Trying this Sugar Baby thing.

[QUOTE=EstebanelSucio;7606779]Rose (formerly Samantha on SA) is for sure real. I'm not so sure about "major GPS" tho. I met her for $$ maybe because we are both very local to each other but YMMV. It is sometimes hard to schedule with her due to her having 3 kids. She can only meet when her ex has the kids. I didn't notice any demons at the time. She even mentioned she didn't drink when asked if she wanted to initially meet at a bar. She is very submissive.[/QUOTE]Can one of you PM me her number? My Burner app got glitchy and when I rebooted her contact was gone. Thanks.

Anyone met these in person, know they are DTF? you can DM me if you prefer.

Mari.

[URL]https://members.seeking.com/member/a87b3536-a3cd-4edd-9b75-d731abb5144d[/URL]

Nia.

[URL]https://members.seeking.com/member/18608e28-2657-4995-ad7e-5674e359fbc9[/URL]

Anyone seen this? Any intel to share, you can DM me if you want.

Nia.

[URL]https://members.seeking.com/member/18608e28-2657-4995-ad7e-5674e359fbc9[/URL]

Mari.

Doesn't want to text and talk on Site, which indicates time wasters and scammers, but she looks real with charlotte background in the pics.

[URL]https://members.seeking.com/member/a87b3536-a3cd-4edd-9b75-d731abb5144d[/URL]

I just got a warning form Seeking about inappropriate behavior, I never posted anything about money or arrangements. I think a girl reported me about our texts. I had to agree to their terms to get back in my account. Seeking is FOS they know what is going on. It's really not worth $150 to tell you the truth. Dia anyone else get this warning?

[QUOTE=HoHopper;7611824]I just got a warning form Seeking about inappropriate behavior, I never posted anything about money or arrangements. I think a girl reported me about our texts. I had to agree to their terms to get back in my account. Seeking is FOS they know what is going on. It's really not worth $150 to tell you the truth. Dia anyone else get this warning?[/QUOTE]How can it be possible that they are believing in evidence on any conversation that happened outside there damn platform, that's breach of trust on there behalf.

Hey everyone, new fun SLN girl in Charlotte, her name is Kyhla and she is 19. She is not into anal, giving head, or girls. She likes being f*cked rough including being spanked, slapped, and choked, but doesn't like her hair being pulled. Asking for a mid range PPM allowance, but will do BBFS for a bit more and very recent testing.

[URL]https://sugarlifenow.com/profile/kyh8ia/[/URL]

[QUOTE=AdamEve7;7611982]How can it be possible that they are believing in evidence on any conversation that happened outside there damn platform, that's breach of trust on there behalf.[/QUOTE]They are covering their ass because the feds were on them. These girls get off on reporting guys and it's not like it used to be. Once they ban you you can't just rejoin unless you have a friend pose as you for their new facial recognition texts. It's really hard to get back on. One more report and you will be banned and they keep your $150. If you try to join again and pay they will use their facial recognition tools to ban you after they take your next $150. Between the new higher prices and the fake and scamming girls on their I'm done with it! You can report girls all day and they never get removed unless it's really damning.

[QUOTE=HoHopper;7611824]I just got a warning form Seeking about inappropriate behavior, I never posted anything about money or arrangements. I think a girl reported me about our texts. I had to agree to their terms to get back in my account. Seeking is FOS they know what is going on. It's really not worth $150 to tell you the truth. Dia anyone else get this warning?[/QUOTE]I don't remember the wording but I've had several messages blocked that I had to carefull reword to get through. I didn't message any specifics or anything graphic. I think it was sentences that mentioned mutually beneficial and intimacy in the same sentence. Each time I changed the wording and it went through. I usually wait for even that until text but some sb's are slower to move off the platform.

Blue.

I'm back on Seeking after being away from it for a while. It has changed so much over the last 20 yrs.

Mya [URL]https://members.seeking.com/member/44a37452-275a-4d9a-87fb-ce9c19627ab9[/URL].

I'm guessing she's been reviewed b / c she has been around a while. 29, cute, aa. She said she usually sticks to 400 ppm but maybe she could do 3 which I had offered. I ended up not pursuing further but 400 is her number and she might come down a bit.

Ang early 20's (20 or 22 aa, I can't remember) and I don't have her link anymore. Super cute in her pics. She was okay with 250 ppm (I started at 200) but the more we talked, the poorer communications got. Responses were short, sometimes terse, and often ambiguous. I had to keep pulling info and clarifying. Ex: She said she didn't want to be close to a SD. It took a while to sort this out but she was okay with sex but not with being emotionally close. Eventually, she said she just wanted to get in and get out. I tried to clarify how long she was okay with hanging out and it devolved from there. I don't like feeling rushed or being limited to 1 round, etc. So I bailed.

I travel a lot so most of the people I've message with are in other states.