Printable View
My guess would be, he did not mean flash as in camera flash.
My guess would be "Flash" as in "Flashing" a naked body.
Not only did it illuminate the background, but the foreground as well.
I have considered the praise, and in my opinion the praise is well deserved.
Strolling the Avenue at about 7:30 on Friday evening, I was in the mood for someone short and slender...say, Angie. It was not very busy. I guess folks were heading for the shore this holiday weekend, but I did spot the LE mobile trailer on the east side of the Avenue. This sometimes foretells a sting, since I have heard they can process arrests right in the van. Indeed there were an unusually high number of patrol cars, so I proceeded with caution.
Up by the bull car dealer who should come sashaying by but a short slender redhead named Nicole. As cute as Angie and a lot more customer-oriented. Nicole likes to call her hair color “auburn” and it matches her eyes. Freckly, with just a few slight wrinkles (she’s 26), nice B-cups and a slender ass. She tries hard to please and has a friendly talkative personality. And she's a good listener. Wants to get clean, but you know the story. Slightly raspy (sexy) voice and track marks on the right arm.
We agreed on $50 for FS, but when we arrived at the Carlyle, all the short stay rooms were booked for an hour! Now that’s a first. So after driving all that way, we had to improvise plan B. CBJ was the agreed upon alternative. She asked for $40, but was accomodating when I said that was steep, and we agreed on $30.
She suggested doing it while driving, since it was safer that way. I told her this would be my first RBJ (rolling blow job). But always one for something new, I said OK, though I might pull over before the climax. So there we were heading east on Poplar Street, me guiding the car very slowly, she with her head in my lap, sucking a banana-flavored condom. I must say that style of sex delays the urge for a while, since you’re looking out for cops, people, and stop signs. But it worked, and indeed she has a nice steady, deep technique. She later said she has also done BBBJs (she’s a spitter).
If you find her, she’ll win you over with her friendliness. Highly recommended.
By the way, we swapped stories about Angie on the drive over. Hers: Angie and she were at a mutual friend's house this week, and while the guy wasn’t looking, Angie stole his gun! Since she just got bailed out of jail this week, I suggested perhaps she wanted to hock the gun to help repay her pimp. If that’s not the case, duck down when you see her, guys, cause I doubt Angie’s a better shot than Dick Cheney!
Although I do appreciate the pics cooky is posting and I certainly don't mean to offend the senior members who support him, however, two things puzzle me about the sherry pics:
1) Pics # 7 & 8 appear to be taken at night, while all of the others are taken during the day. Yet cooky clearly states in his post about sherry he hunted for her during the night. No other mention of multiple encounters of her???? An honest mistake or something fishy???
2) Has anybody ever noticed or participated with any of cooky's photographic subjects???? I have RTFF and can't seem to recall any of these girls being spotted or reported on by any member, especially senior members. I mean every other girl that I have read about in this forum can be vouched for by a minimum of two mongers????
Seniors, please set me straight as I don't mean to accuse, but I am confused.
Thanks and Be Safe.
[QUOTE=Guysmiley1980]You might actually be able to pull it off, because you could say that you are doing a more mature version of Girls Gone Wild....[/QUOTE]
1. 2257 information on file
2. Model release
3. STD/HIV info release & awareness form(s)
4. Production Company Incorporation/LLC
5. Municipal License to film on location
This is the bare minimum you'll need to actually get away with it. Then again, you may as well make an actual movie at that point. Its bad enough dealing with LE and sw's with attitude problems, but [b][i]nothing[/i][/b] is worse than dealing with an actress and a contract dispute.
Stay Safe,
Benchseats Rock
[QUOTE=Burbs Monger]
2) Has anybody ever noticed or participated with any of cooky's photographic subjects? I have RTFF and can't seem to recall any of these girls being spotted or reported on by any member, especially senior members. I mean every other girl that I have read about in this forum can be vouched for by a minimum of two mongers?
Seniors, please set me straight as I don't mean to accuse, but I am confused.
Thanks and Be Safe.[/QUOTE]Sherry looks familar just don't know where, used to frequent strip clubs so she may have been a dancer. Recently business took a down turn and been workin 24/7. Sorry can't give more input
[QUOTE=Burbs Monger]Although I do appreciate the pics cooky is posting and I certainly don't mean to offend the senior members who support him, however, two things puzzle me about the sherry pics:
1) Pics # 7 & 8 appear to be taken at night, while all of the others are taken during the day. Fishy?
2) Has anybody ever noticed or participated with any of cooky's photographic subjects? I have RTFF and can't seem to recall any of these girls being spotted or reported on by any member, especially senior members. I mean every other girl that I have read about in this forum can be vouched for by a minimum of two mongers?
Seniors, please set me straight as I don't mean to accuse, but I am confused.
Thanks and Be Safe.[/QUOTE]
Seems to me that there are a number of members on this board who just want to investigate, find fault with or just make sly comments all the post of other members.
I am not saying that this is the case with Burg Monger, or his post, as I do see reasons for his questions, which I will try to answer.
Answer for question 1): I take my picture in a certain order, I usually go over the poses with the girl prior to her taking off any clothing. This save time and exposurer to passerbys is lessened. I normally take any fully clothed pictures last and away from the orginal spot as they draw the least attention, and creat the least problems. Last Tuesday evening there was a rain storm down pour (note the dropets on the car and windows). Pictures 7 & 8 were taken during the daylight hours under a I95 over pass. I understand were you might have been confused by pictures 7 & 8. I hope this clears it up and hopefully you will forgive any future mistakes on my part.
Answer for question 2): I have none, except to said that a couple of girls were known and Acknowledged. However, I wonder myself why others have not been comfirmed. I believe I may have an answer and wil go more into it with my next picture post.
CookyJar
[QUOTE=Burbs Monger]Although I do appreciate the pics cooky is posting and I certainly don't mean to offend the senior members who support him, however, two things puzzle me about the sherry pics:
1) Pics # 7 & 8 appear to be taken at night, while all of the others are taken during the day. Yet cooky clearly states in his post about sherry he hunted for her during the night. No other mention of multiple encounters of her???? An honest mistake or something fishy???
2) Has anybody ever noticed or participated with any of cooky's photographic subjects???? I have RTFF and can't seem to recall any of these girls being spotted or reported on by any member, especially senior members. I mean every other girl that I have read about in this forum can be vouched for by a minimum of two mongers????
Seniors, please set me straight as I don't mean to accuse, but I am confused.
Thanks and Be Safe.[/QUOTE]
Dude, pics 7 and 8 are in a garage. Check out the stains on the ground and the beading of the water on the fucking car.
Do you have any idea how many girls there are out there? I come through Philly all the time and see lots of wsw and bsw who never get their pics posted on here. Just because you don't see them doesn't mean that they're not out there. Sure you're hunting the right area? Sure your standards aren't too high? Sure you're not too much of a greenhorn? Not to accuse, but if Philly is anything is like Baltimore, more than half of what happens is never reported on at all.
Cooky, keep your dick up.
Vedi, Vici, Veni
Benchseats Rock
Sir just enjoy the pictures and don't question the Master at work. Look at all the pictures of girls no body knows. Clothes on, Walking down the street. He may have had her one one day, Who cares. Glad your reading the forum keep it up. Reading that is.
[QUOTE=Tennis Player]The difference is that you are providing the funds for the girls to stay hooked on drugs, increase their habits, provide money to the drug dealing networks, which degrades the neighborhoods and increases crime. Do what you want to do, but don't be a hypocrite about it and say it's a victimless crime. Without Johns, those girls wouldn't be out on the street. Many of them may still be addicts, but a lot of them would be forced to kick the habit (and so would their "boyfriends" who live off them).[/QUOTE]
XXX Porno chicks aren't hooked on drugs?? LMAO!! Most of these women SW, and XXX are hooked on some form of narcotics.
[QUOTE=Tennis Player]The difference is that you are providing the funds for the girls to stay hooked on drugs, increase their habits, provide money to the drug dealing networks, which degrades the neighborhoods and increases crime. Do what you want to do, but don't be a hypocrite about it and say it's a victimless crime. Without Johns, those girls wouldn't be out on the street. Many of them may still be addicts, but a lot of them would be forced to kick the habit (and so would their "boyfriends" who live off them).[/QUOTE]
Harry is right on. I agree with the basic premise of not being a hypocrite, but the same argument transposes to porn if you replace "johns" with [b]consumers[/b] who incidentally spend 10 BILLION a year on porn.
The only significant difference between the two is the First Ammendment.
Don't make the issue more complicated than it is. If you could successfully argue that getting a bbbj is protected speech while parked in an alley behind someone's house, I'd love to hear it.
Vedi, Vici, Veni
Benchseats Rock
As I had mentioned in a previous report, yes Jill (one of CJ's photo shoots) is real and can be found near K and Venago. Have put many miles on my wheels while cruising The Ave and rarely see the same girl twice. There are a lot of fish in the sea out there.
CookieJar, I thank you for your contributions and do not understand why a couple of posters are so suspicious. Its not like you are selling us a used car.
By the way, did anyone notice the abandoned and partically stripped police cruiser on the K down by Caster last month? Not one of Phillys. Markings were from East Strousburg. (Car 54 where are you?).
Cookiejar, you are being stalked. Take a look at the posting history for the following aliases:
Wooly = Ed Norton = Cookie Cutter = WashAccount = Lets Mate
Just a theory. I have no proof.
I now pause allow the above named to attempt to compose witty rejoinders regarding my (admitted) lack of a substantive posting history. I predict that the devastating attack will be launched by Wooly, as that's the only one in the bunch carrying any cred.
Here another from the past:
I am very sorry about this. Sorry for more then one reason. First these are old pictures, taken in the fall of last year 2005. The reason for posting them now is; I saw Kathy about two weeks ago just below the DD and again over the weekend, down around Lehigh Ave. On neither of those occasions did I stop for Kathy. Because she is available, I think it is safe to post this review.
I came across Kathy walking the Huntington Park area. She was a little big for my taste, but I am usually willing to try anyone at least once. Beside there wasn’t much else happening and she appeared clean in tight jeans and top. That is about were my review ends. Other then the pictures, everything including the attempted BBJ was a flop, do to the smells. When she took off her shoes an odor hit me like a sledge hammer in the nose. (Now this would not have happened during a car date because the girl rarely takes off her shoes while giving a BJ in a car.) And if that was not bad enough, the pussy smell was worst. She did not even have her pants all the way down before the smell hit. And after she got the panties off, it was pure hell. I figured, as I shot the pictures, the odor would dissipate the longer the offending portions were in the open air. They did not, so I ended the BJ with out completion, stop the session and had her get quickly dressed. I dropped her off back on Old York Road. Went back and aired out the place before leaving for home.
I counted this as an all around bad experience. I did not post her pictures earlier for that reason. But she is still out there and that makes this review news worthy.
When I saw Kathy below the DD she seemed on a bad trip. She was walking in the middle of the street waving at passing cars. The last time I saw her she was sitting on some steps, talking to two gentlemen, dressed clean and looking better. I would say she has gained a few pound.
Others may have a different experience with Kathy. Her general attitude was not bad. The saggy body and bad odors were what I could not get pass.
(Let me again mention that something I forget the girls name or may even have gotten it. The girls real name is not an important detail to me. I do not believe they use their real names anyway. So sometimes I just make up a name to go with the pictures. I you want to know if you are dealing with a girl that I have reviewed, check out her picture not the name. I know that there is more then one Kathy out there.)
CookyJar
[QUOTE=Cookyjar]I am very sorry about this. Sorry for more then one reason. First these are old pictures, taken in the fall of last year 2005.[/QUOTE]To the extent you can repeat your process of showing us outdated pictures of disgusting-looking girls, I think I can legitimately repeat my observations:
1) If Kathy indeed hangs out in Philadelphia, no one needs these pictures to decide to drive past such an unnattractive person.
2) If this girl indeed hangs out in Philadelphia, a shot or two of her face/body for identification is acceptable, provided it is accompanied by a description of her personality, location, and technique. To your credit, you have begun doing so. But a shot of her gross-looking **** and ass only brings in out-of-town posters who scan the photo gallery for such porn, and then clutter this board with their unhelpful drooling.
You are certainly not unwelcome here, Cookyjar. But I was hoping in your time away you would reflect on the difference between
• providing helpful information to local mongers, and
• posting raw, unhelpful shots of body orafices.
I got took
I picked up Sally last Friday, on the street behind the DD. She looked tall and cute in jeans and I drove around the block to pick her up. She complained about waiting to receive her money until we were finish. Most girls do, but once I offer to drop them back off and forget the deal they usually agree. Sometimes I have been known to compromise if the girl is cute enough. I was about to tell Sally to get out when she agreed. After we got to a spot that she picked, she again started with can she get her money up front. I said I would give her half after she took off her top and the rest when finished. She removed her top. I gave her $10; I took three pictures and asked her to take off the pants. She pulled down the pants and asked for the other $10. I knew I was about to be jerked off, and not in a good way. But I had seen something interesting and wanted the pictures. So I gave her the last $10. She refused to pull off the panties and pants which was part of our original agreement. I got pissed, told her to get dress and get out. I ended up driving her back to the K. I told her she could have gotten more had she cooperated better. She complained that I had only promised her $20 and that if she had known she would have done more. Bull.
IMPORTANT NOTE: Why I really wanted the last set of pictures.
Sally has quarter to half dollar size faint light brown blotches all over her legs and thighs. They did not appear to be rashes but more like bruises or healed rashes. They were uneven and all over, at first I thought they were from a beating, but, I cannot think what instrument would leave marks of this type. They were not raised but flat. The bright light of the flash seems to have washed them out except for some faint signs if you look. She is a obvious needle user.
My understanding is that certain infections show rashes or blotches in the very beginning, and they soon disappear. This may be the only visible sign, and thereafter the infection can only be detected by blood test.
(If other member know of or have heard of similar information concerning blotches observed during the beginning stage of HIV please post the information.)
Even if a gal beats me, I always point out that others may get different results. However, I will not be using Ms Sally talents, not just because she ripped me off but because I believe she may be sick. I hate doing this type of review because I am no doctor and could be wrong. I do not recommend Sally. And if you must, wrap that wrascal.
CookyJar