Massage Parlor Reports

[QUOTE=Live469;4583849]

I can see how depending on what you are looking for you might have a good time with her, but I wanted her to lay back, let me enjoy DATY until she got her O, then take care of me. For $$ total, it was not at all what I wanted. I will not repeat.

Live 4 69.[/QUOTE]You got way more than usual for only. 4 and your expectations are way too high for that. She doesn't care about getting an O. She cares about the green and how many green givers she can cram into one day. You basically went to a Checkers with a Checkers budget and expected the server to start doing cartwheels in appreciation. I and others I'm sure have never even got close to what you got for. 4 and if we did we wouldn't be complaining.

[QUOTE=MotionLotion;4583965]You got way more than usual for only. 4 and your expectations are way too high for that. She doesn't care about getting an O. She cares about the green and how many green givers she can cram into one day. You basically went to a Checkers with a Checkers budget and expected the server to start doing cartwheels in appreciation. I and others I'm sure have never even got close to what you got for. 4 and if we did we wouldn't be complaining.[/QUOTE]Looks to me like he spent $$ total so his tip was $. 4 not. 4 and that oughta bring good service. Not from her.

[QUOTE=FranklyScarlet;4584125]Looks to me like he spent $$ total so his tip was $. 4 not. 4 and that oughta bring good service. Not from her.[/QUOTE]Thanks for the correction. I'm not hip to all the silly James Bond 007 code talk and abbreviations intended to throw LE off the scent when in reality it does no such thing. Therefore I never bothered to use it or try to even understand it.

[QUOTE=MotionLotion;4584589]Thanks for the correction. I'm not hip to all the silly James Bond 007 code talk and abbreviations intended to throw LE off the scent when in reality it does no such thing. Therefore I never bothered to use it or try to even understand it.[/QUOTE]Frankly Scarlet is correct.

And for a tip of $140, I expect and have, until Cindy, always received good and more often great value.

I'm not naive enough to think that using "$” to mean "$100", ".4" to mean "$40", and ".6" to mean "$60" is some kind of code that will throw off LE (Oh, no! I've just given it away! So "LE" must mean "law enforcement"!). I AM lazy enough to use it as shorthand and believe the average forum follower is capable enough with basic arithmetic to correctly interpret the shorthand, so I will keep using it.

Live 4 69.

[QUOTE=Live469;4585147]

I AM lazy enough to use it as shorthand and believe the average forum follower is capable enough with basic arithmetic to correctly interpret the shorthand...

Live 4 69.[/QUOTE]Understanding arithmetic has no relation to understanding "shorthand". The premise is flawed therefore so is the argument.

[QUOTE=MotionLotion;4585248]Understanding arithmetic has no relation to understanding "shorthand". The premise is flawed therefore so is the argument.[/QUOTE]Fair enough. But the fact remains: you implied I was the unreasonable one, which wasn’t the case. You either didn't understand the silly shorthand, or you couldn't do the math.

[QUOTE=Live469;4585364]Fair enough. But the fact remains: you implied I was the unreasonable one, which wasnt the case. You either didn't understand the silly shorthand, or you couldn't do the math.[/QUOTE]I didn't imply you specifically were being unreasonable. My comment to FranklyScarlet was that I thought talking in code by anyone was unreasonable and therefore I never did it and therefore never bothered to learn it. But since you later explained that you weren't talking in code but rather abbreviating out of laziness then my comment certainly didn't apply to you. Sorry for any misunderstandings.

Merry Christmas.

[QUOTE=MotionLotion;4585469]I didn't imply you specifically were being unreasonable. My comment to FranklyScarlet was that I thought talking in code by anyone was unreasonable and therefore I never did it and therefore never bothered to learn it. But since you later explained that you weren't talking in code but rather abbreviating out of laziness then my comment certainly didn't apply to you. Sorry for any misunderstandings.

Merry Christmas.[/QUOTE]...as implying I was unreasonably complaining about Cindy. Whew, never mind. I hope you give her a shot and enjoy.

Merry Christmas!

I visited Tokyo and it was pretty good. I am not sure how many girls work there, but I got someone other than Joyce. Joyce is the only one I ever remember by face. The massage was alright, and there was some teasing. Standard finish with utc roaming was good. Total damage was 120 for the hr and tip.

I might repeat, but I think I'm going to go back to Lotus instead. For now, it's my go-to.

Dream on,

Seph.

Now that Anna owns / manages both places I was just wondering if anyone has any comments about the girls at both places. I haven't seen any comments on Best lately. I went there a few days ago and had Ju-Ju? She was good and friendly. Okay massage, open to plenty of feeling. Usual finish. $ 20 total.

[QUOTE=Norton32;4591320]Now that Anna owns / manages both places I was just wondering if anyone has any comments about the girls at both places. I haven't seen any comments on Best lately. I went there a few days ago and had Ju-Ju? She was good and friendly. Okay massage, open to plenty of feeling. Usual finish. $ 20 total.[/QUOTE]I've been to both a few times and I've seen some girls float between Lotus and Best. I see Shi Shi (or something like that at Lotus more often, and she's decent looking, young, and gives really good finishes with some prostate play if you're into that. The massage isn't bad either.

At Best, I feel like looks-wise, it's often average to slightly below average older girls, but I find that the service is reliably good and they have great attitudes, so I can look past the looks.

[QUOTE=Live469;4568828]If you are talking about 3225 NW 13th St. , that place is planned to be called "Lucky Q Massage," will be open in January, and will be the new location of the business that is currently at NW 23rd Ave.[/QUOTE]The AMP on NW 23rd Avenue has closed and the business moved over to the 3200 block of NW 13th Street. It is right across the street from Leonard's Furniture in a pretty ho-hum looking building. Same phone as the 23rd Avenue spot. If it is the same staff at the new location I doubt the service level will be different.

[QUOTE=Seph1011;4591124]I visited Tokyo and it was pretty good. I am not sure how many girls work there, but I got someone other than Joyce. Joyce is the only one I ever remember by face. The massage was alright, and there was some teasing. Standard finish with utc roaming was good. Total damage was 120 for the hr and tip.

I might repeat, but I think I'm going to go back to Lotus instead. For now, it's my go-to.

Dream on,

Seph.[/QUOTE]Stopped in a few days ago to see Joyce, she is everything I need, knows me, knows what I like, gives very good massage and plays well. . 6 + $ usually does it. She mentioned that she was taking short breaks this past week and that "Coco" would be there. Perhaps that is who you drew? Please give some physical description if you are able, it would be appreciated!

Live 4 69.

[QUOTE=Live469;4601886]Stopped in a few days ago to see Joyce, she is everything I need, knows me, knows what I like, gives very good massage and plays well. . 6 + $ usually does it. She mentioned that she was taking short breaks this past week and that "Coco" would be there. Perhaps that is who you drew? Please give some physical description if you are able, it would be appreciated!

Live 4 69.[/QUOTE]I got restless and decided to TOFTT, tried Coco. Unfortunately I dreamed she had similar attitude as Cindy at the old 23rd Ave, but without the decent looks. Coco had lots of makeup, looked to be 40-45 yrs old, about 5'4", 140 lbs, saggy B-cups w / unremarkable insensitive nipples, no ass, barrel-shaped torso. Massage was mediocre, demanded tip up front, I should have left right then. Would not repeat.

Live 4 69.

[blue][Deleted by Admin][/blue]

[b][u]EDITOR'S NOTE[/u]: [/b] [blue]This report was deleted because the content of the report was [u]pointless[/u], [u]unproductive[/u] [u]drama[/u]. Please read the Forum FAQ and the Forum's Posting Guidelines for more information. [I]Thank You! [/I][/blue]