Printable View
[QUOTE=Cullen;2303177]It's from 2+ years ago, so it might be the same girl. It's the same name, but with an Indiana area code instead of an Alabama area code. You can see her face in the pics, but it also means they're 2+ years old.
[URL]http://evansville.backpage.com/FemaleEscorts/girl-next-door-andlt3-19/5745660[/URL][/QUOTE][URL]http://richmondin.backpage.com/FemaleEscorts/trishta-lay-19/5754345[/URL]
Anyone have any info on this lady? [URL]http://nashville.backpage.com/FemaleEscorts/an-unforgettable-experience/10989897[/URL] Post have been up for quite sometime but I have not been able to find any reviews or any info about her. If pics are accurate, she looks very nice. Any help here or via PM is appreciated. On another topic, for the guy who inquired about Asia, she is fantastic. I have seen her many times, beginning during the parlor days and very recently. Treat her right, she is a sweetie.
[QUOTE=Neil200;2304447]Anyone have any info on this lady? [URL]http://nashville.backpage.com/FemaleEscorts/an-unforgettable-experience/10989897[/URL] Post have been up for quite sometime but I have not been able to find any reviews or any info about her. If pics are accurate, she looks very nice. Any help here or via PM is appreciated. On another topic, for the guy who inquired about Asia, she is fantastic. I have seen her many times, beginning during the parlor days and very recently. Treat her right, she is a sweetie.[/QUOTE]She also went by the name Selena and has been using the same photos for two years. I read a past review in her that said she wasn't the girl in pics.
[QUOTE=Stixxer;2303236]Yes, true. Most of the "LEO checks" that the girls try to use are based on myth and misinformation. A good ocular patdown after a legitimate prescreening is probably the best security a lady has. And so many providers don't do that, so they are reduced to a pimp or boyfriend hiding in the closet or next door for "security. " Which that can be OK if she has an unruly client, but for LEO, it just makes things get really messy really fast.
We know that LEO can get a member's account information from a screening service and use that to impersonate a legitimate client in order to try and arrest a provider. So really even the screening services, while generally very effective, have their limitations. And that's where the ocular pat-down comes in. A provider needs to be able to use good phone screening skills and visual profiling in order to feel comfortable when meeting a new gentleman. If a guy talks like an agent, walks like an agent, and has the physical build of Rowdy Roddy Piper in his WWF prime, chances are he's an agent![/QUOTE]I would agree with most of that. I guess since I resemble Rowdy, that might be the reason many providers mistake me for LEO, umm. Anyway, to piggy back on your statement and confirm it, what I'm about to share is nothing new but insightful. I recently had a conversation with a provider who worked exclusively for an escort agency, she felt that was the best way to avoid dealing with LEO since they use a screening process. I remember when I first met her several months ago, before I knew she worked for an agency. I asked why she didn't just work independently and keep all the $$ for herself. The agency she worked for made a killing off of her, they got 50% of what she made, that of course explains why agency rates are so much higher. During our recent meeting, she told me she quit her agency because they sent her to an undercover LEO and she got busted. She of course was left to fend for herself. I didn't think about asking if anything happened to the agency, which I cannot recall the name of. From our conversation, it sounded like the agency didn't get busted, although I'm sure LEO is working on it if they haven't already busted it.
Trinity is legit, I have see her about 2 years ago in Indiana. She retired for 2 years. She just recently back and start out at Phoenix.
Anyone know what's happened to this lady? [URL]http://nashville.backpage.com/FemaleEscorts/sexy-sweet-southern-belle-that-offers-special-body-rubs-that-suit-any-of-ur-needsspecial-rates-32/8189075.[/URL] Whatever name she used I saw her several times and all were FUN!
Trinity is legit, I have see her about 2 years ago in Indiana. She retired for 2 years. She just recently back and start out at Phoenix.
Anyone know where this lady went? Saw her several times and had lots of fun! Haven't seen her ad since July. [URL]http://nashville.backpage.com/FemaleEscorts/sexy-sweet-southern-belle-wants-to-see-you-tonight-32/8189075[/URL].
I'll green light Sara. She doesn't talk alot, but I can live with that. I did not meet her friend Nikki.
Anyone know about this blonde like to meet her tomorrow if safe. [URL]http://nashville.backpage.com/FemaleEscorts/100-special-excellent-reviews-the-blonde-you-cant-refuse-new-pics-click-now/11581284[/URL].
Thanks for any help if I see here I will report.
Also has anyone hear from Adrien tried getting a hold of her a few times this week.
[URL]http://nashville.backpage.com/FemaleEscorts/1-gorgeous-b-r-u-n-e-t-t-e-24/11962712[/URL]
I have been seeing the posting for this one a lot recently. She caught my attention, what can anyone share?
[QUOTE=Ronshouse;2305276]Anyone know about this blonde like to meet her tomorrow if safe. [URL]http://nashville.backpage.com/FemaleEscorts/100-special-excellent-reviews-the-blonde-you-cant-refuse-new-pics-click-now/11581284[/URL].
Thanks for any help if I see here I will report.
Also has anyone hear from Adrien tried getting a hold of her a few times this week.[/QUOTE]
[QUOTE=TTipton;2305358][URL]http://nashville.backpage.com/FemaleEscorts/1-gorgeous-b-r-u-n-e-t-t-e-24/11962712[/URL][/QUOTE]Start doing an image search. Do one on this one and you should find out what you need.
Good Luck.
[QUOTE=Ronshouse;2305276]Anyone know about this blonde like to meet her tomorrow if safe. [URL]http://nashville.backpage.com/FemaleEscorts/100-special-excellent-reviews-the-blonde-you-cant-refuse-new-pics-click-now/11581284[/URL].
Thanks for any help if I see here I will report.
Also has anyone hear from Adrien tried getting a hold of her a few times this week.[/QUOTE]Google her number. She has reviews on other sites, plus other photos.
[QUOTE=RustyKuntz;2304586]I would agree with most of that. I guess since I resemble Rowdy, that might be the reason many providers mistake me for LEO, umm. Anyway, to piggy back on your statement and confirm it, what I'm about to share is nothing new but insightful. I recently had a conversation with a provider who worked exclusively for an escort agency, she felt that was the best way to avoid dealing with LEO since they use a screening process. I remember when I first met her several months ago, before I knew she worked for an agency. I asked why she didn't just work independently and keep all the $$ for herself. The agency she worked for made a killing off of her, they got 50% of what she made, that of course explains why agency rates are so much higher. During our recent meeting, she told me she quit her agency because they sent her to an undercover LEO and she got busted. She of course was left to fend for herself. I didn't think about asking if anything happened to the agency, which I cannot recall the name of. From our conversation, it sounded like the agency didn't get busted, although I'm sure LEO is working on it if they haven't already busted it.[/QUOTE]Your relating what a provider told you has made me think of something I guess I've never thought of before. I wonder where LEO spends most of their time / financing on enforcement in relation to this hobby? Obviously sites like BP and SW girls are "low hanging fruit" they can almost guarantee a bust of some sort. Or they can flip it around and use those methods to sting clients as they often do. And then you have the actual website owners of advertisers and verification services, which is a big deal to get government agencies involved on a long term project like that. I would imagine the agencies that contract with 10-20 providers would be a nice bust for an ambitious LEO operation, but perhaps the resources to pull that off would be prohibitive.