I started a new thread by mistake. Does anyone know how I can delete it?
Printable View
I started a new thread by mistake. Does anyone know how I can delete it?
[QUOTE=SteveTimder;6034567]I sent digits to a few guys. Yes 300 ppm. Ya get what you pay for. There are plenty of walkers if you want a cheaper visit. Stay safe.[/QUOTE]Which Haley are you referring to have a link? Or is she utr.
[QUOTE=GoneForGood97;6037996]We can thank social media, specifically Tiktok and Twitter, for this particular delusion. There's a whole SB "influencer" scene where e-girls with model looks put up SB "tips and tricks" about how to make big $ with just texting and feet pics or just nudes and being nice etc. They claim to make thousands a week doing nothing but this. Of course, there are 2 outliers: 1) these girls are usually super model hot, so of course there are some simps that will send $ for nothing more than a few texts and pics of tits and 2) it's not that many guys sending money, but "influencers" don't deal in reality, they deal in what their audience WANTS to believe, because that drives more clicks, more views, and more revenue for them. What's the old joke? Want to know how to make a million dollars easily? Just buy my book, "How to make a million". It's one page long and it says "Write and sell a book that tells people to write a book about how to make a million".[/QUOTE]Yeah.
I keep on running into this -- girls who are "learning" from tiktok / ****** / twitter and are so askewed from reality as to what life really is.
I had this 18 year old xsmall chick in the north burbs -- still in High School, at the time -- who I knew was legit because I had noticed her at Chick-Fil-A one day and put one and one together. Anyway. We meet for coffee and she basically admitted to me that she doesn't know what she's doing, she just likes the security of dating "older men," and was trying to live on her own. Settled down into a nice monthly type of thing for not a lot of money -- maybe 2500 at the most -- and one day she just starts hitting me up for money constantly. "Car's in the shop. " "Ok, which one, I'll take care of it directly. " "Oh, it's this guy who's fixing it. " "Cool, I'll call him". "I need a new phone" "You have an iPhone 13 Pro. " I eventually asked her, "Ok, what's up?" and she said that she had looked at tiktok and saw some pro SB's making much much more than what she was and they were giving them 'tips' on how to get more money.
After a quick attitude adjustment (and some really rough anal the next time we hung out), she has been back to normal. She knows that she can ask me for cash, and as long as it's reasonable, I'll help her out. I don't pretend to notice her cocaine habit, she doesn't look at my phone to see the other chicks calling, and life is good.
I keep on telling myself I'm getting too old for this shit, but, the reality is that I'm probably going to move my age limit up to 22-24 in the next few months because these 18 year old chicks just keep getting under my skin.
[URL]https://members.seeking.com/member/d4a3913a-7a39-4155-b0f6-54c2487a81f3[/URL]
Seems sweet and has a hellacious body. Has anyone seen her yet?
[QUOTE=MisforMaster;6040253]Yeah.
I keep on running into this -- girls who are "learning" from tiktok / ****** / twitter and are so askewed from reality as to what life really is.
I had this 18 year old xsmall chick in the north burbs -- still in High School, at the time -- who I knew was legit because I had noticed her at Chick-Fil-A one day and put one and one together. Anyway. We meet for coffee and she basically admitted to me that she doesn't know what she's doing, she just likes the security of dating "older men," and was trying to live on her own. Settled down into a nice monthly type of thing for not a lot of money -- maybe 2500 at the most -- and one day she just starts hitting me up for money constantly. "Car's in the shop. " "Ok, which one, I'll take care of it directly. " "Oh, it's this guy who's fixing it. " "Cool, I'll call him". "I need a new phone" "You have an iPhone 13 Pro. " I eventually asked her, "Ok, what's up?" and she said that she had looked at tiktok and saw some pro SB's making much much more than what she was and they were giving them 'tips' on how to get more money.
After a quick attitude adjustment (and some really rough anal the next time we hung out), she has been back to normal. She knows that she can ask me for cash, and as long as it's reasonable, I'll help her out. I don't pretend to notice her cocaine habit, she doesn't look at my phone to see the other chicks calling, and life is good.
I keep on telling myself I'm getting too old for this shit, but, the reality is that I'm probably going to move my age limit up to 22-24 in the next few months because these 18 year old chicks just keep getting under my skin.[/QUOTE]I'd be interested in a shot.
[QUOTE=Goo3215;6039527][URL]https://www.secretbenefits.com/next/profile/daefba8bda706982[/URL]
. The only downside is that she talks nonstop from the time she arrives, during playtime and upon leaving LOL. I will definitely repeat.[/QUOTE]LOL. THIS. I had to get her going just cause she wouldn't shut up LOL. We were chilling watching tv, or trying to, and she's rattling on like my 4 yr old. On the flip side, what I gather is she's alone in this area with 2 small kids and and really just wants the company. IMO.
Really sweet girl. Agree with all of your positive comments. Nothing was rushed.
I ended up blocking her unfortunately, just due to her situation. The last time she messaged me she was like come over. Previously we had to work around her kids naps, so I asked what about her kids and her reply was, they aren't here. Sketched me out a bit and I blocked her.
I let my list get a bit too long again. Apologies in advance for the length. I always appreciate feedback regarding any particular profile.
WhoreablyToxic: Acting like a UTR, called me hun. then said she doesn't do anything until gifted. I asked at if that meant money prior to meeting which she answered with: "No never. But would you look at the time. Jesus. Hey hun Ill catch up with you later." Which I take as a Yes!
https://members.seeking.com/member/d4e972ef-f41b-45d1-b350-4a83a78c85e6
BeautyANDBrains: TGTBT, age-pic mismatch, I thought she was real for minute. Asked to switch to kik, cannot text will not video chat, Tried to get me to talk PPM on the site, Hard to believe a scammer could be active since 2015 but I suspect she is very careful about it.
https://members.seeking.com/member/c276ced6-87e5-f97d-c3a5-e6a57c979d91
ConfidentMusician: classic crypto-scammer. Little detail in profile. now in Chicago.
https://members.seeking.com/member/9620afa6-2261-4f67-80ae-637c977c67d9
LusciousHeiress: classic crypto-scammer,
https://members.seeking.com/member/13517a47-f7bd-486d-84f0-f19feb5031d7
EnchantingHeiress: I think I reported her previously. Says she cannot meet and unwilling to video chat. Using at least one stolen picture:
https://www.pinterest.com.mx/pin/1009932285160114010/ Had another stolen pic in the profile since taken down. And now she blocked me!
https://members.seeking.com/member/5da62ac0-85ea-4ee6-9925-6eaa5d77e97c
StylishBelle: All the earmarks of a classic crypto-scammer. "is happy to meet you." Now in San Francisco. Blocked me.
https://members.seeking.com/member/3ead5eeb-a5b7-49bf-a511-bbbee16b5a6e
MANNY: since 5-22 just now appearing in Cinti, odd caps, trans??,
https://members.seeking.com/member/0bcc88fd-d3e3-4c6a-aa23-748f70c5d1a9
FitandFun24: TGTBT?, Fuzzy pics?, terse profile?,
https://members.seeking.com/member/6da5e0c1-21f9-4504-882d-0712ad808613
Ttbbxxo: Tori, OF pic seller??,
https://members.seeking.com/member/44d6bac9-d81e-4c5d-9928-12a0b0874ca1
BAM.
Your posts have saved me a lot of legwork in the past and have helped me dodge a few bullets! Keep it up bro. ! Now that I'm getting back on the hunt, soon I'll be contributing as well. For any of the naysayers who think otherwise, chalk it up to "professional jealously."
[QUOTE=BamBam;6035675]With apologies to members who think this all unnecessary:
PrettyFan: "I DONT LIVE TO PLEASE HUMAN" Huh?
[URL]https://members.seeking.com/member/edbe50e3-fb2a-4b95-96b8-28f6b0afffa6[/URL]
HystericalChickie: Kenyan Pic seller, will not last long, Using pics of Adriana Chechik:
[URL]https://www.twpornstars.com/adrianachechik?sort=retweets&filter=year&page=2[/URL]
[URL]https://members.seeking.com/member/5f6114f6-360e-4784-98f6-39707028c08d[/URL].[/QUOTE]
Although I agree with BAM's statement about the crazy, disillusion women, a few years ago I was able to convince a girl to meet in person that had an "online-only" disclaimer, she later told me she did that to keep the "creeps" away, I didn't really buy it. IMHO the time and energy is better spend not trying to storm their "castle" but sometimes I find the challenge fun. There is no doubt that a lot of these girls are trying to make a buck without ever meeting in person, unfortunately there's a sucker born ever minute, or is it second now?
[QUOTE=BamBam;6037712]You know it and I know it and Bullet knows it: these girls are delusional. But THEY don't know it. I am convinced the sugar sites are paying shills to stir up interest by claiming to easily make $$$$ just by chatting and texting with lonely, rich men. Calliekoa was the original of this type. However, it is always risky to challenge the fantasies of the delusional - - as Bullet discovered. They will lash out. The rule of life is "Don't Poke Crazy. " It never ends well..[/QUOTE]
Some of these chicks cannot go 24 hours and survive. Others are active since 2015 and still scamming. I used to think longevity equalled safety. That may still be true as a general rule but NEVER let your guard down and NEVER pay anything in advance.
FunSiren: second profile in 24 hours, Age-pic mismatch, underage? Already gone or did she block me? She is completely gone from the site. They hit her with neutron bomb. They usually reserve that treatment for underage chicks. If you made contact with her offsite, be cautious.
[URL]https://members.seeking.com/member/937448ef-fc18-41df-986a-2bfa80cf0eaf[/URL]
Zoie1999: Wants significant amount at the MnG, explained token amount, she ghosted. I have some of her SM, She gives popular tarot readings on TT.
[URL]https://members.whatsyourprice.com/profile/kdP3xDaYAyk1kW85Z2m9BjLE[/URL]
Curiosityincinci: not a scammer. I have her PII. However, on the site since 2016 with zero reviews. She is on WYP and SB almost as long. Always active but never engages. Has anyone ever actually met her. Her profile says No Sex.
[URL]https://members.seeking.com/member/5252e601-9754-49c9-ba26-a621742ce09c[/URL]
Layden Lux: Repeat posting. I listed her two months ago. This profile is using pictures of Lindsay Capuano. Google the name to get her SM. I am really surprised Seeking has not already banned her. However, I am chatting with her and think she is real but just using borrowed pics. Can anybody share additional info? PM's are welcome.
[URL]https://members.seeking.com/member/6ea7d9b2-afc7-42ac-80fd-a01e754915fc[/URL]
Stimulating female: Classic crypto-scammer.
[URL]https://members.seeking.com/member/935b42f1-5a13-40bc-ba3d-1fb1f388636c[/URL]
VeganSweetie: Nando1 Nutcase. Avoid! She took me to text. Eventually, we spoke on the phone. No car, no I'd, no money, no brains, no hope, living in some religious shelter. Hopping from one DV safehouse to the next until they kick her out. I blocked her out of prophylactic caution.
[URL]https://members.seeking.com/member/9cabc4d6-226f-40a8-b7e5-8a2ec5f43531[/URL]
Trulyanna: Anna Mae, Traveling UTR? Or just a traveling rinser?, invited me to send money to her cash app: [URL]https://cash.app/[/URL]$iamdke in case you want to donate in my place. Using number with 404 AC from Atlanta GA.
[URL]https://members.seeking.com/member/23597188-70c0-4f57-ada1-9b1688cf4bd9[/URL]
Jco_2: profiles on WYP and SB prolly others. Per FB, engaged to be married in August, moving out of state about the same time. I'm guessing not DTF.
[URL]https://members.seeking.com/member/913ff786-3521-446d-8021-29a35478688f[/URL]
BAM.
After seeing Bam's long list, I'm actually embarrassed to post this. But I did do a search, and didn't find any reports on this one:
[URL]https://members.seeking.com/member/a2d07ea6-6947-4fac-91fa-3ac0e8ddb6f2[/URL]
Made contact and took her to text, and here's an excerpt from that conversation (I'm grinning while I'm typing this):
"my past arrangements, we'd usually go to dinner, sometimes do other fun things, sometimes shopping.
I don't really do anything physical tho. I kind of prefer platonic. That's how all of my previous ones have been. ".
So, even though her profile doesn't expicitly say "platonic", that is what she's looking for.
I text with her for a while. She told me she'd be open to intimacy eventually but wanted to meet for dinner first. Tried for weeks to secure dinner meeting but she kept flaking so I gave up.
[QUOTE=HTownHobbyist;6046300]After seeing Bam's long list, I'm actually embarrassed to post this. But I did do a search, and didn't find any reports on this one:
[URL]https://members.seeking.com/member/a2d07ea6-6947-4fac-91fa-3ac0e8ddb6f2[/URL]
Made contact and took her to text, and here's an excerpt from that conversation (I'm grinning while I'm typing this):
"my past arrangements, we'd usually go to dinner, sometimes do other fun things, sometimes shopping.
I don't really do anything physical tho. I kind of prefer platonic. That's how all of my previous ones have been. ".
So, even though her profile doesn't expicitly say "platonic", that is what she's looking for.[/QUOTE]
[QUOTE=HTownHobbyist;6046300]After seeing Bam's long list, I'm actually embarrassed to post this. But I did do a search, and didn't find any reports on this one:
[URL]https://members.seeking.com/member/a2d07ea6-6947-4fac-91fa-3ac0e8ddb6f2[/URL]
Made contact and took her to text, and here's an excerpt from that conversation (I'm grinning while I'm typing this):
"my past arrangements, we'd usually go to dinner, sometimes do other fun things, sometimes shopping.
I don't really do anything physical tho. I kind of prefer platonic. That's how all of my previous ones have been. ".
So, even though her profile doesn't expicitly say "platonic", that is what she's looking for.[/QUOTE]All contributions welcome! This is her second profile. AD reported her in the past.
BAM.
[QUOTE=HTownHobbyist;6046300]After seeing Bam's long list, I'm actually embarrassed to post this. But I did do a search, and didn't find any reports on this one:
[URL]https://members.seeking.com/member/a2d07ea6-6947-4fac-91fa-3ac0e8ddb6f2[/URL]
Made contact and took her to text, and here's an excerpt from that conversation (I'm grinning while I'm typing this):
"my past arrangements, we'd usually go to dinner, sometimes do other fun things, sometimes shopping.
I don't really do anything physical tho. I kind of prefer platonic. That's how all of my previous ones have been. ".
So, even though her profile doesn't expicitly say "platonic", that is what she's looking for.[/QUOTE]There are some ads that are clearly either fake, a scam or they will never meet. This is one of them. I think they are easy to spot. I see reviews on the ones that are obviously fake and I don't even see the point of "reviewing them". Another red flag to me that its fake or they will never meet you is when they include the "Have you seen my wish list?" IDK but to me the legit ones are easy to spot.
[QUOTE=Hooter12;6048099]There are some ads that are clearly either fake, a scam or they will never meet. This is one of them. I think they are easy to spot. I see reviews on the ones that are obviously fake and I don't even see the point of "reviewing them". Another red flag to me that its fake or they will never meet you is when they include the "Have you seen my wish list?" IDK but to me the legit ones are easy to spot.[/QUOTE]So when I first messaged this person, I was also thinking that this is most probably a fake account. But after texting with her, I got the distinct impression that if I had agreed to a purely platonic arrangement straight-away, she would have been willing to meet me. She's looking for some sucker to take her to dinner and shopping; so basically an atm, as it's implied in her profile.
But of course, I never got to test that hypothesis.