Streetwalker Reports

Some are probably sick of my posting this but I really do think that it's always worth repeating - back in September I extracted data from a file provided by SPD / City of Seattle and found that the only arrests involving prostitution / sexual exploitation anywhere in Seattle city limits going back to 2020 have only occurred along Aurora Ave. Accordingly, I was able to determine that stings primarily occurred in three locations along Aurora: In the Lowe's / KK lot (the largest number of arrests in recent years), the area around 137th and the 100 blocks south of 105th. The former two are the most popular sting spots by a long-shot going back o 2019. Just a heads-up to be super extra vigilant when approaching or being approached by any female in any of those locations.

Probably time to get a new data file from SPD. I don't expect that anything has changed, but it's always interesting to take a look.

[QUOTE=ProJohn1;6716622]Be careful of 137th st otherwise known as "the wall". I have noticed over the last several weeks they have been making arrests there. Including one a couple of days ago.[/QUOTE]

[QUOTE=Hoballer;6716739]Just curious if anyone has any experience with this SW, goes by Ava or Avia and she's almost always working south of 95th what seems to be every night. I've generally been avoiding Aurora lately but came upon her the other night as I had to drive through. She's very spinnery and better-looking in person vs the photos below. I've run into her several times over the past six months and she's very friendly whenever I do run into her, often coming over just to say hello and exchange a laugh or two. She seems to be very limited on menu and services which is why I haven't dated her, yet despite all of this she still greets me without any attitude. Again, photos don't do her body any justice, she turns my head every damn time I see her. For all of her walking and standing I never see her get picked-up though I do see a lot of guys stopping for her. Just wondering how is her experience for anyone whom has actually dated her, I'm definitely curious.

[URL]https://withescorts.com/escorts/335878850351210496[/URL][/QUOTE]You should post the pictures here I can't on any web browser get that link to work.

[QUOTE=Hoballer;6717674]Some are probably sick of my posting this but I really do think that it's always worth repeating - back in September I extracted data from a file provided by SPD / City of Seattle and found that the only arrests involving prostitution / sexual exploitation anywhere in Seattle city limits going back to 2020 have only occurred along Aurora Ave. Accordingly, I was able to determine that stings primarily occurred in three locations along Aurora: In the Lowe's / KK lot (the largest number of arrests in recent years), the area around 137th and the 100 blocks south of 105th. The former two are the most popular sting spots by a long-shot going back o 2019. Just a heads-up to be super extra vigilant when approaching or being approached by any female in any of those locations.[/QUOTE]Thanks for the intel. Those spots are also where SWs tend to aggregate afaik. My question is, what time of the day do stings usually happen? Do they do it at late night?

[QUOTE=Hoballer;6716739]Just curious if anyone has any experience with this SW, goes by Ava or Avia and she's almost always working south of 95th what seems to be every night. I've generally been avoiding Aurora lately but came upon her the other night as I had to drive through. She's very spinnery and better-looking in person vs the photos below. I've run into her several times over the past six months and she's very friendly whenever I do run into her, often coming over just to say hello and exchange a laugh or two. She seems to be very limited on menu and services which is why I haven't dated her, yet despite all of this she still greets me without any attitude. Again, photos don't do her body any justice, she turns my head every damn time I see her. For all of her walking and standing I never see her get picked-up though I do see a lot of guys stopping for her. Just wondering how is her experience for anyone whom has actually dated her, I'm definitely curious.[/QUOTE]I often see her ads on listcrawler. Tried to text her but couldn't even get her to text back LOL.

[QUOTE=Kggcx;6718176]Thanks for the intel. Those spots are also where SWs tend to aggregate afaik. My question is, what time of the day do stings usually happen? Do they do it at late night?[/QUOTE]They typically occur during the afternoon to early evening commute. I haven't looked at the full set of data from SPD but I haven't seen any stings conducted during the early am or late PM.

[QUOTE=Hoballer;6716739]Just curious if anyone has any experience with this SW, goes by Ava or Avia and she's almost always working south of 95th what seems to be every night. I've generally been avoiding Aurora lately but came upon her the other night as I had to drive through. She's very spinnery and better-looking in person vs the photos below. I've run into her several times over the past six months and she's very friendly whenever I do run into her, often coming over just to say hello and exchange a laugh or two. She seems to be very limited on menu and services which is why I haven't dated her, yet despite all of this she still greets me without any attitude. Again, photos don't do her body any justice, she turns my head every damn time I see her. For all of her walking and standing I never see her get picked-up though I do see a lot of guys stopping for her. Just wondering how is her experience for anyone whom has actually dated her, I'm definitely curious.

[URL]https://withescorts.com/escorts/335878850351210496[/URL][/QUOTE]This girl here? [URL]https://escortalligator.com.listcrawler.eu/post/escorts/usa/washington/tacoma/161814054[/URL].

I recognize her. See her every single night in the area of Dunn Lumber. Never once stopped for her or ever been tempted LOL There is way way better out there.

But of course you'd say that. Wouldn't expect anything less, LOL. But i'm curious, which girls out there are "better" to you? You never seem to give any of us any indication of any specific SW(s) who are good to pick-up out there but yet you seem very willing to criticize everyone else's selection whenever they share with the board. If a gal doesn't appeal to you, fine, that's life, but it's strange how you always have to appear as if you're superior by letting all of us know that [i]you[/i] don't like another poster's choice or taste while at the same time providing zero actual information about any providers you've picked-up, like and enjoy. I don't understand that. Many different tastes and varieties out there, man. I probably wouldn't like all of the SWs you've picked-up (whoever they are, we don't know), but i'd not slam you for doing so. Whatever is your taste is your thing, not mine.

You do you, man, but it is rather strange.

[QUOTE=ProJohn1;6718611]This girl here? [URL]https://escortalligator.com.listcrawler.eu/post/escorts/usa/washington/tacoma/161814054[/URL].

Never once stopped for her or ever been tempted LOL There is way way better out there.[/QUOTE]

According to the timestamps on the individual arrests in the data, the vast majority of arrests seem to occur between 5 pm-9 pm. There are some isolated records with a timestamp of midnight, but those are limited, and all of those took place around 137th. So, arrests for patronizing / sexual exploitation do happen outside of the normal commute times but they are rare. When I consulted a lawyer a few months ago, he told me that SPD are generally "sloppy" about their stings, they set them up quickly and net as many guys as possible in the shortest amount of time possible. They get things wrong from time to time because, as he said, they generally have a careless attitude about it. I don't know what's true, just repeating what I was told. But it's important to note that SPD can change their tactics at any time, so although this data does, I think, provide good intel, they can suddenly switch it up. I think that when the motels were open and active it was easy for SPD to net a lot of arrests without having to do too much because people were generally careless about how they went about it out there. One thing the lawyer told me was that a lot of his clients actually believed that prostitution had been decriminalized because the cops didn't appear to be doing anything, so they approached any girl out there without any fear. Then, of course, they got popped. So, preaching to the choir here, always be as vigilant as possible.

[QUOTE=Kggcx;6718176]Thanks for the intel. Those spots are also where SWs tend to aggregate afaik. My question is, what time of the day do stings usually happen? Do they do it at late night?[/QUOTE]

[QUOTE=Hoballer;6718785]But of course you'd say that. Wouldn't expect anything less, LOL. But i'm curious, which girls out there are "better" to you? You never seem to give any of us any indication of any specific SW(s) who are good to pick-up out there but yet you seem very willing to criticize everyone else's selection whenever they share with the board. If a gal doesn't appeal to you, fine, that's life, but it's strange how you always have to appear as if you're superior by letting all of us know that [i]you[/i] don't like another poster's choice or taste while at the same time providing zero actual information about any providers you've picked-up, like and enjoy. I don't understand that. Many different tastes and varieties out there, man.

You do you, man, but it is rather strange.[/QUOTE]I wasn't even criticizing you bro. You are super super sensitive. All I said was there is way way better then her out there which objectively is facts. I was actually being nice about it. She looks like a cafeteria lady and a shapeless blob! She's the definition of bleh. I dunno when those photos on listcrawler were taken but that's her at her absolute peak all dolled up and she's not even that good looking. Mind you those are professionally taken photos heavily edited in photoshop LOL! She looks heavier in person. Maybe sucked some fat out of there or she gained weight LOL.

To suggest that the girls I've dated is some mystery is pretty comical. I have something like 400 posts on this board and have shared many many reports of the girls I've picked up on AA and have taken to my house. Your just mad that I don't name my girls cause you can't find top shelf unicorns out there like me. Stay mad bro.

[QUOTE=Hoballer;6718785]But of course you'd say that. Wouldn't expect anything less, LOL. But i'm curious, which girls out there are "better" to you? You never seem to give any of us any indication of any specific SW(s) who are good to pick-up out there but yet you seem very willing to criticize everyone else's selection whenever they share with the board. If a gal doesn't appeal to you, fine, that's life, but it's strange how you always have to appear as if you're superior by letting all of us know that [i]you[/i] don't like another poster's choice or taste while at the same time providing zero actual information about any providers you've picked-up, like and enjoy. I don't understand that. Many different tastes and varieties out there, man. I probably wouldn't like all of the SWs you've picked-up (whoever they are, we don't know), but i'd not slam you for doing so. Whatever is your taste is your thing, not mine.

You do you, man, but it is rather strange.[/QUOTE]Don't even bother with NoobJohn1. Dude has 400+ posts like 4 months, yet nothing of REAL substance. Claims to be a baller, yet he's picking up SWs. Dude has watched Pretty Woman too many times and thinks he's going to pull off a Richard Gere LOL. His responses are comical and asinine. I genuinely believe that he's a teenager. The way he talks and his matter-of-factly statements that are absolutely ridiculous (check out Rant thread), makes me believe that he might even be a virgin still.

NoobJohn1 has had several posts redacted because of being argumentative. Makes me believe that a lot of what he posts as fact is really just opinions and he has nothing solid. Keep doing you

You both piss up wind.

Go bang woman with wang instead. Much better. Ok? Ok.

Man the haters have collapsed into absolute delirium on here. Genuinely laughing my ass off here. Here is more non helpful and non information of substance. Cause I am such a non contributing member to this board.

I have created a Google Maps with the arrest data from the SPD dataset from 2012-2023. I have done my best to reproduce the data in it's entirety. It is missing some arrests still due to this being a rough draft and the complexity of working with data of this size. I will fine tune the python script I have written to include the missing arrests over the coming days. I will also what the dataset says the offense is later. There are three offenses for prostitution in the dataset. Assisting or Promoting Prostitution, Prostitution, and Purchasing Prostitution. The vast majority of entries just say "Prostitution" for the offense. Now that you can visualize where the prostitution is in the city you can see that South Jackson Street in China Town has the most prostitution activity outside of Aurora. The Latitude and Longitude comes directly from the datasets at the time of the arrest.

[URL]https://www.google.com/maps/d/edit?mid=1t7Ubc8UAovkXHWvoHrJUQl-S-p-6peU&usp=sharing[/URL]

[QUOTE=ProJohn1;6719751]Man the haters have collapsed into absolute delirium on here. Genuinely laughing my ass off here. Here is more non helpful and non information of substance. Cause I am such a non contributing member to this board.

I have created a Google Maps with the arrest data from the SPD dataset from 2012-2023. I have done my best to reproduce the data in it's entirety. It is missing some arrests still due to this being a rough draft and the complexity of working with data of this size. I will fine tune the python script I have written to include the missing arrests over the coming days. I will also what the dataset says the offense is later. There are three offenses for prostitution in the dataset. Assisting or Promoting Prostitution, Prostitution, and Purchasing Prostitution. The vast majority of entries just say "Prostitution" for the offense. Now that you can visualize where the prostitution is in the city you can see that South Jackson Street in China Town has the most prostitution activity outside of Aurora. The Latitude and Longitude comes directly from the datasets at the time of the arrest.

[URL]https://www.google.com/maps/d/edit?mid=1t7Ubc8UAovkXHWvoHrJUQl-S-p-6peU&usp=sharing[/URL][/QUOTE]There are about 469 arrests that are not currently on the map due to most of them being entered into the dataset at the same latitude and longitude (most commonly popular sting spots like KK). This is why the KK does not show any arrests currently because they were all entered in the same lat and long in the data. I am using python and regular expressions to process all of this data. It's tricky.

I wonder what percentage of the arrests were sting operations. ? Using such a long time period is a bit misleading. It is important to remember that the city of Seattle did away with the loitering law several years ago. So it would be much to more accurate to show a map or statistics when the law was in effect. It is possible that LE has been arresting any guy that happens to stop for a decoy. This would be a good way for vice to bump up their numbers and look good. Hard to say since I do not live up there.

[QUOTE=ProJohn1;6719751]Man the haters have collapsed into absolute delirium on here. Genuinely laughing my ass off here. Here is more non helpful and non information of substance. Cause I am such a non contributing member to this board.

I have created a Google Maps with the arrest data from the SPD dataset from 2012-2023. I have done my best to reproduce the data in it's entirety. It is missing some arrests still due to this being a rough draft and the complexity of working with data of this size. I will fine tune the python script I have written to include the missing arrests over the coming days. I will also what the dataset says the offense is later. There are three offenses for prostitution in the dataset. Assisting or Promoting Prostitution, Prostitution, and Purchasing Prostitution. The vast majority of entries just say "Prostitution" for the offense. Now that you can visualize where the prostitution is in the city you can see that South Jackson Street in China Town has the most prostitution activity outside of Aurora. The Latitude and Longitude comes directly from the datasets at the time of the arrest.

[URL]https://www.google.com/maps/d/edit?mid=1t7Ubc8UAovkXHWvoHrJUQl-S-p-6peU&usp=sharing[/URL][/QUOTE]

The last data file which I imported into my database was from September. In that file, there is an OFFENSE_PARENT_GROUP field for "prostitution offenses" and an OFFENSE field containing "purchasing prostitution". The other two are "assisting or promoting prostitution" and simply "prostitution". I focused on records for purchasing which contains records going back to late 2016. Of those, the vast majority of arrests are along Aurora Ave. There are a few records here and there for other areas of the city including International District, downtown and Capitol Hill, but we're talking less than a handful for each from late 2016 onward. Since that time the vast, vast majority of arrests for "purchasing prostitution" have been along Aurora Ave. Of those, most are at 125th which is the Lowe's lot. I don't think anyone is or ever was surprised by that. But, I will mention that this is a stale snapshot from September, it's entirely possible that other arrests for purchasing prostitution have been made in other parts of the city since then.

If going back to 2012, I know from personal anecdotal experience that there were other areas of the city which had strolls at that time. The AAA / Denny stroll being probably the most known and i'd argue was probably the busiest stroll on weekends around that time and was very similar to how Aurora Ave has been the past few years. But, one could find SWs in Pioneer Square, ID or Rainier Ave at that time as well. The AAA / Denny area was completely shut-down when Amazon started constructing their HQ in that area as well as a ton of new apartment buildings. The other areas seem to have fallen-off in activity as well due to gentrification or other growth to a point of insignificance. In July 2016 Seattle police set-up a 10-day sting operation at a massage parlor in the ID which netted about 200 johns. Those arrests pre-dated the records in my file.

But further, since as you mention, the prostitution loitering laws were repealed in 2020, I really focused from 2019 onward. In that time the vast majority of arrests are again along Aurora Ave and again around the Lowe's lot. I do also have a file containing data for King County arrests, but that actually seemed less complete and a cross-examination between the SPD data and King County data led me to believe it wasn't very reliable (SPD arrest records didn't seem to be in the King County file). I do not have the latest SPD files, though, so haven't examined them since. But I think that the major takeaway is that a focus for the city regarding patronizing / purchasing arrests is definitely Aurora Ave. And while I again don't think anyone was ever surprised by that, my goal was to find out [i]where[/i] and [i]when[/i] along Aurora men were mostly getting busted since that's where most of us in this forum seem to be cruising.

[QUOTE=MongerSeeker;6723615]I wonder what percentage of the arrests were sting operations. ? Using such a long time period is a bit misleading. It is important to remember that the city of Seattle did away with the loitering law several years ago. So it would be much to more accurate to show a map or statistics when the law was in effect.[/QUOTE]