Guidelines for further information.[/blue]

[QUOTE=FrenchAngle;6984722]Are you saying for $170 for half hour you got HJ, BJ, and FS in that time frame? And you got to pick your girl too?



Angle.[/QUOTE]I stand by my post. Scentshops.

[QUOTE=TilapiaDinner;6983941]Not sure if you gave $70 or $170. Why does the board use $ to signify 100 dollars? Like saying $$$ is going to keep LEO from understanding you meant $300 spent on cootchie

If you gave $170 and only got HJ, do what the website says and contact them. If, on the other hand you have $70 and got a HJ, you get whatvyou pay for.

$170 was what I brought and I left very satisfied with HJ, covered BJ, FS.[/QUOTE]Yes the $ stands for 100 so I paid 170 and she wanted more for BBBJ.

This along with the other posts may belong in news and media reports but the conversation was started here. Mods may choose to move.

I did finally finally read the entire law in full vs sections an my non-attorney view is this. It appears these places will need to get their record keeping in order to avoid making the news. Arresting the mgr's for failing to keep records seems like nothing other than sensationalist headline making. Most offences of this type are met with warnings, fines or temp suspension of license, not arrest especially on the first offense. In this case it's a misdemeanor, 3rd offence felony. It's an election year so that may have something to do with it. It's also odd that LE is doing the records checks but it could be another agency like the health department is then calling in police. In at least one case they coordinated with the news crew so they are definitely looking for headlines. I did not see any mention of clients in establishments at the time but I would guess there some getting a nice massage. I've had some quality massage and some not so quality.

It appears if they get their records in order and follow some of the other requirements like window dressing that would help them. For now I'm treading lightly and likely won't visit unless they are at least collecting intake forms and have addressed the window requirements. That would show they are complying with records and less likely to make the news.

For everyone's benefit here is the text of the law pertaining to client info.

"A massage establishment must maintain a complete set of legible Records in English or Spanish, which must include the date, time, and type of Service or treatment provided; the full legal name of the employee who Provided the service or treatment; and the full legal name, home address And telephone number of the client or patient. Medical records may satisfy this requirement if the records include the specified information. A copy of The client's or patient's photo identification may be used to provide the full Legal name and home address of the client or patient. Records required under This paragraph must be maintained for at least 1 year after a service or Treatment is provided. All information required under this paragraph must Be collected and recorded before any service or treatment is provided to a Client or patient. The establishment must confirm the identification of the Client or patient before any service or treatment is provided to the client or Patient. ".

This does not seem to indicate any proof is necessary but a copy "may" be used vs and intake form. The last sentence is somewhat confusing and seems duplicated. Nothing in this says it's mandatory to verify, collect or keep a copy of an I'd for clients.

I wonder how they Aroma shops fit this? In any case tread lightly.

[QUOTE=PorkSword;6982456][URL]https://winknews.com/2024/07/31/11-arrested-massage-parlor-bust/[/URL][/QUOTE]I found it funny because I'm sure there are some reviews of those ladies in here. Someone will list early 20's or 30's. Yet they were all late 40's or 50's. Haha.

Has anyone spoken to Mira recently? I have tried for the past 2 weeks to see her.

[QUOTE]" The establishment must confirm the identification of the Client or patient before any service or treatment is provided to the client or Patient.”

This does not seem to indicate any proof is necessary but a copy "may" be used vs and intake form. The last sentence is somewhat confusing and seems duplicated. Nothing in this says it's mandatory to verify, collect or keep a copy of an I'd for clients.[/QUOTE]I'm not a lawyer, but it seems to me that the clause "the establishment must confirm the identification of the Client. " means that the spa must see some sort of identification. How else can they confirm the clients identify?

Further, I imagine that it's probably illegal for the client to give false information on an intake form. The false information alone could be a charge by itself.

Take what I wrote with a grain of salt. Once again, I'm not a lawyer.

[QUOTE=Retired11;6987446]Has anyone spoken to Mira recently? I have tried for the past 2 weeks to see her.[/QUOTE]She is on vacation for the month!