Printable View
[QUOTE=Resident Evil1]Found this one on E Atlantic St. Says she's 25, just back from Mexico and clean just needing survival money. Just the way I like them. 40 for a BBFS and the pics.[/QUOTE]
Please tell me that BBFS is not what I think it is.......
perhaps the acronyms on the ave are diffrent than what they are for escorts?
[QUOTE=CookyJar]Welcome to the forum "Resident Evil1."
Nice set of pictures. The big girl needs love too. That's my motto.
Don't let the delay in posting get you down. We all had to get pass the regular member phase.
CookyJar[/QUOTE]
Welcome "Residentevil1." We need more mongers who take pictures of their encounters. If everyone did then the Philly area SW intel would be nothing short of awesome.
I am an equal opportunity partaker of the SW menu and my positive opinion on the oral skills of chubby gals and MILFs is well documented. They are like the AVIS motto: they try harder.
[QUOTE=TheyCallMeHawk]Please tell me that BBFS is not what I think it is.......
perhaps the acronyms on the ave are diffrent than what they are for escorts?[/QUOTE]
One of the rules of this forum is not to make negative comments about a monger's choice to use or not use a raincoat. Moreover, we would be pretty hypocritical to have encounters with high risk SWs who use needles, etc., and then condemn another for his choice of protection (even if nothing) against any number STDs, the most serious of which are lifelong and/or deadly. A reasonably intelligent person knows the risks and the precautions to take and makes his choices accordingly. As for me, I choose to take what I consider to be acceptable risks and I certainly have no death wish nor desire to catch anything, which I have been fortunate enough never to experience.
When I heard from various "Deep Throat" SW informants that the incidence of requesting BBFS was in the 60-70% range I will admit that I was quite surprised. There would seem to me something amiss that this would be the case. I am not sure what it says about sex education in our public schools and elsewhere, the availability of STD information or perhaps just the recklessness of many who think they are indestructible, or just don't care about the possible consequences. But apparently it is a fact and not just speculation, whatever the reasons. Fortunately the better providers don't engage in such risky behavior, even though asked frequently, (or at least they say they don't, and say so quite emphatically). While I can't help what another monger decides not to do for his own protection, I still have a concern over his bad behavior posing a further risk to me. It is in that vein that I do not condemn him but sincerely wish he would wise up.
[QUOTE=Supereloquent]One of the rules of this forum is not to make negative comments about a monger's choice to use or not use a raincoat. Moreover, we would be pretty hypocritical to have encounters with high risk SWs who use needles, etc., and then condemn another for his choice of protection (even if nothing) against any number STDs, the most serious of which are lifelong and/or deadly. A reasonably intelligent person knows the risks and the precautions to take and makes his choices accordingly. As for me, I choose to take what I consider to be acceptable risks and I certainly have no death wish nor desire to catch anything, which I have been fortunate enough never to experience.
When I heard from various "Deep Throat" SW informants that the incidence of requesting BBFS was in the 60-70% range I will admit that I was quite surprised. There would seem to me something amiss that this would be the case. I am not sure what it says about sex education in our public schools and elsewhere, the availability of STD information or perhaps just the recklessness of many who think they are indestructible, or just don't care about the possible consequences. But apparently it is a fact and not just speculation, whatever the reasons. Fortunately the better providers don't engage in such risky behavior, even though asked frequently, (or at least they say they don't, and say so quite emphatically). While I can't help what another monger decides not to do for his own protection, I still have a concern over his bad behavior posing a further risk to me. It is in that vein that I do not condemn him but sincerely wish he would wise up.[/QUOTE]
Sorry...... such reckless behavior is just plain stupid. If your "deepthroat" source is correct. Then the stroll is much more dangerous than I ever imagined. The number one reason why a monger may not care to use protection is becuase he has nothing to loose(he already has a disease).
I hope those of you that are spending time on the ave are taking notes and remembering the ladies and the mongers who are exhibitting this kind of behavior. I think we all know the risks of this hobby we engage in but some things are just plain stupid. This is one of those things.
I like that bloody mary chick.
nice pics Resident Evil1
Thanks and be careful out there.
[QUOTE=Supereloquent]One of the rules of this forum is not to make negative comments about a monger's choice to use or not use a raincoat. [/QUOTE]
Agreed and it is a good rule. The others can get off their high horse because no one cares what they think is reckless or not....for one it is a buzzkill and makes it less likely for those mongers to share information and pics.
the general public thinks seeing any provider covered or uncovered is crazy and reckless. You guys need a reality check.
Life is about taking risks and it's up to each person to decide what risks are "crazy" and which ones are "worth it". So with all due respect, stfu if you do not agree with the risk/reward ratio that another monger has decided is appropriate for himself.
[QUOTE=Resident Evil1]Started the new year off right with Jaime on January 4th. Snatched her up off E Russell St. and the Ave. $40 for her and a $10 tip for the effort was well worth the scratch. She is a doll and I enjoyed her eagerness to please.[/QUOTE]OMG! Jaime is the chick sweet vanilla that I reviewed as my girl of the year, damn I guess she's back which should be a good thing for anyone who hooks up with her. Nice pics Resident evil1 keep up the good work.
I think Jamie is extremely hot! great pics, i hope you give her another go around so we can see more of her, and on a personal note, whether or not some goes for bbfs none of us have the right to judge that person, we all go out there and take risks, some more than others, if he's enjoying his self then who are we to judge him and his decisions? We all takes risks with sw or parlor girls, whatever your choice is so dont condemn another member if he's happy none of us have the right to judge.
[QUOTE=Resident Evil1]Almost ran this one over in the middle of Kens. ave and Venango on Dec 29.
...[/QUOTE]
You would have done us a bigger favor if you didn't even post those pics.
[QUOTE=Peter Johnson]Agreed and it is a good rule. The others can get off their high horse because no one cares what they think is reckless or not....for one it is a buzzkill and makes it less likely for those mongers to share information and pics.
the general public thinks seeing any provider covered or uncovered is crazy and reckless. You guys need a reality check.
Life is about taking risks and it's up to each person to decide what risks are "crazy" and which ones are "worth it". So with all due respect, stfu if you do not agree with the risk/reward ratio that another monger has decided is appropriate for himself.[/QUOTE]
I should "stfu" since I dont even particpate in this activity anyway. JUsty voicing my opinion and ....my opinion is nill on this subject...
thanks for putting me in my place...
[QUOTE=Resident Evil1]Started the new year off right with Jaime on January 4th. Snatched her up off E Russell St. and the Ave. $40 for her and a $10 tip for the effort was well worth the scratch. She is a doll and I enjoyed her eagerness to please.[/QUOTE]
If there wasn't a time stamp, I'd think they were old pics. I can't remember when I saw her last, but remember well. Great date. Now tks for these pics !!
[QUOTE=Resident Evil1]Started the new year off right with Jaime on January 4th. Snatched her up off E Russell St. and the Ave. $40 for her and a $10 tip for the effort was well worth the scratch. She is a doll and I enjoyed her eagerness to please.[/QUOTE]Yes a Happy New Year INDEED!
Nice little box!
RE, NICE pics. You did a FINE job on them. Jaime's definitely my type and the only drawback from my standpoint would be that tattoo on her neck. I've never understood why a hot young girl does something like that. But I still wouldn't kick her out of bed/the sack due to it.
[QUOTE=Resident Evil1]Started the new year off right with Jaime on January 4th. Snatched her up off E Russell St. and the Ave. $40 for her and a $10 tip for the effort was well worth the scratch. She is a doll and I enjoyed her eagerness to please.[/QUOTE]
I hit the K after cruising through camden (see Camden) been a few years since I hit the K but I had business in town today so it was a three hour side trip lots of girls saw Jackie, when I turned the block she was gone. There was a brazen little blonde in all white walking along the cars backup at the light south of allegheny. I picked up a small blonde past the 7-11 with suede pinkish boots for a BBBJ well worth it. Again lots of girls, great cruise hope to do it again
Few LEO less than I expected, I PM'd a member here for a number, of course he didn't help out. But all in all great cruise
Sprat
I probably have no room to talk about tattoos. The two that I have are of 1. Wacko from the Animaniacs in a Flyers jersey and 2. A pair of crossed hockey sticks with the Irish and Mexican flags at the top half of the sticks with an American flag-draped broadswords piercing the middle of them. But the cherry tattoos on the tops of Jamie's thighs just scream "You're going to regret this ink forever! " The product of a generation of tribal tattoos and everybody being so unique that they all end up being the same. Sorry. Rant over.