Change for your "two cents"
[QUOTE=CookyJar]I was just offering my two cents. Certainly you wouldn’t deny me.[/QUOTE]
I didn't deny you a thing. I was just observing that you had a lot to say for someone who thought the question wasn't worth considering nor answering in the first place.
[QUOTE=CookyJar]This is not the serious type of question I’ve come to expect from you. Ease up. We sometimes take ourselves too serious on this thread. It’s not rocket science. Sock psychology? Come on, admit it! It’s funny. Not funny he, he but funny Ha, ha. [/QUOTE]
You say that my bringing up the issue of "sock psychology" is "haha funny," but then say "we" take ourselves too seriously on this thread? The "we" must be you in this case. Ease up? I wasn't aware I was pressing anything. You are the one doing that. I just asked a simple question about socks. CRIPES! You are the one making a big deal out of it. All I did was make a one sentence reply to your sock tirade. As to "sock psychology," we all know that many SWs keep their socks on. I was merely speculating as to why. I know that different SWs and different mongers have a variety of opinions on this. Yours is not the only right one and case closed, no reason to have raised the question in the first place. It's as legitimate a question as anything else I have seen on this forum, serious or otherwise. I know that many guys keep their socks on also, even though I do not. If I can walk outdoors on the filthy ground and pavement barefoot, I don't think that walking on the floor of the 10 spot house will give me some dread foot disease, nor have I ever contracted any.
[QUOTE=CookyJar](You didn’t mention anything about Foot fetishes. That’s a serious subject and I wouldn’t joke about it.)[/QUOTE]
I did bring up the subject of foot fetishes by mongers VERY recently: an observation from Deep Throat. It IS a serious subject and worthy of discussion. So why didn't you comment about THAT one instead of socks?
[QUOTE=CookyJar]Kissing, now that’s a juicy issue. I’m certain that there is lots of lecture on the subject of prostitution Kissing or the lack of it. Personally I’ve always questioned; why would a monger want to kiss a prostitute? There’s a question to ponder. The hygiene of these girls is always suspect. Why would a monger want to thrust his tongue into a mouth that was most likely filled with someone else’s’ cum since it’s last cleaning. (Think about this. Have you ever dug out a crumb of chicken from between your teeth hours after the meal?) I have had girls offer to kiss me; I grudgingly give them my cheek. Psychologically it may have something to do with the monger’s need for intimacy with the girl. And what about DATY? I understand that there are girls who don’t allow DATY. Why? And, ponder this: why would a monger want to eat the pussy of someone else’s cum piggy? Again! I am not putting anyone down.
Kissing, DATY or Sock psychology – whatever floats your boat? lol[/QUOTE]
I totally agree with you on that one. That is why I analogized the sock issue to the kissing issue. I think they are linked psychologically. As I fully admitted, I could be all wet. But I think both are legitimate psychological AND hygienic matters of contention to contemplate.
As for kissing, I would definitely never kiss a SWs feet, and I avoid the lips as well. Avoiding the pussy with my lips is a given. Avoiding lip kissing is somewhat hypocritical and puzzling from the standpoint of sanitation, because I have no problem placing my uncovered cock in a SWs mouth, and we all know where that has been. I would contend that the issue of a monger kissing a SW is primarily a psychological issue as well, even though there is some risk of disease transmission. But there is little more risk than in a BBBJ. DATY is a different thing altogether. The pussy is a much more likely source of disease, if there is any, and I definitely am not going anywhere near that with my mouth or my uncovered cock.