Printable View
[QUOTE=LancePkrbttm;2816202]FWIW my recommendation remains the same. Stay away. In my opinion it's wrong and could bring trouble your way you don't want.[/QUOTE]Risk assessment is a key factor in the hobby, so why take this risk? Also how does it rationally makes sense for a hobbyist to try and justify seeing a "Legal Aged" girl who is under the voting age. Way to close to both of some forum rules and most definitely logical thought.
[QUOTE=FleetingFreak;2816527]More Praise of MM69!
By the way, the only Diety on this board is you. Thank you again Sire![/QUOTE]I'm just going to stick this here.
[QUOTE=FlailingFreak;2816544]Risk assessment is a key factor in the hobby, so why take this risk? Also how does it rationally makes sense for a hobbyist to try and justify seeing a "Legal Aged" girl who is under the voting age. Way to close to both of some forum rules and most definitely logical thought.[/QUOTE]Many twists and turns to formulate your latest Troll bait.
1 This was a discussion on the legality not risk assessment.
2 Her age wasn't determined by any reasonable means.
3 we are talking about something that has already happened. Not seeing, have seen.
4 Logical thought is something you aren't capable of. Exhibit A the Ursula blog.
Don't you hate when people use your own words against you. One thing that stuck out to me is when you gave her that last one hundred to entertain yourself. You knew everything was a lie at that point, yet you gave her that money knowing full well she was going to buy drugs to shoot up. All so you could be entertained.
P.S. Hail to the king baby.
[blue][Deleted by Admin][/blue]
[u][b]EDITOR's NOTE[/b][/u]: [blue]This report was edited or deleted because the subject of the report was in direct violation of a posted Admin Restriction on the author, the thread, and/or the subject. This behavior will not be tolerated, and a 2nd violation will result in an automatic banning.[/blue]
[QUOTE=MalarkeyMan69;2816574]Many twists and turns to formulate your latest Troll bait.
1 This was a discussion on the legality not risk assessment.
2 Her age wasn't determined by any reasonable means.
3 we are talking about something that has already happened. Not seeing, have seen.
4 Logical thought is something you aren't capable of. Exhibit A the Ursula blog.
Don't you hate when people use your own words against you. One thing that stuck out to me is when you gave her that last one hundred to entertain yourself. You knew everything was a lie at that point, yet you gave her that money knowing full well she was going to buy drugs to shoot up. All so you could be entertained.
P.S. Hail to the king baby.[/QUOTE]His highness has to enter every dialogue associated with anyone.
1. Risk Assessment Definition: "A systematic process of evaluating the potential risks that may be involved in a projected activity or undertaking". Anytime a monger sees a provider under any circumstances there is some type of risk. Your discussion with Lance was about legality mine was about risk. Two separate conversations of thought somewhat related. But thank you Sire for clarifying your legal point.
2. Reasonable Definition: Having sound judgment; fair and sensible. His research was fair and sensible with the information available to him. We now know that she has presented identification showing she is of age, however this was not known at the time and it does not conclusively determine that she is of age. Fake identification is common among those that have reasons to secure it.
3. It had not already happened because he "had not seen" her, but was considering it. Thus "had not seen" and making others, that "had not seen" her, aware of what he felt was fair and sensible information.
4. Logical Definition: Characterized by or capable of clear, sound reasoning. There is nothing in the Ursula Blog that was truly a result of clear and sound reasoning or it would never have occurred. The hobby itself is illogical. So here Sire you are correct, however your anger is not a result of clear and sound reasoning, thus it is illogical.
End Definition: Termination, conclusion. I did not say I spent the money to entertain myself, only to see how it would end, as per the quote from the blog below. However don't confuse the reason for the story which was for many intentions and yet it did entertain many who read it. End is a noun and Entertain is a verb. They are two totally separate words with unrelated meanings.
[QUOTE=FreckleFreak;2767451]Now you all will wonder why in the hell did I fork over another $100. Simple, at this point the most expensive Broadway show couldn't be this good. [B]It was worth the money just to see how this would end.[/B][/QUOTE]Here is your post from the Ursula sage that in your words was Lame! If the Blog was unproductive, stupid and worthless then why did you comment "We see now it was the truth". Don't you hate it when people use your own words against you?
[QUOTE=MalarkeyMan69;2769192]I remember a post back in the day about star. It was second hand about her being a liar. Katie her friend told another Monger that any and everything she said was a lie. This guy posted what was said. I think it was almost immediately refuted by Star. Then she turned on her friend Katie calling her the liar and drug user. The drama died shortly after. We see now it was the truth.[/QUOTE]Thank you again Sire!
[QUOTE=MojoGuy;2815930]Kain, you just made the best post I've seen in this thread for a long damn time.[/QUOTE]Thanks Mojo: we need to find a cure for Cerebral Palsy.
[QUOTE=MidgetMeat69;2816029]This sounds like an angry guy to me. Welcome back LC. We know you never left.
[URL]http://www.usasexguide.info/forum/showthread.php?12661-BBQ-and-fight-thread&p=2779475[/URL]#post2779475.[/QUOTE]This is what I think of you asshole, Your a Taint, that worthless piece of skin between the asshole and pussy (useless).
BG,
[QUOTE=FreckleFraud;2816833]
His highness has to enter every dialogue associated with anyone.
1. Risk Assessment Definition: "A systematic process of evaluating the potential risks that may be involved in a projected activity or undertaking". Anytime a monger sees a provider under any circumstances there is some type of risk. Your discussion with Lance was about legality mine was about risk. Two separate conversations of thought somewhat related. But thank you Sire for clarifying your legal point.
[/QUOTE]What is that? You say later that I'm right. OH GEEZ! You want to talk about yourself. OH GEEZ!
[QUOTE=FreckleFraud;2816833]
2. Reasonable Definition: Having sound judgment; fair and sensible. His research was fair and sensible with the information available to him. We now know that she has presented identification showing she is of age, however this was not known at the time and it does not conclusively determine that she is of age. Fake identification is common among those that have reasons to secure it.
[/QUOTE]He pulled out the dictionary. OH GEEZ! He cherry picked through FB posts. The same that was available to everyone with an internet connection. One on her profile that clearly says she is 18. Another post on her being married. OH GEEZ! These computers.
[QUOTE=FreckleFraud;2816833]
3. It had not already happened because he "had not seen" her, but was considering it. Thus "had not seen" and making others, that "had not seen" her, aware of what he felt was fair and sensible information.
[/QUOTE]It has happened to swizzle stick. Then this guy butts in with incorrect assertions. OH GEEZ! Facts are stubborn things. OH GEEZ!
[QUOTE=FreckleFraud;2816833]
4. Logical Definition: Characterized by or capable of clear, sound reasoning. There is nothing in the Ursula Blog that was truly a result of clear and sound reasoning or it would never have occurred. The hobby itself is illogical. [b]So here Sire you are correct,[/b] however your anger is not a result of clear and sound reasoning, thus it is illogical.
[/QUOTE]Say that again.
[QUOTE=FreckleFraud;2816833]
4. Logical Definition: Characterized by or capable of clear, sound reasoning....
[/QUOTE]No. The other part in the end.
[QUOTE=FreckleFraud;2816833]
[b]So here Sire you are correct,[/b] however your anger is not a result of clear and sound reasoning, thus it is illogical.
[/QUOTE]OH! GEEEEZ! I am right but angry. OOOOH! GEEEEZZZ! I get so anrgy being right. OH GEEZ!
[QUOTE=FreckleFraud;2816833]
Now you all will wonder why in the hell did I fork over another $100. Simple, at this point the most expensive Broadway show couldn't be this good. It was worth the money just to see how this would end.
[/QUOTE]OH! GEEZ! "A broadway show" OH GEEZ! You bought a drug addict drugs and wanted to see how it would end. OH GEEZ!
[QUOTE=FreckleFraud;2816833]
End Definition: Termination, conclusion. I did not say I spent the money to entertain myself, only to see how it would end, as per the quote from the blog below. However don't confuse the reason for the story which was for many intentions and yet it did entertain many who read it. End is a noun and Entertain is a verb. They are two totally separate words with unrelated meanings.
[/QUOTE]OH GEEZ! Still hung up on your lame story. Oh GEEZ! The clarification is painfully worse! OH GEEZ! Again.
[URL]https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=M0sAVtOt2wA[/URL]
Hard to tell if you two despise other or are infatuated with each other, think you two might need to get together and have a drink and sort out your feelings.
[QUOTE=MillitaryMan69;2817411]What is that? You say later that I'm right. OH GEEZ! You want to talk about yourself. OH GEEZ!
He pulled out the dictionary. OH GEEZ! He cherry picked through FB posts. The same that was available to everyone with an internet connection. One on her profile that clearly says she is 18. Another post on her being married. OH GEEZ! These computers.
It has happened to swizzle stick. Then this guy butts in with incorrect assertions. OH GEEZ! Facts are stubborn things. OH GEEZ!
Say that again.
No. The other part in the end.
OH! GEEEEZ! I am right but angry. OOOOH! GEEEEZZZ! I get so anrgy being right. OH GEEZ!
OH! GEEZ! "A broadway show" OH GEEZ! You bought a drug addict drugs and wanted to see how it would end. OH GEEZ!
OH GEEZ! Still hung up on your lame story. Oh GEEZ! The clarification is painfully worse! OH GEEZ! Again.
[URL]https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=M0sAVtOt2wA[/URL][/QUOTE]
[QUOTE=MillitaryMan69;2816213]You use one fb post to discount another. It there are inconsistencies then all of it has to be discounted. If she is married in the state of KY she is at least 16 or age of consent. Her fb profile says she is 18 but again its about being legal which is what your first post eluded to.[/QUOTE]There are a few subtleties you don't seem to pick up on. Given the forum rules I can't spell it out for you. Read the statutes. I took the time to do so since my last post. It reinforces my stance given current KY law. Very loose language regarding relationships that would de facto default the age of consent to 18.
Someone posing to be something they're not will change the obvious references to which they are trying to portray. It's the details that are missed. Like the year and a half old comments on the photos that give away the truth. You call those inconsistencies, I call them clues.
[QUOTE=MidgetMeat69;2816225]I could post multiple photos of her hotel room with all the used needles and meth making ingredients.[/QUOTE]Why does a monger who abhors drug addict providers visit this type of provider? Was his sole purpose for the visit to take pictures of the room full of drugs? Did he retain the addicts services during the photo shoot? Just wondering.
[QUOTE=MilitantMunchkin69;2817411]What is that? You say later that I'm right [B]TWIST[/B] OH GEEZ! He cherry picked through FB posts. [B]TWIST[/B] The same that was available to everyone with an internet connection. One on her profile that clearly says she is 18. Another post on her being married. [B]TWIST[/B] OH GEEZ! These computers. It has happened to swizzle stick. Then this guy butts in with incorrect assertions.[B]TWIST[/B] OH GEEZ! I am right but angry. OOOOH! GEEEEZZZ! I get so anrgy being right. [B]TWIST[/B] OH GEEZ! OH! GEEZ! "A broadway show" OH GEEZ! You bought a drug addict drugs and wanted to see how it would end. OH GEEZ! OH GEEZ! [B]TWIST[/B] Still hung up on your lame story. Oh GEEZ! [B]TWIST[/B] The clarification is painfully worse! OH GEEZ! [B]TWIST[/B] [/QUOTE]I have determined that you will twist other mongers input into a barbed wire type of response that you need to control. You once again highlighted most of my points in your response even with your twist and turns. I knew a long time ago there was no compromise with you or even a close mutual understanding. [B]Don't you get it at this point, you've been played![/B] With every response your anger grows. Your attacks magnify. Your true personality is plastered across the board. You have trapped yourself within yourself.
Haven't you figured out that you can't beat up a monger who from the very beginning beat himself up and admitted his mistakes in the Ursula story. Don't you get it? [B]I beat you too it![/B] You can chastise me all you want because anything you say is far less than what I have already experienced, thought or felt. The entire story is illogical because addiction and the hobby are illogical. You are in the minority of those that think the story was worthless, but you have the right to your opinion just as others the right to their opinion. It's not your opinion or mine that's important. It's what others think of it, how they use it and if it ever helps Star become clean. I'm finished with our Ursula dialogue so go ahead and continue to beat a dead horse because you have nothing better to do.
You are barbed wire. You string yourself across this board waiting for the next monger who says something you don't like only to wrap you angry persona around their post and twist your point of view onto the board. You do make important contributions to the board. What is sad is that you cannot get over yourself and you have to degrade every monger who challenges you. Your opinion matters as do all the other opinions but you display your disagreements in such an angry manner. Well have fun and enjoy yourself. I enjoyed playing my game and appreciated your involvement for everyone to read. I did find the ignore button and will use it from here on. No it's not the USASG supplied one. It's one that I feel is more appropriate.
Thank you again Sire!
[B]Must be a SYNDROME.[/B]
[QUOTE=FowlFreak;2817988]
I have determined that you will twist other mongers input into a barbed wire type of response that you need to control. You once again highlighted most of my points in your response even with your twist and turns. I knew a long time ago there was no compromise with you or even a close mutual understanding.
[/QUOTE]I used your own words. No twisting nessary.
[QUOTE=FowlFreak;2817988]
Don't you get it at this point, you've been played! With every response your anger grows. Your attacks magnify. Your true personality is plastered across the board. You have trapped yourself within yourself.
[/QUOTE]The angry narrative again. You sir have been played! Your angry the one. I will hold scum like you accountable. Sure when cleaning scum a little bit gets on you. When you slimed Katanna and Angelina, 2 of the nicest ladies out there, to get at me you lowered yourself. A feat I thought impossible.
[QUOTE=FowlFreak;2817988]
Haven't you figured out that you can't beat up a monger who from the very beginning beat himself up and admitted his mistakes in the Ursula story. Don't you get it? I beat you too it! You can chastise me all you want because anything you say is far less than what I have already experienced, thought or felt. The entire story is illogical because addiction and the hobby are illogical. You are in the minority of those that think the story was worthless, but you have the right to your opinion just as others the right to their opinion. It's not your opinion or mine that's important. It's what others think of it, how they use it and if it ever helps Star become clean. I'm finished with our Ursula dialogue so go ahead and continue to beat a dead horse because you have nothing better to do.
[/QUOTE]I get it, trying to drag me to the bottom where you reside. Slinging lies, making verbal hit jobs, attacking others. The last time you were finished was a lie. Do you remember that PM? Of course you do. Since you couldn't get the last word you went to the forum. See screenshot below. How many times do you PM my inbox?
[QUOTE=FowlFreak;2817988]
You do make important contributions to the board.Thank you again Sire!
[/QUOTE]Yes, I do. Can the same be said of you? No. Oh and the Lame Ursula story is still very LAME.
Hail to the King BABY.
[QUOTE=MillitaryMan69;2818169][B]Must be a SYNDROME.[/B]
I used your own words. No twisting nessary.
The angry narrative again. You sir have been played! Your angry the one. I will hold scum like you accountable. Sure when cleaning scum a little bit gets on you. When you slimed Katanna and Angelina, 2 of the nicest ladies out there, to get at me you lowered yourself. A feat I thought impossible.
I get it, trying to drag me to the bottom where you reside. Slinging lies, making verbal hit jobs, attacking others. The last time you were finished was a lie. Do you remember that PM? Of course you do. Since you couldn't get the last word you went to the forum. See screenshot below. How many times do you PM my inbox?
Yes, I do. Can the same be said of you? No. Oh and the Lame Ursula story is still very LAME.
Hail to the King BABY.[/QUOTE]The [B]IGNORE[/B] button Sire!
[QUOTE=FreckleFoul;2818198]The [B]IGNORE[/B] button Sire![/QUOTE]Keep trying and Lying.