SB / SA thread

[QUOTE=SwimSays;6415271]Have spoken to the first one around this time last year. Started off good enough and then she wanted 500 for our first meet, in a public place, and even if we hit it off I should not expect anything physical. I didn't even counter and a few days later she followed up with "you are obviously not who I am seeking" and blocked me.[/QUOTE]Thanks, Swim. That one is surely not worth discussing further!

So, how about the second one, kinkykat9000?

[URL]https://members.seeking.com/member/20fd19b7-50e9-4c7a-b52e-91d1585762c1?_cf_ref=aHR0cDovL3d3dy51c2FzZXhndWlkZS5ubC8%3D[/URL]

She admits in her profile that "I'm struggling a little and could really use the extra help LOL". So, it sounds like she might very well be had for a fair price? Someone here must surely have communicated with her and / or hooked up with her? She was quick to send her private pics when I requested. Given her location in Kingston, I'm guessing that she may be a URI student?

[QUOTE=KingOfFours;6414909]As many of you know, up until a couple of years ago, it was easily possible to send messages to women as a non-paying member on SA by posting the private pictures in a certain manner, that enabled communication of one's burner phone number or email address. Indeed, I communicated with many that way, until SA finally figured it out, and plugged that leak. Up until a few years ago, there were, indeed 8 hoes that I inseminated that were on SA. All of those were 200 or less. As far as I know, sadly, none of those are still around any more, except Stephie, who was, and indeed still is, the finest PSE / GFE non-junkie, insatiable, nymphomaniacal performer that I've ever found on that board.[/QUOTE]Can you pm a fellow pervert info for that Stephie you speak of? Thanks King.

[QUOTE=BridesMilk;6419314]Can you pm a fellow pervert info for that Stephie you speak of? Thanks King.[/QUOTE]No need to PM. Here's the link.

[URL]https://members.seeking.com/member/381d5f15-4729-43a1-885e-a237f9bf9027[/URL]

But if its her private number that you want, please keep in mind that I'm VERY selective as to whom I will ever give that out to. Stephie is one if the precious few women selling pussy who is addicted to sex rather than drugs. Now, in the past I have had women like this totally ruined for everybody else by the completely unexpected and downright dangerous behavior of assholes who had used me as a referral. The dude who always uses golf terminology in his handles will know exactly what I'm talking about. So please don't take it personally, if I decide not to risk giving out Stephie's private contact info, for reasons that will, of necessity, sometimes remain unsaid.

However, regarding trades for her, I posted the offer below, about a year ago. It still stands:

[QUOTE=KingOfFours;5926743] I'd REALLY like to find some like her, though, since STRANGE, for me, is always welcomed! So if you want to exchange some info that cannot be posted here, and if you are an ESTABLISHED, heavily cuntributing senior with a strong track record going back a few years, then hit me up, and if you have any others like her whose info you want to share, maybe we can talk turkey?![/QUOTE]

[URL]https://members.seeking.com/member/d00a9ea6-cdc5-4971-b8b7-5770d4ebb6b7[/URL]

I'm very interested, because she's in Narragansett, which is my neck of the Rhode Island woods! The public pic she shows, though, are of TWO girls, below. So I don't even know which one is the one with the profile. But I'd surely raw-dog either or both, if its on the menu! If she (or they) fuck raw, and if the damages are less than 300 each, I'd be VERY much obliged for any info that anyone may have!

[QUOTE=KingOfFours;6442278][URL]https://members.seeking.com/member/d00a9ea6-cdc5-4971-b8b7-5770d4ebb6b7[/URL]

I'm very interested, because she's in Narragansett, which is my neck of the Rhode Island woods! The public pic she shows, though, are of TWO girls, below. So I don't even know which one is the one with the profile. But I'd surely raw-dog either or both, if its on the menu! If she (or they) fuck raw, and if the damages are less than 300 each, I'd be VERY much obliged for any info that anyone may have![/QUOTE]Man. I'm sure you know the answer to that query. Raw dog THESE girls for less than $300? Cmon.

King of Memories at it again. Just making sure I don't hit what he has seeing that its all raw. $300 for those girls. Good luck grandpa.

[QUOTE=BridesMilk;6442610]Man. I'm sure you know the answer to that query. Raw dog THESE girls for less than $300? Cmon.[/QUOTE]

Last active March 30th. Tell tale sign to move on.

[QUOTE=JDeller;6390359]Anybody ever see this one?

[URL]https://members.seeking.com/member/ffe372fe-bc2b-4273-be96-549efa0ea50b[/URL][/QUOTE]

I'm thinking of buying a month membership (or the 90 day membership). Which is best? I'd like to find straight up escorts, but I'd also like to find dates. Here's the thing: I'm by no means a sugar daddy, so if ALL these women are looking for VERY pricey dates. I don't know if it's worth it. Advice?

[QUOTE=DJrunner;6442650]King of Memories at it again. Just making sure I don't hit what he has seeing that its all raw. $300 for those girls. Good luck grandpa.[/QUOTE]Dude, these hot chicks don't want nor need your 100 dollars. Move on to your fat old ladies.

[QUOTE=BridesMilk;6442610]Man. I'm sure you know the answer to that query. Raw dog THESE girls for less than $300? Cmon.[/QUOTE]Actually, I do not know the answer to my query. The reason I posted the query was to find out if anyone who had actually communicated with them, or had actually been with them, had the answer. Because, I need not really point out that I've raw-dogged plenty of that quality, for less than 300, and have posted many pics of them. Not necessarily sugar site hoes, but I personally don't consider sugar site hoes any more or less desirable than any other kind of hoes. Indeed, many of the SA hoes are also on "regular" hoe sites like STG, etc. Of course, there are many hoes on the sugar sites who do not know they are hoes. But as far as GPS goes, that seems to be rampant lately with hoes, whether they are on sugar sites, or not.

So let me try this again, lest my query get buried again under all the replies from those who have neither been with them nor communicated with them: Has anyone been with or communicated with these girls? If so, was raw fucking on the menu, and what were the damages? Surely, these girls' pics look sufficiently hot that at least some of you sugar dudes who pay that site thru the nose for the privilege of asking them directly, have done so? And have at least gotten a price quote? From the whorse’s mouth? C'Mon. , man!

[URL]https://members.seeking.com/member/d00a9ea6-cdc5-4971-b8b7-5770d4ebb6b7?_cf_ref=aHR0cDovL3d3dy51c2FzZXhndWlkZS5ubC8%3D[/URL]

[URL]https://members.seeking.com/member/2276b840-a5e4-4ad6-962e-cc3c1d32f007[/URL]

Her profile text makes it crystal clear that she's a hoe who indeed knows very well that she's a hoe. Has anyone been with her, or has anyone gotten in touch with her, and gotten a price quote and menu?

Hope you find the answer to your q. But, tbh, anyone who has been with them is probably trying to keep them a secret and share them minimally.

I have to disagree with your characterization of SA versus STG. SA is mostly amateurs, non-addicts. STG is mostly pros, addicts. There are some exceptions and some overlap. Let's take Stephie as an example. I would call her a semi-pro. Doesn't watch the clock but has been with many and has been on the site forever. Most of the gems others and I tend to look for on SA are looking to find one or two regulars and get off the site. Those types are the real value you get from SA. And you are unlikely to find that on STG.

[QUOTE=KingOfFours;6443278]Actually, I do not know the answer to my query. The reason I posted the query was to find out if anyone who had actually communicated with them, or had actually been with them, had the answer. Because, I need not really point out that I've raw-dogged plenty of that quality, for less than 300, and have posted many pics of them. Not necessarily sugar site hoes, but I personally don't consider sugar site hoes any more or less desirable than any other kind of hoes. Indeed, many of the SA hoes are also on "regular" hoe sites like STG, etc. Of course, there are many hoes on the sugar sites who do not know they are hoes. But as far as GPS goes, that seems to be rampant lately with hoes, whether they are on sugar sites, or not.

So let me try this again, lest my query get buried again under all the replies from those who have neither been with them nor communicated with them: Has anyone been with or communicated with these girls? If so, was raw fucking on the menu, and what were the damages? Surely, these girls' pics look sufficiently hot that at least some of you sugar dudes who pay that site thru the nose for the privilege of asking them directly, have done so? And have at least gotten a price quote? From the whorses mouth? C'Mon. , man!

[URL]https://members.seeking.com/member/d00a9ea6-cdc5-4971-b8b7-5770d4ebb6b7?_cf_ref=aHR0cDovL3d3dy51c2FzZXhndWlkZS5ubC8%3D[/URL][/QUOTE]

KoF. She uses this phrase which is easily translated as "I suffer from Platinum Pussy Syndrome".

[QUOTE=KingOfFours;6443307][URL]https://members.seeking.com/member/2276b840-a5e4-4ad6-962e-cc3c1d32f007[/URL]

Her profile text makes it crystal clear that she's a hoe who indeed knows very well that she's a hoe. Has anyone been with her, or has anyone gotten in touch with her, and gotten a price quote and menu?[/QUOTE]

[QUOTE=DarkClouds;6443315]Hope you find the answer to your q. But, tbh, anyone who has been with them is probably trying to keep them a secret and share them minimally.

I have to disagree with your characterization of SA versus STG. SA is mostly amateurs, non-addicts. STG is mostly pros, addicts. There are some exceptions and some overlap. Let's take Stephie as an example. I would call her a semi-pro. Doesn't watch the clock but has been with many and has been on the site forever. Most of the gems others and I tend to look for on SA are looking to find one or two regulars and get off the site. Those types are the real value you get from SA. And you are unlikely to find that on STG.[/QUOTE]Yes, of course Stephie is a hoe! And by my lights a very fine one! Actually I think we largely agree. It's true that many hoes on SA are really looking for actual boyfriends with benefits. Me? I'm just looking for HOES! 🤗.

Does anybody have experience with either of these? I'm trying to find ladies with good oral skills, kissing and BBBJ CIM. Also don't want to break the bank. Thanks.

[URL]https://members.seeking.com/member/cf5d1f74-0048-486e-9214-3185eee6ccda[/URL]#x.

[URL]https://members.seeking.com/member/050533b7-e701-403a-a1a6-6e5d67094b57[/URL]