You should be thanking her.
[QUOTE=Bg200; 1509276]I believe it is very important for the readers of escort review boards to know that the ER board misleads its readers by covering for escorts that give bad service through censorship. I went to see Stacy.
[url]http://spacecoast.backpage.com/FemaleEscorts/classy-mature-and-highly-reviewed-free-contest-40/5774721[/url]
Last month and submitted a review to ER. Her preparation and service were very bad. I emailed Stacy with a list of 12 things I would like to include in a femdom session. I also provided her with a list of clothes that I like and don't like. She tells me on the phone not to worry and that she knows what to do. I arrive at her place and she's dressed like a stripper. Exactly what I didn't want to see. She looks old. The reviews say she looks younger than her age. During our session she admits to being 45 years old. She has a trim body that looks like a mid 30 year old. However her face shows her age. She looks very much like someone from 45 to 55. She dressed and looked like she was the head madam of a cat house. This was one of the worse encounters I've ever had. I definitely would not repeat. Of the 12 things I asked her to do for me, she did only 1 of them. I will say she that she did that one extremely well. It took about 20 minutes to perform and left a mess on the bed sheets. She began to launder those bed sheets and showered. 40 minutes later, she pops out of the shower and says "thats 1 hour and $$ what else would you like to do. I told her that I had sent her an email with details of what to do during our session. She obviously did not read the email and so was totally unprepared for this session. I told her to get her laptop out and read that email. After about 15 minutes of hiding out in her bedroom and still doing her laundry, she tells me to come into her bedroom. During this time I noticed she had lit a cigarette which was burning in an ashtray. This is a huge turnoff for me. She tells me to start kissing her feet. This lasts only a minutew hen she says in a little girl's tone of voice,"I'm a little ticklish". She says come up and lick her pussy. She moans a little, grabs my head a little, and basically relaxes as I lick away. After a few minutes, I hear her snore. I can't believe that she has fallen asleep while I'm still licking her pussy. I pull away from her and gaze at her for a few seconds. The age lines are really showing in her face now as she sleeps. I want to get out of there right now. I get up and quietly leave the room. I go to the spare bedroom to retrieve my toys and clothes. As I'm putting on my last pieces of clothes, I can hear her still attending to her laundry. I leave $$ on her dresser and slip out her front door. The encounter wasn't worth much to me, but she had to clean up the mess we made. She is NOT 26-30 years old. She is at least 45. She probably was a really hot chick years ago. The photos of her in her ads look like they are 10-15 years old. This was a deeply disappointing encounter.
This review is a condensed review of the one I submitted to ER. They refuse to publish this review. They asked me to provide phone records to prove that this encounter actually happened. I wrote to them back and forth for a week and a half. I finally told them: It's not right for your site to pick out only negative reviews and begin to challenge their authenticity. If you are doing so, then you are providing a biased and slanted view to the people who are reading your material, without them being aware of this bias. I call upon you to publish my review. It is accurate. It is authentic. Your readers need to know when a provider provides bad service. It is far more important that a negative review is published as it may save one of your readers from a bad experience.
I called upon them to do the right thing and publish my review. They refused.
Anyone who would like a copy of the full review can PM me and I will provide that to you as well as the emails between me and the ER staff.[/QUOTE]I don't know what types of services you asked for because I'm not into the BDSM scene but if humiliation was on your list you should be thanking her. What could be more humiliating that having a ho go to sleep while you're eating her pussy? I hope you gave her a generous tip.
ER cover up of Stacy from Space coast.
Received another email today from the another site staff. Here is proof the the another site board allows a provider to disaprove a review that they do not like.
- TERSupport wrote:
We are not obligated to post any review.
[url]http://theeroticreview.com/info_policies/reviewSubmission.asp[/url]
We have been in touch with Stacy another site I'd#155748 who confirms that the contact information in your review of her is not her contact information.
Your review will not be posted under Stacy another site I'd#155748 profile as you are unable to prove that is the provider whom you had your session with.
Thank you for the support,
-another site Support Staff.
The contact information is perfectly correct. Another site board wants phone records to prove I called her.
More ER cover up of Stacy from Space coast.
Yet another email today from the another site staff. Here is more proof the the another site board allows a provider to disaprove a review that they do not like.
From TERSupport
Sent 8/3/2012 1:32:45 AM
Subject RE: Your review of Stacy
Our decision is final. Your story of her contact details had changed throughout our conversation. You listed a Backpage ad and her personal website yet only inputted the contact number on that Backpage ad, even though you admit that you had not contacted her on that number. That inconsistency along with the appearance and performance score included in your review varies greatly from the provider's other reviews, is the reason your review will not be posted.
This is our final response on this matter.
Thank you for the support,
-another site Support Staff.
The contact information is perfectly correct in my review. Notice if the performance score is not consistant with previous scores, I gave her a 2, the provider can disapprove the review.