-
[QUOTE=BcSpam21;6158021]Cool story, bro.
Seriously, what does this add to the conversation? I'm not very active on boards like this for a number of reasons, and this is one of them. These boards are supposed to be useful in a very risky field, but guys like you just make it such a toxic atmosphere for no damn reason.
Now just to clarify, I'm not here to white knight and defend Gina's honor or anything. I've seen Gina three times in the past, and I honestly never had as good of a time as everyone else seems to. The visits were good at first, but each time for me suffered from the law of diminishing returns. Maybe it was because I wasn't assertive enough and tell her what I wanted, who knows.
As for you, we get it, dude. She's too old for you. That's fine. You've made that perfectly clear, and unless you have anything new to add to the discussion, who gives a shit? A lot of guys like her and are willing to pay what she asks. That's their decision. But who the hell are you to keep chiming in, spamming this thread with useless posts and essentially trolling? Go about your life, see the girls you want to see, and everyone else will see who they want to see?[/QUOTE]It's a different perspective. She has her fans. She also seems to get free promo constantly. Other girls get reviewed. With her it's guess who is back in town.
-
It was Asian Star
[QUOTE=Shinsuke;6157966]Which site? I'm interested in Kana especially if she has a round and soft ass. But not sure where to look. Any help would be appreciated.[/QUOTE]But looks like the website is down and seems like it's all outcall now too. I am not even sure if Kana is still around.
-
[QUOTE=RealInTheField;6159333]It's a different perspective. She has her fans. She also seems to get free promo constantly. Other girls get reviewed. With her it's guess who is back in town.[/QUOTE]Right, because it's relevant to the thread. She was a major fixture of the hobby in Manhattan for so long, and for many, is a high standard that many guys would want to see her again or for the first time, and I honestly don’t see what’s wrong with posters giving others a heads up when she’s in the area.
And you can say "it's a different perspective," but my point still stands. You don't offer anything new to the discussion. You've said several times before that you find her too old, but it's not as if you have a review to offer. You just complain about her age. And what's more, you're not just offering a differing experience for the sake of fairness, you just seem to be argumentative, and feel the need to tear down Gina simply because of her age, and those who speak highly of her.
-
Yup
[QUOTE=Theme888;6158400]The ad doesn't mention the name of the place and uses generic photos which I can guarantee are not accurate. In fact this almost seems like a sting operation, or worse yet you'll go there, someone'll stick you with a needle, then you'll wake up in an abandoned warehouse missing a kidney or something.
I wouldn't trust it.[/QUOTE]That's what I was kinda feeling too. Too good to be true. I ended up finding a new place though, just had to drive kinda far but it was a pretty cool set up not really a parlor either not sure what I would call it but it cost $60 at the door and I got to hook up with 2 of the bitches that were working and only ended up spending like another 60 They post who on the Twitter but I'll prolly go check out another time they said it gets busy sometimes not sure what that means but it was cheap enough to try one more time haha.
Here go the only site I found for it if anyone interested I'll post up the Twitter too just lmk.
[URL]https://tuscl.net/listing.php?id=4753[/URL]
-
[QUOTE=RealInTheField;6157967]To you her price is fine to me just like an athlete that has passed their prime I think the same of escorts.
Higher prices for older escorts never made sense to me. I can't support that. Enjoy.[/QUOTE]I don't understand how you have a problem with older escorts when you were talking about seeing Lucy and Lily from Mott St. 2 months ago. One is in her 60's another in her 50's.
[QUOTE=RealInTheField;6068626]I disagree. I think you can rawdog them both for $200. Fact is they are both old and know it. I ran out of there when I saw Lucy like 3 years ago. Lily looked a bit better. However gave it another shot last year and I ran out of there again. This time with Lily. She insisted I can stay and have them both for $200.
No way should anyone pay more than $200-240 for the both of them.[/QUOTE]
-
[QUOTE=KirkDiggler;6160218]I don't understand how you have a problem with older escorts when you were talking about seeing Lucy and Lily from Mott St. 2 months ago. One is in her 60's another in her 50's.[/QUOTE]Perhaps read my quote again. I said I saw Lily 3 years ago and tried seeing her over a year ago and couldn't. I also gave her $120. An escort over 50 imo isn't worth more than around that rate. This just proves my stance.
-
[QUOTE=RealInTheField;6160263]Perhaps read my quote again. I said I saw Lily 3 years ago and tried seeing her over a year ago and couldn't. I also gave her $120. An escort over 50 imo isn't worth more than around that rate. This just proves my stance.[/QUOTE]Hahahahaa. Yeah. Lily was real young 3 years ago.
-
Executive Choice
While they are def hit or miss, when they hit they are the best service in NYC. Nala is the new talent there, legit body.
-
Nala at EC
[QUOTE=RicardoM85;6160543]While they are def hit or miss, when they hit they are the best service in NYC. Nala is the new talent there, legit body.[/QUOTE]How is her face? Does she allow creampies?
-
[QUOTE=Itinm;6160532]Hahahahaa. Yeah. Lily was real young 3 years ago.[/QUOTE]She wasn't. She also wasn't $400 nor $500. She was $120. Follow along. My post said I don't believe in paying a high rate to an older escort. It's not complicated.
-
[QUOTE=RealInTheField;6160263]Perhaps read my quote again. I said I saw Lily 3 years ago and tried seeing her over a year ago and couldn't. I also gave her $120. An escort over 50 imo isn't worth more than around that rate. This just proves my stance.[/QUOTE]Doesn't matter, these are old women, women at Mott St, and the standard there was $60 3 years ago. Even up to some months ago before they moved it was. When I went to their new spot I was quoted $60 from the older one and $100 for the younger but their still old. Thing is Gina Rollins has been know to Grandfather her rates from what I know so she is not way to pricey for all.
Really Think about what you said dude.
[QUOTE=Itinm;6160532]Hahahahaa. Yeah. Lily was real young 3 years ago.[/QUOTE]Try 30 years ago.
-
[QUOTE=KirkDiggler;6160753]Doesn't matter, these are old women, women at Mott St, and the standard there was $60 3 years ago. Even up to some months ago before they moved it was. When I went to their new spot I was quoted $60 from the older one and $100 for the younger but their still old. Thing is Gina Rollins has been know to Grandfather her rates from what I know so she is not way to pricey for all.
Really Think about what you said dude.
Try 20 years ago.[/QUOTE]I can only go by what her rate is and has been past few years fivehundred now andfour hundred few years back. Those rates are too much for her age. That was and still is my point.
-
98 mott
98 Mott 6th floor would take 60 for short time.
98 mott 3rd floor wanted 150 for an hour. Maybe you can negotiate it to 130.3rd Floor moved to other locations and want 150 an hour.
-
[QUOTE=DRMongerII;6160907]98 Mott 6th floor would take 60 for short time.
98 mott 3rd floor wanted 150 for an hour. Maybe you can negotiate it to 130.3rd Floor moved to other locations and want 150 an hour.[/QUOTE]I've been to their new place, and was quoted 120 for maybe 100 for the short, and 180 for everything byLily. , but the grannie looking ***** that was doable was willing to go 60 with me. At the Mott st location they did 80 or 100 for some, I've even heard 60. This is not for an hour though.
-
[QUOTE=RealInTheField;6160752]She wasn't. She also wasn't $400 nor $500. She was $120. Follow along. My post said I don't believe in paying a high rate to an older escort. It's not complicated.[/QUOTE]You're the one that highlighted it being three years ago like that changes something relevant to the conversation. Don't get all in a huff just because someone pointed out that doesn't change anything that you seem to think it changes.