Printable View
With the many dating sites out there I would assume someone or some how one will be made they can't do anything about. Especially if the communication part of it is strictly done through the phone or in person I can't see how they can shut down BP only because it was just photos and a number it's not like any of them were exposing anything no different then going on POF and seeing a chick in her bikini at the pool.
If a site like Backpage, with international reach and a big budget for legal defense, can go down. You have to expect it is just a matter of time before many more (all?) fall.
Hate to see it like this, but this looks like just the start.
In the mean time our beloved president can fuck porn stars and then pay hundreds of thousands of dollars for their silence. How is that any different from paying for a prostitute?
[QUOTE=SpongeBob66;3791425]This new SESTA law is going to shut down all sites that a third party (you and I and providers) might use to engage in "human trafficking. " They are lumping the world's oldest profession (99%) that harms nobody--along with (1%) child prostitution and "forced" prostitution that we all find abhorrent. This is all politically motivated, but that's beside the point. If you own a web site that gets used by providers / johns then you will either shut it down NOW or face jail.
The only exception MIGHT be those sites based outside the country such as USA Adult Classifieds. And my guess is our "freedom loving" gov't is going to censor such sites, since they can't get at the owners. Admin may chime in on this, and perhaps USA has plans to use frequent new sites to attempt to stay ahead of the censors.
It's a dark day for free, consenting adults and for our country, imo.[/QUOTE]
[QUOTE=Mitico7327;3791997]In the mean time our beloved president can fuck porn stars and then pay hundreds of thousands of dollars for their silence. How is that any different from paying for a prostitute?[/QUOTE]This was due to Congress especially of the feminist variety.
[QUOTE=SlyGuy12;3787429]I went to an AMP once and was told by the girl I was too old (I was 44). She comes in looks at me and says too old, I get older girl for you.[/QUOTE]I'd let my feet do the talking, by walking out.
They are talking about another site: [URL]Onebackpage.com[/URL].
Checked it out, and the previous posted girls look legit with same phone numbers.
Others, however, might not be legit. And, as stated, we still have USA Adult Classifieds as well.
I just decided to come back, and WOW, no BP.
Happy to see this site was looking ahead.
Seeking Arrangement might be that site. Some BP girls had been showing up on there for awhile now. For us it is more effort than BP but it is a site that should not be going anywhere for a long time.
[URL]https://www.seekingarrangement.com[/URL]
[QUOTE=Bcronker;3791956]With the many dating sites out there I would assume someone or some how one will be made they can't do anything about. Especially if the communication part of it is strictly done through the phone or in person I can't see how they can shut down BP only because it was just photos and a number it's not like any of them were exposing anything no different then going on POF and seeing a chick in her bikini at the pool.[/QUOTE]
[QUOTE=Girls1;3792351]They are talking about another site: [URL]Onebackpage.com[/URL].
Checked it out, and the previous posted girls look legit with same phone numbers.
Others, however, might not be legit. And, as stated, we still have USA Adult Classifieds as well.[/QUOTE]Thank you for that link! The one thing that sticks in my mind that the gov' was able to wipe out in the USA was internet poker and that was based offshore, hopefully they will be satisfied just putting a nail in BP- RIP.
[QUOTE=Wolverines;3792678]Seeking Arrangement might be that site. Some BP girls had been showing up on there for awhile now. For us it is more effort than BP but it is a site that should not be going anywhere for a long time.
[URL]https://www.seekingarrangement.com[/URL][/QUOTE]Signed up, don't see any local BP girls on there but I'm sure I will get a lifetime of spam from there now.
Don't forget our sister site guys at [URL]http://usaadultclassifieds.info/classifieds[/URL] . My ATF for 4 years now has moved her ad there. [URL]http://usaadultclassifieds.info/classifieds/222/posts/2-Massages-Massage-Parlors/2-Massages-Massage-Parlors/50617-Bunny.html[/URL] . She is super petite and has the most amazing ass in GR, LOL. Her rates are 40 hhr 60 hr plus tip for HJ ending. As her ad states she works out of her residence, plays music and has a massage table. Seniors can message for more details.
[QUOTE=WealthMoney;3792711]Thank you for that link! The one thing that sticks in my mind that the gov' was able to wipe out in the USA was internet poker and that was based offshore, hopefully they will be satisfied just putting a nail in BP- RIP.[/QUOTE]Nope. This is a sea change.
Backpage was just the most high-profile, thus most politically advantageous target. Wonderful headlines for our pious senator from Ohio, Rob Portman, right? (I can't tell you how much I hope He gets caught with His pants down taking it up the ass from a (male) prostitute some day).
So in only the last couple of days, TER has gone off-line, ECCIE has gone off line, and any others based in the US will be gone very, very soon.
Those off-shore will probably be censored in short order, like your poker was.
Here are the facts:
The Stop Enabling Sex Traffickers Act (SESTA) makes it illegal to knowingly assist, facilitate, or support sex trafficking, and amends the Section 230 safe harbors of the Communications Decency Act (which make online services immune from civil liability for the actions of their users) to exclude enforcement of federal or state sex trafficking laws from its immunity.
SESTA received bipartisan support from USA Senators (this is the kind of bill that politicians are scared to death to vote against because of their public image). SESTA was criticized by pro-free speech groups for weakening section 230 safe harbors, alleging that it would make internet providers become liable for any usage of their platforms that facilitates sex trafficking, knowingly if they moderate for such content, and with reckless disregard if they do not proactively take steps to prevent such usage.
SESTA has been criticized by pro-free speech and pro-Internet groups including the Center for Democracy and Technology, Electronic Frontier Foundation, the ACLU, Engine Advocacy, the Sex Workers Outreach Project (which described SESTA as a "disguised internet censorship bill" and the Wikimedia Foundation, who argue that the bill weakens the section 230 safe harbors, and places an unnecessary burden on internet companies and intermediaries that handle user-generated content or communications.
Online sex workers argued that SESTA would harm their safety, as the platforms they utilize for offering and discussing sexual services (as an alternative to street prostitution) had begun to reduce their services or shut down entirely due to the threat of liability under SESTA.
[QUOTE=WealthMoney;3792749]Signed up, don't see any local BP girls on there but I'm sure I will get a lifetime of spam from there now.[/QUOTE]This company wants roughly $80 a month just so I can read and send emails back and forth to fake women. Yeah let me jump right into a monthly contract!
[QUOTE=Magnum352;3793404]This company wants roughly $80 a month just so I can read and send emails back and forth to fake women. Yeah let me jump right into a monthly contract![/QUOTE]A lot of the girls are still very active here on [URL]http://usaadultclassifieds.info/classifieds[/URL] [URL]http://usaadultclassifieds.info/classifieds[/URL] and [URL]http://usaadultclassifieds.info/classifieds[/URL]
[blue]You one post fucking wonders signing up to post about sites other than ours are starting to piss me off.
I'm starting to think you are all a bunch of fucking spammers so I'm replacing all those links with links to our sister site.
A2[/blue]
[QUOTE=Magnum352;3793404]This company wants roughly $80 a month just so I can read and send emails back and forth to fake women. Yeah let me jump right into a monthly contract![/QUOTE]My thoughts exactly. Big money just to allow you to communicate with gold-digger women with GPS. Plus, it appears most of the women are looking for ongoing "relationships" and that won't work very well for most of us who can't be seen taking women out to dinner and bars and the theater, etc.
[QUOTE=SpongeBob66;3793183]Nope. This is a sea change.
Backpage was just the most high-profile, thus most politically advantageous target. Wonderful headlines for our pious senator from Ohio, Rob Portman, right? (I can't tell you how much I hope He gets caught with His pants down taking it up the ass from a (male) prostitute some day).
So in only the last couple of days, TER has gone off-line, ECCIE has gone off line, and any others based in the US will be gone very, very soon.
Those off-shore will probably be censored in short order, like your poker was.
Here are the facts:
The Stop Enabling Sex Traffickers Act (SESTA) makes it illegal to knowingly assist, facilitate, or support sex trafficking, and amends the Section 230 safe harbors of the Communications Decency Act (which make online services immune from civil liability for the actions of their users) to exclude enforcement of federal or state sex trafficking laws from its immunity.
SESTA received bipartisan support from USA Senators (this is the kind of bill that politicians are scared to death to vote against because of their public image). SESTA was criticized by pro-free speech groups for weakening section 230 safe harbors, alleging that it would make internet providers become liable for any usage of their platforms that facilitates sex trafficking, knowingly if they moderate for such content, and with reckless disregard if they do not proactively take steps to prevent such usage.
SESTA has been criticized by pro-free speech and pro-Internet groups including the Center for Democracy and Technology, Electronic Frontier Foundation, the ACLU, Engine Advocacy, the Sex Workers Outreach Project (which described SESTA as a "disguised internet censorship bill" and the Wikimedia Foundation, who argue that the bill weakens the section 230 safe harbors, and places an unnecessary burden on internet companies and intermediaries that handle user-generated content or communications.
Online sex workers argued that SESTA would harm their safety, as the platforms they utilize for offering and discussing sexual services (as an alternative to street prostitution) had begun to reduce their services or shut down entirely due to the threat of liability under SESTA.[/QUOTE]I'm not a gambler but I know someone who is and she told me Gambling is still available online for anyone in the USA.
The USA Banks will not participate so the risk of losing data through transactions is high. Not worth the risk.
We don't exchange money on http://usaadultclassifieds.info/classifieds/ so the strong arm of the Feds will probably have no effect on this site.
CL therapeutic services has been taking down.
[QUOTE=Magnum352;3793404]This company wants roughly $80 a month just so I can read and send emails back and forth to fake women. Yeah let me jump right into a monthly contract![/QUOTE]I ve been in SA foe the last 4 months and I can tell you that I've seen real 18 years old girls, I found one from Saginaw we meet once a week, she stays with me 4 to 6 hours and just for a couple hundreds, she is the most beautiful girl that I've seen in the last 20 years, super tight body, total GFE, and down for anything. She has money or at least her family she is doing this just for fun.
Now, SA does not work for averyone YMMV depends how you look like and your age, most of the girls that I ve seenin SA told me that they don't care about the money that much. Who knows! I've seen like 15 different girls from SA all over Michigan. Funny thing you also find no girls looking for A SD I've been texting with Jenna, spicy Stacy she wants less than 3 hundreds to stay the whole night, that's not bad, oh well she charge 80 for a SS so.
[URL]http://thedrsuereview.com/list-of-fosta-sesta-fallout/[/URL]
[QUOTE=SpongeBob66;3793546]My thoughts exactly. Big money just to allow you to communicate with gold-digger women with GPS. Plus, it appears most of the women are looking for ongoing "relationships" and that won't work very well for most of us who can't be seen taking women out to dinner and bars and the theater, etc.[/QUOTE]Exact reason why I deleted Tinder and POF ages ago. And there's no way I can fake or pretend like I actually care anymore. Rather just pay for GFE for an hr and move on with the rest of my day.
[QUOTE=BadBoyFourU;3793718][URL]http://thedrsuereview.com/list-of-fosta-sesta-fallout/[/URL][/QUOTE]When they have no place to advertise because most sites are blocked, they'll be reaching out to past clients.
Remember when they call you, there should be a discount. If you don't ask for or insist on a discount you won't get it.
Well I'm taking some time and either taking screen shots of providers with their contact info or writing them down with their info along with a short description in a little black book, while we still have access to sites.
[URL]https://www.escort-ads.com/escort/search/united-states/grand-rapids?country=15949&city=16306[/URL]
That site I posted you have to pay for access to providers info please erase it.
I know all these government shut downs are alarming, and I'm not sure if I'm stepping out of place here by bringing this up, but I was thinking about visiting Kimberly. She is quoting me 140 hhr and 200 hr. Is this normal? She said no greek or bb. To me this seems very high unless she's incredibly hot. Is she a clock watcher? Most reviews I've read are brief and pretty dated.
A lot of truth to that. BP's revenue in 2014 was $135 million with majority of that coming from the adult section.
[QUOTE=Benz1;3793595]I'm not a gambler but I know someone who is and she told me Gambling is still available online for anyone in the USA.
The USA Banks will not participate so the risk of losing data through transactions is high. Not worth the risk.
We don't exchange money on http://usaadultclassifieds.info/classifieds/ so the strong arm of the Feds will probably have no effect on this site.[/QUOTE]
[QUOTE=Wolverines;3794317]A lot of truth to that. BP's revenue in 2014 was $135 million with majority of that coming from the adult section.[/QUOTE]Money changing hands has nothing to do with the new law.
It's about politics. It's about power. Making headlines for politicians and LE and Attorneys General, by shutting down these "horrible human trafficking sites" and showing people like the BP founder (who DARED fight them) that he'll lose, even if they have to create a new law to do it.
I think it's becoming more of an "out of sight, out of mind" world. Government and activists go after low-hanging fruit, leaving more problems for society in their wake. They needed to go after just the traffickers, so they can gain supporters. If they'd left sites intact, LE could catch plenty of cocky traffickers. Now, they save money by driving it into the dark web, where they will do very little.
Hello I was wondering if there were any reviews for the lady in this ad?
[URL]http://grand-rapids.skipthegames.com/female-escorts/caucasian_w/unforgettable-connections/751404180064[/URL]
[QUOTE=Toni7654;3793543]A lot of the girls are still very active here on [URL]http://usaadultclassifieds.info/classifieds[/URL] [URL]http://usaadultclassifieds.info/classifieds[/URL] and [URL]http://usaadultclassifieds.info/classifieds[/URL]
[blue]You one post fucking wonders signing up to post about sites other than ours are starting to piss me off.
I'm starting to think you are all a bunch of fucking spammers so I'm replacing all those links with links to our sister site.
A2[/blue][/QUOTE]LMAO, I think you're right A2 !! Great idea.
[blue]Now some of them are posting
Hey I didn't say that, I said blah
I'm changing those too
A2[/blue]
[QUOTE=Stokes1016;3794310]I know all these government shut downs are alarming, and I'm not sure if I'm stepping out of place here by bringing this up, but I was thinking about visiting Kimberly. She is quoting me 140 hhr and 200 hr. Is this normal? She said no greek or bb. To me this seems very high unless she's incredibly hot. Is she a clock watcher? Most reviews I've read are brief and pretty dated.[/QUOTE]The price she quoted is accurate. No Greek or bb. She is incredible, one of the hottest I've seen! No clock watcher. And I think the reason reviews are dated is because she's picky, and regulars usually don't post reviews every time they see her. She's a sweet and fun girl. Good luck!
Gentlemen.
Did contessa "Tessa" ever come back.
Thanks.
[QUOTE=IrishGuy77;3795636]The price she quoted is accurate. No Greek or bb. She is incredible, one of the hottest I've seen! No clock watcher. And I think the reason reviews are dated is because she's picky, and regulars usually don't post reviews every time they see her. She's a sweet and fun girl. Good luck![/QUOTE]Okay thanks, I think I'm going to go for it next week. I'll tell you guys how it goes.
[URL]https://m.washingtontimes.com/news/2018/apr/9/womens-march-shuttering-backpage-crisis-sex-worker/[/URL]
[QUOTE=Trogon;3795666]Gentlemen.
Did contessa "Tessa" ever come back.
Thanks.[/QUOTE]I wish she would or even just a way to contact as I owe her some money.
[QUOTE=Stroker417;3796221]I wish she would or even just a way to contact as I owe her some money.[/QUOTE]I wish she would return too she was awesome!
I decided to give this one a try she goes by the name madi, it's not the Mandy who has been reviewed on here. She fairly new and she from Hawaii. I texted her and she responded fairly quick. She said her rates we 60 ss. I asked her if she was willing to come to me and she agreed. When she arrived she was much bigger than the pics she sent me but it was the same girl in the pics. She's not much of a looker in person. We chatted for a sec and started with BBBJ then as I told her I was ready I smelled a horrible ordor from her vagina and I opted for BBBJCIM / swallow which was fairly good. She actually kept going well after I already finished which I loved and didn't waste a drop! But after the ordor ordeal I will not be repeating. It's funny how providers expect us gents to be clean and showered but they can't give us the same courtesy.
[QUOTE=WealthMoney;3795837][URL]https://m.washingtontimes.com/news/2018/apr/9/womens-march-shuttering-backpage-crisis-sex-worker/[/URL][/QUOTE]Best thing in that article is the D. C. Council voting to basically ignore the new law (not signed by Pres Trump yet, wonder if he would veto it?) and for the DC police to not prosecute. It will take some kind of court challenge by such local governments or class action lawsuits by LMTs whose business has been hurt to get this overturned.
I think the point Benz and I were making is that money does play a part in who they decide to go after under this new law.
[QUOTE=SpongeBob66;3794998]Money changing hands has nothing to do with the new law.
It's about politics. It's about power. Making headlines for politicians and LE and Attorneys General, by shutting down these "horrible human trafficking sites" and showing people like the BP founder (who DARED fight them) that he'll lose, even if they have to create a new law to do it.[/QUOTE]
Visited Sarah (Chrissann) for the first time today. BBW lives in a private residence in a nice neighborhood in the south side. Oral skills are excellent. Contact info can be found in the USA Classifed.