High-End Escorts

[QUOTE=MassageAwesome;6057782]So what is the starting price on high end? Because in Terri's ad she charging 300 for an hour and to me that's high end. Each person has a different definition of high end.[/QUOTE]There is no starting price for high end.

High End it is all about quality of service, and yes, you usually get what you pay for.

[QUOTE=Han57;6058007]There is no starting price for high end.

High End it is all about quality of service, and yes, you usually get what you pay for.[/QUOTE]I want to make sure because there are escorts I paid for that was 150 and it was amazing service. Just want to make sure high end just ain't about price. If that's the case then Ginger Taylor is definitely high end.

[QUOTE=MassageAwesome;6057782]So what is the starting price on high end? Because in Terri's ad she charging 300 for an hour and to me that's high end. Each person has a different definition of high end.[/QUOTE]It's not about price. It's about a smoking hottie equivalent to a model, actress or porn star in looks + great service. If you think Ginger Taylor fits that then fine. I don't. Instead, I think she is a great provider who is average looking thus not high end. Terri is below that in terms of looks for me. Here is a test. Ask yourself is this girl possibly hot enough to be famous for her looks. If the answer is no then probably not high end. It doesn't mean she is not a great provider or doesn't give good service. It means review her in the regular forum.

Only the cream of the crop belong here. Here is an example of the look of a high end girl (I haven't seen here and the ad may not be legit) it's just so you can get a sense of the quality [URL]https://www.eros.com/georgia/atlanta/files/7852712.htm?cat=6208&wn=1[/URL].

If you think Terri and Ginger are in the top 1% of all the women you've ever seen then that's your opinion but I think most of us would feel different (talking about looks not performance).

[QUOTE=MassageAwesome;6058719]I totally agree. High end escort can mean different things. Like I said, I paid 150 for an escort and had an amazing time, and I have also paid 300 for an escort and had a very bad experience. To me the 150 would be high end due to service. An escort is an escort, so why have this thread because of price. But hey if that's what it is, then it is. And as far as Ginger goes, I paid 200 for her and had an amazing time. So yes, I may be one of the 1% to consider her high end, but that's fine with me.[/QUOTE]You guys still can't get it right. High-End does not mean price. We are talking about looks, body, natural beauty. Terri and Ginger are not High-End escorts. JT4 K99 gets it right. He has gotten it right since we started this category. My goodness just look at what these guys are posting about in the regular escort category, nothing but run down has-beens. Unfortunately many of the High-End ladies know they are top quality and their price reflects it. But look at the regular escort category and they are now asking $300. Goodness most of them should be free they are so bad. You guys are so horny you screw the first one that says yes. But you know that's ok if that's what you want. High-End is for the guys that truly are particular and have higher standards. So if you don't approve of this category, by all means stay with the regular escort category.

[QUOTE=Wleakr;6059205]Based on your description, seems these types of escorts would either have their own site or work with an established agency.

Wouldn't they have reviews on those sites?

I mean, if they are high end, high quality service escorts there shouldn't be any reason to review them here. All info necessary to vet them should be provided on whatever site is hosting them. Because if there are a bunch of negative reviews on said escort on here about them, then they would no longer be high end and would simply be just an "escort".

In essence, there are no "diamonds in the rough" with high-end. They are all diamonds and one can't go wrong.

So, still not seeing the purpose of this thread. You say it's about the looks, but what you really mean is it's about the "look" YOU want to see. Which may not be the type of someone else.

If you know you want the diamonds and willing to pay the price for that guaranteed quality, you don't need this thread. Go to the source. If their quality is not guaranteed, they are just an escort. In which case, come back here and fish![/QUOTE]Beauty it's hard to define but you know it when you see it. Ginger Lynn and Terry are great providers but I would not call them beautiful and therefore not appropriate for this forum. I think the majority of us would agree.

Ok, fair warning guys, if you become argumentative and don't like this site go elsewhere. I will start deleting anyone who doesn't agree with this category and just argue. This category is here for a reason, for those guys who want gain valuable insight on high quality ladies. Go peddle your differences on "Rants and Raves". BTW, Terri and Ginger do not belong on here.

Here are some pictures of my one and only what you would classify as high end. I messed around with this one for almost 6 months in 2017 in asheville NC before the demons got hold of her and she turned in to a complete train wreck. Started out great was awesome company amazing sex etc. Got unreliable but the sex was still good and she was still smoking hot. Then she took my car one night after we turned in because she always stayed over when she saw me. Got my car back and never saw her again.

[QUOTE=AvgJoe217;6059674]Here are some pictures of my one and only what you would classify as high end. I messed around with this one for almost 6 months in 2017 in asheville NC before the demons got hold of her and she turned in to a complete train wreck. Started out great was awesome company amazing sex etc. Got unreliable but the sex was still good and she was still smoking hot. Then she took my car one night after we turned in because she always stayed over when she saw me. Got my car back and never saw her again.[/QUOTE]Will this entry make the cut for high-end?

Only JT and Nova know for sure. What's the verdict?

[QUOTE=AvgJoe217;6059674]Here are some pictures of my one and only what you would classify as high end. I messed around with this one for almost 6 months in 2017 in asheville NC before the demons got hold of her and she turned in to a complete train wreck. Started out great was awesome company amazing sex etc. Got unreliable but the sex was still good and she was still smoking hot. Then she took my car one night after we turned in because she always stayed over when she saw me. Got my car back and never saw her again.[/QUOTE]Pis aren't the best quality but you are getting the idea. Although the Maxim logo at the bottom of the pic is suspicious as an example of what a more high end girl looks like it is reasonable. Her behavior might eventually rule her out but we are zeroing in on the understanding of what the forum strives for. We want to move as far away from the listcrawler addicts as we can both in looks and behavior. Think of it as a spectrum listcrawler addicts on one end and this forum at the other end.

Thanks for the laughs fellas. You all are hilarious! I honestly can't tell whose feelings are the most hurt.

My two cents. High end refers to someone who is both high price and high value. If the value isn't there at a high price, they're simply high price not high end and I'm one and done and spreading the word that the service is poor to protect the next fella from wasting their time and hard earned money.

From my personal experience:

High end by my definition: Cameron Jay, Jemma Jones, Lucy Lee.

High cost yet Not High end by my definition: Nadia Sparks, Sophia Soma, Kat Wilde, Blakely Banks, Bobbie Belle.

I like Ginger's value proposition, but agree she is not high end. Terri is a very nice lady, but she is also not high end and ultimately was not for me.

[QUOTE=Wleakr;6059702]Will this entry make the cut for high-end?

Only JT and Nova know for sure. What's the verdict?[/QUOTE]Looks wise would put her on High-End. However demons would not.

Just saw this hottie on Eros. She is well reviewed on TER (all (9's&10's) and also has a p411 ad. Unfortunately it's 7 bills for admission which at the current time is a little too much for me. If anyone has the funds, I would consider it.

[URL]https://www.eros.com/georgia/atlanta/files/4828445.htm?cat=6208&wn=1[/URL]

Daisy is back in ATL. This girl is a gem. I was lucky enough to have her when she first started visiting ATL when the price of admission was 3 or 4 bills. She has now blown up and does full on porn so she is 6 bills now but if you haven't partaken I highly recommend. She will pretty much let you do anything except BBFS of course. Dfk, BBBJ, dirty talk, most, CIM, COF. BDSM (her fave) and I think Greek is on the table as well.

When I saw her she looked exactly like her pics. Her most recent pics are on twitter where it looks like she put on 5 lbs but still hot. Great personality, has a degree, totally sober, and is bilingual. She is the definition of high end. Enjoy.

[QUOTE=Kcalvin55;6060082]Thanks for the laughs fellas. You all are hilarious! I honestly can't tell whose feelings are the most hurt.

My two cents. High end refers to someone who is both high price and high value. If the value isn't there at a high price, they're simply high price not high end and I'm one and done and spreading the word that the service is poor to protect the next fella from wasting their time and hard earned money.

From my personal experience:

High end by my definition: Cameron Jay, Jemma Jones, Lucy Lee.

High cost yet Not High end by my definition: Nadia Sparks, Sophia Soma, Kat Wilde, Blakely Banks, Bobbie Belle.

I like Ginger's value proposition, but agree she is not high end. Terri is a very nice lady, but she is also not high end and ultimately was not for me.[/QUOTE]I agree with your assessment. I think the second category of High cost but not high end is mostly high end looks (most of them but not all) but not high end service.

However, at least we are not talking about listcrawler level of looks or service which is really what we want to stay away from.

[QUOTE=JT4K99;6057300]I think Terri and Ginger although sweet are more appropriate for the regular escort forum. Let's keep this one separate with women who are 8+ in looks (for starters) and also provide good service. There isn't always a clear consensus on who is "high end" both these two are clearly not.[/QUOTE]I was not stating either was high-end. Nor was I arguing the merits of either being included in said category.

I was merely pointing out that both pics were not of Terri.