Anyone got any intel on any dreams available in the Ulmerton / airport area? Used to be a hotspot and I'm lookin for any leads if you know of any.
Printable View
Anyone got any intel on any dreams available in the Ulmerton / airport area? Used to be a hotspot and I'm lookin for any leads if you know of any.
[QUOTE=Ziggy62;3832300]Has anyone seen this one recently? I used to see her at her parents house, then when they sold it, it was hard to get a hold of her. I think I saw her vacations shots late last year.[/QUOTE]Wow blast from the past. Saw her twice. I haven't seen her post in a long time. She was good at BBBJ.
Does candy not just weed. Watch your wallet, she did a double with her friend a few years back and she helped herself to his wallet, while he was busy with the other one. She went out of this area for a while after those reports came out. Since this site changed, I don't know if the reports are still on here? SW pricing. I know some other hobbyist on here were around when these reports came out.
[QUOTE=Nekidinflorida;3834428]Anyone try Mandy, she is a squirter, can't find any reviews.
[URL]https://outcall.com.tampa.escortbabylon.com/post/26599285/[/URL]
PM if needed.[/QUOTE]
After not losing the faith the one and only Ms Keisha came across my screen after confirming it was her went on my way to see her. She is looking great, only bad part is she had no incall so we did car date. Got a great BBBJ didn't push for more considering it was day time. Will always repeat.
Tanya is up in Feathersound:
[URL]https://www.eros.com/florida/tampa/files/6148792.htm[/URL]
On the pricey side but last I saw her--a few visits 2+ years ago, perhaps--she was a great time. Nice body, pretty face, I'd guess early 40's at this point. Sweet attitude, was GFE at the time, MSOG, BBBJWCIM and a touch on the submissive side if you like that. In a very nice incall location and responded promptly.
She's not the girl in the pics but reasonably close. Others have reviewed her more recently I think.
[QUOTE=DrewAustinOn34;3841122]Anyone got any intel on any dreams available in the Ulmerton / airport area? Used to be a hotspot and I'm lookin for any leads if you know of any.[/QUOTE]
[QUOTE=BestSwimmer;3842026]Does candy not just weed. Watch your wallet, she did a double with her friend a few years back and she helped herself to his wallet, while he was busy with the other one. She went out of this area for a while after those reports came out. Since this site changed, I don't know if the reports are still on here? SW pricing. I know some other hobbyist on here were around when these reports came out.[/QUOTE]I saw her again this afternoon (only due to no other short notice availability) at what she called "her house" I suspect it was not hers though. She was super high on weed and something else. She told me "It is usually 200 no matter what" I told her I negotiated 40 last time at her incall hotel and we settled on 60 for a QV. BB was available and we got to business. She rode me strong and hard but as soon as she got off she lost interest and was texting on the phone as I did her DS. She was then literally checking her texts to see when I showed up and if my 15 minutes were up. I then got a little irritated and tried to put it in greek style. She was not really happy about that. I finished by hand and made sure she had to change the sheets. I would not repeat for free.
[URL]https://www.ibackpage.com/backpage-tampa/FemaleEscorts/gallery[/URL]
Checkout the new and improved BP, LOL.
The pictures seem to professional for me and could be fake posts til they get the girls back posting again.
It is GREAT having that resource back again. The other pages don't seem to compare IMHO.
Monger safe and on.
Mahalo.
[QUOTE=HawaiianD;3846403][URL]https://www.ibackpage.com/backpage-tampa/FemaleEscorts/gallery[/URL]
Checkout the new and improved BP, LOL.
The pictures seem to professional for me and could be fake posts til they get the girls back posting again.
It is GREAT having that resource back again. The other pages don't seem to compare IMHO.
Monger safe and on.
Mahalo.[/QUOTE][URL]https://www.ibackpage.com/backpage-sarasota/FemaleEscorts/all-h-o-l-e-s-open-for-your-pleasure-c-u-m-all-over-me-anywhere-you-want-mdash-mdash-mdash-mdash/6272139[/URL]
Sadly like stg etc the troll bots are already polluting up the page ex.
[QUOTE=FlavorFul1;3842913]I saw her again this afternoon (only due to no other short notice availability) at what she called "her house" I suspect it was not hers though. She was super high on weed and something else. She told me "It is usually 200 no matter what" I told her I negotiated 40 last time at her incall hotel and we settled on 60 for a QV. BB was available and we got to business. She rode me strong and hard but as soon as she got off she lost interest and was texting on the phone as I did her DS. She was then literally checking her texts to see when I showed up and if my 15 minutes were up. I then got a little irritated and tried to put it in greek style. She was not really happy about that. I finished by hand and made sure she had to change the sheets. I would not repeat for free.[/QUOTE]She didn't change the sheets either.
I noticed that they're undergoing some renovations while the proprietor is on a vacation. Ajdal out.
[QUOTE=HawaiianD;3846403][URL]https://www.ibackpage.com/backpage-tampa/FemaleEscorts/gallery[/URL]
Checkout the new and improved BP, LOL.
The pictures seem to professional for me and could be fake posts til they get the girls back posting again.
It is GREAT having that resource back again. The other pages don't seem to compare IMHO.
Monger safe and on.
Mahalo.[/QUOTE]Reviewed that page and I'm going to wait awhile. Could be Feds fishing.
[QUOTE=JarOfRoses;3847254]Reviewed that page and I'm going to wait awhile. Could be Feds fishing.[/QUOTE]I didn't see one familiar face.
[QUOTE=JarOfRoses;3847254]Reviewed that page and I'm going to wait awhile. Could be Feds fishing.[/QUOTE]Whatever this is, it's not the Feds fishing. None of these sites are the Feds fishing. If it is, it would be the dumbest boondoggle of an operation in law enforcement history. First, it's expensive and time-consuming to get a web site up and running properly. You don't just pop one out in a New York minute. Second, let's say it is the Feds. What's the plan? Set up expensive hotel stings for potentially thousands of people for a crime that in most jurisdictions is a second degree misdemeanor, about the same as driving on a suspended license? (And it's not a Federal crime. It's a local one handled by local laws.) Or maybe they get your phone number and email address and try to bust you for talking about paying for sex that way. Then they show up and arrest you. Doesn't seem worth it. And of course, as soon as everyone puts two and two together, we'd all steer clear of that site and it would be a useless waste. Not to mention that without legit girls and reviews, it wouldn't last very long.
But what makes it even more unlikely is that there is no specific Federal law I know of against prostitution. (There's some stuff about minors and foreign nationals, but no general prohibition. That's left to the states.) Prostitution is legislated at the state and local level. It is not a Federal crime as far as I know. (If it was, it would have been outlawed in Nevada long ago.) When people do get busted for prostitution, who does the busting? Not the FBI. It's local police. Are the Feds going to set up a sting for something that isn't even a Federal crime and then hand the perps over to the local police where it actually is a crime? Nope.
Guys, prostitution is not a very serious crime. It's serious enough that the local cops are going to spend some limited resources on it. They may spend time to bust something very high-profile (like the Eliot Spitzer thing) or something that's too obvious and will attract the attention of "concerned citizens" (like Backpage or Discreet Meets). But the cops generally aren't going to spend gobs of cash, get fancy warrants, tap phones, and all the rest, just to arrest you for a petty crime like this one. Every once in a while they do some kind of big sting operation for political purposes, but that's usually limited in time, scope, and location. It's usually done by a county sherriff to get his name in the papers for electoral purposes. And of course they monitor street prostitution because otherwise the neighbors complain.
[QUOTE=TampaMonger;3847548]Whatever this is, it's not the Feds fishing. None of these sites are the Feds fishing. If it is, it would be the dumbest boondoggle of an operation in law enforcement history. First, it's expensive and time-consuming to get a web site up and running properly. You don't just pop one out in a New York minute. Second, let's say it is the Feds. What's the plan? Set up expensive hotel stings for potentially thousands of people for a crime that in most jurisdictions is a second degree misdemeanor, about the same as driving on a suspended license? (And it's not a Federal crime. It's a local one handled by local laws.) Or maybe they get your phone number and email address and try to bust you for talking about paying for sex that way. Then they show up and arrest you. Doesn't seem worth it. And of course, as soon as everyone puts two and two together, we'd all steer clear of that site and it would be a useless waste. Not to mention that without legit girls and reviews, it wouldn't last very long.
But what makes it even more unlikely is that there is no specific Federal law I know of against prostitution. (There's some stuff about minors and foreign nationals, but no general prohibition. That's left to the states.) Prostitution is legislated at the state and local level. It is not a Federal crime as far as I know. (If it was, it would have been outlawed in Nevada long ago.) When people do get busted for prostitution, who does the busting? Not the FBI. It's local police. Are the Feds going to set up a sting for something that isn't even a Federal crime and then hand the perps over to the local police where it actually is a crime? Nope.
Guys, prostitution is not a very serious crime. It's serious enough that the local cops are going to spend some limited resources on it. They may spend time to bust something very high-profile (like the Eliot Spitzer thing) or something that's too obvious and will attract the attention of "concerned citizens" (like Backpage or Discreet Meets). But the cops generally aren't going to spend gobs of cash, get fancy warrants, tap phones, and all the rest, just to arrest you for a petty crime like this one. Every once in a while they do some kind of big sting operation for political purposes, but that's usually limited in time, scope, and location. It's usually done by a county sherriff to get his name in the papers for electoral purposes. And of course they monitor street prostitution because otherwise the neighbors complain.[/QUOTE]You're 100% on the money but they want to feel like they are serious criminals like Tony Montana. I think it ads to their thrill.
A2.
Why do they all look TGTBT? Ajdal out
[QUOTE=TampaMonger;3847548]Whatever this is, it's not the Feds fishing. None of these sites are the Feds fishing. If it is, it would be the dumbest boondoggle of an operation in law enforcement history. First, it's expensive and time-consuming to get a web site up and running properly. You don't just pop one out in a New York minute. Second, let's say it is the Feds. What's the plan? Set up expensive hotel stings for potentially thousands of people for a crime that in most jurisdictions is a second degree misdemeanor, about the same as driving on a suspended license? (And it's not a Federal crime. It's a local one handled by local laws.) Or maybe they get your phone number and email address and try to bust you for talking about paying for sex that way. Then they show up and arrest you. Doesn't seem worth it. And of course, as soon as everyone puts two and two together, we'd all steer clear of that site and it would be a useless waste. Not to mention that without legit girls and reviews, it wouldn't last very long.
But what makes it even more unlikely is that there is no specific Federal law I know of against prostitution. (There's some stuff about minors and foreign nationals, but no general prohibition. That's left to the states.) Prostitution is legislated at the state and local level. It is not a Federal crime as far as I know. (If it was, it would have been outlawed in Nevada long ago.) When people do get busted for prostitution, who does the busting? Not the FBI. It's local police. Are the Feds going to set up a sting for something that isn't even a Federal crime and then hand the perps over to the local police where it actually is a crime? Nope..[/QUOTE]
[QUOTE=TampaMonger;3847548]
But what makes it even more unlikely is that there is no specific Federal law I know of against prostitution. (There's some stuff about minors and foreign nationals, but no general prohibition. That's left to the states.) Prostitution is legislated at the state and local level. It is not a Federal crime as far as I know. (If it was, it would have been outlawed in Nevada long ago.) When people do get busted for prostitution, who does the busting? Not the FBI. It's local police. Are the Feds going to set up a sting for something that isn't even a Federal crime and then hand the perps over to the local police where it actually is a crime? Nope.
[/QUOTE]Agree these sites aren't traps, just full of scammers. See a chick using just an e-mail address you can bet it's stolen pics and someone trying to get you to jump at a pay site or trying to get live e-mails to use for phishing.
What is concerning about Fosta / Sesta is the law is worded so broadly an overzealous District Attorney in the Grady Judd mold could start trying to bring local prosecutions against people who they conclude individually "aid in the promotion of prostitution". What would be juicier around election time than a bust of 50 guys involved in "trafficking". I think the law eventually will be revised as being overly broad, probably has several 1st and 4th amendment problems which may get it tossed altogether, but that will be a long process and who wants to be the test case.
With all the data mining capabilities that exist today it's not inconceivable that there's a main frame chugging away somewhere with an algorithm attempting to match screen names to email to cell phone to credit card to drivers license.
Ever use a credit card to recharge a burner phone or pay for a hotel to meet someone you'd been texting with who advertised on a site? And yes, Feds just made what amounted to prostitution busts in Maryland.
Conspiratorial? Maybe, but we live in a brand new world which is why all these sites had to scramble to move farther offshore and reinvent themselves and we haven't even begun to see how the power brokers will use this law for their advantage. But I forgot, they're from the government, and they're just here to help.
[QUOTE=JasonG76;3838136]Another great time with Nicole last night. This girl is ridiculous. She is freaking hot for an older woman. Great body and attitude. Couldn't get in touch with her on sat, she says she didn't have a room but did on Sunday. She is in a safe hotel location. Set up appt. Got to place and the door open. She was in sexy outfit. Got in and had heavy petting and DFK with alot of tongue. Took clothes off and she laid on the bed while I was standing she gave me a very awesome BBBJ with ball licking. Great time. After a few minutes I jumped into bed and she continued with BBBJ and also paid attention to both nuggets. She then asked if I was ready and offered BBIP but didn't go for it. I sucked on those big tata's and she got the cover and placed it on. Did multiple positions and finished in cover. She is definitely sexy freak in bed. Highly recommended if you have not been with her. Gave donation at end before leaving. She never asked for it. Great attitude, personality and action. Happy mongering.
J.[/QUOTE]I want to thank all of you for being kind to me. Its time for me to move on and leave this business. I have had a good Clean & Long run. Thanks to you here, I will be disconnecting my number and deleting email accounts in 2 weeks. I wish you all the very best, Love & Hugs.
Nicole Legend.
[QUOTE=MFever;3829110]Nicole def A1+++ great stuff![/QUOTE]I will be moving away and starting over. I just want to thank you all for several years of returning to me as a client and ultimately friends. I have 2 weeks left here so if youd like to see me. Please call oor txt. HUGS & KISSES.
NICOLE 'LEGEND'.
[QUOTE=Ajdal;3847997]Why do they all look TGTBT? Ajdal out[/QUOTE]That's very simple to explain. Let's say you want to be the new Backpage. You spend a shit ton of money and time on developers to write a site, integrate payment collection, membership, servers, etc. Only problem? No ads. None. Mongers go to your site and see a blank page. The mongers' reaction? Leave and don't come back. Nothing to see here. Let's say you're an advertiser. You go to the site and also see nothing. Will you post an ad here? Probably not.
Now what do you do? Well, if you're honest like the USAAC guys, you know that the relationship between USASG and USAAC gives you a ready-made audience so you don't have to do anything. Let it build up over time. Maybe at first there aren't many ads, but all are high quality and have a built-in audience. But if you're not USASG / USAAC, what do you do? You throw more money at your developers to create fake ads, most likely by scraping ads from other escort sites, randomizing some shit, etc. Then when the girls come in, they see there are already lots of ads so maybe they'll post one. And so on.
So, why do they all look TGTBT? Simple: They are trying to solve the chicken and egg problem of how to drive traffic to their site. Has nothing at all to do with the cops.
[QUOTE=JayTwogo;3848158]Agree these sites aren't traps, just full of scammers. See a chick using just an e-mail address you can bet it's stolen pics and someone trying to get you to jump at a pay site or trying to get live e-mails to use for phishing.
What is concerning about Fosta / Sesta is the law is worded so broadly an overzealous District Attorney in the Grady Judd mold could start trying to bring local prosecutions against people who they conclude individually "aid in the promotion of prostitution". What would be juicier around election time than a bust of 50 guys involved in "trafficking". I think the law eventually will be revised as being overly broad, probably has several 1st and 4th amendment problems which may get it tossed altogether, but that will be a long process and who wants to be the test case.
With all the data mining capabilities that exist today it's not inconceivable that there's a main frame chugging away somewhere with an algorithm attempting to match screen names to email to cell phone to credit card to drivers license.
Ever use a credit card to recharge a burner phone or pay for a hotel to meet someone you'd been texting with who advertised on a site? And yes, Feds just made what amounted to prostitution busts in Maryland.
Conspiratorial? Maybe, but we live in a brand new world which is why all these sites had to scramble to move farther offshore and reinvent themselves and we haven't even begun to see how the power brokers will use this law for their advantage. But I forgot, they're from the government, and they're just here to help.[/QUOTE]Yeah, it's possible but I think it's doubtful. Again, prostitution is just not serious enough to warrant this kind of constant attention. There are always exceptions, but in most cases it's just not worth the government's time.
I take reasonable precautions against the cops, but I think most guys are way too paranoid. Street mongers should always be very paranoid. If you see escorts, especially when you take one of the team, you should be paranoid, but in that case more about getting robbed than about being busted. Guys who go to spas have nothing to worry about.
As for a burner phone, they need a subpoena first. They're not usually going to waste their time.
My opinion? Anything's possible. But the real question is: What is likely? For a petty crime like prostitution, not much.
[QUOTE=EyeMyt;3846803]She didn't change the sheets either.[/QUOTE]Not saying she did, just that she should have.
[QUOTE=TampaMonger;3848876]Yeah, it's possible but I think it's doubtful. Again, prostitution is just not serious enough to warrant this kind of constant attention. There are always exceptions, but in most cases it's just not worth the government's time.
I take reasonable precautions against the cops, but I think most guys are way too paranoid. Street mongers should always be very paranoid. If you see escorts, especially when you take one of the team, you should be paranoid, but in that case more about getting robbed than about being busted. Guys who go to spas have nothing to worry about.
As for a burner phone, they need a subpoena first. They're not usually going to waste their time.
My opinion? Anything's possible. But the real question is: What is likely? For a petty crime like prostitution, not much.[/QUOTE]Yeah, anything's possible. When I was in the army in the 70's I was nailed in a hotel prostitution sting out in California. I was married at the time. Talk about a clusterfuck. It's made me extra cautious ever since. That's why I mostly stick to the AMPs and well-reviewed escorts. Speaking of that, let's get back to talking about pussy.
[QUOTE=HawaiianD;3846403][URL]https://www.ibackpage.com/backpage-tampa/FemaleEscorts/gallery[/URL]
Checkout the new and improved BP, LOL.
The pictures seem to professional for me and could be fake posts til they get the girls back posting again.
It is GREAT having that resource back again. The other pages don't seem to compare IMHO.
Monger safe and on.
Mahalo.[/QUOTE]Man that page is full of spammers.
Last ad said close to gulf to bay and Hercules. Seen her several times but crickets as of late.
[QUOTE=Nicole75;3848782]I want to thank all of you for being kind to me. Its time for me to move on and leave this business. I have had a good Clean & Long run. Thanks to you here, I will be disconnecting my number and deleting email accounts in 2 weeks. I wish you all the very best, Love & Hugs.
Nicole Legend.[/QUOTE]Nicole you will be sorely missed. Ty for your many visits and recommended friends. Please enjoy and never look back.
[URL]http://usaadultclassifieds.nl/classifieds/index.php?view=showad&adid=54166&cityid=103[/URL]
Always have a good time with her. If you haven't seen her, you should.
Can a fellow senior member PM me her contact info before she leaves please. Can't miss that opportunity.
[QUOTE=TampaBay11;3849628]Last ad said close to gulf to bay and Hercules. Seen her several times but crickets as of late.[/QUOTE]Last I heard she had retired.
Looks like they've found their way back to the fold.
[URL]https://liveescortreviews.com/ad/tampa/727-767-9055/1/1631978[/URL]
[URL]https://backpage.com.tampa.listcrawler.com/post/26627877/[/URL]#.
Say Jordon the other day for a quicky. The pics in her ad are accurate. The session for me was just CBJ and CFS. I am not a big writer of fancy details. By scoring system YMMV.
Looks: 8.
Chemistry: 3 1st time meeting her so the chemistry was not great. This is not a knock on Jordan.
Performance: 7 mostly because the chemistry was off. She did a nice CBJ to get ready for the CFS (not a big BJ guy). CFS was excellent. Nice fit, nice views. Also, she makes good eye contact.
Incall location: 9 I am not comparing against a Ritz Carleton. But for this hobby this was a nice clean hotel in a safe area.
Hygiene: 10 Jordan is a very clean conscious. Nice baby wipes afterwards and even hand sanitizer. She keeps herself very fresh.
Candy: If she does I did not notice it and there was no apparent signs during the session.
Repeat: Yes, because once the chemistry gets better I think Jordan will be an awesome time.
There was zero signs of outsiders or handlers of any kind.
[QUOTE=TTY954;3850261]Last I heard she had retired.[/QUOTE]Yes she has retired. I will miss her. Very good chemistry and was definitely GFE, Now time to find a gal to fill the void.
[QUOTE=JayTwogo;3850363]Looks like they've found their way back to the fold.
[URL]https://liveescortreviews.com/ad/tampa/727-767-9055/1/1631978[/URL].[/QUOTE]Damn that disappeared quickly. Here's the Listcrawler ad that LER pulled from. Although the links never work, so try searching the number.
[URL]https://alligator.com.tampa.listcrawler.com/post/26510112/[/URL]
I pinged Amanda a couple times in June hoping for a retirement farewell romp. Unfortunately, I never heard back. I wish her the best. But also hope she makes a return, perhaps UTR, for selfish reasons. LOL. She was a sweetheart and def GFE is treated her well.
Started texting Sasha, and she always wanted to meet up at some pretty scary hotels. I declined. I drive an expensive car and look like a robbery target at these places. I'm not a big guy and I'd probably lose a fight against a 4th grade girl. It kills my wood if I think I'm going to get mugged on my way back to my car.
Finally I went to see her at her trailer. She seemed very sweet in her texts, but it ended up being one of my worst experiences ever. She agreed to certain services. Pussy was snug (and I'm a small guy), ass was round, and hygiene was good, but she delivered as fast as she possibly could. At least I got what I wanted, but I'll never repeat. This chick could be good if she'd stop rushing so much. Maybe she doesn't like what she does, but her pussy was wet and we didn't use any lube. So I don't know what her problem is.
Recommended if you can get your nut very quickly. Otherwise, avoid.
[QUOTE=JayTwogo;3851177]Damn that disappeared quickly. Here's the Listcrawler ad that LER pulled from. Although the links never work, so try searching the number.
[URL]https://alligator.com.tampa.listcrawler.com/post/26510112/[/URL][/QUOTE]Anyone successfully get in touch with Nadia or Megan? I've had no luck.
Got excited and saw she began posting again after swinging and missing when she was a hot commodity at the end of last year and was rather disappointed. She clearly was wearing a wig as she had blonde hair and had a bandanna over it as well as a shiner over one eye that she claimed was over a brawl she got into with another woman. Anyhow got to the express and she had a sexy outfit and opted for the. 8 for hh special she offered since we shared same ethnicity but soon found out that meant little to nothing. I clocked it in at about 12 minutes total with very little to no BBBJ effort and was not well shaved down under so did not offer 69 or to DATY. Rushed as I only entered mish and once her phone rang mentioned she has another date lined up yet afterwards complained of no calls yesterday. Maybe YMMV but I left disappointed compared to other experiences and most def will not repeat.
[URL]https://independent.com.tampa.listcrawler.com/post/26644998/[/URL]
Hooked up with an Amazon girl the other night! Meet her at Gandy beach and she had a room so we hit it! Started with some a CBJ then to doggie! Total damage was. 6 for the q. V. ! I have digits and know she's looking for more play this weekend! Senior members hit me up for them! She's a white girl 6'2". Rates were quoted at. 6 q. V. , $1 hhr, $150 hr, she also speaks Greek for $2.
Hello everyone can any one please recommend a nice black girl with a nice big boddy please help brother out thanks in advance.
Most sites are going with foreign owners. So instead of. Com, it is. Nl, . Ch. I would say. Com is spam.
[QUOTE=HawaiianD;3846403][URL]https://www.ibackpage.com/backpage-tampa/FemaleEscorts/gallery[/URL]
Checkout the new and improved BP, LOL.
The pictures seem to professional for me and could be fake posts til they get the girls back posting again.
It is GREAT having that resource back again. The other pages don't seem to compare IMHO.
Monger safe and on.
Mahalo.[/QUOTE]
She was good first time but not after that. Stayed in appt on 113th in largo. Come to find out she videoed you walking in and out as well as during the entire session. Claimed her grandma was in room next door and we could not talk or make any noise. Nice tots and nipples but that was it. And yes she wears a wig. Avoid! Tried to find out her real name but had no luck as she kept calling and texting me fir a month. Wish I knew her real name.
[QUOTE=NomNom;3853790]Got excited and saw she began posting again after swinging and missing when she was a hot commodity at the end of last year and was rather disappointed. She clearly was wearing a wig as she had blonde hair and had a bandanna over it as well as a shiner over one eye that she claimed was over a brawl she got into with another woman. Anyhow got to the express and she had a sexy outfit and opted for the. 8 for hh special she offered since we shared same ethnicity but soon found out that meant little to nothing. I clocked it in at about 12 minutes total with very little to no BBBJ effort and was not well shaved down under so did not offer 69 or to DATY. Rushed as I only entered mish and once her phone rang mentioned she has another date lined up yet afterwards complained of no calls yesterday. Maybe YMMV but I left disappointed compared to other experiences and most def will not repeat.
[URL]https://independent.com.tampa.listcrawler.com/post/26644998/[/URL][/QUOTE]