Massage Parlor Reports

Anyone tried that and why do they always mention Ruby on the BP ad.

[QUOTE=TheMissile;3268473]With these girls or milking table in general?

[URL]http://tampa.backpage.com/TherapeuticMassage/best-of-both-worlds-italian-and-persian-bombshell-gia-flat-rates-nuru-body-glides-full-nude-8135860894/26945762[/URL][/QUOTE]I got to the office building on memorial across from a gas station. She rocks a ring on the left finger as she CBJ with sitting on the table. No milking. She didn't want FS. And some guy roams the lot as her security.

[QUOTE=BugaSuga23;3270050]Anyone tried that and why do they always mention Ruby on the BP ad.[/QUOTE]I went there a while back and had a Ginger. It was OK BJ using plastic wrap. Don't know of Ruby.

[QUOTE=BugaSuga23;3270050]Anyone tried that and why do they always mention Ruby on the BP ad.[/QUOTE]Went there when they first opened up guess about a year ago. Total waste of time.

Now my good friend went there twice just recently and says there it appeared that Ruby the only game in town there. He says FS on the menu but everything covered and she asks for dollars that will make you laugh out loud.

Says she's attractive and friendly but he says when he went yesterday and paid for an hour she got to business after a short rub then when done says she's busy today and will give longer massage next time.

He ain't sure if he'll wander back to Ruby or not at this time.

[QUOTE=TheMissile;3268473]With these girls or milking table in general?

[URL]http://tampa.backpage.com/TherapeuticMassage/best-of-both-worlds-italian-and-persian-bombshell-gia-flat-rates-nuru-body-glides-full-nude-8135860894/26945762[/URL][/QUOTE]Srsly we have got to get the good on this. Lordy.

[QUOTE=BugaSuga23;3270050]Anyone tried that and why do they always mention Ruby on the BP ad.[/QUOTE]Rush job, she asked hour or half. I said hour. Paid. Was out in 35 min. Terrible rub. $ for a CBJ. Very repetitive. Have been there before. Always poor service, overpriced, and rushed. I had hoped it had changed.

I was planning a Monday (Feb. 13) trip into Tampa and making some calls to a few of my favorite haunts. I learned that Diana is NOT presently at Orange Spa, and Mamasan didn't want to tell me anything about when she might return. I take this to be a signal that Diana may not be returning to Orange Spa and may have moved on, perhaps to another local AMP (she used to be at Crystal Spa under the same name). Mamasan did try to 'tempt' me with the prospect of a new girl named "May. " Without some other report on her, that really does nothing to lure me in, so if any of you guys have seen, or do see, May at Orange, please let us know your findings.

I also learned that Tiffany is presently at Kim's, and that Momo will be returning "next month" (no precise date was given). I didn't press to get the names of other girls at Kim's right now, however, Kelly and Bee were working the same time as Tiffany back in December. Momo is the beautiful girl with the white braces (which I didn't even notice on my one tremendous visit with her) who seems to really like DATY. At least she'll let you dwell there for as long as you like (many girls don't, as they either get over-sensitive or just want to move things along).

Lastly, I also learned that Joann has just returned to Crystal Spa from "vacation" (first day back was Monday, Feb. 13), so she should be around a while. Since Joann is one of my AFT's, I elected to visit Crystal on my visit to Tampa. Both Mamasan and Joann both have explicitly recommended to me that I should call-ahead to assure I don't have to wait upon my arrival. I believe she may be the most popular girl there right now. By way of a more detailed "review" of Joann, I'll paste here a portion of comments that I shared with another member via PM:

Joann is not as playful, aggressive, & flirty as Kimmy at Lucky Spa (very few are), and probably not even as playful at Tiffany at Kim's Massage. Joann's table shower is more reserved, although very thorough, but more like she's really just CLEANING you thoroughly rather than explicitly trying to stimulate arousal. She's SO fabulously gorgeous that I got aroused anyway! She also does a very long & thorough massage, which you don't get everywhere, and does just a [I]LITTLE[/I] DATO, but more of a teasing method & she doesn't really go "all in" to get her tongue "dirty," so to speak. Joann doesn't provide BBBJ, but she quickly moves to 69 which is arguably the most glorious I can recall in some time! She has just a fabulously shaped & tasty vajayjay. She is also very "tight" inside when she moves from 69 up to RCG, then spins to CG, then switches to Mish, during which she is capable of spreading her legs enormously wide open. Joann also has one of the best proportional figures I have seen. She is VERY VERY VERY slim wasted, with very nice round hips / ass, and quite nice bolt-ons, with what I consider a simply gorgeous face. To my liking, she is better looking than both Tiffany & Kimmy, but that is really subjective. She seems to very willingly offer kissing, although she doesn't freely go DFK right away.

Overall, I'm just stunned by the beauty of both her face and her spectacular body. Based on my remarks above regarding how Kimmy at Lucky or Tiffany at Kims might excel in certain specific areas, I, personally, prefer Joann over those two, and, frankly, over MOST others I've seen along Kennedy Blvd. Nonetheless, even though she's SO high on my list, as is my nature it seems, I still like to sample around to the other places as well.

[QUOTE=BugaSuga23;3270050]Anyone tried that and why do they always mention Ruby on the BP ad.[/QUOTE]I went to pure massage two weeks ago. Didn't get any of the girls you mentioned. Instead, I drew a plump older woman and nothing extra was on the table. And trust me, I tried. Don't waste your time and money when we have so many better options on Kennedy.

[QUOTE=AsnLongTime;3270290]Went there when they first opened up guess about a year ago. Total waste of time.

Now my good friend went there twice just recently and says there it appeared that Ruby the only game in town there. He says FS on the menu but everything covered and she asks for dollars that will make you laugh out loud.

Says she's attractive and friendly but he says when he went yesterday and paid for an hour she got to business after a short rub then when done says she's busy today and will give longer massage next time.

He ain't sure if he'll wander back to Ruby or not at this time.[/QUOTE]She asked for. 1 for CBJ, I say no and said. 8 We went back forth for a bit. Weird crap she came outside to watch me walk to my car.

I am lucky you guys mentioned it. I have been mongering since 2000, in NYC, Vegas, London and now Tampa.

I still think a little spendy but everything was on the table, had an unbelievable time with Fiona (she made sure I remembered her name). I do like they said how much $$ right up front, rather than the game we play of negotiations etc.

I like the prices just down the block for GFE full service but this was above and beyond. I can't justify the $ every time I monger but it's worth it for a special treat.

[QUOTE=DaleMabry;3267570]Brand new member, first report, but have been lurking here for awhile. In fact it was this site which brought me to Lucky's AMP on Kennedy Blvd two weeks ago. So on a Sunday afternoon, I parked behind the spa and pulled on the back door. No response, so I had to sheepishly walk around to the front of the rather seedy strip mall; walk past the sex shop and into Lucky's. Tampa can be a small town, so I did not want to be seen doing this. I mentally prepared to dislike the place. Met by an old, skinny, laconic woman who took my $240 for an hour session, but did not smile at my memorized Mandarin phrase of wanting a "pretty girl with big tits". Led to a room, I waited. Still upset at the parking, and wishing I'd returned to Kims. Then in walked "Kimmy" from Hong Kong, dressed in bra and panties, changing my mood instantly. You know the rest. Wonderful table shower; nuru type body slide, and back to the room. I've been to many of the AMPs in town, and this is by far the best I've ever experienced in Tampa. It was this experience that led me to join the forum here. I will be back to Lucky's this weekend.[/QUOTE]

Awesome adventures at this place. Had a little bit of a wait but it was worth it. Chick that greater me at the door was a knock out, I told her that I wanted her and she said "no me but I promise you will have young pretty girl and be happy. " She was honest. Hot ass early 20's Asian with great tits have me a good scrub down in the shower and bbj. Back the the room for a light touch rub then down to business. Did everything except Greek and covered after BBBJ.

If your curious just go there. Great time.

[QUOTE=MrBill469;3256729]The next time I'm in there, I'll be wary of [B]IVY[/B] and, if I draw her, will probable outright tell Mamasan that I want someone else because I've heard Ivy doesn't perform as well as Kimmy / Ewa. If she can convince me Ivy's been re-educated, then I might try, but Kimmy was pretty smokin' hot compared to your description of Ivy.[/QUOTE]Just a heads up that Ivy is up to speed on what the patrons want now. She's a great catch if you're lucky enough to pull her.

Also, Kimmy is coming back this Friday the 17th.

So, not to sound negative, but how many times a day do you think girls like Kimmy and crew at Lucky or Kim's go through their routine? I'd guess they get in 10+ sessions per day. That's what $8 -10 k / week or. And how many times a day can a girl physically take such a pounding? I'd think they'd be stretched out and sore all the time. Maybe they just get used to it. But, if the roles were reversed, I don't see how I could perform hour after hour if a bunch a middle to aging women were waiting inline for me. And, if we could take an accurate poll, how many of us mongers would be sporting some sort of STD? It just makes me wonder.

[QUOTE=Latino45;3271152]She asked for. 1 for CBJ, I say no and said. 8 We went back forth for a bit. Weird crap she came outside to watch me walk to my car.[/QUOTE]Yeah. My friend told me when he went back 2nd time Ruby made comment of nice car, pretty. Told him he should park a little further away. That lot has to be huge.

[QUOTE=BpkbDude;3273331]So, not to sound negative, but how many times a day do you think girls like Kimmy and crew at Lucky or Kim's go through their routine? I'd guess they get in 10+ sessions per day. That's what $8 -10 k / week or. And how many times a day can a girl physically take such a pounding? I'd think they'd be stretched out and sore all the time. Maybe they just get used to it.[/QUOTE]Ten per day per girl seems high. Looking at potential volume from another angle: Kim's and Lucky, for example, have 3 girls working at any one time. This, along with the highly limited available parking (4 spaces in back at Kim's, and 2 spaces in front with an additional 3 in back at Lucky) combined with the hours of operation (about 12 hours / day) would mean that, for EACH girl to engage 10 clients per day, those parking spaces would have to be nearly fully occupied just about [U]ALL THE TIME[/U]. . . And they're not. Examining the frequency at which customers get turned away or asked to wait (which is ONLY during peak times), would indicate that each girl has considerable down time in their daily 12 hour shift. Based on all that, I personally believe that ten per day is high. I wouldn't be able to venture a reliable estimate on actual volumes, other than to suggest that it's considerably less than that. . . Maybe, oh I dunno, say, like five per day, but that would vary based on the busy vs dead days of the week (Fridays busy, Sunday mornings dead).

[QUOTE=BpkbDude;3273331]But, if the roles were reversed, I don't see how I could perform hour after hour if a bunch a middle to aging women were waiting inline for me.[/QUOTE]Wait. . . Are you saying that I'm not as sexy, attractive, handsome, and studly, as all the girls tell me I am! LOL!! Nonetheless, your observation is precisely the reason that the industry is structured the way it is. . . girls "do this" because they CAN, and guys are paying customers because they "CAN'T" (perform constantly). Also, I think your word "perform" is right on the mark. The girls ARE performing but aren't necessarily required to produce any evidence of reality, other than an available and lubricated "opening", while a guy's "performance" is more likely to require at least genuine arousal (to be able to sport wood) although not necessarily ejaculatory results on every encounter. That required male arousal would, indeed, be a challenge to produce given the female client description you offer above.

[QUOTE=BpkbDude;3273331]And, if we could take an accurate poll, how many of us mongers would be sporting some sort of *disease*? It just makes me wonder.[/QUOTE]Spoken like one without an extensive track record. In fact, the AMP girls are arguably the most hygienic providers on the planet and, with their insistence on proper protection, this risk is far lower (not zero) than many fear-mongers would have one believe. I can only speak factually for myself, but in over 35 years of practice in this hobby, I have never had such an experience. I find that others who speculate that the risk "simply must be so high that a large number of hobbyists are definitely walking around with those problems", are usually those without the experience to tell them otherwise. If it were possible to take an accurate poll here of highly experienced hobbyists, I believe a very high percentage would be able to weigh in with the same experience I have reported, while there would be a handful of respondants that have run across 1 or possibly 2 experiences otherwise, and those experiences were most likely from encounters at places OTHER than an AMP.